White Supremacy: "A Hoax"?

Currently, the two “leading” candidates for President are: a reality TV star with a hypnotic comb over, color of orange; and, a geriatric with multiple face lifts, combined with very obvious hair plugs, resulting in a man from Mars look.

Yes, White Supremacy is, indeed, “A Hoax”.

edit to add: @Mufasa

If the implication here is that both candidates are white failures, Sanders is a Jew, he is not white.

And Marx was a Jew, not German. A beer for whoever gets the reference.

2 Likes

In apartheid South Africa Jews were classified as “white”. I bet you’re aghast now after finding this about your idols.

So what?

On what basis are they my idols?

What a shitty post from you, again.

He didn’t say he was going to kill whites though. He said if necessary go to war with white nationalists. I think it’s a step to say he meant kill white people. Was the war on crime about killing criminals? Was the war on poverty about killing poor people?

It was a poor choice of words maybe but if directly asked to clarify I’m sure Bernie meant go to war with the ideas espoused by them and not use the US military to find and eliminate them. I’m also not sure why you’re holding a candidate who said that to a much higher standard than the President? We are to take it to mean that Bernie meant kill white people but meant to ignore all the inflammatory things our actual President says?

What race are Jews?

A “war on crime” doesn’t single out a group of people. Sanders explicitly did.

Sanders has repeatedly used the word “war” this weekend. It isn’t an accident. The implication is that white nationalists/whites, can and will be killed if he becomes President and deems it appropriate.

He’s a troll and/or WS.

Well I’m very curious still. I mean if I’m to be worried about a declining white majority then I need specifics. What is the proper amount of majority to you and why?

My line about the founding fathers shouldn’t be dismissed. You said the country was created for whites and I gave reasons counter to that. I think you should respond to them. I’m not sure why those things are ignored yet you point to the 1790 Act as the way it was always meant to be.

He’s a troll. Why do you expect an answer?

Troll.

Majority: i think the higher the white majority, the better.

Founding Fathers: you asked specific questions about why they didn’t create certain laws. It is impossible for me to answer that.

My point was a war on something is often used in political rhetoric. If Trump tomorrow said we are going to have a war against illegal immigration are we to take that as Trump plans on murdering anyone who tries to cross the border.

Troll…

If Trump said tomorrow we are going to have a war on crime, no one would care.

If he said the following day we are going to have a war on black criminals, there would be national riots.

You surely know this.

Troll…

You have mentioned that people get the definition of white nationalist wrong and you said that you view it as people who want to protect the nation or something similar. I’m going to post the definition again.

Webster: “one of a group of militant whites who espouse white supremacy and advocate enforced racial segregation.”

Do you think we should fight a war against people like this? I mean against the idea of this? Because I do. It would be a massive threat to our current nation if it wasn’t fairly fringe. I don’t mind people who say this type of mindset has no place in America. Do you agree?

But that’s not what I said. If tomorrow Trump said we are going to fight a war against illegal immigration would you take it to mean he meant murder people who try to come into the country illegally?

One could certainly hope.