Wang Waving & Pointless Arguements

Wait…so Satan is in charge of dicks?

While I agree with the OP I think the deterioration here is just a reflection of the deterioration everywhere. I remember my shock when I first started working with my current employer. The stress there is unbelievable. Management’s made up of people who just enjoy pushing people around (they would have been cops but where we work they’re a little less likely to get shot at) and everyone snitches on everyone else about the dumbest things. And these are adults, most over the age of 40. One can only imagine how they’ve raised their children to behave or how they themselves behave when they post on message boards.

When I first started on the job I was in a daze over all the stuff going on around me, it was so unusual. Ten years later, the disease has spread and it seems my workplace is no longer the exception regarding rude and nasty behavior. I know some here think I’m a nut about manners (I recall being called “mom”) but I think a lack of civility (along with an inability to accept other viewpoints) is a clue that our society is heading back to the dark ages. I know at times I’ve been guilty too, but I really wish we could all stop being so quick to react before considering whether we really want to contribute to the decline.

For what it’s worth, I recall when I started reading/posting back in 2005, there were similar discussions. Regulars would complain about the site catering to a wider range of people, a new wave of posters lacking insight, focus, manners or whatever. They’d dream about the ‘golden age’ when Goldberg, Patrizia and whoever else still posted and discussions were respectful and to the point. Ever since, in periodic intervals, the topic comes up and has lead among other things to the implementation of the T-Cell Alpha.

Due to time constraints I haven’t been posting as much as I used to in the last few months, but that is not the point. The way I see it, change is inevitable. Some changes may be for the better, others for the worse. I don’t see much use in complaining other than maybe suggestions how some technical aspects of the site can be improved, though.

This is an internet forum more or less accessible to everyone and this isn’t going to change. In a perfect world, these options wouldn’t be needed, but I guess it boils down to ignoring obnoxious posts or posters, arguing with them - in rare cases even changing their minds - or clowning them until they go away. Apart from that, while some of the drama and bickering may painful to read, some of it is great for comic release. SrJoker comes to mind as a recent example.

While I definitely consider this site more than a bunch of text by random, anonymous internet-personae, it bears questioning how seriously one should take arguments and insults by some person you will never meet in ‘real life’ and who is obviously just trying to get a rise out of you or the regulars as a whole.

By the way, the picture above is ‘The Golden Age’ by Lucas Cranach the Elder.

In the center, you can see Holy Mac trying to set up a MMF.

The guy in the bottom right corner looking like a dear in the headlights is a member of the class of 09 who has just been informed that you have to eat food in order to build muscle mass.

Bottom left is Jack Urboady in the process of ‘banging a bird from the internet’.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Wait…so Satan is in charge of dicks?[/quote]

I guess so, maybe I should have been nicer to him, then I woulda got the 13 inch monster.

is that imhungry in the top center?

YEah I don’t really pay much attention to who it is who says what because it mostly turns into the same dumb shit anyway.

Perhaps it is the changing of the times and there are alot of younger guys here and whatever siren was saying. As for changing things around here??? Like chicken I have a job and life to attend to so trying to point out the stupid douchebaggetry everytime it pops up on here in an effort to make things less retarded and more useful is not something that’s going ot happen. I’m more likely going to go with what the long haired jerkof posted keep to reading the articles that interest me.

BTW siren if you are actually working with people in LE and are suprised that they are mostly worthless dicklickling dbags then you are more part of the problem then you realize. If that’s not the case then I appologize for the misinterpretation of what you posted (and the potential mispelling of the word misinterpretation).

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
is that imhungry in the top center?[/quote]

No, it’s the King of Beasts: The Lion!

Tigers were relegated to an inferior status below lions… because they couldn’t grow a mane.

lol

[quote]michael2507 wrote:
For what it’s worth, I recall when I started reading/posting back in 2005, there were similar discussions. Regulars would complain about the site catering to a wider range of people, a new wave of posters lacking insight, focus, manners or whatever. They’d dream about the ‘golden age’ when Goldberg, Patrizia and whoever else still posted and discussions were respectful and to the point. Ever since, in periodic intervals, the topic comes up and has lead among other things to the implementation of the T-Cell Alpha.

[/quote]

FWIW, sometimes I think society’s decline is a perpetual or at least cyclical thing.

Back in high school a teacher read to us from this letter a man wrote to a friend complaining that his teenage son was rebelling and fucking up his life big-time. He went on to say that the way the majority of young people were acting these days, it would be a wonder if society didn’t collapse in the next few years.

Then came the shocker: the teacher revealed that the letter was by some ancient Roman, like Cicero or Marcus Aurelius!

