Who Pays Income Taxes?

Lots of people bitch about the small amount they get from Bush’s tax cuts. The secret to get a bigger refund? Actually pay taxes, which most don’t.

"The Top 50% pay 96.54% of All Income Taxes

(The top 1% pay more than a third: 34.27%)

October 4, 2005

This is the latest data for calendar year 2003 just released in October 2005 by the Internal Revenue Service. The share of total income taxes paid by the top 1% of wage earners rose to 34.27% from 33.71% in 2002. Their income share (not just wages) rose from 16.12% to 16.77%. However,
their average tax rate actually dropped from 27.25% down to 24.31%

*Data covers calendar year 2003, not fiscal year 2003

  • and includes all income, not just wages, excluding Social Security

Think of it this way: less than 3-1/2 dollars out of every $100 paid in income taxes in the United States is paid by someone in the bottom 50% of wage earners. Are the top half millionaires? Noooo, more like “thousandaires.” The top 50% were those individuals or couples filing jointly who earned $29,019 and up in 2003. (The top 1% earned $295,495-plus.) Americans who want to are continuing to improve their lives, and those who don’t want to, aren’t. Here are the wage earners in each category and the percentages they pay:
The top 1% pay over a third, 34.27% of all income taxes. (Up from 2003: 33.71%) The top 5% pay 54.36% of all income taxes (Up from 2002: 53.80%). The top 10% pay 65.84% (Up from 2002: 65.73%). The top 25% pay 83.88% (Down from 2002: 83.90%). The top 50% pay 96.54% (Up from 2002: 96.50%). The bottom 50%? They pay a paltry 3.46% of all income taxes (Down from 2002: 3.50%). The top 1% is paying nearly ten times the federal income taxes than the bottom 50%! And who earns what? The top 1% earns 16.77% of all income (2002: 16.12%). The top 5% earns 31.18% of all the income (2002: 30.55%). The top 10% earns 42.36% of all the income (2002: 41.77%); the top 25% earns 64.86% of all the income (2002: 64.37%) , and the top 50% earns 86.01% (2002: 85.77%) of all the income.

I have made an executive decision as the owner and ultimate editor of this website that this table and these numbers stay on this website forever - updated when each year’s numbers come out, of course. In order to get these facts, you have to see them each and every day. This story, along with a link to the IRS chart, will stay somewhere on the RushLimbaugh.com homepage so everyone can see and find these numbers at any time. It’s crucial that people get this, so please, share it with a friend now!

The Rich Earned Their Dough, They Didn’t Inherit It (Except Ted Kennedy)

October 10, 2003

The bottom 50% is paying a tiny bit of the taxes, so you can’t give them much of a tax cut by definition. Yet these are the people to whom the Democrats claim to want to give tax cuts. Remember this the next time you hear the “tax cuts for the rich” business. Understand that the so-called rich are about the only ones paying taxes anymore.

I had a conversation with a woman who identified herself as Misty on Wednesday. She claimed to be an accountant, yet she seemed unaware of the Alternative Minimum Tax, which now ensures that everyone pays some taxes. AP reports that the AMT, “designed in 1969 to ensure 155 wealthy people paid some tax,” will hit “about 2.6 million of us this year and 36 million by 2010.” That’s because the tax isn’t indexed for inflation! If your salary today would’ve made you mega-rich in '69, that’s how you’re taxed.

Misty tried the old line that all wealth is inherited. Not true. John Weicher, as a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a visiting scholar at the Federal Reserve Bank, wrote in his February 13, 1997 Washington Post Op-Ed, “Most of the rich have earned their wealth… Looking at the Fortune 400, quite a few even of the very richest people came from a standing start, while others inherited a small business and turned it into a giant corporation.” What’s happening here is not that “the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.” The numbers prove it.

