Why Doesn't God Communicate With Us Anymore?

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
I look at the bible as morality expressed through metaphor and allegory. When it is conveyed through story that god no longer communicates with people I have to look at it as communication being a two way street.

Someone (god) can talk all they want but if you aren’t listening (people) there is no communication. On the other hand, If you are looking, listening, and actively seeking a god centered life, well you just might find what you are looking for. You at least have a better chance than someone who isn’t.

It’s the people that know for a fact that what they are doing is righteous or ordained by god or what ever they believe in that I have a hard time with.

[/quote]

Fair point. Which “God”. Jesus? Allah? et als. ??

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]Reygekan wrote:
Attacking their religion isn’t warranted and is incredibly rude because it’s not relevant.[/quote]

It’s absolutely warranted and relevant. I’ve had it with people thinking stupid things, calling these things “beliefs”, bundling them up with “religion”, and hiding their stupidity behind “Its my religion!”

Respecting someones right to believe something does not mean respecting the thing they believe. I respect the right fools have to believe in an Invisible Wizard Man In The Sky. However, I dont respect the belief - its stupid.

When you look at all the detriment religion has had on society, you have to see that it all comes from the insane notion that “You have to respect other peoples religious beliefs”. Fuck that. My religion says fuck your religion.

If I wore a tinfoil hat because I “believed” the aliens were trying to steal my thoughts, people would rightly call me a nutjob every chance they got. Yet you watch people gather weekly to talk to the man in the sky and you have a problem with my observation that its insane? forbes justifies the murder of a child “if God says so”, and I’m wrong to point out that talking snakes and magic fruit are retarded fairy tales? [/quote]

Oh, come on. Where’s the ole celebrate diversity and embrace the differences type of shit we have come to love from leftists like you?

Or is it only people like you who are allowed to determine what should be embraced and celebrated?

Would it make you happy if we all became homogenized in our thoughts and beliefs?

What if they were opposed to yours, and you had to change?

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]Reygekan wrote:
Attacking their religion isn’t warranted and is incredibly rude because it’s not relevant.[/quote]

It’s absolutely warranted and relevant. I’ve had it with people thinking stupid things, calling these things “beliefs”, bundling them up with “religion”, and hiding their stupidity behind “Its my religion!”

Respecting someones right to believe something does not mean respecting the thing they believe. I respect the right fools have to believe in an Invisible Wizard Man In The Sky. However, I dont respect the belief - its stupid.

When you look at all the detriment religion has had on society, you have to see that it all comes from the insane notion that “You have to respect other peoples religious beliefs”. Fuck that. My religion says fuck your religion.

If I wore a tinfoil hat because I “believed” the aliens were trying to steal my thoughts, people would rightly call me a nutjob every chance they got. Yet you watch people gather weekly to talk to the man in the sky and you have a problem with my observation that its insane? forbes justifies the murder of a child “if God says so”, and I’m wrong to point out that talking snakes and magic fruit are retarded fairy tales? [/quote]

Oh, come on. Where’s the ole celebrate diversity and embrace the differences type of shit we have come to love from leftists like you?

Or is it only people like you who are allowed to determine what should be embraced and celebrated?

Would it make you happy if we all became homogenized in our thoughts and beliefs?

What if they were opposed to yours, and you had to change?

[/quote]

Every person has the right to think what they want and express those beliefs in a way that does not directly harm others. (Spare me the hyperphilosophical examination of “directly harm”. We both know posting on the internet and picketing a funeral are vastly different)

So the Christians have a right to say the Buddhists are going to hell. I have the right to say the Christaisn are a bunch of morons. They have the right to say I’m a moron.

Never have I said anything that can lead to the conclusion that “People should not be allowed to believe in god.”

Their right to believe should be embraced and celebrated, sure. I celebrate by calling them retarded.

I think the fundamentally polarized nature of the beliefs will undermine even the most well meaning discussion. I can’t speak for anyone else, but for me, religion is a tool in the toolbox, not the “be-all end-all” of existence. I can see that it can provide value and structure in certain ways and I think that it played a VITAL role in developing western (and eastern/mid-eastern) civilization. It satisfied MANY questions that we humans had during a time of collective ignorance and lack of scientific means to explore our universe.

