It really seems like the girlfriend knew how to be a pest to ICE, the driver seemed to be along for the adventure.
Her panic from agent 1 saying the F out the car was very telling that she was no “professional” ICE watcher.
The girlfriend should be ashamed for not telling her beforehand that if we illegally block traffic and they threaten to arrest us, than we get arrested, don’t panic.
I saw a vid of another woman being threaten to be arrrested for honking etc she just laughed and the agent let her go. Interesting………
@punnyguy the reason why he has internal bleeding is because the dumb azz shot into the car (not supposed to do that) and caused her to accelerate and hit him, that’s why they aren’t supposed to shoot into cars.
I had to reply to you via edit cause I’m no longer allowed to play in here. I’m still a new poster yet I been posting for years.
I guess I forgot to mention with every so many humans who rebel by human nature there’s a power control freak making stupid “off limit” laws, another human flaw.
I think one thing to remember is that ICE are not cops. They have no jurisdiction or authority over American citizens. When an ICE agent asks you (as an American citizen) to do something, that’s the equivalent of a random dude at Walmart parking lot. In paramilitary gear.
The current idea that that’s two sworn police officers giving lawful orders is simply not true.
They had no authority to block or impede her travel any more than you or I have.
18 U.S.C. § 111 criminalizes the act of forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating, or interfering with any federal officer, agent, employee, or member of the uniformed services who is engaged in or on account of the performance of their official duties. This statute applies to current and former federal officers, including FBI, DEA, ATF, Secret Service, U.S. Marshals, Border Patrol, ICE, Postal Inspectors, and federal judges. The offense is categorized into three levels based on the severity of the act: simple assault, assault involving physical contact or intent to commit another felony, and assault with a deadly or dangerous weapon or resulting in bodily injury. Simple assault is classified as a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in prison and a fine of up to $100,000. If the assault involves physical contact or the intent to commit another felony, it becomes a Class D felony, carrying a maximum penalty of eight years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. The most serious charge, under 18 U.S.C. § 111(b), applies when a deadly or dangerous weapon is used or bodily injury is inflicted, resulting in a Class C felony with a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. Prosecution requires proof that the defendant intentionally and forcibly committed one of the prohibited acts while the officer was performing official duties.
A strawman argument (also called a straw man fallacy or simply strawman) is a common logical fallacy where someone misrepresents, distorts, exaggerates, or oversimplifies their opponent’s position to make it easier to attack and “defeat.” Instead of engaging with the actual argument, they set up a weaker, fake version (like a scarecrow made of straw that’s easy to knock down) and then refute that.The name comes from the idea of building a flimsy “straw man” dummy that doesn’t fight back, allowing the arguer to appear victorious without addressing the real issue.Classic Structure of a Strawman
Person A makes a reasonable position (e.g., “We should regulate guns more strictly to reduce mass shootings”).
Person B misrepresents it (e.g., “So you want to ban all guns and take away everyone’s Second Amendment rights!”).
Person B then attacks the distorted version (which is much easier to argue against), ignoring the original nuanced point.
This creates the illusion of winning the debate while dodging the harder, actual discussion.
This isn’t actually true, and this belief is going to get more dumb liberals in trouble (if not hurt or killed).
Interference: A citizen can be detained if they commit a crime, like assaulting an officer or interfering with an operation, but this isn’t immigration enforcement against them.
I’ll happily shit on liberals too. I think her wife talking elevated the situation and was definitely a factor. Any encounter with LE should be comply, shut up, and lawyer up.
Vance says they will go door to door and if not here legally they will take you and you try to come back the right way….
Yet Kristi has said if you don’t turn yourself in and we find you, you can’t come back.
Inconsistent, yet I don’t ever expect my gub to be honest.
@twojarslave it’s seems Don has more passion for EyeRan then Merica and it also seems his army Eyece are the groups that he was supporting, they are hiding their faces because of this saying it’s due to being doxxed of course they will be identified as part of a hate group. It seems they are a bunch of hypocrites claiming to be minimal gub intervention but now they are actually feds. They are mostly fat white trash which explains the cowboy non trained tactics. It’s so Fing clear………
And why are they even standing off in MN. This is not the Floyd situation, it’s a white woman and all the protesters are white. Everything happening there is unconstitutional too, it looks like you have been conned by Don the con. He’s always been a con man.
Inform a child that “this is off limits to you” and child will be fascinated with what’s off limits.
Tell Adam and Eve that fruit is forbidden, what happens…….you know what happens.
@twojarslave I’m sure I’m wasting my time……..
But here is the guy we are dealing with….
Now ask yourself about ordering someone to do something you wouldn’t do yourself and integrity.
Ts face when he says “there will be casualties and there will be more, that’s the way it is” his face when he said that, sick man he is. Now would he even consider sending his own son? Or even he himself the draft dodger.
All the blind “left” hate and here is the right sickness. And his family is married into the aggressor, interesting and the folks who wanted a deal here are all in real estate. No wars = lied.
Everything this guy has done in business goes sour and resorts to schemes why would this be any different.
Violence is/is not the answer sucks as a question. Violence is an answer. It depends on situation if it’s the right one or not.
Ps. Humanity’s history is pretty fucking dark. Everybody always talks about slavery, or the holocaust, but they’re drops in the ocean. So violence kinda has been the answer for the majority of history.
This was not directed to you specifically, just felt like ranting.
