Trinity - Bible Teaching or Doctrine of Man

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

Isaiah 9:6 states:
“6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7 To the abundance of the princely rule and to peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom in order to establish it firmly and to sustain it by means of justice and by means of righteousness, from now on and to time indefinite. The very zeal of Jehovah of armies will do this.”

quote]

So this verse is talking about being King in Heaven? The throne of David is on Earth, so being crowned King in Heaven is not what this verse is talking about. You might want to reread what you posted.[/quote]
You are right D. David did rule on earth and that was because David was a human. When Jesus went to heaven he was no longer human; he was a spirit being so Jesus is going to be king over God’s Kingdom which will rule from heaven. I didn’t explain that well in my previous post.

There has been only one Kingdom of God where there was a government with a king that ruled over God’s people. The ruling king represented God’s authority and sat on God’s throne. David sat on this throne which represents God’s authority and as king ruled over God’s people. This is what Jesus is going to sit on as the “son of David”(Luke 1:32,33) - he’s the one who has the legal right (Ezekiel 21:26,27). However, as a spirit being, Jesus isn’t going to rule on earth. This throne that he inherits will rule from heaven. It can rightly be called the throne of David because like David, Jesus will rule over God’s people who are on the earth.

As I’ve been pointing out Jesus became king in heaven over this kingdom in 1914. His first act was kicking Satan out of heaven and throwing him down to the earth and as a result of Satan’s anger he causes WOE for the people of the earth which was the first world war. After that event God’s kingdom is officially announced with Jesus as king (Revelation 12:7-12). But notice what Jesus does when he takes the throne at Matthew 23:31-33:
31 “When the Son of man arrives in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit down on his glorious throne. 32 And all the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate people one from another, just as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33 And he will put the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on his left.”

So when Jesus becomes king he turns his attention to the nations and does a separating work - he puts sheep on his right hand and goats on his left hand. He puts them into two groups. This harmonizes with the wheat and weeds illustration at Matthew 13:36-41. In this illustration Jesus said at the conclusion of the system of things Jesus will do a separating work and put the wheat in one group and the weeds in another group. We are now living during the conclusion of the system of things when the separating work is taking place. It’s so important to realize the time period we are living in because soon, as Daniel 2:44 points out, God’s kingdom with Jesus as king will crush and put an end to the current ruling governments earth wide and will stand to times indefinite.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:
Football - soccer, or Football - American. I always have to distinguish between the two. You have to be a fan of rugby.[/quote]

Neither I’m afraid - I’ve always been a bit of a nerd! I quite enjoyed athletics at school though, but I never got into any particular sport (except bodybuilding of course). I remembered the first time they got weights out into our really basic school gym (instead of getting us to play soccer for like the 1000th time), and I loved it - it was such a welcome change LOL.

I do have an honest question for you guys.

If the past of the JW’s is a history with many doctrinal errors as they sought the light of truth (I believe that is how you described it) - how do you reconcile the scriptural errors of the past with any confidence that they have it right this time? I mean, if the truth eluded the inspired founders of your faith, then how are you sure their followers/replacements are doing any better? please understand, I am not being a smart-ass, I am just really curious how you can have such confidence and boldness as you display on here with such a shaky historical record.

Also, kind of a follow on question . . . since past JW’s were disfellowshipped for not agreeing with a couple of the rendtitions of the ealier 1914 doctrine, when it was replaced with the “new light” of Jesus’ heavenly kingship, were all of the disfellowshipped JW’s automatically forgiven for not accepting the incorrect version of the doctrine and accepted back into the fellowship?

and then another follow-on question to the first two . . . if the JW leadership currently rejects most of the teachings of its founder (CT Russell - president from 1879-1916) and since they also reject his successor (JF Rutherford - president from 1916-1942) how can you be confident that in say 20-30 years, the new leadership will not be rejecting the teachings of your current president and teaching something new? I mean, they are already rejecting the first 63 years of an organization that only has existed for 130 years . . .

Speaking of your founder, since the WB&TS claims apostolic succession, who passed the apostolic “torch” to Russell?

OK - I hav emor equestions, but would like to hear your answers to these . . . thanks!

