[quote]TigerTime wrote:
Theories as to why?[/quote]
It looks like a fake study, as all the links went back to this one source.
I will say the Afgans looked down on men without beards, and beards were helpful in combating face chapness/Sun exposure.
For the record, despite the myth that American Indians cannot grow beards, we can (they do tend to be crappy), and I did have a mighty beard.
(As an aside, boys without beards are fair game for gay sex in that area and it was considered “not gay” to fuck them in the ass. So, if captured, cleanly shorn HoustonGuy would have been ridden hard an put away wet.)[/quote]
I wouldn’t have been captured. Even if I was, the only fucking would be me banging their wives, mothers, sisters and daughters.[/quote]
I would have rather fucked my horse.[/quote]
It would’ve been a show of dominance only, which makes it not gross, amiright?
[quote]tonypluto wrote:
This reminds me of something The Onion would write.
Is any of it serious or is it all a joke?
Either way I’m not shaving.[/quote]
Dude, it is 100% a joke. From their website:
“The Duffel Blog is an interesting and funny look at military life. We focus on veterans, military stories, defense, politics (sometimes) and life on base with a comedic twist. We are in no way, shape, or form, a real news outlet. Just about everything on this website is satirical in nature.”