I have no idea what your conception of a âresetâ involves, whether through government policy or other means. I just know that you see Jews as a problem requiring some kind of solution.
As someone who has been the target of local reddit-based Antifa, I get it. Leftists say a lot of really stupid things, on account of the identity-based lens through which they view the world. Their attempts to translate their visions into social justice public policy have been a pretty big problem for the last 100 years, longer if you dig past socialism.
I actually defended Candice Owens a few years ago against zecarlo calling her stupid or something like that. Sheâs clearly not stupid, as she is making a lot of money by putting her narratives out to her audience, no different than Ben Shapiro or Heather Cox Richardson.
Itâs a Wednesday, so boredom explains some of it. What Iâm getting at is that social justice political movements along identity lines eventually lead to government policies along identity lines, as is evidenced by both Nazi Germany and The USA today. The antidote to identity politics isnât more identity politics with different in-groups and out-groups.
âJews run societyâ sounds an awful lot like âwhite men run societyâ to me. Thereâs truth to both narratives, but that doesnât make it a good basis for public policy.
I didnât say you hated Jews, only that you see them as a problem. When asked what your solution to that problem was, you said a âresetâ. I still donât know what that actually means.
Ethnic enclaves are legal and have been legal in the USA for a long time. Weâve all been free to go Amish the whole time, or model a similar type of society for a different in-group.
Even with all of Lewistonâs dysfunction, it is still a city with real people from all different kinds of backgrounds. Iâm not sure how you would segregate a city like Lewiston, or dissolve the government, nor would I be interested in finding out anymore than I enjoyed finding out what Maine Democratsâ ideas of social justice actually meant in terms of public policy.
No, it actually wouldnât. Somalians have been here for well over 20 years now, with thousands of USA-born US Citizens and many more who became naturalized or passed the US Citizenship exam. Many other immigrants have done the same who arenât Somali. One of my BJJ buddies passed his exam a few years ago after immigrating here from Africa, specifically Tunisia.
Iâm all for enforcing immigration policy and doing so aggressively, but Iâm still completely lost on how any of Nick Fuentesâs ideas actually translate into coherent public policy.
I dont think any group benefitted more from their victimhood after WW2. Which I understand sounds odd. But whether purposely or not there has been a lot of media focused on ww2 and the holocaust. Just from a collective consciousness, if you ask a random 20yr old anywhere in the world what the holocaust was, youâll likely get an answer. If you ask the same what the rape of Nanjing was, Iâm not confident theyâll know. Perhaps my view is skewed due to geography.
Just wanted to highlight the one unassailable fact here that everyone(?) seems to agree onâŠ
The Japs (I use the pejorative term on purpose here) arguably treated the Chinese worse than the Nazis treated the Jews. But now we all get along, because (simplistically) we live by the rules, because w/o rules humans are savages.
Look, weâre all grateful for Nintendo, but havenât more Asians died in wars of conquest and plunder than any other people that we know of, thanks to Asians being ahead of the curve on written language to record it all?
I seriously do not know what âresetâ means to you at all, either in terms of public policy or a broader sociocultural/spiritual movement.