Check Out the UPDATED IRS Table of Numbers from Cy 2003…

(The IRS: Individual Income Tax Returns Each Tax Year 1985 - 2003)
{Requires EXCEL to View}

? Rush’s Coverage of the Previous IRS Data: here

Read the Article…

(AP: Obscure minimum tax will affect 36 million by 2010)

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Lots of people bitch about the small amount they get from Bush’s tax cuts. The secret to get a bigger refund? Actually pay taxes, which most don’t.

"The Top 50% pay 96.54% of All Income Taxes

(The top 1% pay more than a third: 34.27%)[/quote]

Since you are a Math teacher, I assume you understand what that means.

So you seem to have a problem with the fact that some people make more money than others. You’re basically attacking the fact that there is a tremendous income inequality in the US.

So you’re a filthy commie.

Why? Well, you know in what political system everybody pays the same amount of tax, right? And you know why, right? Don’t pretend you don’t. You’re a commie. Just admit it!

[quote]hspder wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Lots of people bitch about the small amount they get from Bush’s tax cuts. The secret to get a bigger refund? Actually pay taxes, which most don’t.

"The Top 50% pay 96.54% of All Income Taxes

(The top 1% pay more than a third: 34.27%)

Since you are a Math teacher, I assume you understand what that means.

So you seem to have a problem with the fact that some people make more money than others. You’re basically attacking the fact that there is a tremendous income inequality in the US.

So you’re a filthy commie.

Why? Well, you know in what political system everybody pays the same amount of tax, right? And you know why, right? Don’t pretend you don’t. You’re a commie. Just admit it!
[/quote]

So rich is now 29K in 2003 dollars?

We need far more people making less than 29K to even out the disparity.

Tax increases will take care of that. Bring back the death tax as well. While we are at it - I am sure there is some sort of tax that we could impose on stocks held - but not sold.

Maybe we could call it an investment tax, and it would subtract from the basis of the stock held instead of add to the basis such that all proceeds from the sale of the stock is taxed at a new, more punitive tax rate of 50%.

[quote]hspder wrote:

Since you are a Math teacher, I assume you understand what that means.

So you seem to have a problem with the fact that some people make more money than others. You’re basically attacking the fact that there is a tremendous income inequality in the US.

So you’re a filthy commie.

Why? Well, you know in what political system everybody pays the same amount of tax, right? And you know why, right? Don’t pretend you don’t. You’re a commie. Just admit it!
[/quote]

It means that half of all people are basically getting the benefits of American society as a gift from those who produce. It means that about 90% of us either get a free ride or a ride for chump change. And the people who make this bonanza possible get spit upon by libs.

The supreme irony is also when I see someone complain that ‘all they got was a lousy $180 tax refund’, never realizing any of the above. Then there’s the demagoguery, where you and your lib buddies scream about heartless Republicans giving a tax break to the rich.

There is justice, Hspder, whether you and your fellow libs want to admit or not. It will someday take a big bite out of your collective asses.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
It means that half of all people are basically getting the benefits of American society as a gift from those who produce.[/quote]

Again, you seem to have a poor grasp of Math for a Math teacher.

No. It means half of all people barely make enough money to make ends meet – much less pay tax.

[quote]hspder wrote:
Again, you seem to have a poor grasp of Math for a Math teacher.

No. It means half of all people barely make enough money to make ends meet – much less pay tax.
[/quote]

Ouch. Count that one.

Thing is, I can’t feel all THAT sorry for folks who struggle, as I have spent the better part of my career just getting by, and I’m not crying about it. The way I see it, those who can fuck you will try to fuck you because it feels good.

Example: Oil companies, record prices, record profits. Good for them. I am reaching a point in my career now where I am the one pulling out the pee-pee and giving it to somebody else and letting my ass heal finally.

If the fact that I am making more money means that somebody somewhere is making less, then good. Take it like a man… just like I have for so long. I’ll give it back by paying more taxes so it all works out fairness-wise for supporting our government.

Rich folks shouldn’t bitch about paying more taxes. They should continue to be rich (like I hope to be), and shut fuck the up.

