Walking Dead Season 3

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
You guys are out of your fucking minds. Maggie is smoking hot. This is e-standards at its finest.[/quote]

Nothing hot about Maggie at all. Her sister is ugly as hell too.

Lori on the other hand…dimepiece.

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
You guys are out of your fucking minds. Maggie is smoking hot. This is e-standards at its finest.[/quote]

QFT

Fuck all y’all saying otherwise. Maggie is gorgeous.[/quote]

You’re crazy. This is the difference between attractive and gorgeous.

Only to someone with mediocre standards would Maggie be considered gorgeous.

Or in a post-apocalyptic world where the undead roam the earth and hot women are few in number. So in the Walking Dead world, perhaps she could be smoking hot; but in real life, no.

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
You guys are out of your fucking minds. Maggie is smoking hot. This is e-standards at its finest.[/quote]

She’s attractive; no way she’s smoking hot.
[/quote]

This. That said, maybe in comparison to the other women on the show she’s hot.

[quote]super saiyan wrote:
Also, it’s season 3 and I just found out that Rick is really British. WTF?[/quote]
So is Maggie.

[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:
Also, it’s season 3 and I just found out that Rick is really British. WTF?[/quote]
So is Maggie.

[/quote]

I just realized that maggie is lauren cohan that was on supernatural, now I have 50% more boner power.

Strange…not sure how I feel about this episode.

Is the portrayal of the governor in line with the comics?

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
Is the portrayal of the governor in line with the comics?[/quote]

Well the comics went straight from “Hello” to “Yes, I am Bat-Shit-Crazy” in the span of a page and a half.

[quote]super saiyan wrote:
Maggie isn’t hot, but she’s not fat.
[/quote]

It depends on the presentation, I suspect.

FWIW, Lauren Cohan’s not only a Brit, but Jewish (tribe of Levy, most likely), which make it really funny she’s playing a country preacher-type daughter.

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:
Maggie isn’t hot, but she’s not fat.
[/quote]

It depends on the presentation, I suspect.

FWIW, Lauren Cohan’s not only a Brit, but Jewish (tribe of Levy, most likely), which make it really funny she’s playing a country preacher-type daughter.[/quote]

If you think that is funny you would have loved her character in Supernatural. Still Hot. Evil or Corn Fed.

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
Is the portrayal of the governor in line with the comics?[/quote]

Well the comics went straight from “Hello” to “Yes, I am Bat-Shit-Crazy” in the span of a page and a half.
[/quote]

Yeah with last night’s episode I went from “this guy seems pretty cool” to “well, that’s fucked up but I can understand why you’d do it” to “holy shit this dude is nuts and the girls are in serious trouble.”

I guess I question why would you want to take out heavily trained people that can help protect your place, unless you think they would be a threat. But, why would they be a threat.

oh, and what’s in the tea?

Maybe it will be explained later, but why kill the troops? They could have added valuable manpower. Or perhaps he had beheaded the LT beforehand and didnt want the trouble.

It really makes me wonder, what ARE they doing with those corpses?

I wonder how Merle is going to develop as time goes on. I guess I am pretty interested in how they set up Woodbury with all that baggage (women and kids, non trained) and effectively managed its creation and fortification.

What happens when someone drowns in their bathtub, or dies of natural causes, which in that case, they would turn. Damn, I want to wikipedia the shit out of this right now.

FWIW Maggie is banging.

[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
I guess I question why would you want to take out heavily trained people that can help protect your place, unless you think they would be a threat. But, why would they be a threat.[/quote]

To take their weapons and ammo without having more mouths to feed and greater competition for women.

[quote]Jackie_Jacked wrote:

[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
I guess I question why would you want to take out heavily trained people that can help protect your place, unless you think they would be a threat. But, why would they be a threat.[/quote]

To take their weapons and ammo without having more mouths to feed and greater competition for women.
[/quote]

Makes sense, but so does having trained people. Then again, when you’re a corrupt society you really don’t want soldiers I guess

[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:

[quote]Jackie_Jacked wrote:

[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
I guess I question why would you want to take out heavily trained people that can help protect your place, unless you think they would be a threat. But, why would they be a threat.[/quote]

To take their weapons and ammo without having more mouths to feed and greater competition for women.
[/quote]

Makes sense, but so does having trained people. Then again, when you’re a corrupt society you really don’t want soldiers I guess[/quote]

They are Trained. They may also still have morals. I’m not sure what direction they will take the TV version of the GOV. But the comic version was more like a Hitler-Jim Jones mix than anything else.

[quote]Jackie_Jacked wrote:

[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
I guess I question why would you want to take out heavily trained people that can help protect your place, unless you think they would be a threat. But, why would they be a threat.[/quote]
To take their weapons and ammo without having more mouths to feed and greater competition for women. [/quote]
I think it is easy to see that many trained men with allegiance to their commander vs your “governor” as a threat. What I think is sadistic is that they went out of their way to kill them. It’s one thing to not allow them access to your town and if things get dicey to shot them but actively seeking out survivors to pillage is entirely separate.

And like Jackie said, man/woman ratio should be kept in check if you want to run a community.

[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:

[quote]Jackie_Jacked wrote:

[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
I guess I question why would you want to take out heavily trained people that can help protect your place, unless you think they would be a threat. But, why would they be a threat.[/quote]

To take their weapons and ammo without having more mouths to feed and greater competition for women.
[/quote]

Makes sense, but so does having trained people. Then again, when you’re a corrupt society you really don’t want soldiers I guess[/quote]

I’m sure that is a part of it too. The military would automatically assume power and if you refuse to be called anything but Governor, I don’t doubt there is a huge ego and a fear of being removed from his throne.

[quote]JLone wrote:

[quote]Jackie_Jacked wrote:

[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
I guess I question why would you want to take out heavily trained people that can help protect your place, unless you think they would be a threat. But, why would they be a threat.[/quote]
To take their weapons and ammo without having more mouths to feed and greater competition for women. [/quote]
I think it is easy to see that many trained men with allegiance to their commander vs your “governor” as a threat. What I think is sadistic is that they went out of their way to kill them. It’s one thing to not allow them access to your town and if things get dicey to shot them but actively seeking out survivors to pillage is entirely separate.

And like Jackie said, man/woman ratio should be kept in check if you want to run a community. [/quote]

Absolutely a very cold way get rid of them. The Governor’s tanks were particularly disturbing.