That being said, I cannot HELP but equate anyone who believes LITERALLY in the bible/religion in THIS DAY AND AGE with someone who believes in Santa Clause AFTER he’s seen his parents putting presents under the tree. To ME, it seems completely illogical and naive to hold such unfounded and ridiculous beliefs in the face of modern science. I see otherwise normal people revert to gullible five year olds making emotional decisions when the topic of religion comes up. Their irrational and emotional attachment to these ideas makes me question their intellect, decision making ability, logical thought process and connection with reality. To put it bluntly, it makes me not TRUST them or their ability to think rationally. If they can’t think rationally, then how can I trust them to make responsible decisions under times of great stress? How can I trust them to lead my country? How can I trust them with my children? Or my money? Or ANYTHING that I hold dear?

I also have to admit that I hold a certain degree of resentment at the judgment I perceive them directing at me. I mean these people HONESTLY BELIEVE that I DESERVE to spend an eternity in “hell”. Their smug sense of superiority constantly permeates every interaction. Their blind, self-indulgent humility props up their fragile, guilt and shame ridden ego in a way that I just can’t comprehend. I’ve encountered a few “zealots” that are so emotionally and psychologically DAMAGED by religious beliefs that I wonder how they even function on a daily basis. And they aren’t just content to have their beliefs and go about their lives. No, they are compelled to try and “convert” me to their idiotic beliefs. They knock on my door at inappropriate times and actually expect me to let them into my home and waste my time… Why on earth would I entertain someone like that? Who in their right mind would expect me to do such a thing? It brings me back to the question: how can I trust someone who THINKS that way?

At the end of the day, I simply can’t help myself but to question their sanity. And to prove it, they keep arguing over and over the same things, the same chapter and verse, the same tired old “logic” wrapped in a different example yet they expect a different result! LMAO They expect me to actually “see” things “their” way. They expect me to throw my logic, intellect, observation, education and considerable experience out the window and replace it with “FAITH”… ARE THEY FUCKING RETARDED? Why would I do that? Because I might “burn in hell” if I don’t? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL I’m quaking in my fuckin’ boots…

While we’re being honest, I will admit that the ONLY reason I’ve ever tolerated being around religions people is to get laid. I mean the shame and the guilt they pile onto the young women in their “flock” is like a palpable weight hanging around their supple, tender little necks… And it makes it TEN times easier for me or anyone with any kind of “skillz” with women to unlock that poorly conceived “chastity belt” and open Pandora’s proverbial box. And everyone know that once it’s open, good luck in closing it again! LOL So for THAT, I have to say, “thank you”.

On the flip side, I can only assume (assumptions based on being told/threatened/chastised on various occasions) that THEY think that I am nothing more than a “sinner” (a ridiculous concept! how can a newborn child be a “sinner”? riddle me that!) and that unless I “repent”, I will burn for eternity.

How am I supposed to have a conversation with someone like that?

ON TOPIC: Why doesn’t “God” communicate with us anymore? Because “God” is a human construct, born of ignorance and weakness designed to control people’s thoughts and behaviors and to give them comfort in times of tragedy. Because people with weak minds simply can’t deal with reality in any other way.

I will concede that RITUAL, a facet of many religions, has value and can be a very useful tool for personal development and evolution. So long as it is not polluted with ridiculous beliefs.

Do I think religion has a place in modern society? Sure. I won’t infringe on ANY person’s belief. But stay the fuck out of MY head, Stay the fuck out of MY rights, Stay the fuck out of MY body, Stay the fuck out of science, Stay the fuck out of politics, and quit knocking on my door at ten o’clock in the god damn morning when I’m fucking hung over and have a nekkid chick in my bed!

I really don’t think an intelligent debate is possible, because I don’t think religious people meet my definition of “intelligent”.

