White Kids Shot

Off Topic
42

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
Same reason that Cain Velasquez can parade around on national TV with a 20" long “BROWN PRIDE” tattoo on his chest and no one says a damn word, but if any top white athlete ever showed up to game day with a giant “white pride” tattoo he’d instantly be labeled a racist and his career would be over. We’re always gonna be wrong.
[/quote]

Because “Brown Pride” does not refer to a race but a mixture of races. Also, it is in reaction to oppression and prejudice whereas White Pride is an expression linked to oppression. Of course, if someone had an Irish, Italian, Polish, etc., pride tattoo no one would care, now would they? Maybe someday we’ll see someone sporting one of those tattoos.

43

[quote]SLAINGE wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
This should be obvious why we don’t hear about white beingkilled by other races.

If we all saw it documented there would be a glaring weakness in “white knight” armor. Think about it this way, a bully is a bully because no one has SEEN him get his/her ass kicked. That leads most to believe it CANT be done. This results in easier “control” of the surroundings for the bully.

Its really all about keeping up appearances, some whitepeople will be sacrificed and forgotten to do so…

keeping the idea of superiority alive by never acknowledging weaknesses…and when a weakness cannot be ignored turn it into an act of martyrdom

White people talk crazy to blacks/other minorities for this reason…they dont expect retaliation because they never see it.

as a black dude, I’ve been warned through every book in my school system and documentary that if I ever “ste out of line” I can be burned alive, hung from a tree, or have my eyes cut out…and the world will keep spinning

so, we dont hear about white suffering by whites’ own doing…

[/quote]
Wut?[/quote]

I double that Wut?

There’s some broad generalisations right there wow…[/quote]
Dare I say the original post smacks of racism?

44

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
Same reason that Cain Velasquez can parade around on national TV with a 20" long “BROWN PRIDE” tattoo on his chest and no one says a damn word, but if any top white athlete ever showed up to game day with a giant “white pride” tattoo he’d instantly be labeled a racist and his career would be over. We’re always gonna be wrong.
[/quote]

Because “Brown Pride” does not refer to a race but a mixture of races. Also, it is in reaction to oppression and prejudice whereas White Pride is an expression linked to oppression. Of course, if someone had an Irish, Italian, Polish, etc., pride tattoo no one would care, now would they? Maybe someday we’ll see someone sporting one of those tattoos. [/quote]
We so we go from thumbs up for a slogan referring to latinos in general being ok to whites needing to specify which particular lineage they are proud of?

45

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
Same reason that Cain Velasquez can parade around on national TV with a 20" long “BROWN PRIDE” tattoo on his chest and no one says a damn word, but if any top white athlete ever showed up to game day with a giant “white pride” tattoo he’d instantly be labeled a racist and his career would be over. We’re always gonna be wrong.
[/quote]

Because “Brown Pride” does not refer to a race but a mixture of races. Also, it is in reaction to oppression and prejudice whereas White Pride is an expression linked to oppression. Of course, if someone had an Irish, Italian, Polish, etc., pride tattoo no one would care, now would they? Maybe someday we’ll see someone sporting one of those tattoos. [/quote]
We so we go from thumbs up for a slogan referring to latinos in general being ok to whites needing to specify which particular lineage they are proud of?[/quote]
Brown Pride does not refer to Latinos in general so your conclusion is wrong.

46

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
Same reason that Cain Velasquez can parade around on national TV with a 20" long “BROWN PRIDE” tattoo on his chest and no one says a damn word, but if any top white athlete ever showed up to game day with a giant “white pride” tattoo he’d instantly be labeled a racist and his career would be over. We’re always gonna be wrong.
[/quote]

Because “Brown Pride” does not refer to a race but a mixture of races. Also, it is in reaction to oppression and prejudice whereas White Pride is an expression linked to oppression. Of course, if someone had an Irish, Italian, Polish, etc., pride tattoo no one would care, now would they? Maybe someday we’ll see someone sporting one of those tattoos. [/quote]
We so we go from thumbs up for a slogan referring to latinos in general being ok to whites needing to specify which particular lineage they are proud of?[/quote]
Brown Pride does not refer to Latinos in general so your conclusion is wrong. [/quote]
Enlighten me.

