You’re being hysterical.
If you were near the top 2% like myself you would be able to see my tone has been humorous while making these posts. True, but still humorous.
DW I consider you to be a top 30%er you haven’t been the worst.
To be fair, in the deadlift stakes I’m probably only a top 20%er at best. Pretty weak really.
No, not that smart at all. Not the brightest, or even one of the brightest, at a decent sized suburban high school.
When you’re in the 99.9th %ile things are a little more exclusive. It’s quite obvious that this doesn’t describe you. Your parents shouldn’t have made such a fuss over what a clever boy you were. It’s gone to your head and distorted your thinking.
1 Like
It’s not funny to lie and say you’re 2% when it’s obviously much higher.
My parents unfortunately never made a fuss over my intelligence at all. My siblings are superior. Perhaps that is why I’ve become a White Supremacist.
Thank God I’m not Somalian though eh Emily, as I’d be only a top 30%er there 
I may have done myself a disservice, I’m not sure.
Maybe I am top 1%? Top 2% is fine with me though, what difference does it really make?
If you re-read his post he says “you can argue the methodology is NOT terribly valid”, which is pretty much exactly what you said here. You two are agreeing.
EDIT–The message I took from Pat’s post was that the data can say whatever it says but it’s worthless regardless of what the numbers say. Which is pretty much how I read studies. Unless I missed his post
Any of your what?
When I called you a fag, was that one of those times?
I didn’t read the rest…
That’s a great pickup line to use on women.
5 Likes
I hope the 10 minutes you have been gone were you taking a shower and phoning a doctor 
Is spelling one of them? Sorry I’m a Nazi about that stuff. I bet that changed how you feel about me.
Yuuuuge.
Bigly.
I have excellent spelling. ‘Behavior’ etc is wrong.
Lol.
Surprised to see you still on TN.
I took a few years break until recently. Everyone left and the yellow font/black background changed, much to my huge disappointment.
I’ve been here since 2005ish.
You are one of the real OGs of this site, I can’t think of many others at all still here, which is a shame.
This place used to be a serious riot, the SAMA forum alone was never ending hilarity - and then the scandals having to delete the entire fucking forum and further scandals having to delete the PM funtion. Those were the days lol.
“But you cannot argue what the data shows. You can argue the methodology is not terribly valid because of the archaic-ness of the testing with regards to IQ, but results are what they are.”
This is what pat typed. My question is, why can’t you argue what the data SHOWS?
Not in America, and what’s an etc?
Surely you know ‘etc’?
Women? Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Woman would be a great leap forward.
I know etc followed by a period.
Start a thread on women if you want. I’ve got a ton to say there too. I’ll teach you alot about them.