Vick Indicted!

[quote]MikeShank wrote:

I thought the NAACP could use this situation as an opportunity to reach out to young black men on an incredibly broad front (this case has drawn the attention of all dog lovers regardless of race) and start a dialogue on how young black men can start to see that there are certain behaviors that don’t help your situation out, particularly if you are already living in a society that is in some cases stacking the cards against you to begin with. .

I think they have dropped the ball in that regards.

Thanks,
Mike Cruickshank
[/quote]

I don’t know if I see what stance you would expect the NAACP to take in Vicks case, unless they crucify him and use him as an example as the federal courts are doing.

Yes there are certian behaviours that urban violent black men participate in but how will NAACP condemning Vick really help that? If anything I would see further seperation between black youth and elders as was created by bill cosby and Oprah already. What your essentially doing is showing that their Hero, who is loved by both white and black, can’t even get a fair trial not even in the eyes of their own elder black population.

The only way I can see them possibly making any good out of this is if they let the case play out and show how having bad friends can get you in bad situations.

[quote]MikeShank wrote:
In case anybody missed it, here is a picture and a link with more info on Vick’s co defendent that has turned against him:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070731/ap_on_sp_fo_ne/fbn_vick_co_defendant;_ylt=Ai9V_58Skc.ybSgJMJ6fukTIyLQF

[/quote]

So I’m the one who’s gotta say it. sighs

STOP SNITCHIN!

[quote]MikeShank wrote:
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=207187&cl=3526195&ch=207399&src=sports

Mike Vick finally speaks out! He doesn’t really say much at all to the specifics of the case with this statement comming out only hours after one of his co defendents decided to take a plea.

What caught me the most about this video was the inclusion of the NAACP speaking out on Vick (I believe it was the Atlanta chapter, I am not sure if it involves the national office).

It is not that I don’t agree with their statement of innocent until proven guilty, I have already stated I believe that to be true, I just can’t do it but then again that is why I don’t belong on this jury.
What I found strange was the statement that Vick is being unfairly villianized for a crime he hasn’t been convicted of yet.

I bring this up because the NAACP didn’t seem to hold the same restraint in the duke rape case in which they seemed very active and didn’t seem to care much about the potential innocence of the accused.

http://www.bet.com/News/NAACP+KeepingCloseEyeonDukeCase.htm?Referrer={91C38BD6-E141-45CE-A10A-F303328FDAF3}

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/gaynor/061122
[/quote]

NAACP and ACLU are both such hypocritical organizations that I don’t ever pay attention to anything they say. You could point out their hypocritical actions all day but it would just be a waste of time.

Rawlings has now dropped vick too. Please check out the quote listed below since this seems to be a constant thread through all the sponsors who are leaving him. I don’t think it really matters at this point whether he has been convicted or not.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070801/ap_on_sp_fo_ne/fbn_vick_rawlings_3

Rawlings recognizes that Mr. Vick has not been convicted of the charges stemming from his recent indictment," the St. Louis company said. “However, we have determined that ending our relationship with Mr. Vick at this time is necessary.”

“Rawlings is disappointed about the charges brought against Mr. Vick for his alleged participation in a dogfighting operation,” the company said. “Dogfighting is illegal and entirely unacceptable to Rawlings.”

Hi Airtruth,

What is your opinion about what will happen with him if it is proven that he did more than associate with these guys? What if it is found that he had a direct hand in this and was guilty of brutally beating these dogs to death.
Will the NAACP then be compelled to condemn him more than if it was just guilt by association?

I was also surprised to see you said that he is viewed as a hero by younger kids (as I guess all sports stars are to a certain extent). What makes him a hero to black youth besides his athletic skill? I am also really surprised to hear that you think the comments of both Oprah (which I am not aware of) and Cosby have distanced the elder black community from the younger community. Can you please comment?

thanks,
Mike

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
MikeShank wrote:

I thought the NAACP could use this situation as an opportunity to reach out to young black men on an incredibly broad front (this case has drawn the attention of all dog lovers regardless of race) and start a dialogue on how young black men can start to see that there are certain behaviors that don’t help your situation out, particularly if you are already living in a society that is in some cases stacking the cards against you to begin with. .

