Why Did God Create......

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

Heaven, to me, is simply accepting yourself in your entirety. Hell is when you go on splitting yourself, rejecting certain parts for other parts. The most miserable people I know are those who claim to be “religious” for this reason. The most joyous people I know don’t even judge themselves, they simply accept themselves as they are. How can God cast judgment on such a man? How can God allow such a man to be subjugated to eternal torture? I cannot believe in any such God.

[/quote]

Type these words up and hang on to them. Maybe you can figure out a way to take them with you when you die. If you can’t then make sure you memorize them so you can preach this little sermon to your Creator, Savior and Judge some day when you stand before Him.
[/quote]

Heh. It is so easy to tell which posters don’t have kids.

[/quote]

Has kids? TigerTime IS is a kid! He’s an 18 year old Bible expert. Just when I thought it couldn’t get any worse around here with all the 21 year old college experts we’ve actually fallen a level to High School.

He’s still 3 years away from being able to have a legal beer. Just started driving two years ago. And now he knows everything there is to know about the Bible.

(shaking head) What’s next? Debating 8th grade students on the merits of capitalism?

I’ve had enough I’m outta here…
[/quote]

Nothing you just wrote has any bearing on what one does or does not know about Christianity.

And fyi, the drinking age here is 18 ;)[/quote]

True, I simply wanted to point out to the others who may not be aware that you are just a punk kid. And much of what you say is a joke based on your lack of experience and knowledge of the topic.

Oh no, you now want to answer me don’t you? Yeah…you have to…dam

:([/quote]

Yeah I suppose, I mean, you keep sending messages to me and all…

What have I said that’s been joke based? I suppose not being the church’s subordinate bitch makes me a punk… alright, I can live with that title :wink:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Before the Internet (not something TigerTime even remembers) 18 year kids actually had to know what they were talking about BEFORE entering into a face to face debate about such grand topics. So, keep in mind as we move along we all love the Internet and what it’s able to bring into our lives, but there is a downside. Anonymous 18 year old self proclaimed geniuses.

(Now he has to answer this…)

(eye roll)[/quote]

Well you DID mention me specifically… I’m not really getting this whole “being disappointed when TT responds to me” thing when you guys are going out of your way to talk either directly TO me or ABOUT me.

Also LOL@ YOU calling ME anonymous when between the two of us I’M the only one with a picture of myself on my profile.

Hell, even if I was completely anonymous on this site you would have no right to bitch about it as you’re doing the exact same thing. For all I know you could be 12!

Either way, being anonymous has no effect on ones argument, you’re deliberately obfuscating the issue with both a red herring and an ad-hominem attack. Nice Job…

Ugh… now you’ll have to respond to me. Shucks. =(

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

Oh, I see. Having kids suddenly reverses the lack of evidence for your creator and magically will make me accept a God who would allow (relatively) arbitrary finite actions to result in eternal torture… Makes perfect sense.[/quote]

No.

Again you miss the point; which is the point. [/quote]

??? Are you just making this up as you go along?

Alright then, what exactly does having kids have to do with the discussion we were having?

[quote]pushharder wrote:

Wow. I must really have you guys pissing in your panties if this is honestly the best you can do.

“ahhh shit I can’t refute him… Oh wait! He’s 18! I can just ignore his arguments and talk about his age as a substitute for an actual counter-point! Harharhar!”

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

Wow. I must really have you guys pissing in your panties if this is honestly the best you can do.

“ahhh shit I can’t refute him… Oh wait! He’s 18! I can just ignore his arguments and talk about his age as a substitute for an actual counter-point! Harharhar!”

[/quote]

You’ve already been thoroughly refuted; that’s why it’s so much fun to pick on you now.
[/quote]

Thoroughly refuted? The last thing you said to me relative to our debate was that SOME christians cherry pick, then you reiterated that those old rules no longer apply (once again, with nothing supporting this claim). To which I responded with:

"You know, you keep saying that these rules no longer apply, but you’re doing everything you can to avoid the fact that these rules are never declared obsolete in the bible. You just made that up so you can feel good about ignoring the rules set down by your own God.

Also, I wasn’t aware that God’s rules only apply if they are given directly to you. I guess that means EVERYTHING in the bible is obsolete… "

And after that the only thing you said about me was relative to my age. I’m still waiting for an actual counter argument.

[quote]TigerTime wrote:
obfuscating the issue([/quote]

Good word little man (ruffles hair)…YOU’RE A BIG BOY!

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:
obfuscating the issue([/quote]

Good word little man (ruffles hair)…YOU’RE A BIG BOY![/quote]

Little man? You’re twelve aren’t you?

Also, LOL@ at this desperate attempt at ignoring my criticism of you.

How can you say that the Christian faith is the right faith? The Jews have their faith and their beliefs that go back further than that of the Christian faith. The Muslims have their faith and their Prophet. Yet, in my eyes, the Muslim faith is clearly the most rational and reasonable. I can’t believe that you people are able to honestly practice a religion that has been devoutly corrupt for more than 2000 years.

