Winny vs. Halo?

Im going to be running another cycle soon and have a question about which AAS you guys would recommend for my goals. I play rugby and am looking to gain strength and speed. I wouldn’t mind putting on some mass but it’s important that it doesn’t slow me down.

My cycle will be 500mg Test E and 600mg EQ. Would you recommend ending it with Winny or Halo?

Thanks

Out of curiosity, why use EQ, a steroid known for appetite increases, when you don’t want to gain that much mass?

I’ve never used Winstrol, but I have used halo with large increases in strength and aggression.

[quote]rrjc5488 wrote:
Out of curiosity, why use EQ, a steroid known for appetite increases, when you don’t want to gain that much mass?

I’ve never used Winstrol, but I have used halo with large increases in strength and aggression. [/quote]

My first cycle was with EQ and I really liked the gains. It did increase my appetite but it wasn’t as dramatic as what I’ve heard from others. During my first cycle I actually lost weight. Dropped about 20lbs of fat and added 8lbs of LBM.

I also experienced ZERO negative sides from EQ and experienced good strength and endurance gains. Since, I know how my body reacts to EQ I will probably make it a staple in any of my future cycles.

It really depends on how you’re training/eating - if rugby is your focus, I’m guessing you’re going to be continuing some kind of agility/speed training as well as lifting. You should probably be more worried about not eating enough than gaining mass that will slow you down.
Winny may be a good recourse if you want to lean out after your cycle (and maintain your gains), but if you eat clean, you shouldn’t have any problems with any of your gains slowing you down. I would say there are far better uses for your money.

[quote]altered_beast wrote:
It really depends on how you’re training/eating - if rugby is your focus, I’m guessing you’re going to be continuing some kind of agility/speed training as well as lifting. You should probably be more worried about not eating enough than gaining mass that will slow you down.
Winny may be a good recourse if you want to lean out after your cycle (and maintain your gains), but if you eat clean, you shouldn’t have any problems with any of your gains slowing you down. I would say there are far better uses for your money.[/quote]

I am definitely eating enough and my diet is pretty clean. What would you recommend putting in my cycle instead of Winny or Halo?

[quote]GymJones wrote:
I am definitely eating enough and my diet is pretty clean. What would you recommend putting in my cycle instead of Winny or Halo?
[/quote]

I’d say your cycle is solid enough with the test E and EQ. No need for anything else (except PCT, of course). By using Test E and EQ you’ve got a strong strength/size booster coupled with EQ which, though not as powerful, is less-likely to have side-effects. The addition of Winny would definitely be superflous. It would be better to complete the cycle, and use HALO/Winny later for a ‘cutting’ cycle.

What were you hoping to get out HALO/Winny?

For your goals your cycle is pretty solid as is with the Test E/EQ. Halo is very popular drug of choice for competing athletes, I have taken before and always used pre-workout (I was no longer competing so my “competition” was my own workout). Basically if you add in Halo it would be strictly to enchance performance pre competition but I dont think it adds much to your cycle overall, you can really go either way, try it out before practice or game day and if you like it keep doing it, if not stick with your original run. AAS is all individual trial and error, just like the way you know how your body reacts and performs with EQ, do the same with the Halo and find out for yourself if its a substance worth its weight in your body.