Define the group.
Exactly the discussion that was had in the video I posted with Rubin.
Bit sensitive zecarlo.
I didnāt accuse you of anything just asked if your were a fan of the book. Accusations may have occurred based upon your answer I will admit that.
So are you fan?
I am curious about the conspiracy theories and how true you believe them to be. Bit off topic from the original post but I would love to know.
If Iāve breached any terms of use on this forum I hope the moderators punish me accordingly.
Also zecarlo. For the future. You might want to reframe from calling a person individually a Jew or a group of people collectively as Jews. Its offensive, insensitive and rude despite the practice being common.
Instead say they are Jewish, Heās Jewish. Etc Etc. Hope that helps you be a better person as you navigate the world in this confusing and trying time.
1 Like
Perhaps they possess genes that causes lower levels of myelination in their neurons compared to other groups so action potentials travel at a slightly slower velocity. Intelligence is highly pleiotropic though so it could be a multitude of genetic differences.
Not everything is a byproduct of social construction. Some things just are for reasons outside mans control.
āLet me rephrase then. I doubt the history of the USA, with an emphasis on black history, is his strong suit. Now, if he took the time to learn more about it, given he is a smart man, he might formulate better arguments, or even change his mind.ā
So since he disagrees with you he is uneducated but if he agrees with you then he is a smart man. Makes a whole lotta sense.
A number of individuals.
No, you made an accusation, own it.
I have read the Protocols because my Masterās thesis dealt with the Holocaust and conspiracy theories regarding the Jews.
You would be wrong.
I didnāt ask to define the word group but define who is the group made up of.
I actually didnāt zecarlo. Suspecting something and probing by asking your opinion of something in response to that suspicion does not equal an accusation.
What did you think of the book then? Since you have read it. I really would love to know. The fact that you donāt flat out denounce it could be considered by many to be tacit affirmation that you may perhaps consider the contents of that book to be true or if not the contents then at the very least the sentiment. Wouldnāt be an unreasonable of them.
Wrong on what?
I am eager for more elaboration on your part. Really interested in your response. Of course we are all busy so I hope you add more when you have the time.
Again, you are making accusations and I am once again notifying the moderators.
zecarlo. Why are you so soft buddy.
Why are you so upset?
Am I to assume this is the end of our discussion? I know it was littered with a few rabbit holes but I was enjoying it.
Well its been fun. Toodaloo zecaraloo.
2 Likes
You accusing me of antisemitism for being critical of Jordan Peterson is a sign that youāre the one who is soft and upset. But, you donāt have many tools in your intellectual toolbox.
No actually it didnāt come from your criticism of Peterson but it was from your response regarding Shapiro. But again to be CLEAR what you are calling my āaccusationā is not a result of any criticism regarding Peterson, Shapiro or any intellectual for that matter. I shall explain below. Try to make it clear.
You mentioned something about forces behind slavery lingering past emancipation and then you mentioned forces behind segregation lingering past the civil rights movement. Which is a fair point to an extent.
Thats why I mentioned forces behind the Holocaust/ww2 persisting after fall of Berlin. That would be absurd to think Nazis are hiding in shadows or if they are they certainly are not having a major roll in geo politics today. Thats the comparison I was trying to make to your point.
But something you added in your response piqued my curiosity.
This right here : āThe Nazis are gone. But if you look at contemporary conspiracy theories, many contain references to the Rothschilds and the Jews.ā
Hmm what does zecarlo mean by this.
I was very curious as to what you meant by this exactly hence why I asked your opinion on a certain piece of literature.
So as you can see it has nothing to do with your opinion or Peterson or Shapiro. Its absurd that you even attempt to make that claim. Its such a stretch. All you have to do is scroll up and take 2 minutes to read the conversation.
I call you soft because I am asking simple questions that should have simple obvious answers. But you seem to refuse to answer them. I wonāt prob any more. Clearly you donāt want to discuss it. More then willing to go back to the main subject matter. But if you want to answer the question I still would love to know.
I stated a fact about modern conspiracy theories. The Nazis are gone yet, the same forces that were behind the antisemitism then, and before the nazis existed, still exist. There is nothing to read into that, it is a fact, there is no what do I mean by that.
And you didnāt simply ask what I meant. I get it, you canāt keep up so you make accusations, it doesnāt mean Iāll let you get away with it. Being weak intellectually or not educated enough is not a free pass for slander and defamation. Not everyone will agree with you. The smarter they are, the less likely they will. The fact you are not that bright is nothing to be ashamed of. It doesnāt make you a bad person. Being disingenuous however, does make you a bad person.
And here is why you are a liar. You say you didnāt accuse me of antisemitism yet want me to defend myself against that claim.
Well zecarlo.
The forces still exist but what are they managing to accomplish? There will always be anti semites and racists. But as a movement collectively what are they accomplishing?
I was just curious as to which conspiracy theories and if you believed them because the ones I am aware of are generally considered erroneous by most academics and lay people.
I never made an accusation. If you had said āIāve read The protocols of the Elders of Zion and I agree with the ideas put forth itā Then maybe I might have made such an accusation.
The closest I came accusing you of anything was my claim that some could possibly consider your refusal to dismiss the book as garbage as a tacit affirmation that you do believe in the ideas held in it.
All I asked was your opinion of the book. Based upon your response to my forces behind ww2 comment.
I am not unintelligent nor uneducated nor am disingenuous.
Or maybe I am because I donāt agree with you.
No, you are simply because you are.
1 Like
White privilege and aliens are the same Iād say.
Everyone talks about them.
Some people claim they seen them.
Some people claim they exist.
Yet thereās no any solid evidence it actually existsā¦
2 Likes
I finally figured out how to quote. Guess I am not that unintelligent. Again I am just so curious I canāt help myself. What I feel like you are saying in the first paragraph above is that the Jewish people where behind the anti-Semitism prior to ww2 and after. Essential that ww2/Holocaust was manufactured by Jewish peoples? Is my interpretation correct? Is that something you believe zecarlo.