From slaughtering Muslims and any non-Christians without a valid cause during the Crusades to the papal authority raping, sodomizing, and living lives of lust and grandeur you’d clearly think that someone would wake the fuck up and realize that this shit is beyond absurd. Yet you still stand by this faith that you believe to be so righteous in all regards.

It’s the same crap today just in different context.

TL;DR - This. Shit. Is. Fucked.

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]colt44 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I remember God created the heavens and the Earth , I do not rember anything about God creating the Angels or the Devil. I remember Lucifer being full of pride and was expelled from Heaven , BUt I never heard that God created angels or Satan[/quote]

God created everything, so by extension, he created satan. [/quote]

You will have to excuse me , where did it say God created everything, did he create himself [/quote]

God doesn’t have a beginning, he wasn’t created.[/quote]

I was asking for scripture to back up that god did not create himself or satan ?
[/quote]

Wait, I do not understand. You are asking for scripture to back up what exactly?[/quote]

That God created the angels [/quote]

Okay, why does there have to be scripture to back it up?

Edit: He already answered my question for him.

[quote]Think tank fish wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

Well, google tells me that these laws aren’t decreed obsolete in the bible and you’re cherry picking which verses to follow… but I doubt that’s what you wanted me to find :wink:

[/quote]

Google nor anyone else told you any such thing, DisingenuousTime. You know it. I know it. Your mom knows it.

The only cherry picker is Tony-the-pseudo-Bible-scholar-Tiger. Your posts and mine reflect that. You have no idea what you’re talking about it; you’re simply arguing because you’re on the internet. You’re throwing stuff up hoping it will stick. You’re certainly more capable talking about medieval Irish history but you’re hopelessly out of your league here.
[/quote]

http://www.atheistperspective.net/p/bible-verses.html << Oh well, you can’t win em all…

Seriously though, you can find any expressed opinion on Google… It just wasn’t a smart move to try and call me out on something than could be shown to be true simply by using Google to find a site that suggests Christians cherry-pick.

I don’t know why you’re trying to make it out as though I came here to argue with you. YOU responded to ME. I’m not forcing you to respond to my comments and you’re free to not respond to me anytime.

This is a very simple game of logic; God has condemned wearing clothes with mixed fibers, eating shellfish, etc. You say these laws are obsolete so I ask you were in the bible these laws have been decreed as such. If this can’t be done (and I don’t think it can) then I guess these things are still banned as far as God’s concerned. [/quote]

Have you ever read the bible? Or are you criticizing something you’ve never read? I am guessing the latter…I had the feeling this was another set up. Another pseudo genius atheist who thinks he found reason in the unreasonable tenet of atheism.
I’ll give you the one main reason atheism is flawed at it’s very core. It posits that something can come from nothing and the things can happen for no reason what so ever. Now, what makes it even more ridiculous with all this belief and trust in science is that there is not a single solitary mircofragment of evidence to even remotely support such a ridiculous notion.

The difference between you and I is that believe in something that is actually possible and you believe in something that is verifiable impossible…Now that you let the cat out of the bag of your true intentions, let’s see how smart you are:
Prove something can come from nothing, as an atheist you MUST believe this to be true or you are not an atheist. It’s that simple…

I won’t be holding my breath.[/quote]

You make some good points but how does that flaw not apply to theism. If you believe in a creator god where is the proof that something can exist eternally and without itself being created.
[/quote]

This was kind of hashed out…like a few centuries ago, maybe a few millenniums ago. Things exist and began to exist, and for them to begin to exist they need an adequate cause. Same for the universe, which it’s cause is reasoned to look only like what we know as God.

[quote]forlife wrote:
There are general references to the Law of Moses being fulfilled in Christ (see Matthew 5:17-18), but it is not specified what was fulfilled and what continues to apply.

For example, the 10 commandments were given to Moses, but they are still considered to be in effect. However, most (but not all) of the ordinances and judgments are no longer considered by most Christians to be in effect.

The ritual sacrifices in anticipation of Christ’s sacrifice, in particular, were fulfilled.

The rest is really up to individual interpretation.[/quote]

“Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For amen I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot, or one tittle shall not pass of the law, till all be fulfilled.” - Mt. 5:17-18

After this he goes to show that the ten commandments are a shadow of the full ten commandments, and that the OT was a shadow of the real and full law.

Thou shalt not kill became thou shalt not be angry.
Thou shalt not commit adultery became though shalt not lust.

Not only did Jesus not remove the moral laws (neither did he remove the Jewish ritual, he freedom the Jews from being slaves to ritual), he made them harder. However, mysteriously he made the burden lighter than before.

[quote]CRisCO wrote:
I think the concept of salvation is very confusing to some people. The idea that a person is judged more on their faith then their actions is difficult for some to deal with.[/quote]

Where are they judged more on their faith than their actions?

I thought it was they were now judged on their interior actions/external actions and faith?

