Why Did God Create......

[quote]TigerTime wrote:
Something else I’ve been thinking about… God dealt out a lot of punishment in the OT, but doesn’t do any of that now. What’s the dealio? I know the whole point of Jesus coming was to save us from God’s wrath, but for those of us who don’t accept Jesus, why isn’t God still murdering us? If we don’t agree to the loophole he gave us then we’re really in no different standing than any heathen God cracked down on 3000 years ago. I’m sure if God went old school on us, you’d see a lot more assess in church pews. Does God not care any more?

A side note for Cortes, if everything God does in moral by definition, then why did he bother sending Jesus to take on our punishment for us? If his punishment is moral, then there’s no need to give us a loophole. Is God himself displeased with his own morality?[/quote]

Jesus Christ was sent out of L O V E by the Father! The same reason that he doesn’t strike down those who don’t believe in him.

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
You can bitch and moan about how “unfair” God is all you want. That is in its essence, defiance and unbelief, and something you get to take up with God all by yourself. He has spelled out His plan, made it simple, exemplified His Mercy and YOU know it and understand it to the extent that any of us with a finite intellect can.

You would do well to take what God has revealed to YOU and deal with it and not worry so much about hypothetical bad guys on hypothetical deathbeds being visited, or not, by hypothetical priests.

Or you could continue to let it vex you so as is obvious on the forum and live your life a miserable man with no purpose.[/quote]

It’s the belief in a god that operates in this arbitrary way that I find puzzling. It seems that you have no answer either, except that it is god’s will. Sounds a lot to me like Tiribulus’s response when challenged on double predestination.

I’m not sure why you’re characterizing me as a miserable man with no purpose, unless to reinforce your belief that people who don’t share your religious views must be miserable and without purpose :)[/quote]

It’s not arbitrary. It’s very clear and logical. We are warned multiple times in the Bible thus: Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee.

Again, this is an extension of the point I’ve been making throughout this entire thread. God made absolutely everything, including the rules. Then he gave us the rules. Sometimes we don’t know why a rule exists, but we are still bound to follow it. You don’t see people making these arguments against gravity. Talking about how unfair gravity is. All of us should be able to fly where ever we want, when we want, and then to take advantage of the weight granting properties of gravity when we want, as well.

So, break the rules, pay the consequences if you are truly unrepentant. I don’t see how you guys don’t see the other side of this. It’s not, OMG like Hitler was sooooo bad and if he just said the magic words before he died he’d go to Heaven and Ghandi wouldn’t.

This demonstrates, rather, exactly how patient and loving God truly is, and how human you are. In that, so long as we just ask and mean it, no matter how damned bad we have been, anybody can be forgiven. You don’t see the beauty in that?
[/quote]

Saying that god made the rules, and therefore god defines good and evil, is exactly what Tiribulus would argue in his defense of double predestination. Who are we to question god? Unfortunately, this logic makes it possible to believe in any kind of god at all, irrespective of what we might personally believe is moral or not.

My point is that a priest, for example, can be the catalyst for someone to “just ask and mean it”. Why should someone be damned forever just because they never got the catalyst, when someone else did?

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

So, will God allow me into Heaven regardless of what I do now so long as I repent on my deathbed?

[/quote]

What makes you think you’ll get a deathbed?

A friend of mine’s grandson didn’t get one the other day. He was your age.

[photo]33865[/photo]
[/quote]

Exactly. How is that fair or just?

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:
No… I still don’t see the logical justification for sending homosexuals to Hell.
[/quote]

Uh, where in the bible does it say homosexuals are going to hell?[/quote]

Do un-repenting sinners NOT go to Hell? If homosexuals don’t go to Hell, then what’s the consequence?[/quote]

See, you actually do know the answers to these questions. It is EXACTLY correct that unrepentant sinners DO go to Hell. However, this fact also hints at duplicity on your part, or at least self-delusion. Because if you know what the word unrepentant means in the context of Christianity, then you should know that there is nothing at all sadistic by any normal measure in such a person going to Hell rather than Heaven. The reason being that you must first CHOOSE to reject God. In other words, you must consciously and with full knowledge of what you are doing choose to become an enemy of God by engaging in an act which he has expressly forbidden. Then you must die in that state.

An analogy: Bim and Ben are bitter enemies who live in the same town. All of the people in the town are poor, except for Ben, who has a magnificent palace. One winter, a wildfire rages out of control, destroying Bim’s house and crops, and burning up his life’s savings he’d hidden in his attic. He has nothing, as damage to the town is pretty much total, there is basically no one who can help him except for Ben, whose palace was untouched by the fire. Ben, being a caring person, decides to forget his differences with Bim and offers him a room and food at his palace. All he has to do is to agree in kind, to forget all past differences and accept the offer to come and stay.