I should qualify my last statement with “while discussing the topic of religion”.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

The stories are either true or false. In MY world, miracles do not exist, but lies do. I have no reason to believe that in the past it was any different. Therefore, the most logical explanation for ancient stories about miracles is that they were made up by people seeking power.[/quote]

So parts of the bible are the bronze age equivalent of “star magazine”?[/quote]

Yeah, or in other words, “bullshit”. When I hear a story about a talking snake, my experience on this planet leads me to the logical conclusion that it is bullshit. I’ve seen a million lies and not one talking snake.

Could it have allegorical value? sure. But taken literally, as Angry Chicken has just argued, it is ridiculous.

That’s why God doesn’t communicate directly with us anymore. Because He never did.

[quote]Sweet Revenge wrote:
The Bodyguard wrote: Why Doesn’t God Communicate With Us Anymore?

Maybe if you tweak the way you frame the question, you can get more helpful answers.
For example: How does God Communicate with us (you/me) now?

I think it would also be helpful to expand your concept of ‘communication’ beyond spoken and written words.
[/quote]

No. I like my question just the way it was intentionally posed and I did not ask for an editor :slight_smile:

The question posed is directed to religions that claim a special relationship with God thru their scriptures. According to some of those scriptures for instance, God stoop atop a mountain and addressed an entire nation and in another He incarnated thru man and walked among us. Both “national” and “personal” revelation are alleged to have occurred. Why did it stop amid so much confusion today?

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:
I don’t know; I’ve met lots of people who claim that God does communicate / has communicated with them. And I’m not talking about the schizophrenics I used to be a counselor for, either.

Maybe God only communicates with some people. I certainly am not one of them.

If my hypothesis is correct, though, it seems awfully damned reasonable that he’d not communicate with those of you who are so derisive towards others’ beliefs. Hell, I know I’D avoid you pretty much at all cost.

[/quote]

Well, I agree and disagree with your conclusion and without adding my personal belief, I’ll simply state that if I have at any time had an open heart while seeking the truth, why do I not have the answer as to which religious doctrine, if any, is the truth? Christian? Jew? Muslim? Which one?
For what it’s worth, he has never communicated directly with me in any manner I could distinguish as different from any other natural experience. That said, I would never have the hubris to demand that he do so, nor the audacity to require he fit into the mold of my limited conception.

Do I believe he does still communicate, with me, you and even the bodyguard? You betcha.
[/quote]

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Sweet Revenge wrote:
The Bodyguard wrote: Why Doesn’t God Communicate With Us Anymore?

Maybe if you tweak the way you frame the question, you can get more helpful answers.
For example: How does God Communicate with us (you/me) now?

I think it would also be helpful to expand your concept of ‘communication’ beyond spoken and written words.
[/quote]

No. I like my question just the way it was intentionally posed and I did not ask for an editor :slight_smile:

The question posed is directed to religions that claim a special relationship with God thru their scriptures. According to some of those scriptures for instance, God stoop atop a mountain and addressed an entire nation and in another He incarnated thru man and walked among us. Both “national” and “personal” revelation are alleged to have occurred. Why did it stop amid so much confusion today?[/quote]

Fair enough. It’s just that the question is posed in such a way that it assumes God HAS stopped communicating with his people. It’s a bit like saying…When (or why) did you stop beating your wife? (it presumed you beat your wife).

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I should qualify my last statement with “while discussing the topic of religion”.[/quote]

Awesome posts AC. This last thought touches on possibly my biggest gripe about religion: there are really fucking smart people wasting their time on this nonsense when they could be helping progress humanity.

Imagine where we would be with understanding the origins of the universe if so many people didnt shout “Sky Wizard poofed it into existence!”. Imagine how much more the non-SW folk could do if they didnt have to waste so much time arguing that we have no reason to think an invisible man created our universe on a whim.

Consider ethics. We don’t yet have a perfect understanding of ethics, mostly because so damn many people respond with “The answers are in MY holy book!”. Maybe if everyone put down the fables and worked together, we could get more done.

[quote]forbes wrote:

[quote]Sweet Revenge wrote:
I think it’s of great value to get other points of view and understandings, whether you agree with them or not. It’s all ultimately good and helpful. Everyone needs to work out their own enlightenment (salvation). So, the great variety of opinions that are expressed are very useful in helping one find and establish their Truth.

