Wiener is out. Heās pretty slippery though and will probably find a way to sneak in through back channels.
It depends. We may need something to grease the way in for Weiner.
SIIHB!
āMake Weiner Great again!ā
Sounds like a Viagra ad.
Hes got my voteā¦ If I wanna send drunken D pics to random girls on instagram at 5am its my constitutional right dammit
This is too awesome not to post:
"President Donald Trump, scorned by reports that Rex Tillerson called him a āmoronā earlier this year, told Forbes in an interview released Tuesday that he has a higher IQ than his secretary of state.
[ā¦]
āI think itās fake news, but if he did that, I guess weāll have to compare IQ tests,ā Trump said. āAnd I can tell you who is going to win.ā
Am I the only one whoās been completely won over by Secretary Tillerson?
Iām going to wait on the results of the IQ challenge before deciding.
Same.
POTUS challenging his SoS to an IQ contest. This is 2017.
All. This. Winning.
Could be worseācould be a glove-size contest, if ya know what I mean.
You said the same things leading up to 2012.
I was convinced Romney would beat Obama. I was wrong.
Shit, Iām still convinced Trump will lose in 2016 let alone 2020.
So you tell me Dr Crystal Ball. lol. Whatās going to happen?
Homie, popular vote is meaningless. Absolutely meaningless. It means a lot of people went to the poles in MA, NY & CAā¦ It is a moot point.
Keep in mind that āsingle most hated Demā you speak about won the primary, almost beat Obama in 2008, and was followed by a senile communist rather than a moderate like Jim Webb.
The Dems have a lot of the same problems the Reps had in 2008 & 2012, and are in the same āstay in my bubbleā denial about it. While they will be fine, and assuredly will have POTUS by 2024, they need to get their shit together and match the red-tide of 2010 if they want control of anything anytime soon.
Because literally outside of Obama in 2012, and staying relevant in the Senate, the Dems have been getting their asses kicked since 2010. That tide will certainly swing back to them (Americanās are fickle about how long one party holds their boots to our necks, and like to switch boots now and again) but it might not be all that soon.
This is the 2016 POTUS results by county. This isnāt a good look for the Dems manā¦ You canāt rely on urban turnout to the point of this bad. Keep in mind, this was for Trump of all people.
Nah. Thatās not even a little bit right.
āWonā a primary in which the DNC had thrown heavy support from the start. Itās as much a āwinā as when the globetrotters āwinā a game.
ie, lost to Obama in 08.
Hopefully the gerrymandering that SCOTUS is looking at now will change a bit of that.
Why are people always stuck on these silly color charts. Hereās the one I like.
When accounted for population density, all those rural parts of the country are worth about as much as a couple neighborhoods in a larger city.
Iāll never understand why Republicans are so proud of conquering farmland.
Why Trump won in one sentence.
Answer this for me:
Who, in any major metropolitan area, are the most important people in that city on any given day of any given year?
Donāt google. Give your honest answer.
Probably law enforcement and emergency response personnel, why?
Wrong. Itās the garbage collectors. Imagine urban life if the people who pick up your garbage all said āfuck you.ā
Although your answer is better than most I hear from those trapped in the leftās bubble, youāre still missing the bigger picture of what Iām trying to tell you. in the post you poo-pooed and now here. Itās also why being āproud of conquering farmlandā matter much, much more than popular vote.
Winning elections is 100% marketing. The unsung heroās of everyday life, like sanitation workers, matter. The āfarmlandā matters. Everyone matters. Once you forget the foundation of society, like the āfarmlandā and garbage collectors, a lot of people turn off to you and your message, subconsciously even.
Wrong. Imagine urban life in a high crime rate city with zero law in the land.
Agreed. Not sure if Iād be proud my party was better at āmarketing.ā
I agree everyone matters. Thatās why I place more importance on the popular vote, as it shows the intent of āeveryone.ā Iām not fond of telling people in high pop states that their vote doesnāt matter as much as the guy in Montana.
My reference about conquering farmland is because as itās so loosely populated, for every 1 unit of farmland, you just got .1 units of city in terms of votes or some such shit. People go āLOOK AT ALL THE RED ON THIS MAPā then when you remind them NYC has a higher population than most of those states they go āYou just donāt get it man, look at allllll this red!ā
If āeveryone mattersā then their votes should all count for the same. The electoral process directly changes this and weāre stuck with unbalanced votes in National elections.