Utah Passes Amnesty

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:
Could anyone explain how that would work in the states favor?[/quote]

How can you question the benefit of competitive labor? Even if they don’t increase the amount of tax revenue for the state they increase the wealth of society as a whole.

As for the politics of it it only benefits the politicians with regard to the favors they will receive from the business owners who insist this legislation must be passed. In Utah many of the business owners are Mormons who go through their church to get things done for them.[/quote]

Wouldn’t the drain on the economy of having to support that many more people outshine the plus that comes along with competitive labor?

The legislation part makes sense, thank you.[/quote]

“The system” doesn’t support anyone. People support themselves. I don’t know one immigrant (illegal or otherwise) that is supported by “the system”. Hard work and family is their only support in many cases. This does not mean that a few of them don’t take advantage but that is not the norm.

Competitive labor is always beneficial to society because it brings about greater productivity and thus lower prices on the good that are produced.

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:
Could anyone explain how that would work in the states favor?[/quote]

How can you question the benefit of competitive labor? Even if they don’t increase the amount of tax revenue for the state they increase the wealth of society as a whole.

As for the politics of it it only benefits the politicians with regard to the favors they will receive from the business owners who insist this legislation must be passed. In Utah many of the business owners are Mormons who go through their church to get things done for them.[/quote]

Wouldn’t the drain on the economy of having to support that many more people outshine the plus that comes along with competitive labor?

The legislation part makes sense, thank you.[/quote]

“The system” doesn’t support anyone. People support themselves. I don’t know one immigrant (illegal or otherwise) that is supported by “the system”. Hard work and family is their only support in many cases. This does not mean that a few of them don’t take advantage but that is not the norm.

Competitive labor is always beneficial to society because it brings about greater productivity and thus lower prices on the good that are produced.[/quote]

Ok that makes sense, but what about public schools and what not? Wouldn’t a large population increase, at the very least, cause big problems to public programs?

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
You guys are seeing the trees but not the forest.

Illegal aliens don’t just come to work, as they claim, but they have kids, they get sick, and get arrested, etc. Their cost is ALOT more than their contribution. These people also send a good portion of their money back to their home country, which takes away from recycling it back into our economy.

Do people really think that taxing minimum wage workers will outweigh all of that ^^^?[/quote]

So, basically they wanted to incentivize MORE illegal immigration. Everytime any sort of amnesty is passed it basically says, “See? Get here and stick it out long enough for the next round of amnesty.”

Edit: Gotta love the libertarian fools and their “competitive” labor. Yeah, that labor working for $4 bucks an hour will support the politicians who promise more education and healthcare dollars. And if they can’t vote, their multitude of sons and daughters will. “Hey, let’s replace ourselves with throngs of uneducated, unskilled labor. Surely, it’d be great for a small government movement!” Umm, no.[/quote]

Um, have you seen California? Do you pay attention? 4 of the 11 million illegal aliens reside here, so the remaining 49 states cover the other 7 million. Half the kids in schools here do not even speak English! The “stick it out long enough and wait til amnesty comes” is EXACTLY the strategy being used with illegal aliens. They play a good game of chess. The set up a strong pro-illegal alien lobby here. You have all sorts of legal organizations to protect them (La Raza, MALDEF, LULAC, Brown Berets, MECHA Movement, etc.), once they get here, they take advantage of our birthright citizenship flaws and get welfare for their kids (for up to 18 yrs here in Cali, you think that is also a coincidence?) You have free education for schooling K-12, and now there is a movement to subsidize in-state tuition for illegal alien kids here (the statewide California DREAM Act). Latinos votely very largely Democratic because they don’t make enough money to make it worth their while to vote Republican.

Did Meg Whitman’s housekeeper get deported? Nope. She even used fake documents to secure a false SSN, and she STILL isn’t being deported. A convicted MS-13 gangmember Edwin Ramos killed 3 people (a father and 2 young boys), who is here illegally, and STILL won’t be deported.

Everyone is scared to upset the illegal alien lovers, as if to say fuck you to all the tax paying citizens. What does it take?

You really think all that is accidental^^^? Why do I have to subsidize all that bullshit^^^?

Half of our $29 Billion deficit (yes you read that correctly) comes from the costs associated with illegal immigration, and do you think anyone is going to address that? The governor here wants to raise taxes, he has no chance, NO CHANCE IN HELL for that to happen, so you will see $29 Billion in cuts. If you think the shit in Wisconsin was bad, what will happen here will be that on ROIDZ.

We need 3 things, public worker pension reform, deport all illegal aliens, and reform the prison system. If we could do all that, we could fix our problems with no tax hike. But you won’t because we have a governor and state legislature (except for some Republicans) who will pull their pants down to the highest bidder. No one wants to live in reality here, and while I would not blame the entire problem in my state on illegal aliens, it is a HUGE fucking problem that no one will even look at.

