I have the truth. Maybe you should start there.
England won’t win a world cup with an all black team. So there’s that.
I don’t think rugby is a fair comparison, as that is a white game played by white nations, in the main.
If there was any money in it, the US would have a team of 10-13 blacks who would utterly annihilate NZ, due to superior athleticism.
Almost every male born in America would like to play in the NFL or NBA.
It is dominated by blacks as they are athletically superior.
What do you know about males, I mean American males? NFL and NBA? What about NHL, MLB, soccer, tennis, swimming, etc.?
See, just more lies from you.
Again, this is conjecture.
Everyone I used to play rugby with that also used to play football at both the high school and division 1 collegiate level has stated that rugby takes far more athleticisim than football to play.
- I enjoy writing.
- I like talking about these topics
- I like hearing other opinions
- I like elements of trolling
- I haven’t got work for a while, so have plenty of spare time. I won’t be able to keep this up past next week latest.
But honestly, what brings me back to this thread more than anything, is to watch morally superior people tie themselves in knots. I really do find it amusing. They are so brainwashed and frightened, despite otherwise being (no doubt alot of them), super bright, inquisitive and useful people.
2%'r huh?
I think you’re the one who’s frightened because I called you on your lies.
White nationalists are truly frightened at the prospect of being outperformed by immigrants that don’t even speak the language.
Which is why you rarely see a white nationalist at the top of the ranks. Top rank guys know they can outperform people.
To be honest, I’m being pretty generous.
I posit an argument about blacks and American sports.
You respond by talking about another sport which has no American connection.
Don’t you think you should directly tackle my comment? As you haven’t.
As for “far more athleticism” I strongly disagree. The athletic capabilities of the top 100 NFL players far exceed rugby. If we are defining athleticism as speed and strength in the main (considering these are power sports).
Rugby has more endurance, due to the conflicting nature and rules of the sports.
I mentioned other sports in America. You ignored it because you were caught in another lie.
How about the NHL? Speed and technical ability are key, but the sport does not have a large African American player presence. Also, plenty of money in the NHL to be had so the money angle doesn’t hold water.
Or if we are talking endurance as a form of athleticism, why are there so few African American race car drivers at the highest levels? NASCAR drivers make tons of money and have to possess great endurance and quick reactions (like the sport or not, this is true).
This is called a non sequitur.
I am not surprised you have posted this.
A post of logical fallacies.
That’s all you have posted, besides the lies.
Entirely possible. I’m not used to EU ways of things as I’m an American. In America the high quality people are never struggling to find work.
I am personally related to a number of white nationalist AMERICANS to have direct insight to their thinking.
But feel free to show me all those white supremacists 1%'rs. I’m sure they’re out there somewhere. Theoretically
NFL and NBA are accessible to all citizens.
Anyone can go to a park with a $5 dollar ball from a young age.
NHL has barriers to entry.
On a non-sequitur point, I would love to see that put to the test. I think the outcome would suprise a lot of people (i.e. I believe the rugby players would in general perform better).
Another lie.
Same is true of soccer no?
(Edit: this was rhetorical. I was dirt poor growing up and my parents couldn’t afford to put me in peewee football so they put me in soccer, it’s far cheaper)