However, Bim is stubborn and prideful. He will NOT put those differences aside. He will NOT accept the offer of room and sustenance. He holds on to his fear and anger, even though rejecting Ben at this time will certainly result in his death from exposure and starvation.

Now. Is Ben sadistic for not forcing Bim into his palace? Is Bim just a victim of circumstances who should be allowed full access to Ben’s palace despite any differences they have? Please tell me, what is “fair” in this scenario?
[/quote]

So, will God allow me into Heaven regardless of what I do now so long as I repent on my deathbed? [/quote]

Yes.

But, you will have to actually believe in him and repent of your sins with a truly contrite heart. This assumes you’ll have some kind of death bed conversion almost certainly brought on by fear. It’s not something I would exactly shoot for and definitely not a method I would recommend, but if the odds are in your favor and it happens that way, good for you.

I always think about blood clots, though. I remember there was this kid when I was in high school who was pretty much the most popular guy in school. He looked like an Abercrombie model, was athletic, varsity football, prom king (for real), all that. Then one day we find out he is dead. Blood clot in from his leg. His death was pretty much instantaneous. That certainly gave me some perspective I had been lacking up to then.

And if Hell is real, eternity is a loooooooooooooooooooooong time. Just sayin.

[quote]TigerTime wrote:
Something else I’ve been thinking about… God dealt out a lot of punishment in the OT, but doesn’t do any of that now. What’s the dealio? I know the whole point of Jesus coming was to save us from God’s wrath, but for those of us who don’t accept Jesus, why isn’t God still murdering us? If we don’t agree to the loophole he gave us then we’re really in no different standing than any heathen God cracked down on 3000 years ago. I’m sure if God went old school on us, you’d see a lot more assess in church pews. Does God not care any more?
[/quote]

Do us all a favor. READ the Bible. At least once. It will put an end to a lot of these questions. Seriously.

Do a site search You’ll see almost no one else is asking these kinds of questions. There’s a reason for that.

[quote]

A side note for Cortes, if everything God does in moral by definition, then why did he bother sending Jesus to take on our punishment for us? If his punishment is moral, then there’s no need to give us a loophole. Is God himself displeased with his own morality?[/quote]

Free will.

Tirib has a different answer but he’ll have to explain it because I certainly can’t fathom what it would be.

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:
So you couldn’t find it, eh? Please refer to this post and refrain from pulling the victim card in the future when you are accused of not having read the Bible as you claimed. [/quote]

All right, first, I never said it could be found. I know not everyone goes by the “Sunday” Sabbath, but that’s the common understanding and everyone knows what I’m talking about when I say “Sunday”. Not so had I said “Saturday”. Second, the only “victim card” I’ve pulled is at the ridiculous ad hominem attacks made on me in lieu of an actual argument.

Yeah, no I did get that the first time, I just thought I missed something because that’s stupid.

So, if I’m clear on this; “God”=“good” and “good”=“burn the queers”, therefore God burns queers… If God’s version of “good” is this, then God has one fucked up sense of morality. If this is “good”, then “good” is sadistic, ugly and nonsensical. If God’s only reason for making homosexuality a sin is “It’s in my nature to hate the gays, and I’m good, therefore being gay is immoral…”, then God seem more interested in his own ego than in logic.

And before you say it, yes I know there is more to God’s sense of “good” than condemning homosexuals.

I guess this is where our conversation ends. There simply can be no further debate when you define that which is moral by everything God says and does, unquestioned. I can point to all the killings God has ordered/carried out, but if you are just going to say God is good because God is good, there’s no point so I’m done. I’m not going to argue circular logic. [/quote]

You say you are getting it, but you are most certainly not.

Again: The ACT of FORNICATION is the issue.I know it makes it sound like you have a point when you throw around phrases like “burn the queers,” but you don’t.

There are a whole host of reasons why the sex act outside of marriage is prohibited that have both immediate and collateral societal consequences. They make sense when viewed without the lens of immediate selfish individual personal gratification fogging one’s perception of the issues.

But first,we are assuming a Christian cosmos, are we not?
[/quote]

So God has no problem with married homosexuals?
[/quote]

Not if they are married to someone of the opposite sex and restrict their sexual encounters to that person :wink:

[quote]
And yes, I’m arguing within the context of a Christian cosmos.[/quote]

Okay, then keep in mind that you’ll need to confine the discussion to the God we all understand as the Christian God, and assume that this reality was wholly created by him. If you want to change things around to where gay sex is a virtue or at least a neutral then you are not talking about the cosmos we are discussing here, and attempting to respond to your blustering about “fairness” becomes an absurdity.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:
Something else I’ve been thinking about… God dealt out a lot of punishment in the OT, but doesn’t do any of that now. What’s the dealio? I know the whole point of Jesus coming was to save us from God’s wrath, but for those of us who don’t accept Jesus, why isn’t God still murdering us? If we don’t agree to the loophole he gave us then we’re really in no different standing than any heathen God cracked down on 3000 years ago. I’m sure if God went old school on us, you’d see a lot more assess in church pews. Does God not care any more?

