[quote]orion wrote:
I could do this all day…[/quote]
Please do.
[quote]Cortes wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Joshka Fischer, ex foreign minister, girlfriend…
[/quote]
Lol. [/quote]
Ja, you laugh out of pity, surely, because we all know that da wimmenz would never ever go for am older guy, cause they are creepy and disgusting and generally unattractive…
Imagine how that poor bastard must suffer under her constant contempt…
.
.
[quote]LoRez wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
I could do this all day…[/quote]
Please do.[/quote]
Well, not quite on topic, but if you ever waver in your belief that da wimmenz go for whatever they think their alpha cock du jour is, there is nothing like HotChicksWithDouchebags:
…
.
Ted turner
Mwuahahahaha…
Blasphemy, no doubt…
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
.[/quote]
makes no sense, he was low status and not pretty, while the women on the rich mens sides were high status (as far as I know) and stunning (as far as my dick says).
.
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
And then we have:
[/quote]
Yeah that is not convincing however, because the women you posted were perfectly bangable, except, maybe, … fuck no, I wont disrespect her, The Taming of the Shrew alone…
We are talking men in their 60s and 70s banging 9s and 10s and you are bringing perfectly doable women who are a few years older than their boyfriends to the table?
Even that is so rare that it rivals your 20 (gasp!) of all Fortune 500 companies…
Besides, since you had to bring up Julia Roberts, look ye here who she was banging when she was really, really hot.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
.[/quote]
makes no sense, he was low status and not pretty, while the women on the rich mens sides were high status (as far as I know) and stunning (as far as my dick says). [/quote]
Of course it doesn’t make sense to you.
The point is that women seek out men for all sorts of different reasons. For every woman you post who has an ugly, highly successful husband, I can post an example of the opposite.
You’re quoting the Elizabeth Taylor picture, right? I can’t tell what picture it is you responded to but I assume it was that one.
There are all sorts of examples of men outshooting their coverage for unattractive women (sorry Liz, but as good-looking as you were for your age when you married Larry Fortensky, you weren’t attractive in a general sense anymore). Who is Oprah’s husband? What about that dipshit who married Star Jones? Elizabeth Hasselbeck? It goes both ways.
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Also, I would like DB to adress why the dominant sex in Hyenas is female, dripping clits and all, and why their dominance structure quickly reasserted itself when Hyenas that had no “role models” to speak of where left alone to figure it out themnselves.
I would also like to know why the human penis is shaped like it is, why we have psychological adaptions regarding mate guarding like jelaousy, why human males pump 2-3 times as much sperm into a woman if they could not mate guard for a few days, why women go for more masculine men if they are ovulating, why 90% of all sperm does not even try to impregnate da wimmenz but to block or attack other sperm if women throughout the history of the human race have not
CONSTANTLY BEEN ON THE HUNT FOR ALPHA COCK.[/quote]
I’d like you to explain to me why the biological attributes of a hyena has any bearing on the biological attributes of a human being.
I’d also like you to explain to me what pumping sperm and all that has to do with the leadership capabilities of men and women.
What does what women are attracted to have to do with any of this? I’m arguing that women are not biologically inferior leaders. Are they attracted to masculine men? Sure. And men are attracted to effeminate women, for the most part.
What does that have to do with the points I’ve made?
L[/quote]
You stated that human females are not hypergamic and what I posted has a lot to do with that they fucking are.
You also claimed that those leadership skills are “roles” that need to be learned, which I guess is true even for hyenas, which does not change that they instinctively establish a female dominant hierarchy.
Not so incidentally, female hyenas have more testosterone than male ones.
At least in mammals the sex with more testosterone dominates.
Always.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Also, I would like DB to adress why the dominant sex in Hyenas is female, dripping clits and all, and why their dominance structure quickly reasserted itself when Hyenas that had no “role models” to speak of where left alone to figure it out themnselves.
I would also like to know why the human penis is shaped like it is, why we have psychological adaptions regarding mate guarding like jelaousy, why human males pump 2-3 times as much sperm into a woman if they could not mate guard for a few days, why women go for more masculine men if they are ovulating, why 90% of all sperm does not even try to impregnate da wimmenz but to block or attack other sperm if women throughout the history of the human race have not
CONSTANTLY BEEN ON THE HUNT FOR ALPHA COCK.[/quote]
I’d like you to explain to me why the biological attributes of a hyena has any bearing on the biological attributes of a human being.
I’d also like you to explain to me what pumping sperm and all that has to do with the leadership capabilities of men and women.
What does what women are attracted to have to do with any of this? I’m arguing that women are not biologically inferior leaders. Are they attracted to masculine men? Sure. And men are attracted to effeminate women, for the most part.
What does that have to do with the points I’ve made?
L[/quote]
You stated that human females are not hypergamic and what I posted has a lot to do with that they fucking are.
You also claimed that those leadership skills are “roles” that need to be learned, which I guess is true even for hyenas, which does not change that they instinctively establish a female dominant hierarchy.
Not so incidentally, female hyenas have more testosterone than male ones.
At least in mammals the sex with more testosterone dominates.
Always. [/quote]
Elephants too?
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
The point is that women seek out men for all sorts of different reasons. For every woman you post who has an ugly, highly successful husband, I can post an example of the opposite.
[/quote]
No, you cant.
You can post the weaksauce you posted which makes no sense whatsoever, because people have eyes you know?
Combined with human sexual dimorphism, studies that women always marry upwards when they can, even in Sweden, may the Mother Goddess be with them and of course that 60% of all men in history simply did not reproduce I have gutted your argument, set the remains on fire and right now I am pissing on the ashes.
[quote]LoRez wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Also, I would like DB to adress why the dominant sex in Hyenas is female, dripping clits and all, and why their dominance structure quickly reasserted itself when Hyenas that had no “role models” to speak of where left alone to figure it out themnselves.
I would also like to know why the human penis is shaped like it is, why we have psychological adaptions regarding mate guarding like jelaousy, why human males pump 2-3 times as much sperm into a woman if they could not mate guard for a few days, why women go for more masculine men if they are ovulating, why 90% of all sperm does not even try to impregnate da wimmenz but to block or attack other sperm if women throughout the history of the human race have not
CONSTANTLY BEEN ON THE HUNT FOR ALPHA COCK.[/quote]
I’d like you to explain to me why the biological attributes of a hyena has any bearing on the biological attributes of a human being.
I’d also like you to explain to me what pumping sperm and all that has to do with the leadership capabilities of men and women.
What does what women are attracted to have to do with any of this? I’m arguing that women are not biologically inferior leaders. Are they attracted to masculine men? Sure. And men are attracted to effeminate women, for the most part.
What does that have to do with the points I’ve made?
L[/quote]
You stated that human females are not hypergamic and what I posted has a lot to do with that they fucking are.
You also claimed that those leadership skills are “roles” that need to be learned, which I guess is true even for hyenas, which does not change that they instinctively establish a female dominant hierarchy.
Not so incidentally, female hyenas have more testosterone than male ones.
At least in mammals the sex with more testosterone dominates.
Always. [/quote]
Elephants too?[/quote]
No, but they have no “societies” with both sexes.
Or, to be precise, once the males reach maturity they are cast out.