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

One thing I can say for certain is the fact that the scriptural evidence in the Bible is so strong and the signs that all can see with their own eyes are so clear which all point to 1914 being the year Jesus became king in heaven, when Satan was kicked out of heaven, when Jesus presence started and when the last days began.

[/quote]

I dont know about you guys, but I beleive that Jesus has been king in heaven forever. How do I know this? In the begining God created the Heavens and the Earth. God is on the throne in Genesis, and God is on the throne in Revelation. Never was God not on the throne. He is King in Heaven and King of Earth.

Got one more thought of questions for the JWs. If the end of days started in 1914 when will Jesus be returning? I mean if you know when he started to reign in heaven when will he reign on Earth? When will your prophesy, made after the year 1914, be discredited, or are your prophesies the same as a fortune teller? So vague that when Jesus returns you will say, “See we were right.” We had 1000 years past 1914 for the prophesy to be correct, but when 2914 comes around and he has not returned would you then agree the JWs are full or crap, or will the prophecy be changed again?

Just had a thought. Jesus died late Friday afternoon, was burried before night fall on Friday, dead all day Saturday, and rose on Sunday Morning. As we all know he was not dead for 3, 24 hour periods, but was dead for 3 days, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Maybe that Jesus started to reign in heaven in 1914 the millenium reign may have ended at the turn of the millenium in the year 2000. Not a full 1000 years, but a millenium that started in 1000 AD. I would say your prophesy of 1914 is false based on these assumptions. Got a new prophesy?[/quote]
No Jesus has not been king in heaven forever. The Bible clearly shows that Jesus is given the kingship in heaven. Ezekiel 21:26,27 is a prophecy which states that the crown will be removed from a wicked King which turned out to be Zedekiah. The prophecy then states that the crown will be given to the one who comes and has the legal right. King Zedekiah was the last king in the line of David to sit on God’s throne. Jesus as a descendant of David is the one who has the legal right. Isaiah 9:6 states:
“6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7 To the abundance of the princely rule and to peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom in order to establish it firmly and to sustain it by means of justice and by means of righteousness, from now on and to time indefinite. The very zeal of Jehovah of armies will do this.”

That prophecy makes it clear that Jesus will sit on the throne of King David which has been vacant since King Zedekiah was removed by the Babylonians. Daniel 7:12, 13 show a scene in heaven where Jesus aproaches Jehovah and is given a kingdom. Daniel 7:13,14 states:
13 “I kept on beholding in the visions of the night, and, see there! with the clouds of the heavens someone like a son of man happened to be coming; and to the Ancient of Days he gained access, and they brought him up close even before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership and dignity and kingdom, that the peoples, national groups and languages should all serve even him. His rulership is an indefinitely lasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom one that will not be brought to ruin.”

Again, this is Jesus approaching God and God gives him the kingdom just like God gave King David his kingship.

Revelation, which is a future vision describes a battle in heaven where Satan is kicked out of heaven and thrown down to the earth. After that event God’s Kingdom is officially announced with Jesus having authority over this kingdom which means he is king.

Revelation 12:7-10 states:
“7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled 8 but it did not prevail, neither was a place found for them any longer in heaven. 9 So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him. 10 And I heard a loud voice in heaven say:
Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God!

This is when Jesus becomes king in heaven which is after Satan gets kicked out of heaven. Once Satan is kicked out of heaven this spells WOE for the people of the earth according to Revelation 12:12. Remember this is a future vision that was given to John and when he writes Revelation the above events did not yet happen.

So no Jesus has not been king in heaven forever.[/quote]

So I am assuming you think the time in heaven is the same as “Earth time”? Why would God be Pigeon holed to our calendar?[/quote]
No, the time in heaven is not the same as time on earth. There are two places in the Bible that mention how long one day is for God. 2 Peter 3:8 which states that “one day is with Jehovah as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day.” And Psalms 90:4 states “that for a thousand years are in your eyes but as yesterday when it is past.”