47

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Gettnitdone wrote:
I’m sorry but white people make up like what, 75% of the population in the United States? Like I’ve said countless times, violence against Caucasians will never be seen as the same as violence against minorities as long as white people are the majority. It’s a game of numbers and history of minority oppression. Not to mention that white colonization still has a lingering subconscious trace in the cranium of society.

Is it right? Fuck no but it explains why there is ‘hypocrisy.’

Think of it psychologically. When a white man attacks a black man out of prejudice he is acting on an oppression impulse. When a black man attacks a white man out of prejudice he does it for ‘liberty.’ Hate is hate and nether can be tolerated in a civilized society but the hypocrisy angle assumes we live in a perfect world. We don’t.

/Thread[/quote]

/thread[/quote]

Bravo
/thread!

48

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
Same reason that Cain Velasquez can parade around on national TV with a 20" long “BROWN PRIDE” tattoo on his chest and no one says a damn word, but if any top white athlete ever showed up to game day with a giant “white pride” tattoo he’d instantly be labeled a racist and his career would be over. We’re always gonna be wrong.
[/quote]

Because “Brown Pride” does not refer to a race but a mixture of races. Also, it is in reaction to oppression and prejudice whereas White Pride is an expression linked to oppression. Of course, if someone had an Irish, Italian, Polish, etc., pride tattoo no one would care, now would they? Maybe someday we’ll see someone sporting one of those tattoos. [/quote]
We so we go from thumbs up for a slogan referring to latinos in general being ok to whites needing to specify which particular lineage they are proud of?[/quote]
Brown Pride does not refer to Latinos in general so your conclusion is wrong. [/quote]

I wouldn’t have an issue with it if it did.

Audio’s beef is with the Klan and the other Hate groups who adopted “White Pride” as a slogan for hate. Is it fair no but take that up with the people marching waving Nazi Flags and yelling " White Pride"

Not every issue is the fault of the Media.

50

For the record, my actual opinion is that pride in a racial/ethnic/skin color group is hilarious. So what, you were born. Good job being a sperm.

You are proud of things you do, create, organization membership you earned your way in to et cetera. The person you are based on the things you have done and do that make you you, not whose jizz hit whose egg. If that is a source of pride for you, get a fucking hobby or do something worthwhile. I mean that’s like bottom barrel shit.

I want to play the conjecture game too though, in light of white pride being wrong and brown pride being perfectly ok. If you can’t see sarcasm peppered through out, fuck your retarded brain:

Simply put, white people are the most awesome. Just like Rock said. In the world at large, we are definitely a minority. You know, whites vs. other. Doesn’t matter. Through out history, our various cultures have stayed at the forefront of technological, scientific, cultural and military advances.

A boat full of like a few hundred white people stopped on the S. American continent one day and took over the whole fucking thing. N. America too. Hell, at first contact the indigenous people thought whites were God! First impressions say a lot, you know? Anyways, the gods took goods, gold, people. Foreign, unexplored territory, severely outnumbered, didn’t fucking matter. you don’t fuck with God.

Oh yeah Africa. Can’t forget about them. They were easy though, give them some alchohol and they trade their own people. Put the Colt 45 and Mad Dog down ya’ll, we’re using it as a cultural chain, kinda like aids, to keep you down. We just discussed ramping up advertising for alcohol at the lates Supreme Rulers of the Universe Secret Club Meeting, Whites Only. We are disguising our propaganda around the upcoming 4th of July holiday though, you know when everybody drinks, so it’s not so obvious we are just fucking with the brown crowd.

Asia was a little tough obviously but they were also fairly advanced so trade made more sense. Why beat up a buddy, you know? I mean there were a few exceptions but those dudes are pretty fucking tough, really strong willed.