I think they have dropped the ball in that regards.

Thanks,
Mike Cruickshank

I don’t know if I see what stance you would expect the NAACP to take in Vicks case, unless they crucify him and use him as an example as the federal courts are doing.

Yes there are certian behaviours that urban violent black men participate in but how will NAACP condemning Vick really help that? If anything I would see further seperation between black youth and elders as was created by bill cosby and Oprah already. What your essentially doing is showing that their Hero, who is loved by both white and black, can’t even get a fair trial not even in the eyes of their own elder black population.

The only way I can see them possibly making any good out of this is if they let the case play out and show how having bad friends can get you in bad situations. [/quote]

[quote]tmoney1 wrote:
MikeShank wrote:
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=207187&cl=3526195&ch=207399&src=sports

What caught me the most about this video was the inclusion of the NAACP speaking out on Vick (I believe it was the Atlanta chapter, I am not sure if it involves the national office).

It is not that I don’t agree with their statement of innocent until proven guilty, I have already stated I believe that to be true, I just can’t do it but then again that is why I don’t belong on this jury.
What I found strange was the statement that Vick is being unfairly villianized for a crime he hasn’t been convicted of yet.

Yeah I saw this about the NAACP yesterday as well. In my opinion, the NAACP has shown up to the party late. This ordeal with Vick has been going on for several weeks, and the NAACP just now decided to make a statement? The latest they should have made a statement was 2 weeks ago, but that’s just me.

I might be the only person, but I’m still saying innocent until proven guilty, and I support Vick all the way (although I DO NOT support dog fighting).

Once again Mike, no disrespect, but it seems sad to me that dogs are taking precedence over humans, and I think that’s odd.[/quote]

This is a crime. Dogs are not being given precedence over humans. They investigate crimes. Crimes involving the famous gather more media attention. What’s so hard to understand?

There are violent crimes. Paper crimes. Crimes against animals and so on.

[quote]MikeShank wrote:
Hi Airtruth,

What is your opinion about what will happen with him if it is proven that he did more than associate with these guys? What if it is found that he had a direct hand in this and was guilty of brutally beating these dogs to death.
Will the NAACP then be compelled to condemn him more than if it was just guilt by association?

I was also surprised to see you said that he is viewed as a hero by younger kids (as I guess all sports stars are to a certain extent). What makes him a hero to black youth besides his athletic skill? I am also really surprised to hear that you think the comments of both Oprah (which I am not aware of) and Cosby have distanced the elder black community from the younger community. Can you please comment?

thanks,
Mike

[/quote]

It’s funny The president of the Atlanta Chapter was on hot97 this morning, although princeton might be a few cities out of range.

To be honest about the NAACP I don’t know what stance they will take if he’s convicted. I could see them just stepping away quietly and stating that all they ever asked for was a fair trial. That would have been a great question for them to ask him this morning.

Vick is a young outstanding athlete, and as you said yourself just being an athlete alone sets you as a hero in many kids minds. Couple that with the fact that he had an extremely underprivelaged childhood and still made it. This is all he had to do to set himself as a hero. It’s not right, but as many frustrated athletes have realized its the way it is.

If I come to you and tell you your father is a criminal what is the first thing your going to say? Suppose you had no father and your heroes are athletes and rappers when somebody says something bad about them how do you expect them to act?

Oprah and Bill Cosby have way too many factors distancing themselves from the underprivelaged young black community.

  1. There old. Be honest who do you think a young person is going to accept advice from more, there father? or there GrandFather?
  2. Way too much money for way too long. Making it out of poor neighborhoods in 1950’s is way different then making it out of a poor neighborhood in the 90’s.
  3. Self-Entitlement that leads to lack of respect to young people.

Number 3 is most important, because when you say something respectfully whether correct or incorrect most people will try to listen. However, Bill Cosby and Oprah both because of 1 and 2 refuse to do this and spit in the face of the young black community.