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:
Could anyone explain how that would work in the states favor?[/quote]

How can you question the benefit of competitive labor? Even if they don’t increase the amount of tax revenue for the state they increase the wealth of society as a whole.

As for the politics of it it only benefits the politicians with regard to the favors they will receive from the business owners who insist this legislation must be passed. In Utah many of the business owners are Mormons who go through their church to get things done for them.[/quote]

Wouldn’t the drain on the economy of having to support that many more people outshine the plus that comes along with competitive labor?

The legislation part makes sense, thank you.[/quote]

“The system” doesn’t support anyone. People support themselves. I don’t know one immigrant (illegal or otherwise) that is supported by “the system”. Hard work and family is their only support in many cases. This does not mean that a few of them don’t take advantage but that is not the norm.

Competitive labor is always beneficial to society because it brings about greater productivity and thus lower prices on the good that are produced.[/quote]

Ok that makes sense, but what about public schools and what not? Wouldn’t a large population increase, at the very least, cause big problems to public programs?
[/quote]

Yes, and where I live is the proof of that.

When you have a large population of kids who do not speak English, it keeps teachers back from progressing students forward in actual teaching. If you saw the percentage numbers of kids in ESL classes as a part of the total school enrollment, you would fall over. You also flood schools and overburden the infrastructure more than it can handle. You then need to build more schools for kids who don’t speak English (ya think that will pay off in the long run?) How many millions of dollars are spent on schools, where half the fucking kids drop out and do not even speak the language here. This bullshit idea of it being an “investment” (which is always a code word for spending), never pays out in the long run, because there might be a VERY few number of these kids who turn out to do something truly productive.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Immigrants are one of the last sources of money for the church in general, this is no surprise. Utah is also afraid of a boycott, the same way Arizona was. [/quote]

Why do you insist on saying this, the biggest sources of money for religion are rich people.[/quote]

Where are you getting this information? Come to Los Angeles, come to where Roger Mahony used to reside, you will find a 20% non-Latino attendance, if that. [/quote]

I thought we were talking about Utah, and the LDS specifically?

I know about Los Angeles, but that is logically incorrect. Latino isn’t synonymous with immigrant. Another point, Southern California being 40-80% Latin also would explain a 80% Latin attendance rate in LA. However that is skewing the data, California is predominantly Latin. However, the Archdiocese of LA isn’t the Catholic Church. It is a part of the whole. In America, Latins only make up 32% of the Church, non-Hispanics make up the majority of 60%. It is true that immigrants are the largest growing area of the Church in America 9 mill out of 11 mill. As well, even though Archdiocese of LA is the largest, the Northeast is the densest and the majority of Catholics in America.

Another thing you’re forgetting is the benefactors like Tom Mahoghan, the guy that owned Domino’s who gives large chunks of his money to the Catholic Church and like the Arizona lady that gave 100 million to the Diocese of Phoenix.

The fact is that the majority of money comes from citizens only because citizens make up most of the upper and middle class.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
The latest news is that more and more States…including all the Border States (most notably Texas)…have become very interested in what Utah has proposed.

Again…interesting.

Mufasa[/quote]

It is because of two words, tax revenue[/quote]

Would you mind explaining that a little?[/quote]

Agreed,

Taxing people who make minimum wage is not cost effective. I see this as more of a humanitarian thing than an economic one. And should this stand up, illegal aliens will flood Utah and send it to the 3rd world cesspool that California is now. Watch and see the strain of social infrastructure and program spending (which will come by tax increases) skyrocket to pay for all this. [/quote]

Once they are not considered illegal better paying companies will hire them. No one can deny they are not hard workers.

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
The latest news is that more and more States…including all the Border States (most notably Texas)…have become very interested in what Utah has proposed.

Again…interesting.

Mufasa[/quote]

It is because of two words, tax revenue[/quote]

Texas hardly collects tax revenue. They don`t even have income tax.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

Democratic votes, that’s the ONLY reason. [/quote]

From where out of state, Utah is Republican.

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
I don’t know one immigrant (illegal or otherwise) that is supported by “the system”.[/quote]

Then you don’t live near them.

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:
Ok that makes sense, but what about public schools and what not? [/quote]

He meant in theoretical Austrian-Anarcho world. No public schools, or public anything. In other words, outside of reality.

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:
Ok that makes sense, but what about public schools and what not? Wouldn’t a large population increase, at the very least, cause big problems to public programs?
[/quote]

Yep, and that is why I am against public programs – especially the useless American education system.

But let’s for argument sake assume that those people that do come here are actually supporting the system because they pay consumption taxes and they rent homes where their landlords pay estate taxes to support the schools, etc. Does it matter if they are not paying federal income taxes since most welfare funding is taxed at a local level? I don’t think so.