A side note for Cortes, if everything God does in moral by definition, then why did he bother sending Jesus to take on our punishment for us? If his punishment is moral, then there’s no need to give us a loophole. Is God himself displeased with his own morality?[/quote]

More evidence ^ for a lack of your purported Bible reading and study.

The charade’s over. I doubt you’ve even read the table of contents in the Bible.
[/quote]

I should read through the thread before posting. You’re in my head, push :wink:

[quote]forlife wrote:

Exactly. How is that fair or just?[/quote]

Because we make the choice NOW. The point isn’t to live a life of debauchery and then at the last possible minute say the magic words and receive all the benefits of Heaven.

That is what wouldn’t be fair.

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
You can bitch and moan about how “unfair” God is all you want. That is in its essence, defiance and unbelief, and something you get to take up with God all by yourself. He has spelled out His plan, made it simple, exemplified His Mercy and YOU know it and understand it to the extent that any of us with a finite intellect can.

You would do well to take what God has revealed to YOU and deal with it and not worry so much about hypothetical bad guys on hypothetical deathbeds being visited, or not, by hypothetical priests.

Or you could continue to let it vex you so as is obvious on the forum and live your life a miserable man with no purpose.[/quote]

It’s the belief in a god that operates in this arbitrary way that I find puzzling. It seems that you have no answer either, except that it is god’s will. Sounds a lot to me like Tiribulus’s response when challenged on double predestination.

I’m not sure why you’re characterizing me as a miserable man with no purpose, unless to reinforce your belief that people who don’t share your religious views must be miserable and without purpose :)[/quote]

It’s not arbitrary. It’s very clear and logical. We are warned multiple times in the Bible thus: Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee.

Again, this is an extension of the point I’ve been making throughout this entire thread. God made absolutely everything, including the rules. Then he gave us the rules. Sometimes we don’t know why a rule exists, but we are still bound to follow it. You don’t see people making these arguments against gravity. Talking about how unfair gravity is. All of us should be able to fly where ever we want, when we want, and then to take advantage of the weight granting properties of gravity when we want, as well.

So, break the rules, pay the consequences if you are truly unrepentant. I don’t see how you guys don’t see the other side of this. It’s not, OMG like Hitler was sooooo bad and if he just said the magic words before he died he’d go to Heaven and Ghandi wouldn’t.

This demonstrates, rather, exactly how patient and loving God truly is, and how human you are. In that, so long as we just ask and mean it, no matter how damned bad we have been, anybody can be forgiven. You don’t see the beauty in that?
[/quote]

Saying that god made the rules, and therefore god defines good and evil, is exactly what Tiribulus would argue in his defense of double predestination. Who are we to question god? Unfortunately, this logic makes it possible to believe in any kind of god at all, irrespective of what we might personally believe is moral or not.

My point is that a priest, for example, can be the catalyst for someone to “just ask and mean it”. Why should someone be damned forever just because they never got the catalyst, when someone else did?[/quote]

It’s not the only argument for choosing virtue over sin, it’s the one that answered the question T2 was asking, to wit, “Are God’s rules not arbitrary?”

Though the above should be all we require as justification to be good, in addition to these, despite that we may not or outright refuse to see them, there are also actual earthly consequences that come from choosing to consciously defy God’s will(sin), just as there are rewards for virtuous behavior, though it may seem there are not.

Example: (from Wikipedia) [quote][Mother] Teresa wrote in her diary that her first year was fraught with difficulties. She had no income and had to resort to begging for food and supplies. Teresa experienced doubt, loneliness and the temptation to return to the comfort of convent life during these early months. She wrote in her diary:

Our Lord wants me to be a free nun covered with the poverty of the cross. Today I learned a good lesson. The poverty of the poor must be so hard for them. While looking for a home I walked and walked till my arms and legs ached. I thought how much they must ache in body and soul, looking for a home, food and health. Then the comfort of Loreto [her former order] came to tempt me. 'You have only to say the word and all that will be yours again,' the Tempter kept on saying ... Of free choice, my God, and out of love for you, I desire to remain and do whatever be your Holy will in my regard. I did not let a single tear come.[/quote]

This certainly contrasts strongly with our current culture of self-worship and the insatiable demand for the immediate fulfillment of our every desire. Not too many people would argue that Mother Teresa’s life did not produce (massive) benefits. But, even for her, it was often difficult to recognize what was happening.

In the same insidious manner, sin produces the opposite effect. Like wooden supports for a house built in a swamp, quietly rotting. The house seems fine, maybe for years even, but one day, the entire structure is going to give way and collapse into the murk.

