[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
[quote]165StateChamp wrote:
If a child is doing something wrong, they need to learn to no longer do that thing. Looking back to when I was a child, I didn’t need to know WHY I shouldn’t do something; what was important was just making sure I did not do it. Sometimes physical punishment is the best option for teaching this.
Why would I not go this route? I don’t think I have it in me to hit a child. That’s my personal weakness. I do like the idea of digging holes or running though. [/quote]
LOL @ theoretical parenting.
Children do need to know why something is wrong or they won’t learn or understand. I think the childless here don’t give single-digit aged children enough credit.
When does ‘why’ become important? Their 10th birthday? 11th? 8th? Sorry, but my kids are raised to ask questions and to understand EVERYTHING they do. Apply this to bodybuilding (“Why squat?”-- “Don’t worry about it, just shut up and squat”).
Naturally kids going to ask why they can’t do something. Does anyone really think otherwise? Do you want your kids to be mindless robots?
Is ‘just shut up and do what I say’ how kids should be educated in the classroom, too?
My neighbor, the single, childless PhD saw that we got movie screens for the van for a long trip. She said that she believes that those things ruin children and that they should be made to sit and admire the scenery (for a 10 hour trip). Apparently, some of you would agree. I’m going to guess that many with children would not.
[/quote]
I think you miss his point.
Scenario: “A burglar breaks in the house and your kid doesn’t know it yet. You wake them up and TELL THEM to go hide in the closet. Your kids, based on your practice of them NEEDING to know why at all times, don’t go hide until you explain in fully why they need to.”
Meanwhile, the way I was raised, I am going to hide in the closet because dad told me to, not because he sat down and explained WHY in detail at all times.
The key to that kid surviving in that circumstance now relies on them being quiet and listening when told to do something.
No, no kids always need to know WHY right now. They need to learn to listen when told as well because who knows when them simply shutting up and doing as told could even save their life.
In my house growing up, you did what you were told to do BECAUSE your parents told you to do it. Yes, there may be some explanations as well but your obedience did not rely on an explanation.
It should NEVER rely on the explanation…at least if your parents did their job well.[/quote]
To be sure, I didn’t miss his point and quite the opposite–I don’t think any parent here has stated that obedience RELY on explanation, especially not in an emergency situation.
In your burglar scenario, it’s not much of a leap from “GET IN THE CLOSET” to “GET IN THE CLOSET THERE’S SOMEONE IN THE HOUSE”. I could even see in that situation, explaining the ‘why’ could freak the kid out. Of course, you only know that by knowing your kid(s) in that particular situation.
In fact, a similar thing happened to my wife recently when I was away on business (cops chasing someone through the neighborhood ended up near my house and cops were banging on the door at 2AM). My inquisitive kids didn’t question her “GET UNDER THE BED NOW AND STAY THERE”.
Again, maybe it’s an experience thing, but I don’t think that’s what is being discussed when we’re talking about explaining the ‘why’ here.
The burglar scenario is much different than:
“Don’t play in the road.”
“Why?”
“Because I said so”
“But, why!!?”
“Because!!!”
“Why not?”
“RESPECT MAH Uh-THAR-uh-TIE”
Much, MUCH easier to say: “Don’t play in the road-- you could get hit by a car.”
At this point, after some minutes, the adventurous 7 year old is likely to end up in the road anyway. If your hand ends up smacking their ass at that point, I wouldn’t hold that against anyone. Ever.
The adventurous 7 year old may not be able to tell you WHY he ended up out in the road anyway, but he’ll at least know why he wasn’t supposed to be there.