Or the negative aspects of American society you see aren’t as heavily tied to race as you think it is.
What % of higher black crime rates are due to the system being biased against them vs them having a higher crime rate?
What % of lower performing schools with high % blacks are moreso about funding and quality of teachers vs the higher % of blacks?
It’s impossible to quantify all the reasons that bad things happen in this country (between race, age, gender, religion, culture, personal upbringing, random happenstance). The main issue people have with you is that you seem to “KNOW” with near absolute certainty that racial demographics are so heavily weighted in the negative aspects of society, when the resounding thought amongst half intelligent people is that it COULD be racial demographics, but we just don’t know yet.
Imo there’s too many variables that we humans manage to screw up for us to ever really nail down the root causes in their entirety, but I’m sure we’ll keep arguing about it until the end of time.
I think the last three weeks I’ve shot down argument after argument from you and exposed multiple links you have to be complete nonsense. I’ve shown (and so have others) you to be a hypocrite of the highest magnitude as you won’t do anything about the problem you say exists despite being one of the few people on PWI who can do something about it.
I’m growing tired Raj. You have the same arguments every day. If I take a break from destroying your posts and let others do it for a while will you promise to go outside and at least try to talk to a girl?
On the contrary, you’re anti science. You’ve looked at a few variables and given them random weights, and assumed the rest don’t matter and/or have an arbitrarily designated weight that is low. Science dictates that something must be evaluated and/or quantified before given a weight.
You’re basically ordering a pizza with a different topping on every slice, and have concluded the number of calories in a pizza is 2000 because the first 2 slices have 200 a piece. Every other slice could have 400 or 200 or 12, you simply haven’t done enough research to know whether or not they all have 200.
As I’m a data junkie, and not an actual scientist, if I’m butchering science over here anybody feel free to correct me.
Which is fine. What isn’t is your designation that race accounts for the majority of IQ fluctuation. We see literal examples every day of children adopted from other countries (such as the low end ones you talk about in Africa) that don’t grow to operate in America at mental retardation level.
Does upbringing influence IQ? How much?
Does access to quality food influence IQ? How much?
Does a mentally stimulating environment influence IQ? How much?
Gender?
Physical history?
Parental genetics?
How much more does having an older sibling (back to environment) to leech experience and knowledge off of stimulate brain activity?
All of these factors have a weight, look at any 2 together (food/upbringing, genetics/gender, etc) and the total weight changes. Look at all the factors, and the weight changes less but starts to average out. You constantly cite articles that look at 1 or MAYBE 2 pieces of the puzzle, and extrapolate that THIS MATTERS SO MUCH AND EVERYONE ELSE IS A LIBTARD CAVING TO SOCIAL PRESSURE.
You genuinely have no idea when every metric is tossed into the same pot (life). Maybe we’ll know one day, but today is not that day.
Is this because of their race, or because this particular race has spent so much less time in what we consider to be “civilized society?” How will this metric change as time goes on?
The 130 black and interracial adopted children scored above the white
population average for the same U.S. region (M = 100) and were performing
adequately in school. In fact, we found the average IQ of the
black/interracial children adopted in the first 12 months of life to be 110,
some 20 points above the average IQ for black children being reared in the
black community.
Nah I’m good. Also out of my depth on the actual stats of the study. Not looking to derail a Trump thread with race IQ talk any more than I already have.
I’m not looking to reshit that squirrel. I’m also way out of my depth in stats after the first page or 2. Raj will be Raj, I’m not going to change that.
What do you thrive at? You don’t thrive with the ladies. It’s unlikely you have a good job. You read and post white supremacist sites and links despite being a person of color. This makes no sense. You’re anti immigrant now that you’re here (you said you should be the last person on the ship). This makes no sense though somehow more sense than worshipping people who hate you. Your twitter and posts show your anti-women which does make sense because you blame them for your lack of success with them. After all it can’t be your fault. And you tell others that porn would be better than most women. It isn’t but I know you have to rationalize weird things when your strike out rate is every time.
You might want to thrive on your own before you talk about how unsuccessful someone else is.
Don’t try and change the subject. Until you can thrive at anything in life you would probably be better off not talking about black people being unsuccessful