I think we both are analytical in our approaches (and general thinking), and have come up similar conclusions independently (although you have convinced me on some things). I can defend my advice given here (or at least most of it) with solid logic (so I don’t think it is an echo chamber effect).
I see solid reasoning in several members here. Iron comes to mind (convinced me on a few items, especially the logic about the oral at the end being a good option). Unreal was really analytical, but went too deep for most posters here with a couple hours of research. I enjoyed his posts though.