So in God’s time 1000 humans years is one day but the scriptures I mentioned in my previous post do not reference any specific time period but Isaiah 9:6 does state that Jesus will sit upon the throne of David. So we know that when David was king Jesus was not king over God’s Kingdom. There were 19 Kings in the line of David from the tribe of Judah that sat on the Davidic throne spanning at least four centuries. The last king in the line of David was Zedekiah and as Ezekiel 21:26,27 states the crown or kingship is removed from him and is given to he who the legal right which is Jesus. This happened in 607 B.C.E. So the Davidic throne in the line of David from the tribe of Judah would remain vacant until Jesus who is a descendant of David sits on the throne and becomes king.

How do we know that it happened in 1914? First, the Bible Students in the 1800’s used the prophecy in Daniel 4:10-16 about a kingship represented by a tree being cut down and restrained for seven times to interpret when the trampling by the nations on Jerusalem would end which Jesus mentions at Luke 21:24. They realized that the trampling started in
607 B.C.E. when Jersalem was destroyed by the Babylonians and the last Davidic king was removed. This took them to 1914. Second, Revelation 12:10 states that as a result of Satan being kicked out of heaven, God’s kingdom comes into power with Jesus as it’s king. At Revelation 12:12 as a result of Satan being kicked out of heaven and thrown down to earth the verse states that he will cause “WOE” to the people of the earth. We can clearly see the results of Satans anger. Because the first WOE Satan causes is WAR which was a world war that never occurred before. If you look at the four horsemen of the apocalypse at Revelation 6, the first rider in white is given a crown or kingship, he has a bow and he goes forth to complete a conquest. This horseman is the newly crowned Jesus. The next horseman that rides after the newly crowned Jesus and continues to ride with Jesus is war. The first sign Jesus said would mark his presence and the conclusion of the system of things mentioned at Matthew 24:3 is War. This is the start of the WOE Satan brings to the earth because of him being kicked out of heaven which is marked by a clear, discernable event. The other two horsemen that ride with the newly crowned Jesus at Revelation 6 are famine and pestilence which again is more WOE that Satan brings on the earth. So when Jesus becomes king he kicks Satan out of heaven down to the earth. As a result of Satan being kicked out of heaven he is angry because he knows his time is short so he causes trouble for the people on the earth. Some of the problems Satan causes are symbolized by horsemen who appear after Jesus becomes king and ride with Jesus for a period of time. They are War, Famine and Pestilence. This is the reason Jesus is riding alongside 3 bad horsemen. These three bad horsemen that ride alongside the newly crowned Jesus is a result of Satan causing WOE to the earth and the WOE comes in the form of WAR, FAMINE and PESTILENCE. These are also three of the signs Jesus mentions at Matthew 24:3-7 and Luke 21:10,11 that would mark his parousia or presence and the conclusion of the system of things.

So again, the significance of 1914 is when Jesus became king in heaven, which was when Satan got kicked out of heaven down to the earth and when Jesus presence and the conclusion of the system of things started. Due to Satan having great anger because he knows his time is short, he causes WOE or trouble for the people of the earth. The WOE or trouble comes in the form of WAR, FAMINE and PESTILENCE which Jesus told his disciples would be some of the signs that would identify his presence in heaven as king and the conclusion of the system of things. All of this is based on the Bible and the Bible only.

[/quote]

Ugh, that was actually painful to read to be honest… This is what Irish referred to as tortured logic. You want to know when Satan came to the Earth? It was the day sin aka, evil entered the world. Who do you think tempted Eve in the garden? What planet was it, Mars?
Jesus revealed his kingship in the gospels talking to Pilate. “If my kingdom was of this world…” He is speaking present tense and if I am not mistaken the Crucifixion of Christ occurred between 29 AD and 33 AD, not 1914. Since he said this plainly at that time it stands to reason that a direct saying would trump a warping of Daniel or Revelation.
I am also very weary of anybody who claims to have detailed knowledge of the goings on in heavenâ?¦We donâ??t even have a good grasp of earthly happenings, how in the hell are we supposed to know what goes on in heaven.

Now if you are biblical literalists, like you claim, then you will know that the time of the end times, Armageddon, or what ever you call it is NOT in the Bible. When Jesus said that nobody knows the day or the hour save for the Father, that means nobody knows and nobody can know. Itâ??s not knowable. â?? MT 24:36 and MT 24:42 Further, Jesus warns of those who claim to know and calls them false prophets.
So, if nobody, but the Father knows when the end times are, why then, should I trust your interpretation? Are you not playing the role of the false prophet but saying, this has occurred and that is coming? When Jesus says you cannot know and it will come when you least expect it, should I trust his words, or your interpretation. Should I listen to you or the word of God?