I don’t believe we are supposed to agree. Can you imagine a world where everyone conformed to the same Stepford-Religion? Seems un-natural to me. God expresses through the diversity in all religions, leaving out no one. I believe it’s a mistake to think God needs a human-made cookie cutter to reveal Himself to his creation. [/quote]

What religion do you consider yourself?[/quote]

None, right now. I don’t feel like I need the crutch of organized religion at this point in my life. However, I’ve had weaker times and fully appreciated the rigid constructs of Christianity (I know thats a very broad term). And I’m not denegrating that in any way…just like you wouldn’t put down a person for using crutches after they broke a leg. But eventually, one gets strong enough to stand on their own and find their own way. Strong enough to see and choose to de-construct outgrown religious belief systems within themselves.

[quote]Sweet Revenge wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Sweet Revenge wrote:
The Bodyguard wrote: Why Doesn’t God Communicate With Us Anymore?

Maybe if you tweak the way you frame the question, you can get more helpful answers.
For example: How does God Communicate with us (you/me) now?

I think it would also be helpful to expand your concept of ‘communication’ beyond spoken and written words.
[/quote]

No. I like my question just the way it was intentionally posed and I did not ask for an editor :slight_smile:

The question posed is directed to religions that claim a special relationship with God thru their scriptures. According to some of those scriptures for instance, God stoop atop a mountain and addressed an entire nation and in another He incarnated thru man and walked among us. Both “national” and “personal” revelation are alleged to have occurred. Why did it stop amid so much confusion today?[/quote]

The question is posed in the negative, as if God HAS stopped communicating with his people. It’s a bit like saying…When (or why) did you stop beating your wife? (it presumed you beat your wife).

[/quote]

Obviously, I disagree. If you do not know exactly what I meant after I explained it, ask me again for clarification. But I will say that since we do not have new scripture (unless you want to credit the claims of Joseph Smith), God has indeed stopped communicating as I have described “communication” for purposes of my OP question.

Sorry I can’t help you. Perhaps others here can give you a satisfactory answer.

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

Imagine where we would be with understanding the origins of the universe if so many people didnt shout “Sky Wizard poofed it into existence!”. Imagine how much more the non-SW folk could do if they didnt have to waste so much time arguing that we have no reason to think an invisible man created our universe on a whim.

[/quote]

You’re right. Particle physicists have only recently formed a multi national coalition using billions of dollars of equipment and human resources at the LHC trying to prove the existence of a Higgs boson, a theoretical sub atomic particle based on the Higgs mechanism, which hasn’t been proven yet, and can’t be without the proof of the existence of the Higgs boson.

Ironically enough, nicknamed the “God Particle”. But when they do find it (or not) they will be one step closer to understanding the origin of the universe.

If it weren’t for these stupid religions that have plagued human history they would be way ahead of this by now, and I’m sure you would be able to rest easily knowing that much more about the origins of the universe.

Of course you already knew that, right?

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

Imagine where we would be with understanding the origins of the universe if so many people didnt shout “Sky Wizard poofed it into existence!”. Imagine how much more the non-SW folk could do if they didnt have to waste so much time arguing that we have no reason to think an invisible man created our universe on a whim.

[/quote]

You’re right. Particle physicists have only recently formed a multi national coalition using billions of dollars of equipment and human resources at the LHC trying to prove the existence of a Higgs boson, a theoretical sub atomic particle based on the Higgs mechanism, which hasn’t been proven yet, and can’t be without the proof of the existence of the Higgs boson.

Ironically enough, nicknamed the “God Particle”. But when they do find it (or not) they will be one step closer to understanding the origin of the universe.

If it weren’t for these stupid religions that have plagued human history they would be way ahead of this by now, and I’m sure you would be able to rest easily knowing that much more about the origins of the universe.

Of course you already knew that, right?

[/quote]

Yes. What exactly is your point here? That we are far along in our understanding of the universe? Great. It does nothing to alter or refute my point, which is that, without those stupid religions, we’d be farther.

[quote]angry chicken wrote:<<< for me, religion is a tool in the toolbox, not the “be-all end-all” of existence. >>>[/quote]WHY THOMAS AQUINAS!!! IS THAT YOU??? IT IS YOU!!!