There is hardly any federal level welfare – it’s mostly used as blackmail money to keep the states in line with the federal government’s wishes – e.g., the federal highway system.

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:
Ok that makes sense, but what about public schools and what not? [/quote]

He meant in theoretical Austrian-Anarcho world. No public schools, or public anything. In other words, outside of reality.[/quote]

Public schools are not usually funded by income taxes.

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
I don’t know one immigrant (illegal or otherwise) that is supported by “the system”.[/quote]

Then you don’t live near them.

[/quote]
x2. I surprised someone actually said that. Maybe its so natural to me since I live in an “illegal dense” area.

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:
Ok that makes sense, but what about public schools and what not? Wouldn’t a large population increase, at the very least, cause big problems to public programs?
[/quote]

Yep, and that is why I am against public programs – especially the useless American education system.

But let’s for argument sake assume that those people that do come here are actually supporting the system because they pay consumption taxes and they rent homes where their landlords pay estate taxes to support the schools, etc. Does it matter if they are not paying federal income taxes since most welfare funding is taxed at a local level? I don’t think so.

There is hardly any federal level welfare – it’s mostly used as blackmail money to keep the states in line with the federal government’s wishes – e.g., the federal highway system.[/quote]

So are you a true Libertarian?

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

Democratic votes, that’s the ONLY reason. [/quote]

From where out of state, Utah is Republican.
[/quote]

For now.

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
The latest news is that more and more States…including all the Border States (most notably Texas)…have become very interested in what Utah has proposed.

Again…interesting.

Mufasa[/quote]

It is because of two words, tax revenue[/quote]

Would you mind explaining that a little?[/quote]

Agreed,

Taxing people who make minimum wage is not cost effective. I see this as more of a humanitarian thing than an economic one. And should this stand up, illegal aliens will flood Utah and send it to the 3rd world cesspool that California is now. Watch and see the strain of social infrastructure and program spending (which will come by tax increases) skyrocket to pay for all this. [/quote]

Once they are not considered illegal better paying companies will hire them. No one can deny they are not hard workers.[/quote]

This will depend on whether labor laws will apply to them or not. Remember, the only reason these people have these jobs is because they are willing to accept such low pay. Should labor laws apply to them, they become of no more value than any Joe Schmoe on the street. The saying shouldn’t be “jobs that Americans won’t do” but “wages Americans won’t accept.”

What do you mean being supported by the system? The system cannot support anyone.

We (any one that pays any taxes at all) are the ones supporting the system and not the other way around.

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:
Ok that makes sense, but what about public schools and what not? Wouldn’t a large population increase, at the very least, cause big problems to public programs?
[/quote]

Yep, and that is why I am against public programs – especially the useless American education system.

But let’s for argument sake assume that those people that do come here are actually supporting the system because they pay consumption taxes and they rent homes where their landlords pay estate taxes to support the schools, etc. Does it matter if they are not paying federal income taxes since most welfare funding is taxed at a local level? I don’t think so.

There is hardly any federal level welfare – it’s mostly used as blackmail money to keep the states in line with the federal government’s wishes – e.g., the federal highway system.[/quote]

So are you a true Libertarian? [/quote]

I am ethically a libertarian and politically an anarchist.

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:
Ok that makes sense, but what about public schools and what not? Wouldn’t a large population increase, at the very least, cause big problems to public programs?
[/quote]

Yep, and that is why I am against public programs – especially the useless American education system.

But let’s for argument sake assume that those people that do come here are actually supporting the system because they pay consumption taxes and they rent homes where their landlords pay estate taxes to support the schools, etc. Does it matter if they are not paying federal income taxes since most welfare funding is taxed at a local level? I don’t think so.

There is hardly any federal level welfare – it’s mostly used as blackmail money to keep the states in line with the federal government’s wishes – e.g., the federal highway system.[/quote]

So are you a true Libertarian? [/quote]

Lift is right.

There are hardly any Federal welfare programs available. We have Medi-Cal and Cal-works here, which are welfare and some statewide health care programs, but that’s it. I know that our state has asked for a bailout from the Feds, to which they said no. There is no efficiency to any degree with these programs at all, it all just gets swallowed into the black hole of government waste.

Hilarious story about the highway system, well it’s both bitter sweet. How many people have seen it take fucking years to get a road repaired, repaved, or improved in their city or state? I know here in LA, it takes fucking years. Well in Japan, yes nuclear-ridden, glowing the dark JAPAN, they have fixed roads within 6 days of the tsunami. Un-fucking-believable. I bet a union wasn’t behind the repair.

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

I am ethically a libertarian and politically an anarchist.[/quote]

Thats pretty interesting, thanks for your candid answer.