Worst Advice You've Ever Gotten?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Jason van Wyk wrote:
I’m more than happy to defer to the authority of people much more knowledgeable about biochemistry than I am, but what makes it a heavy amino acid?

You are arguing SEMANTICS. Yes, it is a group of amino acids. Does this mean that no one can describe this to others as being a “heavy amino acid” in order to aid in mental visualization? No. You are nitpicking his method for no reason just to try to act like you know more. Who, out of both of you, would get the basic message across to a room full of students of varying levels of understanding? You are the type of person who would pick apart someone’s visual aids used during a discussion just to show you understand the subject…even though those aids may have benefitted most of the people listening to the presentation.[/quote]

So, did he catch the gout?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
You are arguing SEMANTICS. Yes, it is a group of amino acids. Does this mean that no one can describe this to others as being a “heavy amino acid” in order to aid in mental visualization? No. You are nitpicking his method for no reason just to try to act like you know more. Who, out of both of you, would get the basic message across to a room full of students of varying levels of understanding? You are the type of person who would pick apart someone’s visual aids used during a discussion just to show you understand the subject…even though those aids may have benefitted most of the people listening to the presentation.[/quote]

Forgot to mention, it is a bad way to say it because there are such things as heavy amino acids (such as phenylalanine with extra hydrogens used to trace protein synthesis).

[quote]buffalokilla wrote:

Forgot to mention, it is a bad way to say it because there are such things as heavy amino acids (such as phenylalanine with extra hydrogens used to trace protein synthesis). [/quote]

Heavy chain amino acid. Good point, though, and that could be confusing.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Jason van Wyk wrote:
I’m more than happy to defer to the authority of people much more knowledgeable about biochemistry than I am, but what makes it a heavy amino acid?

You are arguing SEMANTICS. Yes, it is a group of amino acids. Does this mean that no one can describe this to others as being a “heavy amino acid” in order to aid in mental visualization? No. You are nitpicking his method for no reason just to try to act like you know more. Who, out of both of you, would get the basic message across to a room full of students of varying levels of understanding? You are the type of person who would pick apart someone’s visual aids used during a discussion just to show you understand the subject…even though those aids may have benefitted most of the people listening to the presentation.[/quote]

I think you’re being overly aggressive. I did not understand why he called it a heavy amino acid and wanted to know where it came from. As you said, it is a teaching aid to help students visualize the the thing.

Alright, I see that now. I wasn’t trying to make him out to be an idiot, nor was I trying to make myself seem smarter. I’m sorry if it came across that way.

[quote]Scott aka Rice wrote:
utahpower242 wrote:
Don’t use a belt, it will make your abdominal and lower back weak.

Unless you’re doing a 1RM why do you need a belt?[/quote]

I’m not advocating for the people who wear belts while curling. I’m just saying that wearing a belt is not a bad thing. Anytime you lift over your body weight it is nice to have a little extra support.

Just a quick point, whenever i step out of the rack with over 525 to do squats, which isn’t my 1rm i like having a belt, just incase. But i normally put a belt on after 225 as i’m working my way up to my 1rm.

And if your worried about it making your abs and lower back weak, i’m sure you can find a place to do some good mornings or stiff legged deads, or maybe some crunches.

Which to some is probably some bad advise, eargly awaiting the flaming… :slight_smile:

[quote]utahpower242 wrote:

And if your worried about it making your abs and lower back weak, i’m sure you can find a place to do some good mornings or stiff legged deads, or maybe some crunches.

[/quote]

Wouldn’t the good mornings and the deads have to be over 1xbw to have some effect?
Would you wear a belt for those?

actually the whole

‘dont do curls in the squat rack’ is just common courtesy

take yesterday

me:‘sorry could i get into do some squats?’

really skinny guy: ‘sorry i have 5 sets to go…’

me: ‘grrrrr!’

  1. weightlifting will stunt your growth

  2. creatine is bad for you/steroid (from school friends who didnt even train, biology teacher had to tell them what it was as they didnt believe me)

  3. You work out too much (3 times a week!)

  4. it will make you slow (ehh 100m fell by a second)

  5. you should be studying…(eh maybe they were right there…)

[quote]eisenaffe wrote:
utahpower242 wrote:

And if your worried about it making your abs and lower back weak, i’m sure you can find a place to do some good mornings or stiff legged deads, or maybe some crunches.

Wouldn’t the good mornings and the deads have to be over 1xbw to have some effect?
Would you wear a belt for those?

