Uvalde School Shooting

Did you just choose to not read my response here?

1 Like

Correct – I did not read that.

2 Likes

I really don’t understand why anyone here is questioning how ā€˜an 18 year old could spend 5000 on guns.’. He DIDN’T. We know, for a fact, that the purchase was done online, which means credit card. And he picked the gun up at a local store. What exactly is suspicious about this? I could make a bunch of really extravagant purchases right now that I can’t afford, because that’s how credit cards work. The kid could have had zero dollars in the bank and still done this.

1 Like

Consider that I am very old with this question.

How does a 18 year old (just turned 18) get a credit card with a credit line near $5,000? It seems if he did use a credit card that it was not his.

A few options…

Reach in his mom’s purse or dad’s wallet and take theirs

Buy a stolen credit card number off the internet

Steal one from someone else

He wouldn’t exactly be the first teenager in history to steal a credit card

EDIT: it also wouldn’t be crazy to think it was his own. Super high interest credit cards do exist that are given out pretty easily, with limits like this.

1 Like

My wife applied for a credit card for the first time in her life in her mid 20s. She got a $2000 limit.

I’m not saying it’s impossible for a higher limit, or to obtain multiple credit cards, but i think we are stretching to explain this away at the moment. Id like an official answer rather than it being explained away tbh.

If the answer to that question is that he had multiple credit cards or a limit that could cover - and that was his payment method, i can accept that. I just think we should wait for an official answer before explaining it away.

I suppose we will wait a few weeks to find if a credit was used and whether it was a stolen or purchased card number (or card), and being told 4 different stories before actually giving the public the facts.

3 Likes

Well, it’s already pretty well verified that this was an internet purchase, and that information was available day 1. He sent a text message to someone with a copy of the receipt. You’re welcome to look it up. The website he bought it from has also verified how the purchase was made. So, knowing it was an internet purchase, we then know it was credit or debit. I would be shocked if this was a debit purchase.

I’m just not seeing why a conspiracy theory could be considered more likely to be true than ā€˜he used his mom’s card’. This seems so fucking simple to explain. Occam’s razor here

1 Like

There was another mass shooting with an ar. Not hearing anything in the news though and I can’t figure out why….

3 Likes

I’m not saying it’s more likely to be considered true, and everything that hasn’t been verified currently is all a ā€œconspiracy theoryā€. I think going Occam’s on most things leads to a blind populace; it is important to question things - and these things should all have answers. I don’t see why that is unreasonable tbh.

1 Like

Wrong. It’s how I’ve already figured out the whole thing: Trump-supporting, white supremacist, Neo-Confederate burst into a school to kill mostly-Hispanic children. Easy.

2 Likes

Only the shooter died… So it isn’t a mass shooting by definition.

People get shot literally every day in America. Not every gun death is going to make national news.

1 Like

Kinda my point. A guy showed up with an ar and started firing into a crowd. In terms of anti-mass shooting policy this is every bit as noteworthy as the school shooting. And we should feel as good about this and every life saved as we do bad about the one in Texas lost. It isn’t newsworthy because it doesn’t fit their narrative. It illustrates the bias in legislating from headlines.

3 Likes

I’m sure the nra will get credit from the left for saving many people in this case….

It’s not noteworthy because literally NOBODY is making the argument that guns never work to save lives. Everyone acknowledges that sometimes, a good guy with a gun saves lives.

The argument from the left, regarding this situation, would be that the unsuccessful shooter probably shouldn’t have had a gun in the first place.

But to your point, yes, it’s fortunate that no one else died in this particular situation. It’s great when guns save lives.

HA! We almost had a knock-down, drag-out fight at my friendly neighborhood poker game last night over this exact issue. People DO argue that good guys with guns don’t save lives, I assure you.

2 Likes

Which, ironically, the right also agrees with. The difference is the right just shrugs and says idiots with guns is just the cost of freedumb.

The belligerent shooter was a felon who had been to prison, which makes him a prohibited person in all of the USA.

What law or policy might have stopped this guy?

What did stop this guy?

3 Likes

A good guy with a gun stopped this guy. I’m not sure what your point is? I certainly have never argued that nobody should have guns. And I’ve never argued that good guys with guns are never successful.