And?
Agreed.
1 Like
Oh you’re referring to on the religious freedom side. You don’t see a difference between religious liberty and dehumanizing an entire race? I think that’s pretty clear.
Well, unless that woman slapped the handcuffs on herself, she literally was sent to jail for NOT following her religion, right?
1 Like
Finance, I’m a Sr. Financial Analyst.
Did they give black slaves a choice of religion?
Fuck, who know…
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Negative. But if you believe something is less than human and can’t make decisions for itself, you don’t give it many, if any choices.
Awesome! I started as a Data Analyst in my Acct dept and they bumped me to a different dept as Project Manager after about 10 months. Sometimes I miss the data mining
1 Like
Many of the founders tried to end slavery at this countries inception. Most of the northern colonial founders were against it from the get-go including Jefferson (who is a bit of an enigma in fairness).
I love this.
“Let’s try to end slavery but in the meantime I’m going to rape my slaves”
My thoughts as well, but maybe that’s why he called him an enigma.
Any links to info on this?
Good for you and I hope that you never change! But, that is how the game is played and by you not playing does not make it go away.
Why do you feel it’s important to bring up Bill Clinton at this juncture?
1 Like
Jefferson raped his slaves, that’s a new one. Jefferson himself tried to end slavery numerous times and eventually got fed up with trying. He predicted, correctly, that emancipation would occur in the coming decades. Yes he also owned slaves. How he reconciled the two positions I’ve no idea.
Read American Sphinx if you’re truly interested.
He had sex with his slaves and the slaves were there against their will.
This is called analyzing facts.
Not off my phone, but if you just google Madison, Washington, Jefferson, et al and slavery you’ll find plenty 9f evidence (actual quotes, letters writtwn documents, etc… ) that support this.
Lemme ask it like this. Do you personally think when an individual (no political affiliation) says something that is factually untrue, they are lying, regardless of intent? Or do you think the intent of whether or not they MEANT to lie should matter (ie difference between 1st and 2nd degree murder).
I’m sorry that you don’t understand the difference between fact and a political interpretation of said fact. But that’s okay I’ve come to expect such things from you. But you do have other good qualities.