[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
I’m not taking a position on the whole video-taping deal, but if you’re in public, there is no expectation of privacy, no right of privacy, and therefore no crime…unless you’re trying to film up a girl’s skirt for instance.[/quote]
I agree, there’s no expectation of privacy in public. However, that doesn’t excuse dickhead moves like inconspicuously videotaping someone for the sole purpose of anonymously ridiculing them on the Internet. Just because it isn’t against the law or anything like that doesn’t make it right.[/quote]
The moment you video tape it and add negative remarks or statements about that person, it becomes more than just a random video tape of the public. If it can be considered “defamation of character”, you can be sued for it.[/quote]
Weeeeeellllllll, I think it has to get really, really nasty before defamation of character, from a strictly legal standpoint, becomes the case. Don’t quote me, but I think defamation of character, in the eyes of the law, is very similar to slander and libel cases in that the plaintiff would have to prove that they’ve suffered some sort of monetary damage as a direct result of the “defamation”.
But I agree with your basic point and the legality of the whole thing is almost secondary, really. Like you mentioned earlier, I like Nards as well but I really can’t get behind some of the videotaping stuff. Is it funny? Sure as shit. But it kind of loses its humor when you consider how exactly it is that the videotape got on the Internet in the first place.