Trump 2025 - Resuming The National Nightmare Of Peace And Prosperity (Part 2)

Obviously not, but his pissy one-sided hyperbole irritates me.

I would have left that alone.

1 Like

You’re probably right.

Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean its bad.

If european elitists don’t like the US’s will to self determine thats their problem. Kier Starmer, Antonio Guterres and Klaus Schwabb can all go suck each others dicks.

2 Likes

Oh, look its the weird little gooner come to visit for his daily- what ever the hell it is? Goon fuel?

1 Like

There’s nothing hyperbolic about the comparison, especially when you consider how small of a geographic area the really dangerous parts of Chicago occupy. I’m guessing you don’t live in a war zone part of the city, but lots of people do and nobody’s organizing nationwide protests for their conditions.

I don’t follow Chicago news all that closely these days, but I’m guessing that Illinois Democrats are very similar to Maine Democrats. Blame Trump nonstop, call him a fascist, a racist, a threat to “Our Democracy”, and call everyone who doesn’t share their hysterical beliefs the same. All while dominating state and local government and watching problems grow worse in their jurisdictions.

What I like or don’t like is not important in this context.

I might be missing something, but Greenland or Iran weren’t actually successes so far. I have a strong impression that Trump is a volatile leader who acts with very little planning.

1 Like

Large scale massacres?

Majority of regular persons in Iran don’t support the regime, so no, this was not a victory for them.

Iran’s military capabilities have taken a beating, true, but that’s probably only thing US has achieved so far. Iran’s regime still stands, and that’s a huge victory for them. Few martyrs in leadership won’t hurt it as much as we would like to think.

They will make this as a story of how they stood tall against evil US imperialists and survived. They did not really lost anything that they can not build up again. Also, if possible, they will be even more hostile towards US in the future.

US should not surrender the game so easily (or rather not start the war at all). But once it was on, US should have finished what it started. It would have cost lot more US lives and money, but now US kinda looks weak for certain parts of the world for giving up so easily. And Iran will take it as a victory.

1 Like

Mar 3: “We won the war.”
Mar 7: “We defeated Iran.”
Mar 9: “We must attack Iran.” “The war is ending almost completely, and very beautifully.”
Mar 12: “We did win, but we haven’t won completely yet.”
Mar 13: “We won the war.”
Mar 14: “Please help us.”
Mar 15: “If you don’t help us, I will certainly remember it.”
Mar 16: “Actually, we don’t need any help at all.” “I was just testing to see who’s listening to me.” “If NATO doesn’t help, they will suffer something very bad.”
Mar 17: “We neither need nor want NATO’s help.” “I don’t need Congressional approval to withdraw from NATO.”
Mar 18: “Our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz.”
Mar 19: “US allies need to get a grip -step up and help open the Strait of Hormuz”
Mar 20: “NATO are cowards.”
Mar 21: “We don’t use it, we don’t need to open it.”
Mar 22: “This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours.” “Iran is Dead”
Mar 23: “We are giving them more time.”
Mar 24: “The war is nearing its end.”
Mar 25: “We are still negotiating.”
Mar 26: “Iran is begging for peace. They gave us a gift. We will give them more time.”
Mar 27: “Talks with iran are going very well”
Mar 28: “War will be over soon”
Mar 29: “Maybe we take Kharg island, maybe we dont”
Mar 30: “Open the Strait or we will obliterate all energy infrastructure and oil wells”
Mar 31: “We dont need the strait, we got plenty of oil. Get it yourself UK.”
April 1: “Iran wants a ceasefire” / “Strongly considering pulling out of NATO” / “There’s no deal with Iran”
April 3:“We can take their oil and make a fortune”
April 5:“Open the fuckin strait you crazy bastards or youll be living in hell”
April 6:“US could charge for strait of hormuz passage”
April 7:“A whole civilization will die tonight”

3 Likes

Now when you think of it. Properly planned operation would have involved taking and securing Hormuz immediately, so Iran could not use the blockade as a weapon.

Also,I think US had the perfect opportunity when there were “Scarf rebellions” in 2022. But Biden did not act.

Aggressive support for rebellion and some bombing could have solved the situation and there would be western friendly government in Iran already.

Went to see them with my dad in '92 when they came to my city. Mark and the gang were firing on all cylinders. I was still in the 7th grade and it was my first ‘‘big’’ concert. No photos but will never forget it.
Can’t believe I’m now 10 years older than my father was on that night. Fuck


2 Likes

A ceasefire isn’t a surrender or capitulation. We’ll know more about how it actually plays out in about two weeks or so. I’d be surprised if Iran will still retains any ability to enrich uranium, and I’d be surprised if they don’t re-open the strait.

I realize that Trump can seem rather different to European observers compared to past Presidents, but that’s what got him elected. To say he didn’t have a plan seems to be at odds with what would appear to be one of the most lopsided and decisive military actions in history. We’ve got whole apparatuses whose job it is to make plans for every contingency you can imagine.

I’m not sure there was any military way to decisively prevent something like mining the straights, but keeping that body of water closed also comes at tremendous cost to the Iranian regime. It’s definitely high-stakes poker and we, the public, don’t get to know all of the cards in play.

Biden had to be corralled by the Easter Bunny to prevent him from speaking. The Democratic Party is also very pro-Islamist, pro-socialist revolutionary, and pro anything that strategically weakens the USA and entrenches their own criminal schemes. Republicans have a problem with corruption, too, but Democrats are now an explicitly Marxist revolutionary organization, or at least all of their most prominent figures are. All of their actions make sense through that lens.

It is no coincidence that an open socialist revolutionary named Graham Platner is clobbering the old guard Janet Mills in the Democratic Senate Primary. He speaks the language of revolution, class warfare, and identity politics, and that’s what the Democrats of today want to hear.

Hah! Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz again, since Israel kept on attacking Lebanon.

I guess we are still going. Maybe US can still overthrow the regime. If you’re ready for that, I mean. New prolonged war could be poison for Trump’s approval rating.

I will repeat myself, but if Trump will end the islamic regime in Iran and support successfully the process for reasonable peace in Ukraine, I’ll take my hat off. But he still needs to prove that he can pull these off. Don’t start stuff you can’t finish. I thought Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq already taught that.

"The strikes killed 112 people and wounded 837 across the country, Lebanon’s health ministry said.
In Beirut, Reuters reporters saw people on motorcycles picking up wounded and transporting them to hospitals because there were not enough ambulances to get them in time. A group of firefighters worked to put out flames in a car park after one strike left more than a dozen cars scorched and mangled."

Israel doing war crimes should be no news to anyone.

I don’t think there is a single nation in the middle east that would even wipe their ass with the Geneva Convention. But if they could turn it into a bomb
 well, that would be something.

The only reason they even use the words “war crimes” is to appeal to westerners and continue doing what they’re doing.

1 Like

Me neither, and probably so. I’m not an military expert, even though I’ve studied the subject a bit.

But to a layman the blockage of the strait seemed something US did not believe that would happen.

I dunno. US is generally quite strong and capable in the field. I can give several examples where US absolutely crushed the enemy with firepower/tech superiority. So in that sense Trump’s military actions aren’t unique.