I know many young black women raising kids by themselves, most have two jobs and the jobs they have don’t really care about what they have to do to be home for their kids.
This is a direct quote from Bill Cosby.
“I’m talking about these people who cry when their son is standing there in an orange suit. Where were you when he was two? Where were you when he was twelve? Where were you when he was eighteen, and how come you don’t know he had a pistol?”

What does this do?

  1. These kids fathers are not going to be there crying(they weren’t there), the mothers will.
  2. Your telling this mother who had to work 2 Jobs working how many hours to bring home $24000 a year living in NY/NJ area that this is her fault and stop crying. Yes she can stay home and not work but what will you say when her and her baby are homeless? To get off her ass and work? Love doesn’t pay bills, love doesn’t buy groceries.
  3. There are some ignorant people out there, by far the majority are not. Now you the previous black hero are condemning this working class mother in the same breath as all the ignorant ass people out there. Thats as bad as all the racist screaming all blacks are idiots.
  4. Killed what little self-esteem this woman has as it hurts alot more when your grandfather tells you you ain’t shit, then when some outsider does.
  5. You just told this 18 year old kid who is making right and wrong decisions in his life that his mother wasn’t there for him, and nobody loves him. Are you going to expect him to get out of jail and know what love is to raise a kid?

This can go on and on. It all boils down to this. I don’t think their intentions are wrong, but they have old people syndrome. They think they can say whatever they want because there 70.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:

I think he is being attacked because of his status. If he is guilty I want to see he suffer the maximum penalty, but it certainly appears the media and the prosecutor are setting him up as the primary target when it is likely that others were more heavily involved.

I imagine that for much of the year he does not have time to get involved in the dog fight business, although he doesn’t look like he spends much time studying the playbook.

I’m leaning toward this view also. Kind of hard to be in on the day-to-day operations of something when you live in another state and you are seen out and about on your own time and making official public appearances, i.e., charity events, filming commercials, etc.

I bring this up because the NAACP didn’t seem to hold the same restraint in the duke rape case in which they seemed very active and didn’t seem to care much about the potential innocence of the accused.

Hypocrites.

No argument there. I do hope all realize that some of these organizations and self-proclaimed leaders do not speak for everyone.
[/quote]

This post didn’t come out with my statements highlighted! Where’s the justice? Hopefully you can see what I added to it.

[quote]BLACKSMITH wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:

I think he is being attacked because of his status. If he is guilty I want to see he suffer the maximum penalty, but it certainly appears the media and the prosecutor are setting him up as the primary target when it is likely that others were more heavily involved.

I imagine that for much of the year he does not have time to get involved in the dog fight business, although he doesn’t look like he spends much time studying the playbook.

I bring this up because the NAACP didn’t seem to hold the same restraint in the duke rape case in which they seemed very active and didn’t seem to care much about the potential innocence of the accused.

Hypocrites.

No argument there. I do hope all realize that some of these organizations and self-proclaimed leaders do not speak for everyone.

/quote]
I’m leaning toward this view also. Kind of hard to be in on the day-to-day operations of something when you live in another state and you are seen out and about on your own time and making official public appearances, i.e., charity events, filming commercials, etc.

Sorry to repeat this post…hopefully this is more understandable.

[quote]BLACKSMITH wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:

I think he is being attacked because of his status. If he is guilty I want to see he suffer the maximum penalty, but it certainly appears the media and the prosecutor are setting him up as the primary target when it is likely that others were more heavily involved.

I imagine that for much of the year he does not have time to get involved in the dog fight business, although he doesn’t look like he spends much time studying the playbook.
[/quote]

I’m leaning toward this view also. Kind of hard to be in on the day-to-day operations of something when you live in another state and you are seen out and about on your own time and making official public appearances, i.e., charity events, filming commercials, etc.
[/quote]
I bring this up because the NAACP didn’t seem to hold the same restraint in the duke rape case in which they seemed very active and didn’t seem to care much about the potential innocence of the accused.

No argument there. I do hope all realize that some of these organizations and self-proclaimed leaders do not speak for everyone.