Anyways, where ever God appeared, he not only took what he wanted, people submitted to his culture and still do. Why? Because it’s better than a mud hut and bugs for lunch. Of course you’d like a nice, engineered home, beef, beer, showers… better is just better you know? You’re welcome.

I mean it’s pretty obvious that if any group deserves collective pride it’s whites errr… God.

Just joking. We are all a random union of a sperm and an egg. It’s 2012 and what happened 400 years ago is important to learn but has absolutely no bearing on where you go and what you do today at all. Todays actions by todays people affect us in the here and now.

Lets not be retards.

51

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
Same reason that Cain Velasquez can parade around on national TV with a 20" long “BROWN PRIDE” tattoo on his chest and no one says a damn word, but if any top white athlete ever showed up to game day with a giant “white pride” tattoo he’d instantly be labeled a racist and his career would be over. We’re always gonna be wrong.
[/quote]

Because “Brown Pride” does not refer to a race but a mixture of races. Also, it is in reaction to oppression and prejudice whereas White Pride is an expression linked to oppression. Of course, if someone had an Irish, Italian, Polish, etc., pride tattoo no one would care, now would they? Maybe someday we’ll see someone sporting one of those tattoos. [/quote]
We so we go from thumbs up for a slogan referring to latinos in general being ok to whites needing to specify which particular lineage they are proud of?[/quote]
Brown Pride does not refer to Latinos in general so your conclusion is wrong. [/quote]

I wouldn’t have an issue with it if it did.

Audio’s beef is with the Klan and the other Hate groups who adopted “White Pride” as a slogan for hate. Is it fair no but take that up with the people marching waving Nazi Flags and yelling " White Pride"

Not every issue is the fault of the Media.[/quote]
Yeah, the Nazi/KKK crowd is an embarrasment if we are going to view individuals as groups based on skin color. They’re like the retarded cousin in the closet. You feel sorry for them but don’t want to be associated. And 99% of us aren’t.

Unfortunately instead of using intelligent thought, people default to these guys when they hear white pride instead of realizing, “Hey, if it makes sense for virtually all other races in the world to derive some kind of pride from their cultural history, it probably makes sense for whites too.”

Nope, that wouldn’t support the sad little woe is me world view that plagues so many minorities. Focus on the negative people!! Positive thinking is unfamiliar and scawwy!! Better to be sad and familiar.

52

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
For the record, my actual opinion is that pride in a racial/ethnic/skin color group is hilarious. So what, you were born. Good job being a sperm.

You are proud of things you do, create, organization membership you earned your way in to et cetera. The person you are based on the things you have done and do that make you you, not whose jizz hit whose egg. If that is a source of pride for you, get a fucking hobby or do something worthwhile. I mean that’s like bottom barrel shit.

I want to play the conjecture game too though, in light of white pride being wrong and brown pride being perfectly ok. If you can’t see sarcasm peppered through out, fuck your retarded brain:

Simply put, white people are the most awesome. Just like Rock said. In the world at large, we are definitely a minority. You know, whites vs. other. Doesn’t matter. Through out history, our various cultures have stayed at the forefront of technological, scientific, cultural and military advances.

A boat full of like a few hundred white people stopped on the S. American continent one day and took over the whole fucking thing. N. America too. Hell, at first contact the indigenous people thought whites were God! First impressions say a lot, you know? Anyways, the gods took goods, gold, people. Foreign, unexplored territory, severely outnumbered, didn’t fucking matter. you don’t fuck with God.

Oh yeah Africa. Can’t forget about them. They were easy though, give them some alchohol and they trade their own people. Put the Colt 45 and Mad Dog down ya’ll, we’re using it as a cultural chain, kinda like aids, to keep you down. We just discussed ramping up advertising for alcohol at the lates Supreme Rulers of the Universe Secret Club Meeting, Whites Only. We are disguising our propaganda around the upcoming 4th of July holiday though, you know when everybody drinks, so it’s not so obvious we are just fucking with the brown crowd.