You are making bold claims of knowledge so these are not unreasonable questions. You are claiming to know that which Jesus said canâ??t be known and only false prophets would claim knowledge of…
[/quote]
I can completely understand coming from your perspective that this seems like a twisting of the scriptures because it is unlike anything you have heard but let me try to clarify some of the points you made.

Yes, Satan did have access to earth, he was actually a cherub who’s was assigned to watch over the garden of Eden. Even after he went against God and played a part in the downfall of the human race he still had access to both heaven and earth. We can see this in the book of Job at Job 1:6,7:
"6 Now it came to be the day when the sons of the true God entered to take their station before Jehovah, and even Satan proceeded to enter right among them. 7 Then Jehovah said to Satan: “Where do you come from?” At that Satan answered Jehovah and said: “From roving about in the earth and from walking about in it.

The events in Job occurred at least 1000 years after the events in the garden of eden but yet Satan was still allowed in heaven and he had access to earth. Can you see the way the verse states this? It says “even Satan proceeded to enter” before God. You’re not understanding what I’m saying when I say that Satan was kicked out of heaven and thrown down to the earth in Revelation 12:7-12. Never did I say that when this happened this was the first time Satan had access to earth. Revelation 12:7-12, which is a vision of the future, states that “neither was a place found for them in heaven” so once Satan and his demons were kicked out of heaven they no longer had access to heaven, meaning that what Satan did in Job 1:6,7 which was to take his position before God, Satan could no longer do that.

Now is that twisted tortured logic? I know I’m not the best when it comes to sentence structure and explaining things so maybe that’s why it appears to be twisted tortured logic. But the above explanation seems to be pretty clear. Are you humble enough to accept it? I don’t mean accept everything I’m saying, but for this one point are you humble enough to say “Okay, now I understand what you mean. I did not know that.” Or are you just going to put both hands over your ears and say “NO, NO, NO, NO?”

Now in regards to your other point about Jesus kingdom. No, Jesus saying to Pilate that “my kingdom is no part of the world” did not mean that his kingdom was already established. Remember the “Our Father” prayer at Matthew 6:9-11? Jesus told his followers to pray to God for his kingdom to come which means it had not yet come. Even when Jesus was in front of Pilate God’s kingdom still had not come because at Acts 1:6 as Jesus was going to heaven, Jesus’ apostles asked him if he was going to restore the kingdom to Israel at that time. They asked him that question because his kingdom had not yet come and they wrongly thought that Jesus’ kingdom was going to restore Israel to it’s former glory and remove the oppressive yoke of the Romans. Again, is that “twisted, tortured logic?”

You are absolutely right when you say that no one knows when Armageddon is going to come; not even Jesus knows, only Jehovah knows. The year 1914 is when Jesus became king in heaven, the year Satan was kicked out of heaven, and the year Jesus’s presence and the conclusion of the system of things started. Jesus’ disciples plainly asked Jesus at Matthew 24:3 “Tell us, When will these things be, and what will be the sign of your presence and of the conclusion of the system of things.” What do you think that means Pat? Jesus’ disciples asking Jesus for signs and then Jesus giving the signs means that his disciples would be able to recognize when his presence started and when the conclusion of the system of things started. Through those signs they would be able to identify the specific time period they were in. Jesus parousia or presence which most Bibles translate as “coming” is not when Armageddon is going to start. How do we know that for a fact. It’s because when Jesus comes, which is when people will see Jesus, Armageddon will start and many people will be destroyed. When that event happens you will not need signs to identify this because it will be clear. But according to Matthew 24:3 Jesus’ parousia or presence and the conclusion of the system of things would be identifiable by signs which means that it would not be easy to discern and people will have to pay attention to the signs Jesus gavein order to identify Jesus’ presence and the conclusion of the system of things. Further proof that Jesus’ parousia or presence which most bibles translate as coming is going to be a period of time rather than armageddon is at Matthew 24:37-39 which states:
“37 For just as the days of Noah were, so the presence of the Son of man will be. 38 For as they were in those days before the flood, eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark; 39 and they took no note until the flood came and swept them all away, so the presence of the Son of man will be.”