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:
No… I still don’t see the logical justification for sending homosexuals to Hell.
[/quote]

Uh, where in the bible does it say homosexuals are going to hell?[/quote]

Do un-repenting sinners NOT go to Hell? If homosexuals don’t go to Hell, then what’s the consequence?[/quote]

I just said it’s not in the Bible. The act of homosexuality is a sin, being attracted to the same sex is not. However, how God judges we don’t know. That’s between that person and God and noone else.[/quote]

Then, unless God wants to correct me, I’m going to assume that God isn’t letting sexually active homosexuals into Heaven, especially un-repenting ones.[/quote]

All things being equal, no. But things are NEVER equal. That’s why we cannot know what God thinks…But if you deliberately snub God, hell is a safe bet, but that was your decision and not his.
And dude, we don’t care if your gay. FL is gay and he is fine. This place is about heated discussions. It sounds weird to have on a lifting site, but this place is actually pretty cool. Since I am on the DL I don’t look at training shit to much because I can’t do any of it for about 8-9 more weeks. Besides, after 20 years, i get the point.
I have been training longer than you’ve been alive, wow! I just realized that.

[quote]Cortes wrote:
The point isn’t to live a life of debauchery and then at the last possible minute say the magic words and receive all the benefits of Heaven.

[/quote]

Well…there goes forlife’s plan.

:slight_smile:

Homosexuality is very clear in the Bible, both in the OT and the NT. Un-repentent homosexuals will not enter the kingdom of Heaven.

But, we’re all sinners and unworthy to enter the kingdom of Heaven me, you homosexuals, everyone. And that’s why Jesus Christ came to earth. It’s a simple (but not easy) plan for salvation. Believe upon the Lord Jesus Christ as your savior repent of your sins and you shall enter the Kingdom of Heaven.

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

Exactly. How is that fair or just?[/quote]

Because we make the choice NOW. The point isn’t to live a life of debauchery and then at the last possible minute say the magic words and receive all the benefits of Heaven.

That is what wouldn’t be fair.
[/quote]

Responding to this and your other post:

The arbitrariness is in requiring some to make the choice NOW, while allowing others to make the choice LATER. Some don’t get a second chance. Some are never visited by the priest. How is it fair for them to suffer forever, while others actually do get the second chance? It sounds like god is playing favorites (which is why it reminds me of double predestination).

Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee

Doesn’t matter when death comes. We are given fair warning.

[quote]Cortes wrote:
Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee

Doesn’t matter when death comes. We are given fair warning. [/quote]

Even so, some get that last catalyst and many don’t. It seems arbitrary and not a little unfair, especially when you consider eternal hellfire and damnation is the consequence, just because you didn’t get that deathbed catalyst that someone else got.

My wife is of the opinion that god is a teenager, at the time of dinosaurs he was five years old.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:
Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee

Doesn’t matter when death comes. We are given fair warning. [/quote]

Even so, some get that last catalyst and many don’t. It seems arbitrary and not a little unfair, especially when you consider eternal hellfire and damnation is the consequence, just because you didn’t get that deathbed catalyst that someone else got.[/quote]

Thing is, FL…YOU know the truth and you know it now. You don’t need (or deserve?) the deathbed experience. What are YOU going to do about it NOW? Reject Him? Accept Him?[/quote]

The only thing I know is my own ignorance. God told me the Book of Mormon was true when I read and prayed about it, so the whole god thing is not so reliable in my book.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:
Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee

Doesn’t matter when death comes. We are given fair warning. [/quote]

Even so, some get that last catalyst and many don’t. It seems arbitrary and not a little unfair, especially when you consider eternal hellfire and damnation is the consequence, just because you didn’t get that deathbed catalyst that someone else got.[/quote]

Thing is, FL…YOU know the truth and you know it now. You don’t need (or deserve?) the deathbed experience. What are YOU going to do about it NOW? Reject Him? Accept Him?[/quote]

The only thing I know is my own ignorance. God told me the Book of Mormon was true when I read and prayed about it, so the whole god thing is not so reliable in my book.[/quote]

I understand. Honestly and sincerely.

You just keep thinking on it. You might even try the praying thing. Do the praying and let God do the rest.[/quote]

That’s the problem. I did the praying thing, and God answered my prayer by telling me that the Mormon church was His true and living church. I had that same deeply poignant, powerful witness many times over the course of years as I served a mission, studied the scriptures, attended church, prayed earnestly, fasted, and did my best to follow the teachings of Christ, accepting Him as my Savior and Redeemer. I know that I was 100% sincere at the time, just as I am 100% sincere now.

And yet I now realize that despite those powerful, indelible spiritual experiences, my beliefs were based on a lie. The Mormon church is not God’s church, although God told me it was all that time.

I can only conclude that earnest faith and prayer are not reliable as a source of truth.