Asia was a little tough obviously but they were also fairly advanced so trade made more sense. Why beat up a buddy, you know? I mean there were a few exceptions but those dudes are pretty fucking tough, really strong willed.

Anyways, where ever God appeared, he not only took what he wanted, people submitted to his culture and still do. Why? Because it’s better than a mud hut and bugs for lunch. Of course you’d like a nice, engineered home, beef, beer, showers… better is just better you know? You’re welcome.

I mean it’s pretty obvious that if any group deserves collective pride it’s whites errr… God.

Just joking. We are all a random union of a sperm and an egg. It’s 2012 and what happened 400 years ago is important to learn but has absolutely no bearing on where you go and what you do today at all. Todays actions by todays people affect us in the here and now.

Lets not be retards.

[/quote]

(J/K)
Hey if you have that much pride in your beliefs then put it on a T-shirt and wear it with PRIDE.

53

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

'Remember, according to the National Civil Rights Memorial, 40 people, many of them white, were murdered during the Civil Rights Era from 1955 to 1968 by the Klan and its racist white sympathizers.

The victims include famous cases such as Emmett Till and Medgar Evers, the Philadelphia Mississippi Murders, the Birmingham church bombings, etc. These 40 murder victims of white racism have been memorialized in stone at the National Civil Rights Memorial, in documentaries, movies, books, and in high school and college curriculum across the nation.

The 104 white victims in this post are not memorialized in stone or in documentaries, movies, books or in school curriculum because they are an embarrassment to the “liberal” dogma that forbids mention or criticism of black race hatred of whites. Therefore they have been dropped down the memory hole of “political correctness”.

And these 12 massacres do not include many of the other racist mass murders of whites by blacks such as the Zebra Killings, De Mau Mau, Yahwah Ben Yahwah Cult murders, New Orleans Sniper murders, Fountain Valley Massacre, etc, etc, which account for hundreds more white victims.

http://blackracismandracehatred.blogspot.com.au/2012/02/12-black-massacres-that-murdered-104.html[/quote]

Whats wrong SM getting bored over in PWI?

54

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
Same reason that Cain Velasquez can parade around on national TV with a 20" long “BROWN PRIDE” tattoo on his chest and no one says a damn word, but if any top white athlete ever showed up to game day with a giant “white pride” tattoo he’d instantly be labeled a racist and his career would be over. We’re always gonna be wrong.
[/quote]

Because “Brown Pride” does not refer to a race but a mixture of races. Also, it is in reaction to oppression and prejudice whereas White Pride is an expression linked to oppression. Of course, if someone had an Irish, Italian, Polish, etc., pride tattoo no one would care, now would they? Maybe someday we’ll see someone sporting one of those tattoos. [/quote]
We so we go from thumbs up for a slogan referring to latinos in general being ok to whites needing to specify which particular lineage they are proud of?[/quote]
Brown Pride does not refer to Latinos in general so your conclusion is wrong. [/quote]

I wouldn’t have an issue with it if it did.

Audio’s beef is with the Klan and the other Hate groups who adopted “White Pride” as a slogan for hate. Is it fair no but take that up with the people marching waving Nazi Flags and yelling " White Pride"

Not every issue is the fault of the Media.[/quote]
Yeah, the Nazi/KKK crowd is an embarrasment if we are going to view individuals as groups based on skin color. They’re like the retarded cousin in the closet. You feel sorry for them but don’t want to be associated. And 99% of us aren’t.

Unfortunately instead of using intelligent thought, people default to these guys when they hear white pride instead of realizing, “Hey, if it makes sense for virtually all other races in the world to derive some kind of pride from their cultural history, it probably makes sense for whites too.”

Nope, that wouldn’t support the sad little woe is me world view that plagues so many minorities. Focus on the negative people!! Positive thinking is unfamiliar and scawwy!! Better to be sad and familiar.[/quote]

Yeah I’m sure the people that used versions of the Swastika as a Yin-Yang type of symbol would be pissed to see how the Nazi’s fucked that up.