[quote]hspder wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
It means that half of all people are basically getting the benefits of American society as a gift from those who produce.

Again, you seem to have a poor grasp of Math for a Math teacher.

No. It means half of all people barely make enough money to make ends meet – much less pay tax.
[/quote]

It also means that if they have a child and are married they get an extra 4-5K from the government through the EIC and refundable tax credits.

The argument here isn’t how much they make - it is how much they pay - or don’t pay - in taxes.

[quote]hspder wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
It means that half of all people are basically getting the benefits of American society as a gift from those who produce.

Again, you seem to have a poor grasp of Math for a Math teacher.

No. It means half of all people barely make enough money to make ends meet – much less pay tax.
[/quote]

Once again, you are using demagoguery. The poor and many in the middle class GET TO LIVE HERE FOR FREE or damn near close to it. They get police, fire, FBI, food stamps, on and on, FOR FREE. If you made $20,000/year but got roads, schools, and a military to protect you, you’re living like a prince! Plus, you have unheard of opportunity in this country to rise — I worked in a factory at night, 3rd shift, got a degree and became a teacher, eventually getting an MA in Math Ed. All that time, while living in dire poverty, I received all the benefits of living here AS A GIFT from the men who produce. When you turn on the lights, or take a shower, those things are gifts from the men who produce. Could YOU produce them for yourself? Could you butcher an animal and turn it into a meal for your family? Grow a field of wheat? All these things are gifts from productive individuals.

These are the people you spit upon and scream: ‘You’re not paying enough!!’ That is not justice.

[quote]lothario1132 wrote:
hspder wrote:
Again, you seem to have a poor grasp of Math for a Math teacher.

No. It means half of all people barely make enough money to make ends meet – much less pay tax.

Ouch. Count that one.

Thing is, I can’t feel all THAT sorry for folks who struggle, as I have spent the better part of my career just getting by, and I’m not crying about it. The way I see it, those who can fuck you will try to fuck you because it feels good.

Example: Oil companies, record prices, record profits. Good for them. I am reaching a point in my career now where I am the one pulling out the pee-pee and giving it to somebody else and letting my ass heal finally.

If the fact that I am making more money means that somebody somewhere is making less, then good. Take it like a man… just like I have for so long. I’ll give it back by paying more taxes so it all works out fairness-wise for supporting our government.

Rich folks shouldn’t bitch about paying more taxes. They should continue to be rich (like I hope to be), and shut fuck the up.[/quote]

Hspder has demagoged you. Libs want to try to increase envy and hatred of rich people. Since all libs have death and destruction as their prime motivation, they hope to destroy or discourage those in a society who are productive. If successful, the producers produce less (as in the Soviet Union), more people go hungry or suffer, and that is the ultimate goal of all liberals. They are secret killers, trying to kill all rational life. To destroy, is their motivation. The Soviet Union, Communist China, the dissolution of Africa, and on and on, all came about from the core philosophy of Liberalism, the idea that each man exists to serve other men.

Let Liberalism die in the dust bin of history.

[quote]lothario1132 wrote:
hspder wrote:
Again, you seem to have a poor grasp of Math for a Math teacher.

No. It means half of all people barely make enough money to make ends meet – much less pay tax.

Ouch. Count that one.

Thing is, I can’t feel all THAT sorry for folks who struggle, as I have spent the better part of my career just getting by, and I’m not crying about it. The way I see it, those who can fuck you will try to fuck you because it feels good.

Example: Oil companies, record prices, record profits. Good for them. I am reaching a point in my career now where I am the one pulling out the pee-pee and giving it to somebody else and letting my ass heal finally.

If the fact that I am making more money means that somebody somewhere is making less, then good. Take it like a man… just like I have for so long. I’ll give it back by paying more taxes so it all works out fairness-wise for supporting our government.

Rich folks shouldn’t bitch about paying more taxes. They should continue to be rich (like I hope to be), and shut fuck the up.[/quote]

Why are you making so much sense lately?