And, how do you define faith?

Faith as in, I actually believe. Or, I believe in this creed.

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:

[quote]CRisCO wrote:

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:

I have accepted him several times, not a bleep, I must be doing something wrong. But that was not the point. Breivik has faith, maybe it withers some day and he kills himself, hopefully so but you have to choose the right faith, don’t you, Hare Krishna for example wont do.[/quote]

I don’t understand what you mean here btw? Are you saying you tried to accept him and he didn’t answer you?[/quote]

Very perceptive of you. That’s how it has always been. No answers, not anything. I still talk to him occasionally though he never answers.[/quote]

The old Protestant myth alive today, I see. Though a few in history have heard the voice of God, too many Christians walking around today thinking they should be hearing the voice of God.

Well, I tell you it ain’t going to happen unless your his prophet.

The truth, you need discernment. Or, better to understand how discernment works. I haven’t heard the voice of God once in my life (maybe when I was a wee lad), when I pray it’s like I’m talking into a black closet. Nothing to be heard.

That’s okay, we’re not made to hear the voice of God, we’re to know the will and mind of God. And, that is where discernment comes in for this kind of thing. Here’s an article to explain further*: Discernment by Peter Kreeft

Second, I never understood the personal relationship with Jesus, or the more down to earth phrase, personal friendship with Jesus. As Catholics we ain’t looking for just no friendship, we’re looking for a marriage. That’s what we be, the Bride of Christ. And, our Mother, the Holy Catholic Church, can teach us everything we need to know for our marriage.

Ye needs just faith to start, for baptism of course, for justification, righteousness and salvation. Then one needs to strengthen that faith (our faith can be viewed in our Creeds) and now that one is in the grace of the Lord (through baptism) one most merit through works to continue to be sanctified and justified so that one may die with their salvation.

  • Here is a wee excerpt of the article explaining how to discernment works:

[quote]Five general principles of discernment of God’s will that apply to all questions about it, and therefore to our question too, are the following:
Always begin with data, with what we know for sure. Judge the unknown by the known, the uncertain by the certain. Adam and Eve neglected that principle in Eden and ignored God’s clear command and warning for the devil’s promised pig in a poke.
Let your heart educate your mind. Let your love of God educate your reason in discerning his will. Jesus teaches this principle in John 7:17 to the Pharisees. (Would that certain Scripture scholars today would heed it!) They were asking how they could interpret his words, and he gave them the first principle of hermeneutics (the science of interpretation): “If your will were to do the will of my Father, you would understand my teaching.” The saints understand the Bible better than the theologians, because they understand its primary author, God, by loving him with their whole heart and their whole mind.
Have a soft heart but a hard head. We should be “wise as serpents and harmless as doves,” sharp as a fox in thought but loyal as a dog in will and deed. Soft-heartedness does not excuse soft-headedness, and hard-headedness does not excuse hard-heartedness. In our hearts we should be “bleeding-heart liberals” and in our heads “stuck-in-the-mud conservatives.”
All God’s signs should line up, by a kind of trigonometry. There are at least seven such signs: (1) Scripture, (2) church teaching, (3) human reason (which God created), (4) the appropriate situation, or circumstances (which he controls by his providence), (5) conscience, our innate sense of right and wrong, (6) our individual personal bent or desire or instincts, and (7) prayer. Test your choice by holding it up before God’s face. If one of these seven voices says no, don’t do it. If none say no, do it.
Look for the fruits of the spirit, especially the first three: love, joy, and peace. If we are angry and anxious and worried, loveless and joyless and peaceless, we have no right to say we are sure of being securely in God’s will. Discernment itself should not be a stiff, brittle, anxious thing, butâ??since it too is part of God’s will for our livesâ??loving and joyful and peace-filled, more like a game than a war, more like writing love letters than taking final exams.[/quote]

It is a good article, even if you don’t care to follow it, it is a good article to understand how Catholics (and all Christians) are supposed to discern. :slight_smile:

  • I do what I want (you’ll get it if you read the article)

Chris IV

[quote]JoabSonOfZeruiah wrote:

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
…I don’t want to live forever. It was a horrifying thought as child and it still is.[/quote]
Why?

I have heard some arguments that it would be boring but I think that reasoning does not follow for a few reason. If we were made to by God to take enjoyment in having communion and learning about him than it stands to follow that any other pursuit we humans do in a fallen state to fill the void left by not seeking God would ultimately in the end be unsatisfying. In seeking God that void is filled yet there is always more to learn about him.[/quote]

I explained this in some detail at the beginning of the thread on eight things we will do when we are in heaven, and not get bored.

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
Jesus has never threatened me with anything, the only things he has maybe ever said to me is in faint whispers and none of that has anything to do with prolonged life, only people have done that.[/quote]

And just to be clear, Jesus isn’t your landscaper?

Edit: Oh right, Finland, not the US.[/quote]

No, he’s a symbol in my head, put there by my grandmother.