[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
At the end of the day, the Anglo-American alliance is a strong one, and I am proud to be a part of it.
The Brits were tough as iron in WWII, and the Americans of course came in to help win the day. Everyone on both sides of the pond can and should feel proud of the contributions to overcome fascism in its European cradle, rather than tut-tutting with a pissing contest.[/quote]
What is wrong with arm wrestling?
[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
What is wrong with arm wrestling?[/quote]
Nothing - as long as you don’t lose sight of the fact that you are brothers.
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
What is wrong with arm wrestling?
Nothing - as long as you don’t lose sight of the fact that you are brothers.
brothers fight all the time and one brother is definately the alpha. America certainly is the alpha brother in this relation.
Dave9
July 15, 2007, 10:24pm
64
[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
What is wrong with arm wrestling?
Nothing - as long as you don’t lose sight of the fact that you are brothers.
brothers fight all the time and one brother is definately the alpha. America certainly is the alpha brother in this relation. [/quote]
You seem pretty angry - are you on another “cycle” of animal pak II again?
Hardcore.
[quote]Dave_ wrote:
What is wrong with arm wrestling?
Nothing - as long as you don’t lose sight of the fact that you are brothers.
brothers fight all the time and one brother is definately the alpha. America certainly is the alpha brother in this relation.
You seem pretty angry - are you on another “cycle” of animal pak II again?
Hardcore.
[/quote]
Dave9
July 15, 2007, 6:55pm
66
[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
What is wrong with arm wrestling?
Nothing - as long as you don’t lose sight of the fact that you are brothers.
brothers fight all the time and one brother is definately the alpha. America certainly is the alpha brother in this relation.
You seem pretty angry - are you on another “cycle” of animal pak II again?
Hardcore.
Nope.
Such vicious “pak rage”. Tut.
[quote]Dave_ wrote:
What is wrong with arm wrestling?
Nothing - as long as you don’t lose sight of the fact that you are brothers.
brothers fight all the time and one brother is definately the alpha. America certainly is the alpha brother in this relation.
You seem pretty angry - are you on another “cycle” of animal pak II again?
Hardcore.
Nope.
Such vicious “pak rage”. Tut.
[/quote]
I’m neither currently using the pak nor raging.
You on the other hand seem to be a little over sensitive. Take it easy on the soy. Try to read a little more comprehensively as well.
[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
brothers fight all the time and one brother is definately the alpha. America certainly is the alpha brother in this relation. [/quote]
I don’t quite know if you would know what was an “Alpha” and what wasn’t. You seem patently unqualified.
[quote]Dave_ wrote:
You seem pretty angry - are you on another “cycle” of animal pak II again?
Hardcore.[/quote]
Heheh.
Looks like Texasguy1 got all spent polluting other forums, so he brought his douchebaggery to an already subpar Poilitics forum.
But then, anyone “raging” on Animal Pak needs an outlet for all that “power”.
:>
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
brothers fight all the time and one brother is definately the alpha. America certainly is the alpha brother in this relation.
I don’t quite know if you would know what was an “Alpha” and what wasn’t. You seem patently unqualified.
[/quote]
Show me where it was illegal please. What is the name of the law that banned the then confederacy from withdrawing and when was it passed?
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
You seem pretty angry - are you on another “cycle” of animal pak II again?
Hardcore.
Heheh.
Looks like Texasguy1 got all spent polluting other forums, so he brought his douchebaggery to an already subpar Poilitics forum.
But then, anyone “raging” on Animal Pak needs an outlet for all that “power”.
:>[/quote]
Which law banned the south’s withdrawel again? apparently, according to you, there was one. you are claiming it existed yet you can’t produce it…
[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
Which law banned the south’s withdrawel again? apparently, according to you, there was one. you are claiming it existed yet you can’t produce it…[/quote]
Hey, genius - wrong thread.
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
brothers fight all the time and one brother is definately the alpha. America certainly is the alpha brother in this relation.
I don’t quite know if you would know what was an “Alpha” and what wasn’t. You seem patently unqualified.
[/quote]
So far it just sounds like you are throwing around baseless accusations with ridiculous semantically subjective arguments.
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Which law banned the south’s withdrawel again? apparently, according to you, there was one. you are claiming it existed yet you can’t produce it…
Hey, genius - wrong thread.
[/quote]
Technically so is the your animal stak reference then. Way to be hypocritical.
The burden of proof is on you. What law banned the south’s actions?
[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
Technically so is the your animal stak reference then. Way to be hypocritical.
The burden of proof is on you. What law banned the south’s actions? [/quote]
Seek out the proper thread - you really aren’t that bright, are you?
And read more carefully - I said you were unqualified to comment on what is an “Alpha” and what isn’t.
Dave9
July 15, 2007, 11:56pm
76
[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
Which law banned the south’s withdrawel again? apparently, according to you, there was one. you are claiming it existed yet you can’t produce it…
Hey, genius - wrong thread.
Owned!!!
[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
I started the animalpak II reference, and was merely making the point that someone who thinks that such a product can whack 10lbs on them in a week (or whatever it was) is obviously a dimwitted fruitloop.
Good day.