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:
I don’t know; I’ve met lots of people who claim that God does communicate / has communicated with them. And I’m not talking about the schizophrenics I used to be a counselor for, either.

Maybe God only communicates with some people. I certainly am not one of them.

If my hypothesis is correct, though, it seems awfully damned reasonable that he’d not communicate with those of you who are so derisive towards others’ beliefs. Hell, I know I’D avoid you pretty much at all cost.

[/quote]

Well, I agree and disagree with your conclusion and without adding my personal belief, I’ll simply state that if I have at any time had an open heart while seeking the truth, why do I not have the answer as to which religious doctrine, if any, is the truth? Christian? Jew? Muslim? Which one?
For what it’s worth, he has never communicated directly with me in any manner I could distinguish as different from any other natural experience. That said, I would never have the hubris to demand that he do so, nor the audacity to require he fit into the mold of my limited conception.

Do I believe he does still communicate, with me, you and even the bodyguard? You betcha.
[/quote]
[/quote]

Well, we get into the realm of total subjectivity (or, if you prefer, since this is the internet, perfect objectivity, in which I am Absolutely correct and all others whose beliefs deviate one iota from my own are wrong), but:

The important thing is that you KEEP your heart open, and you do not demand answers, or adherence to a time frame, or even comprehension. It’s that latter word, I think, that gets most of us, as we are such egotists by nature (no personal attacks, sincerely, I am probably almost as egotistical as you are).

If you truly ask, he does answer. If you request with an honest, selfless heart, you will receive what you ask for. Thing is, most of us have so much trouble separating that kernel of truth from the chaff of our natural inclinations, desires, egotism, peer, familial and media influence and all of the other temptations, competitors and distractions we are bombarded with in our everyday lives.

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:
I don’t know; I’ve met lots of people who claim that God does communicate / has communicated with them. And I’m not talking about the schizophrenics I used to be a counselor for, either.

Maybe God only communicates with some people. I certainly am not one of them.

If my hypothesis is correct, though, it seems awfully damned reasonable that he’d not communicate with those of you who are so derisive towards others’ beliefs. Hell, I know I’D avoid you pretty much at all cost.

[/quote]

Well, I agree and disagree with your conclusion and without adding my personal belief, I’ll simply state that if I have at any time had an open heart while seeking the truth, why do I not have the answer as to which religious doctrine, if any, is the truth? Christian? Jew? Muslim? Which one?
For what it’s worth, he has never communicated directly with me in any manner I could distinguish as different from any other natural experience. That said, I would never have the hubris to demand that he do so, nor the audacity to require he fit into the mold of my limited conception.

Do I believe he does still communicate, with me, you and even the bodyguard? You betcha.
[/quote]
[/quote]

Well, we get into the realm of total subjectivity (or, if you prefer, since this is the internet, perfect objectivity, in which I am Absolutely correct and all others whose beliefs deviate one iota from my own are wrong), but:

The important thing is that you KEEP your heart open, and you do not demand answers, or adherence to a time frame, or even comprehension. It’s that latter word, I think, that gets most of us, as we are such egotists by nature (no personal attacks, sincerely, I am probably almost as egotistical as you are).

If you truly ask, he does answer. If you request with an honest, selfless heart, you will receive what you ask for. Thing is, most of us have so much trouble separating that kernel of truth from the chaff of our natural inclinations, desires, egotism, peer, familial and media influence and all of the other temptations, competitors and distractions we are bombarded with in our everyday lives.
[/quote]

Well, this is a thoughtful answer but I disagree with your conclusion. I was baptized a Catholic. I used to attend church only with my grandparents. Frankly, I found the Catholic chuch, with its stained glass, saints and such to be spooky. Mom remarried a jew. Spent some early time in Saturday school where I learned the basics. We didn’t celebrate Christmas, we had the other thing, but we weren’t synagogue going Jews so to speak. Fast forward to my adulthood. There was even a period I considered myself “saved”. The point is not to give you my personal historical account, but to illustrate to you that I have been exposed to 3 major religions and I hold no bias or influence one way or the other. No one that influenced me was overtly religious.