This post didn’t come out with my statements highlighted! Where’s the justice? Hopefully you can see what I added to it.

[quote]BLACKSMITH wrote:

I’m leaning toward this view also. Kind of hard to be in on the day-to-day operations of something when you live in another state and you are seen out and about on your own time and making official public appearances, i.e., charity events, filming commercials, etc.

Sorry to repeat this post…hopefully this is more understandable.[/quote]

You definitely need help with your quoting skills.

I recommend a program of 3threadsx5quoteposts a day.

I do agree with you in some respects even with his friend ratting on him. The first date they tried to get Taylor to say Vick was present, Vick had just went on injured reserve and had to be shipped off somewhere.

This guy also had beef with Vick and the other 2 since 2005

.

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
BLACKSMITH wrote:

I’m leaning toward this view also. Kind of hard to be in on the day-to-day operations of something when you live in another state and you are seen out and about on your own time and making official public appearances, i.e., charity events, filming commercials, etc.

Sorry to repeat this post…hopefully this is more understandable.

You definitely need help with your quoting skills.

I recommend a program of 3threadsx5quoteposts a day.

I do agree with you in some respects even with his friend ratting on him. The first date they tried to get Taylor to say Vick was present, Vick had just went on injured reserve and had to be shipped off somewhere.

This guy also had beef with Vick and the other 2 since 2005
[/quote]

Hey, hey, simmer down! LOL! I’m trying to function and sound intelligent on 4 hours of sleep, but a 3x5 set-rep isn’t bad.

When this trial starts, I believe more light will be shed on the motives of some and I think that the defense atty’s will bring out other things we just have not even heard of yet. I say that because the prosecution is required to put all their evidence out there (and why the indictment seems so damning), whereas the defense is not required to do so. I think this is part of the ‘discovery process’, but if there are any legal minds out there, feel free to correct me.

The NAACP was looking to string up the Duke boys because the alleged victim was black. They preach “innocent until proven guilty” in the Vick case because Vick is black.

It’s not about the victim or the defendant. It’s not about the alleged crime. For the NAACP, it’s about COLOR. That’s what the C stands for…

The NAACP, and a lot of others, need to get this point: “Innocent until proven guilty” only applies in the justice system. It does not apply to multi-million dollar endorsement deals or any other job.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:

i]
Is this what you were trying?
[/i]

[/quote]

Yes it is, thank you kindly. I’ll come back when I’ve had more sleep.

Hey Uncle Gabby, who is the blonde on the right? I know it’s Sophia Loren on the left but I can’t recognize the blonde. It’s not Marilyn Monroe; Jayne Mansfield maybe?

Just read this a few minutes ago: Reporter said that Vick would be better off raping women than being charged with dogfighting.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/football/nfl/08/01/bc.fbn.vick.reporterapo.ap/index.html


Hey Guys,

I want to thank you for all the good posts that have been contributed to this thread.

Here is my daily post, another famous Pitbull in history,

Bud!

Here is his bio:

…The first dog to travel across America in a car was a PitBull ( Bud ) and did so with the first persons ( Horatio Jackson and his assistant and “bicycle” mechanic Sewall Crocker ) to cross America in a car ( a Winton named the Vermont). Horatio later donated Bud’s goggles to the Smithsonian Institute in Washington D.C. During the trip Bud would assist in watching for large bumps in the road and often received as much if not more attention by the press than did Jackson. After the trip was completed Bud bravely guarded the Jackson home until his death of old age.

http://www.americanpitbullregistry.com/PitBull%20History.htm

[quote]tmoney1 wrote:
Just read this a few minutes ago: Reporter said that Vick would be better off raping women than being charged with dogfighting.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/football/nfl/08/01/bc.fbn.vick.reporterapo.ap/index.html [/quote]

yeah I saw that. The guy got fired, but damn he was right. Kobe had way more support than Vick.

Hey Guys,

Here is a post about the very same topic mentioned about Vick.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/si_blogs/extramustard/10_spot/2007/08/is-mike-vick-outrage-out-of-proportion.html

This guy is a little more tame with his analogies.