[/quote]

No, I don’t do them. My lower back gets enough of a work out form doing normal deads and squating, even with a belt. Maybe i’m just weird. I’m still getting good numbers. Squating 580, and dead almost 700, I “hitched” according to the judge. But I’m not advocating for the use of a belt tightned to the limit all the time, just on the 1rm.

Respectfully,
Me

ok here are the advices that messed up my training big time

‘you will only bulk up by lifting heavy, and with low reps’
-yeah i di that and injured my wrists plus i bulked up with loads of bodyfat, not muscle.

‘high reps workouts are useless’
well actually i gain more muscle and get stronger with higher reps.

‘eat as much calories as you can’
It got me freaking fat!!!

I’ll tell you the worst advice I’ve ever read:

[quote]SkinnySwimmer wrote:
Please, please don’t get freaky jacked like a female bodybuilder. If you’re doing squats and cable crunches right now make sure you keep us updated so you don’t cross the line between fit yet feminine and intimidating. [/quote]

Yes, because cable crunches are the equivalent of a hypodermic of androgens to the glutes.

[quote]Sxio wrote:
I’ll tell you the worst advice I’ve ever read:

SkinnySwimmer wrote:
Please, please don’t get freaky jacked like a female bodybuilder. If you’re doing squats and cable crunches right now make sure you keep us updated so you don’t cross the line between fit yet feminine and intimidating.

Yes, because cable crunches are the equivalent of a hypodermic of androgens to the glutes. [/quote]

That’s really more of a request made in jest than advice but thanks for taking the time to drag this out into a completely different thread.

I was doing standing barbell shoulder press. First cleaning the weight of the floor. I see a trainer rush towards me while Im pressing the weight.
Him: you’re doing it wrong you know
Me: umm really? can you show me then?
Him: yeah sure, first lets unload the bar
Me:…
Him: So all you gotta do is this, (he cleans the weight like a metrosexual bitch to his neck) All you have to do is snap!
Just snap your arm! The upward movement you were doing is unnecessary.
Me:…(goes to change room and /wrists)

First of all i wasn’t doing cleans. Second of all, fuck you dont waste my time.

I was doing a set of reverse hyperextensions with about 350 pounds. A guy walks up to me after my set and said, “Young man, you’re going to hurt your back doing those.” I said, “Actually, one of the reasons I do them is so I won’t hurt my back. I’ve been doing them for close to twelve years and haven’t had back problems since I started doing them. They’ve really helped strengthen up my back.”

He grumbled, said something under his breath and walked away. A few days later I saw him doing “cheat” curls and he was bent back so far he could have balanced a poodle on his chest. A month or so later I heard he was at home watching TV, had a heart attack and died…

[quote]Intheburg04 wrote:
I was doing a set of reverse hyperextensions with about 350 pounds. A guy walks up to me after my set and said, “Young man, you’re going to hurt your back doing those.” I said, “Actually, one of the reasons I do them is so I won’t hurt my back. I’ve been doing them for close to twelve years and haven’t had back problems since I started doing them. They’ve really helped strengthen up my back.”

He grumbled, said something under his breath and walked away. A few days later I saw him doing “cheat” curls and he was bent back so far he could have balanced a poodle on his chest. A month or so later I heard he was at home watching TV, had a heart attack and died… [/quote]

He clearly didn’t know quite enough about fitness and health. Nonetheless, RIP.

A guy approached me in the gym … overweight, clipboard, headband … you know this guy. Started telling me about his diet plan and how he had cut out beef completely “because it makes you fat”.

“you need to consume 8000 calories a day”- my dad

basicly a one way ticket to fatkid town

[quote]westdale warrior wrote:
“you need to consume 8000 calories a day”- my dad

basicly a one way ticket to fatkid town[/quote]

lol

[quote]MikeyKBiatch wrote:
dude-dilly squat wrote:
I actually gave this advice to a couple of girlfriends: “No, baby, you should swallow. It will stop you from getting cancer of the esophagus. No, really they did a study.”

Um, this is fact… and cnn says so.

http://www.sinc.sunysb.edu/Stu/pip/

[/quote]

Um, this is NOT a fact… that is not a CNN website nor is it a genuine AP news story.

Note the names of the scientists:

Dr. B.J. Sooner, etc.

