Since you believe it was stolen without any evidence, I would say: more than what it took you.
I could be Trump’s 2nd or 3rd biggest defender here though I couldn’t help you out on the “looting and shooting” thing. That’s because I detest the media more than anything and won’t hesitate to take Trump’s side if I think he’s right.
From my previous lengthy post to you, I think you can trust that I will give whatever evidence compelling enough to show the election has been stolen a fair and thorough analysis.
Please post what you have.
Well, to even begin to have credibility, there would have to be enough so that Trump’s campaign could allege fraud in a filed complaint in a court.
That wouldn’t be enough - as it is only a mere allegation at that point, not proof - but you can’t even get off the launch pad without a credible allegation in court.
(Spoiler alert - there are none.)
That’s easy. I’m interested in ANY evidence of systematic problems in the election that would overturn the results. I voted for Biden, but I want Trump to win if he should have won the election.
However, Trump is now 1 and 25 in his court cases. His one win was to get observers moved from 15 to 6 feet from elections workers in PA. Do you know of any evidence that the election was stolen? If so, post it without resorting to fringe websites, tweets and other non-news sources.
Remember that we aren’t talking about irregularities/human error here that might change a few, dozens, or even hundreds of votes. Biden’s lead is massive and Trump would need to change the outcome in at least 2 and most likely 3 states to win. If you know about it, post it.
Aw don’t burst his bubble! I really wanna see what kind of Hail Mary attempts at conjuring up evidence the rabid Trump supporters have made.
1 Like
Dominion. Steven Crowder has a fraud week going on with links with fraud prove on his website and talks about it on his podcast.
Oh sweet baby Jesus…surely most people, even without formal education, understand the concept of hierarchy of evidence? As in, some sources are more trustworthy than others? Who the hell wants to live in a country where critical decisions about elections are made only on the evidence of this podcast, that tweet, or “some dude told me so”?
Or by a guy who sets up a table on notoriously left college campuses, makes an absurd statement designed to elicit an emotional response then says “Prove me wrong.” as a gimmick to “own the Libs”.
The dude is a a fucking idiotic drunken frat boy. Not a valid source of information.
For the sake of free and fair elections, I’d love to see some fraud or wrongdoing exposed so that it can be eliminated, but that just doesn’t seem to be happening.
This most recent strategy of casting shadows because so-and-so runs this company, and this tech was used there is just a bunch of silly bullshit to give Trumps hard core the sensation and titilation of wrong doing.
They’re analogous to those last couple of squirts of endorphins your brain experiences while you die.
2 Likes
The failed Canadian comedian who never went to college or had a real job? I’m curious; what in his life experience would make anyone think he has a clue about anything he talks about?
1 Like
Shit like this is exactly why half of all Republicans believe the election was stolen from Trump. People seem to have no ability to use some discrimination regarding their “news” sources.
Pro tips: Try Reuters or AP. If you have to have something right leaning try the Wall Street Journal. There are also a number of newspapers still functioning in major cities that or fairly neutral or lean a bit right.
Not sure why you think no amount of evidence would matter to me. I’m not a Trump fan but like I’ve said over and over if widespread fraud happened and he should have won of course I would support it. I’d far rather the actual winner of an election serve regardless of whether I’m a fan or not. Please don’t mistake me for someone who doesn’t care as long as he loses how it happened. I’ve said this more than once.
Let’s just look at the facts as we know them right now. Trump alleged fraud months before the election happened with nothing to back it up. I think he did this so he could do exactly what he is doing if he lost. I think he would do this no matter how “close” the election was.
Now what’s came out since the election as best as I can understand it is a constantly revolving door of conspiracy theories. Most of these have been shot down within seconds. Easily proven as false.
A lot of lawsuits with almost everyone of them failed. Trump’s actual lawyers in some of them saying they have no evidence of fraud.
You CAN’T have this many people vote in an election with no issues. Mistakes happened just like they have in every other election ever I have no doubt. But the margins Biden won by are high enough that without strong evidence to the contrary to make me think he won.
It makes zero sense to me that if Dems could rig this election that they wouldn’t ensure victory in the Senate. Why would they handicap themselves? Do we really think Biden can do a bunch without the Senate? Come on that’s a massive piece we saw it with Obama.
All I’ve seen as far as rigged elections comes from far right websites. Maybe they are the only ones telling the truth. But lawsuit after lawsuit getting slapped down matters. Trump’s lawyers saying they have no evidence of fraud matters.
For me George Soros planted deep state operatives at local levels in a handful of states doesn’t matter. It’s the same type of shit the far right always says happens.
1 Like
Just to piggyback on that post. Trump is living in a world that is separate from reality. His supporters do not have to join him. They can be upset he lost and at the same time recognize these things for the lunacy they are.
“Trump’s claim about Detroit is demonstrably false. There are 670,000 people living in Detroit, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s most recent estimate, and the city says that 250,138 ballots were cast there.”
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1329087255168708608?s=21
Who cares? If people aren’t alleging it in court pleadings, it’s just propaganda and noise.
So, what’s the reason none of that has been used as evidence by trump’s army of lawyers in their thousands of court filings?
2 Likes
Clever as always. I was asking a rhetorical question to @H_factor, not challenging him to debunk my radical right wing stolen election conspiracy theory.
And yet, he’s far more successful than you.
I feel as if my position has been pretty clear on this from the beginning. If massive voter fraud occurred and Donald Trump won the election then by all means he should be President. Not sure why I would fight against that.
But it doesn’t seem as if Trump’s biggest supporters are willing to do the same. They were told before the election their would be massive voter fraud (without evidence) and by god they are sticking to that “he lost so it was rigged” mindset. Which was planted in them by a known conman.
Yea you’re clearly a fair unbiased person.
It isn’t really a question of quantity. There have been plenty of people offering “evidence”, but it doesn’t support Trump’s claims. If I were to get evidence that supported his claims, then that would be enough. Until that happens, his claims should just be dismissed (like how they are in court).
Hasn’t that been what what they’ve been doing? Multiple irregularities across the country have led the Trump campaign to allege fraud. The evidence comes after, during the lawsuit, correct?