If the goal of the 90 day ban was to give time to develop more impressive vetting processes, wouldn’t Trump have had so much time to render that original 90 days needed moot?
If the ban was truly temporary and was the means to an end, where is that end?
LOL, they had seven years to come up with an alternative healthcare plan and we’ve all seen how that’s going, you can’t expect the gubmit to come up with an answer to anything in 90 days!
Maybe your version of extreme vetting? But again I ask why his extreme vetting hasn’t been implemented yet? Why is he pushing for a ban for a timeframe he’s had multiples of?
Like the promise of coming up with an extreme vetting process in 90 days if he gets a Muslim ban?[quote=“ActivitiesGuy, post:1004, topic:229190”]
LOL, they had seven years to come up with an alternative healthcare plan and we’ve all seen how that’s going, you can’t expect the gubmit to come up with an answer to anything in 90 days!
[/quote]
C’mon man. WHO KNEW healthcare could be so complicated!!!
C’mon man. WHO KNEW healthcare could be so complicated!!!
[/quote]
Because now it looks like he’s attempted to fulfill his campaign promises. Also who is to say his extreme vetting practice hasn’t begun to be implemented
Its not a ban when he says ban he means ban but not really a ban like you think he means… Who knew keeping brown people out of a country could be so complicated jeesh covfefe allready
But again, like the campaign promise of the ban only being temporary and needing 90 days to implement extreme vetting?
Is Trump physically capable of doing something and not bragging about it? [quote=“therajraj, post:1013, topic:229190”]
Welp looks like breitbart has fallen to bullshit political correctness.
They fired this reporter for this tweet
[/quote]
Breitbart is a business at the end of the day. Don’t do stuff that’s bad for business and you won’t get fired. Even breitbart isn’t extreme enough to publicly support your kind of views.
Have to have them in the federal bureaucracy due to their tech-savvy, but no way are the bulk of them going to be loyal to Trump if they feel certain information needs to be public.
Stating an unpopular opinion like removing Muslims 100% stops terrorism is simply bad for business. You don’t have to agree with the decision. Reporter took a shot at the bottom line, breitbart is in this for the $$$. Simple math.
I’d change this to “no way they’ll be loyal to anyone if they feel certain info needs to be public.” If nothing else, the millennial generation isn’t going to stand by while fraud and corruption runs around like the previous few gens did.
This is an interesting observation to me as our generation is typically referred to as the “me” generation, older generations tell us we are the most selfish, self-absorbed, and god-less generation yet. This is in no way saying that I do or don’t believe it’s true, simply that other folks would not view it that way, just a curiosity for me.