Yeah I remember earlier you claimed you were taking the conservative approach “because history” and I showed you that the history itself went through changes and you weren’t being conservative at all.
Powerlifters didn’t have to sit around and allow themselves to be limited by Olympic weight lifting in order for them to do their own thing. It’s built on individual agency.
To say defining a sport practitioner by their training is “not sustainable intellectually” is like saying a pianist isn’t a pianist unless they perform on stage, nonsense. The methodology is the defining feature. The competition is just one context where that methodology is displayed.
Sure Powerlifting morphed off of Olympic Lifting. The changes took a few years to reach a very good finished product. Advocating for sustaining the finished product is the conservative position.
Suggesting that sustaining the “finished product” is the only conservative or legitimate approach ignores decades of informal lifters who advanced strength and technique outside competitions. History shows that practice precedes codification.
You literally believe that if you pulled 135 at a meet and never competed again but then pulled 600 in a garage, that 135 is the strongest you’ve ever been.
Why are you so beholden to external validation of a corrupt federation? You do realize that any meet you had via the USAPL is invalid because the IPF expelled it right?
It doesn’t matter what the competitons think lol, athletes existed before competitions.
besides, competitions question each other’s legitimacy all the time. What are you going to do when you find out the competition you were in was actually illegitimate?