[quote]lothario1132 wrote:
Rich folks shouldn’t bitch about paying more taxes. They should continue to be rich (like I hope to be), and shut fuck the up.[/quote]

Do you believe all americans should be able to deduct their real estate tax from their federal tax?

How would you like it if you could not deduct neither your real estate tax nor your mortgage interest like the rest of americans?

Do you think it is fair that some people get a rebate homestead rebate and others do not?

Why?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why are you making so much sense lately?[/quote]

Do you believe all americans are entitled to deduct their real estate taxes from their federal taxes?

Why or why not?

[quote]Marmadogg wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Why are you making so much sense lately?

Do you believe all americans are entitled to deduct their real estate taxes from their federal taxes?

Why or why not?[/quote]

I don’t know. I know very little about the details of either. My field is neither economics or real estate and I own no land currently. I’ll research both issues and make a comment when I feel I have enough knowledge to judge them.

I was agreeing with his point that rich people should shut up and pay taxes and simply enjoy being rich…as opposed to bitching about paying more than poor people percentage-wise.

I pay taxes. Hell, my family and I were paying taxes when we couldn’t even get some of the benefits for it (social security). Just pay it and be grateful you’re in America.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Why are you making so much sense lately?

Do you believe all americans are entitled to deduct their real estate taxes from their federal taxes?

Why or why not?

I don’t know. I know very little about the details of either. My field is neither economics or real estate and I own no land currently. I’ll research both issues and make a comment when I feel I have enough knowledge to judge them.

I was agreeing with his point that rich people should shut up and pay taxes and simply enjoy being rich…as opposed to bitching about paying more than poor people percentage-wise. [/quote]

I should be able to deduct my children, real estate taxes, and mortgage interest while the vast majority of American can.

That is not fair.

Not only do I pay a higher rate but I am not allowed to take deductions that should be rightfully mine.

How do you think it would effect our economy if all Americans were not allowed to deduct their children, real estate taxes, and mortgage interest?

My federal + state + real estate taxes = 50%+

It that fair?

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

Let Liberalism die in the dust bin of history.

[/quote]

Uhh…it’s not going anywhere man.

Most people say that about your idol’s philosophy- except hers already died.

You and these taxes…I don’t understand the stick up your ass about them.

The people who make the most should pay the most. Seems clear to me.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Headhunter wrote:

Let Liberalism die in the dust bin of history.

Uhh…it’s not going anywhere man.

Most people say that about your idol’s philosophy- except hers already died.

You and these taxes…I don’t understand the stick up your ass about them.

The people who make the most should pay the most. Seems clear to me. [/quote]

I don’t object to taxes but to the principle of taxation — that one person or group, more powerful than someone else, has the right to legally extort the product of your labor. Your life, your property, your soul, are sacred and belong to you. To force you to part with any of these, using threats of jail or confiscation, is simply evil and immoral.

But, what the heck … that’s a dead philosophy alright. Its pure evil and neo-fascism, and myriad other things. Yup.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
The people who make the most should pay the most. Seems clear to me. [/quote]

And that is how it would work if there were a flat percentage across the board. If taxes were a flat 25%, and I make $100,000, I would pay out $25,000 to the government. If you made $10,000, you would pay $2500. Make more=pay more.

But with the current system, not only do you pay more, you also pay a higher percent of your income. That’s not right.

[quote]nephorm wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
The people who make the most should pay the most. Seems clear to me.

And that is how it would work if there were a flat percentage across the board. If taxes were a flat 25%, and I make $100,000, I would pay out $25,000 to the government. If you made $10,000, you would pay $2500. Make more=pay more.

But with the current system, not only do you pay more, you also pay a higher percent of your income. That’s not right. [/quote]

Removing deductions and making Americans pay taxes on their taxes adds insult to injury.

For instance…I pay my real estate tax from money that is already taxed. For every one thousand dollars in real estate tax I am charged I pay $1,390.

Is that fair?