55

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
Same reason that Cain Velasquez can parade around on national TV with a 20" long “BROWN PRIDE” tattoo on his chest and no one says a damn word, but if any top white athlete ever showed up to game day with a giant “white pride” tattoo he’d instantly be labeled a racist and his career would be over. We’re always gonna be wrong.
[/quote]

Because “Brown Pride” does not refer to a race but a mixture of races. Also, it is in reaction to oppression and prejudice whereas White Pride is an expression linked to oppression. Of course, if someone had an Irish, Italian, Polish, etc., pride tattoo no one would care, now would they? Maybe someday we’ll see someone sporting one of those tattoos. [/quote]
We so we go from thumbs up for a slogan referring to latinos in general being ok to whites needing to specify which particular lineage they are proud of?[/quote]
Brown Pride does not refer to Latinos in general so your conclusion is wrong. [/quote]

I wouldn’t have an issue with it if it did.

Audio’s beef is with the Klan and the other Hate groups who adopted “White Pride” as a slogan for hate. Is it fair no but take that up with the people marching waving Nazi Flags and yelling " White Pride"

Not every issue is the fault of the Media.[/quote]
Yeah, the Nazi/KKK crowd is an embarrasment if we are going to view individuals as groups based on skin color. They’re like the retarded cousin in the closet. You feel sorry for them but don’t want to be associated. And 99% of us aren’t.

Unfortunately instead of using intelligent thought, people default to these guys when they hear white pride instead of realizing, “Hey, if it makes sense for virtually all other races in the world to derive some kind of pride from their cultural history, it probably makes sense for whites too.”

Nope, that wouldn’t support the sad little woe is me world view that plagues so many minorities. Focus on the negative people!! Positive thinking is unfamiliar and scawwy!! Better to be sad and familiar.[/quote]

Yeah I’m sure the people that used versions of the Swastika as a Yin-Yang type of symbol would be pissed to see how the Nazi’s fucked that up.
[/quote]

There are swastikas all over my house. Seriously.

56

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
Same reason that Cain Velasquez can parade around on national TV with a 20" long “BROWN PRIDE” tattoo on his chest and no one says a damn word, but if any top white athlete ever showed up to game day with a giant “white pride” tattoo he’d instantly be labeled a racist and his career would be over. We’re always gonna be wrong.
[/quote]

Because “Brown Pride” does not refer to a race but a mixture of races. Also, it is in reaction to oppression and prejudice whereas White Pride is an expression linked to oppression. Of course, if someone had an Irish, Italian, Polish, etc., pride tattoo no one would care, now would they? Maybe someday we’ll see someone sporting one of those tattoos. [/quote]

We so we go from thumbs up for a slogan referring to latinos in general being ok to whites needing to specify which particular lineage they are proud of?[/quote]
Brown Pride does not refer to Latinos in general so your conclusion is wrong. [/quote]

I wouldn’t have an issue with it if it did.

Audio’s beef is with the Klan and the other Hate groups who adopted “White Pride” as a slogan for hate. Is it fair no but take that up with the people marching waving Nazi Flags and yelling " White Pride"

Not every issue is the fault of the Media.[/quote]
Yeah, the Nazi/KKK crowd is an embarrasment if we are going to view individuals as groups based on skin color. They’re like the retarded cousin in the closet. You feel sorry for them but don’t want to be associated. And 99% of us aren’t.

Unfortunately instead of using intelligent thought, people default to these guys when they hear white pride instead of realizing, “Hey, if it makes sense for virtually all other races in the world to derive some kind of pride from their cultural history, it probably makes sense for whites too.”

Nope, that wouldn’t support the sad little woe is me world view that plagues so many minorities. Focus on the negative people!! Positive thinking is unfamiliar and scawwy!! Better to be sad and familiar.[/quote]

Yeah I’m sure the people that used versions of the Swastika as a Yin-Yang type of symbol would be pissed to see how the Nazi’s fucked that up.
[/quote]

There are swastikas all over my house. Seriously.[/quote]

I have some old Chinese prints with them on it but I’m not sure if it’s called swastika. What are yours?