If you were joking… I apologize… :slight_smile: But you just never know… lol

From Urban Legends:

Study: Fellatio may significantly decrease the risk of breast cancer in women

Netlore Archive: Web page masquerading as a CNN news story claims women can decrease their risk of breast cancer by ‘performing the act of fellatio on a regular basis’

Description: Web hoax/Joke
Circulating since: October 2003
Status: False
Analysis: See below

Text as posted on Usenet, 9 Oct 2003:
Study: Fellatio may significantly decrease the risk of breast cancer in women

Thursday, October 2, 2003 Posted: 9:19 AM EDT (1319 GMT)

(AP) – Women who perform the act of fellatio on a regular basis, one to two times a week, may reduce their risk of breast cancer by up to 40 percent, a North Carolina State University study found.

Doctors had never suspected a link between the act of fellatio and breast cancer, but new research being performed at North Carolina State University is starting to suggest that there could be an important link between the two.

In a study of over 15,000 women suspected of having performed regular fellatio over the past ten years, the researchers found that those actually having performed the act regularly, one to two times a week, had a lower occurance of breast cancer than those who had not. There was no increased risk, however, for those who did not regularly perform.

“I think it removes the last shade of doubt that fellatio is actually a healthy act,” said Dr. B.J. Sooner of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, who was not involved in the research. “I am surprised by these findings, but am also excited that the researchers may have discovered a relatively easy way to lower the occurance of breast cancer in women.”

The University researchers stressed that, though breast cancer is relatively uncommon, any steps taken to reduce the risk would be a wise decision.

“Only with regular performance will your chances be reduced, so I encourage all women out there to make fellatio an important part of their daily routine,” said Dr. Inserta Shafteer, one of the researchers at the University. “Since the emergence of the research, I try to fellate at least once every other night to reduce my chances.”

The study is reported in Friday’s Journal of Medical Research.

In 1991, 43,582 women died of breast cancer, as reported by the National Cancer Institute.

Dr. Len Lictepeen, deputy chief medical officer for the American Cancer Society, said women should not overlook or “play down” these findings.

“This will hopefully change women’s practice and patterns, resulting in a severe drop in the future number of cases,” Lictepeen said.

Sooner said the research shows no increase in the risk of breast cancer in those who are, for whatever reason, not able to fellate regularly.

“There’s definitely fertile ground for more research. Many have stepped forward to volunteer for related research now in the planning stages,” he said.

Almost every woman is, at some point, going to perform the act of fellatio, but it is the frequency at which this event occurs that makes the difference, say researchers.

The reasearch consisted of two groups, 6,246 women ages 25 to 45 who had performed fellatio on a regular basis over the past five to ten years, and 9,728 women who had not. The group of women who had performed fellatio had a breast cancer rate of 1.9 percent and the group who had not had a breast cancer rate of 10.4 percent.

“The findings do suggest that there are other causes for breast cancer besides the absence of regular fellatio,” Shafteer said. “It’s a cause, not THE cause.”

Comments: Is it really necessary to debunk this? The names alone suffice to expose the text as a spoof: Dr. B.J. Sooner. Dr. Inserta Shafteer. Dr. Len Lictepeen. This is clearly not an Associated Press news story.

The text first appeared, dolled up to look exactly like a CNN News Web page, on a college student’s Web site in early October 2003. It vanished without explanation soon afterward, only to reappear 24 hours later with a disclaimer stating that the story, which now bore the byline “Brandon Williamson,” was intended “for entertainment purposes only.” (A subsequent version was also stripped of all references to CNN, presumably due to threats of litigation.)

Those who find this sort of thing amusing will probably also enjoy “Ogling Breasts Makes Men Live Longer,” a similar spoof circulating since 2000.

Some dude at the gym had an audition for an abercrombie modeling spot, and apparently he had 3 days until the audition. He told me a few things that made me want to puke:

  1. “I’m doing a total body workout with high reps for a few hours every day til the audition because it will get me cut.”

  2. “I’m going to lose 5 pounds, which will come off solely on my waist.”

After this one, I asked if he wanted advice on cutting weight and getting all the water out of his body, to which he replied “No, I’m talking about fat. The [5 lbs of] fat I’ll lose will come directly off my midsection.”

After using every ounce of strength I had to not kick him in the teeth, I tried to say nicely: “You know you can really only safely lose about a pound of fat a week.”

To which his retort was, “Yeah, SAFELY.”
I didn’t even finish my workout, I just went right home and took a nap because I was too pissed to be awake.

I’ll leave it up to you to find all the things wrong with the ignorant shit he tried convincing me of. There’s about 100,000 of them or so, so I apologize in advance for keeping you up all night.