I’ve always been an introspective deep thinker, even at a young age. I have no natural inclinations, desires, ego or any other influence when it comes to my personal search for truth. I fancy myself a philalethian at heart - a truth seeker, and I hold no attachment to the outcome of the discovery of a truth, especially about God. I seek the truth of everything, even something as trivial to you as the breeding of my prized bloodline of dogs.

I HAVE an open heart and it’s exactly why I cannot dismiss Islam at the expense of Christianity and so forth. I cannot abandon all intellectual reason when I examine the claims of various religions and I cannot blindly turn my eye to the common theme and outright plagiarism of and by modern religions from those of earlier civilizations, starting with such startling revelations that the “Christ” and resurrection, right down to the 3 days, is NOT an original story to Christianity! I’m not trying to raise a talking point for specific debate about the foregoing, but to only illustrate my point about common themes and apparent plagiarism.

And I cannot put my “faith” into the words written by any man. And thus my question - IF God ever communicated with man as claimed (national and personal revelation), why has he stopped? We do have dogmatic believers here and I have not heard one satisfactory answer although I would expect a self-serving scriptural quote to the effect that He will not return again until the end times or something to that effect.

My question is really simple, and has nothing to do with my alleged personal bias, if any. In fact, if anyone here could prove to me the truth of a religion, I’d happily accept it. But again, the claim is that at one time, God spoke with man, and then incarnated thru a man and performed miracles. And then God never spoke again, unless we want to include the claims of Muhammad - and we can consider that a valid claim too for arguments sake. Heck, we can even include the claims of Joseph Smith. But the point remains, at one time, God spoke with us directly…what happened?

I do agree with your comment about “kernel of truth” and as far as I’m concerned, all religions share a “kernel of truth” and those “kernels” are not the intellectual or divine property of any one religion and appear to have been with us since civilization. And perhaps therein is the true word of “God”. And perhaps he does speak to us directly if it is He that resides in that part of each of us that is intrinsically good.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

Why not direct communication with his children?[/quote]

Well, it’s not like He didn’t already write down how to communicate directly.

Read the fucking instruction manual.[/quote]

We haven’t even passed one page and here comes you being direspectful.

[/quote]
Sorry, that was meant to be read tongue-firmly-in-check

[quote]
Which “fucking instruction manual” shall I read? Shall I read the OT? Shall I read the Koran? Shall I read the NT? Shall I continue? And last I checked, “He” did not write down anything. Had “He” written anything, there would be no dispute. Man wrote. And therein lies the problem. [/quote]

Since Jewish people, Christians, and muslims agree that the first five books of the Bible are divinely inspired (and, in fact, dicated by G-d), I would respectfully start there, and consider your question of veractiy at a later time.

Go read Genesis 1, and answer why Mondays have sucked since the beginning of time.

But for an English version, I recommend the Jewish Study Bible.

The NIV Bible (a Christian Bible) seems clearly and accurately written, as well.

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

Imagine where we would be with understanding the origins of the universe if so many people didnt shout “Sky Wizard poofed it into existence!”. Imagine how much more the non-SW folk could do if they didnt have to waste so much time arguing that we have no reason to think an invisible man created our universe on a whim.

[/quote]

You’re right. Particle physicists have only recently formed a multi national coalition using billions of dollars of equipment and human resources at the LHC trying to prove the existence of a Higgs boson, a theoretical sub atomic particle based on the Higgs mechanism, which hasn’t been proven yet, and can’t be without the proof of the existence of the Higgs boson.

Ironically enough, nicknamed the “God Particle”. But when they do find it (or not) they will be one step closer to understanding the origin of the universe.

If it weren’t for these stupid religions that have plagued human history they would be way ahead of this by now, and I’m sure you would be able to rest easily knowing that much more about the origins of the universe.

Of course you already knew that, right?

[/quote]

Yes. What exactly is your point here? That we are far along in our understanding of the universe? Great. It does nothing to alter or refute my point, which is that, without those stupid religions, we’d be farther.[/quote]

Prove it.