On the other hand, the stupidity that used to be mostly confined to those under 20 does seem to be spreading to much older people… So there is cause for alarm.

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
is that imhungry in the top center?[/quote]

No, it’s the King of Beasts: The Lion!

Tigers were relegated to an inferior status below lions… because they couldn’t grow a mane.

lol[/quote]

Bullshit!

It’s because tigers knew that having a mane is so 80’s and it’s not very conducive to killing things, as it’s not very streamlined.

They could grow a mane if they WANTED to. Lions with big manes are just compensating, anyway.

[quote]Doc L wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]ALA wrote:

I don’t think a chicken-tiger relationship would work out. I don’t see how intercourse would work.[/quote]

Me and Chicken’s relationship is more spiritual, than physical.

Thanks for your concern, though.[/quote]

Ah no good, no good at all. Tiger and Rooster not a good match. Much miscommunication. (According to the chinese zodiac anyway.)

[/quote]
Hungry and I communicate just fine, thank you very much!

Wideguy just wanted to come in here and swipe his Cialis pine all around.

DB

Here’s a picture of Wang actually waving.

[quote]WideGuy wrote:
YEah I don’t really pay much attention to who it is who says what because it mostly turns into the same dumb shit anyway.

Perhaps it is the changing of the times and there are alot of younger guys here and whatever siren was saying. As for changing things around here??? Like chicken I have a job and life to attend to so trying to point out the stupid douchebaggetry everytime it pops up on here in an effort to make things less retarded and more useful is not something that’s going ot happen. I’m more likely going to go with what the long haired jerkof posted keep to reading the articles that interest me.

BTW siren if you are actually working with people in LE and are suprised that they are mostly worthless dicklickling dbags then you are more part of the problem then you realize. If that’s not the case then I appologize for the misinterpretation of what you posted (and the potential mispelling of the word misinterpretation).[/quote]

What’s “LE”?

[quote]Billy Whizz wrote:

[quote]atapene wrote:
i’ve only been reading these forums relatively recently, but one thing that does get a bit boring sometimes is how every thread that slides into the gutter follows pretty much the same path.

someone gets annoyed at someone else… maybe an insult or inference and then a retaliation. then everyone calls the other guy a homosexual, and likely a few others chime in with new and amusing ways to call everyone else a homo.

its like someone spills someones beer in the bar, they get aggro at each other, then go outside to sort it out like men… in the kiddies playground. i find this kinda weird. are people still just used to using words like fag and gay as insults because they did when they were kids before they knew better? or are there just huge numbers of homophobes out there?

there are just so many other interesting and hilarious pathways for insults to follow which i dont think are getting as much recognition as they should.[/quote]

Shut your dick-loving mouth.[/quote]

this of course was the correct response to my post.

[quote]SirenSong61 wrote:

[quote]WideGuy wrote:
YEah I don’t really pay much attention to who it is who says what because it mostly turns into the same dumb shit anyway.

Perhaps it is the changing of the times and there are alot of younger guys here and whatever siren was saying. As for changing things around here??? Like chicken I have a job and life to attend to so trying to point out the stupid douchebaggetry everytime it pops up on here in an effort to make things less retarded and more useful is not something that’s going ot happen. I’m more likely going to go with what the long haired jerkof posted keep to reading the articles that interest me.

BTW siren if you are actually working with people in LE and are suprised that they are mostly worthless dicklickling dbags then you are more part of the problem then you realize. If that’s not the case then I appologize for the misinterpretation of what you posted (and the potential mispelling of the word misinterpretation).[/quote]

What’s “LE”?[/quote]

Law Enforcement.

AKA the other gang in blue.

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
actually, i’m kinda curious where in PA you’re located hungry. you don’t have to give me your exact address, just a ballpark figure. I’m from outside of Reading.[/quote]

I work in West Chester and live about 15 minutes outside both Philly and Delaware.

I know you weren’t looking for my exact address, Worm. Sheesh. Kids egos these days… [/quote]

We are practically neighbors…I can see the Commodore Barry from my land…

Someone mused how to change things? I have the single answer for you to change everything for the better. The following is not even subject to serious debate. Want a respectful forum? Real names, city, state. 98% of the dumb shit goes bye bye in key strokes of disclosure.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
Someone mused how to change things? I have the single answer for you to change everything for the better. The following is not even subject to serious debate. Want a respectful forum? Real names, city, state. 98% of the dumb shit goes bye bye in key strokes of disclosure.[/quote]

Why don’t you be the first to use this revolutionary idea and post your full name and address.

Tard.