57

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:
Same reason that Cain Velasquez can parade around on national TV with a 20" long “BROWN PRIDE” tattoo on his chest and no one says a damn word, but if any top white athlete ever showed up to game day with a giant “white pride” tattoo he’d instantly be labeled a racist and his career would be over. We’re always gonna be wrong.
[/quote]

Because “Brown Pride” does not refer to a race but a mixture of races. Also, it is in reaction to oppression and prejudice whereas White Pride is an expression linked to oppression. Of course, if someone had an Irish, Italian, Polish, etc., pride tattoo no one would care, now would they? Maybe someday we’ll see someone sporting one of those tattoos. [/quote]

We so we go from thumbs up for a slogan referring to latinos in general being ok to whites needing to specify which particular lineage they are proud of?[/quote]
Brown Pride does not refer to Latinos in general so your conclusion is wrong. [/quote]

I wouldn’t have an issue with it if it did.

Audio’s beef is with the Klan and the other Hate groups who adopted “White Pride” as a slogan for hate. Is it fair no but take that up with the people marching waving Nazi Flags and yelling " White Pride"

Not every issue is the fault of the Media.[/quote]
Yeah, the Nazi/KKK crowd is an embarrasment if we are going to view individuals as groups based on skin color. They’re like the retarded cousin in the closet. You feel sorry for them but don’t want to be associated. And 99% of us aren’t.

Unfortunately instead of using intelligent thought, people default to these guys when they hear white pride instead of realizing, “Hey, if it makes sense for virtually all other races in the world to derive some kind of pride from their cultural history, it probably makes sense for whites too.”

Nope, that wouldn’t support the sad little woe is me world view that plagues so many minorities. Focus on the negative people!! Positive thinking is unfamiliar and scawwy!! Better to be sad and familiar.[/quote]

Yeah I’m sure the people that used versions of the Swastika as a Yin-Yang type of symbol would be pissed to see how the Nazi’s fucked that up.
[/quote]

There are swastikas all over my house. Seriously.[/quote]

I have some old Chinese prints with them on it but I’m not sure if it’s called swastika. What are yours?[/quote]

Decorative art, stickers on cooking ware, religious stuff… it’s a big part of Indian culture.

From my understanding, Hitler adopted the Swastika from Indians.

The word Swastika itself derives from an ancient Indian language called Sanskrit.

58

It’s not the same Swastika though, Hitler modified it by tilting it.

59

[quote]therajraj wrote:
It’s not the same Swastika though, Hitler modified it by tilting it.[/quote]

I also hear some Native americans have a version.

I was asked about my print in my office once by a nephew. “did the Chinese have Nazis”. Hahahaha "NO

One dumb ass group fucked it up for everyone.

60

I bet there are Mexican on White murders, White on Indian, Samoan on African American, etc, etc, etc.

Why can’t you just say, “Some people do fucked up shit.” That’s all it is. Fucked up people doing fucked up things. Doesn’t matter if it’s white, black, blue or purple. Whatever motivation there is is fucking stupid. Is there going to be a trilogy of threads per “race on race” instance of violence?

There’s absolutely nothing to talk about beyond the above- Generally, the predominant instances of violence consist of little more than fucked up people doing fucked up shit.

61

[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
I bet there are Mexican on White murders, White on Indian, Samoan on African American, etc, etc, etc.

Why can’t you just say, “Some people do fucked up shit.” That’s all it is. Fucked up people doing fucked up things. Doesn’t matter if it’s white, black, blue or purple. Whatever motivation there is is fucking stupid. Is there going to be a trilogy of threads per “race on race” instance of violence?

There’s absolutely nothing to talk about beyond the above- Generally, the predominant instances of violence consist of little more than fucked up people doing fucked up shit. [/quote]

Yep. But once this gets started it snowballs because people don’t want to feel left out.

It’ll die down soon…then start over again in a couple weeks…like a menstrual cycle.