Didnât Trump just stroke some weird globe with the Saudiâs; assure them billions in arms sales; do the âSabre/White Boyâ Shuffle with them; and assure them that we are staunch âALLIESâ?
[quote=âthunderbolt23, post:920, topic:229190, full:trueâ]
And itâs worked pretty good. When something succeeds, we should do more of it (and improve what weâre doing).[/quote]
As usual you just assert random garbage.
[quote=âthunderbolt23, post:920, topic:229190, full:trueâ]
I donât believe that to be true, but it was always a long game to play. [/quote]
Wrong. The terror watch list has steadily grown since the war on terror began.
I do know 22 US veterans commits suicide per day. I do know a million people have died in Iraq.
Itâs amazing that knowing these facts people still push for the War on terror. You must be a genocidal maniac
I would consider the larger Occident area and Treaty allies in the mix. But I canât say your definition is strictly incorrect either, so fair enough.
when Iâve read articles on the list they never really explain how the list is assembled. My guess would be this is on purpose as they probably donât want to make it easier for terrorists to avoid the list.
terror related cases have been on the rise since 9/11 so probably
MCGA? As John Oliver said, it seems that Trump is finally keeping one of his campaign promises about creating jobs. Too bad those newly created jobs will be in China.
China will plow 2.5 trillion yuan ($361 billion) into renewable power generation by 2020, the countryâs energy agency said on Thursday, as the worldâs largest energy market continues to shift away from dirty coal power towards cleaner fuels.
The investment will create over 13 million jobs in the sector, the National Energy Administration (NEA) said in a blueprint document that lays out its plan to develop the nationâs energy sector during the five-year 2016 to 2020 period.
Did he also cause them to build the Three Gorges Damn?
You canât act like this is an all of the sudden response to Trump pulling out of the Paris debacle of wealth distribution when China has been working on renewable energy for just as long as anybody else has.
Its one thing to be partisan, but donât be stupid.
My ultimate takeaway is that as a world leader (and understanding that the Paris agreement was non-binding concerning consequences) that we should probably not denounce something that seems to have a large amount of evidence, there is already an anti-science movement (meaning people âbelieveâ or âdonât believeâ science, as they see fit) and what I can see happening is that, âHey, our leader, the leader of one of the most powerful nations on earth, has decided to publicly announce that he does not believe what science is telling us.â Itâs just a concerning message to be sending to the folks at home and abroad, in my opinion.