[quote]pushharder wrote:
Joey, baby, you and only you have shown yourself to be the paragon of stupidity. You act the inept fool here, the dunce of PWI. The juvenile ignoramus.
You couldn’t debate yourself out of a wet paper bag. Pull your cock out of your mouth and sit up straight in your desk and maybe I’ll call on you if you’re lucky.[/quote]
[quote]pushharder wrote:
What does your diagram have to do with this topic?[/quote]
Are you serious?
[quote]ironcross wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
What does your diagram have to do with this topic?[/quote]
Are you serious?[/quote]
Yes, he is. It has nothing to do with your thread. Science has no dictates for marriage or any other human relationship. So, how it is relevant to what should or shouldn’t be recognized as marriage?
[quote]joebassin wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
What does your diagram have to do with this topic?[/quote]
It shows your stupidity. [/quote]
It originally was just meant to illustrate my point regarding the different view points on the topic, but in the end, you’re right. That’s astounding.
That Bodyguard guy was right about this board.
The diagram is actually perfectly relevant here.
I have seen a lot of “ignore contradicting evidences” and “keep ideas forever” in this thread.
No, I take that back. Science does tell us that the smallest unit capable of having and raising it’s own biological children within an intact home is…the traditional state recognized marriage. Heyoooo!
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]ironcross wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
What does your diagram have to do with this topic?[/quote]
Are you serious?[/quote]
Yes, he is. It has nothing to do with your thread. Science has no dictates for marriage or any other human relationship. So, how it is relevant to what should or shouldn’t be recognized as marriage? [/quote]
It’s not pointing out science in particular; the diagram is depicting the “shove it under the carpet” mentality that those with religious ideas about many things have. That applies to this conversation, as Push is trying to side-step the whole issue by screaming “It’s rare! You’re making this up!” When the truth is, it’s real and doesn’t fit into his made up paradigm of what man and woman means and what relationships are meant to happen between people.
There is no place in the Western mindset for hermaphrodites. Therefore, you ignore them.
[quote]ironcross wrote:
[quote]joebassin wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
What does your diagram have to do with this topic?[/quote]
It shows your stupidity. [/quote]
It originally was just meant to illustrate my point regarding the different view points on the topic, but in the end, you’re right. That’s astounding.
That Bodyguard guy was right about this board. [/quote]
If he said full of right wing nuts then yes he was right.
[quote]Sloth wrote:
No, I take that back. Science does tell us that the smallest unit capable of having and raising it’s own biological children within an intact home is…the traditional state recognized marriage. Heyoooo![/quote]
Indeed.
And for those who don’t know, these sciences are called History, sociology, anthropology. And if you really need your dose of naturalistic reductionnism, you can add ethology to the list.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]ironcross wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
What does your diagram have to do with this topic?[/quote]
Are you serious?[/quote]
The fact that you are incredulous about my seriousness suggests some serious introspection on your part is needed into how to debate logically on PWI. [/quote]
Your “logical debate” consists of standard teenage insults and failing to grasp some very basic points I’ve made on this thread and others, which quite a few other people have had no trouble conceptualizing. If that’s the level of “superior logic” I’m supposed to rise to, I think I’ll pass. Thanks.
I guess this is what I get for trying to have a conversation on the internet.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]ironcross wrote:
[quote]joebassin wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
What does your diagram have to do with this topic?[/quote]
It shows your stupidity. [/quote]
It originally was just meant to illustrate my point regarding the different view points on the topic, but in the end, you’re right. That’s astounding.
That Bodyguard guy was right about this board. [/quote]
The problem isn’t whether or not that Bodyguard guy is right or wrong about this board or whether a French Canadian is kicking my ass on this forum; it’s about my nonsensically “astounding” reasoning abilities.[/quote]
Did some corrections for you
[quote]
There is no place in the Western mindset for hermaphrodites. Therefore, you ignore them. [/quote]
Nope.
We don’t ignore them. But we won’t modify a fundamental institution just for them.
Because you know, laws are here to serve the general public interest, not to please each and every individuals.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]ironcross wrote:
There is no place in the Western mindset for hermaphrodites. Therefore, you ignore them.
[/quote]
You don’t give a flying fuck about hermaphrodites. This is just a smokescreen to whine about gay marriage needing to be legalized.
[/quote]
You seem to have an obsession with gay marriage maybe you have something inside you don’t want to tell us.
[quote]kamui wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
No, I take that back. Science does tell us that the smallest unit capable of having and raising it’s own biological children within an intact home is…the traditional state recognized marriage. Heyoooo![/quote]
Indeed.
And for those who don’t know, these sciences are called History, sociology, anthropology. And if you really need your dose of naturalistic reductionnism, you can add ethology to the list. [/quote]
Lol. Science actually doesn’t tell us that. Neither of you have a very good grasp of what science tells us. In Sloth’s case, that’s okay. He’s not aspiring to understand it, but in Kamui’s case, I hope it’s the language barrier. He seems to have a higher education, yet doesn’t follow the logic of the argument like any other educated person on here does. The insult aimed at Push in the other thread is a great example.
[quote]ironcross wrote:
It’s not pointing out science in particular; the diagram is depicting the “shove it under the carpet”[/quote]
The ‘shove it under the carpet’ attitude of the pro-aborts and state recognized gay-marriage folks.
Be it
You agitate from an emotional obsession with equalizing unequal things, and not science.