Can you see Pat? Jesus presence or coming is compared to the days before the flood - not the flood event. When Jesus comes, which is when Armageddon starts, this is comparable to the flood event but Jesus says that his presence will be like the days before the flood leading up to the flood event. It took Noah and his family 50-60 years to build the ark which was the days before the flood. So Jesus presence is going to be a period of time called the conclusion of the system of things or last days that will lead up to the flood event. This time period would be discernible through the signs Jesus told his disciples to look for at Matthew 24:3-14. So again, we do not know when armageddon is going to come only God know this.

Pat, when you use words like “Ugh” or “tortured logic” you need to thoroughly examine the Bible before you make statements like that. Because it is obvious that you do not know. You don’t know about what happened to Satan in Revelation 12, you don’t know about God’s kingdom and you don’t know that the last days can be identified by the signs Jesus gave. I apologize if my post are too long and they appear to be “torture” to read but I do that so I can thoroughly explain a point like I did with the above points. It’s just sad that this information in the Bible is not taught and is so different to people that it is “tortured logic” to many.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:
Football - soccer, or Football - American. I always have to distinguish between the two. You have to be a fan of rugby.[/quote]

Neither I’m afraid - I’ve always been a bit of a nerd! I quite enjoyed athletics at school though, but I never got into any particular sport (except bodybuilding of course). I remembered the first time they got weights out into our really basic school gym (instead of getting us to play soccer for like the 1000th time), and I loved it - it was such a welcome change LOL.[/quote]

I loved the weight room. My only issue is fat loss. I have always been the fat kid. I have tried everything. My discipline sucks. I am 6’5" tall and 315lbs. I played football in high school then hurt my back. If you can avoid back issues by all means do. I have been dealing with that for 15 years.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
<<< I believe that balance is required - you cannot be fully left, or fully right. “Sacrifices”/head knowledge don’t mean anything if the individual is blatantly doing something un-Christian/spiritual…and a person who has “spiritual discernment” would display that spirituality in some way other than just speaking about it.[/quote]
I don’t think “balance” is the way I’d characterize it. Questions of carnality and spirituality, mere intellectual acquiescence versus a change of heart and the like are all after the fact. What we’re dealing with, what God is dealing with, what the Bible, the whole of human history and the entirety of the Gospel are dealing with is life and death.

Have you been to a cemetery lately? The local residents there have been rendered strikingly incapable of life in this present world. They are in fact dead. I really believe what has been largely lost in modern Christianity is the biblical truth that sin IS death. It is spiritual death every bit as real as and infinitely more consequential than physical death. The spiritually dead are no more capable of interacting with the kingdom of God than the physically dead are this world. They must be resurrected from that spiritual death which is a supernatural act upon the inner man by God himself.

It is not an acknowledgment that the Bible is true or even that Jesus is God. A recent poll showed that 80% of Americans say that they believe that Jesus of Nazareth was the Son of God and that He did in fact raise from the dead!!! If that weren’t so heartrendingly tragic it would be laughable. This country could not possibly be the national whorehouse that it has degenerated into if that were actually the case. They don’t mind answering a poll to make themselves feel good as long it doesn’t make any real demands on their life. They are dead.

It is also not being the most externally moral and upright selfless “good” person you can be. There is such a thing as common grace wherein God restrains evil in the heathen for the blessing of the elect and to prevent them from destroying the Earth by dinner time. “All these things I have kept from my youth” is not resurrection and once again Paul couldn’t be clearer that by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

All of the commands of Christ and the exhortations of Peter, Paul, James, John etc. are to those who have already been made alive in Christ and who can hear them as properly glorifying to the one true God.

In short, even not being “blatantly un-Christian” is in itself positive evidence of no more than common grace for which one will be all the more accountable in the judgment. God is not impressed that Gandhi did a buncha “really good stuff” in the name of his pagan hindu god/s. He is interested in His own glory and is quite stuck on Himself that way. He can do it and we can’t.

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:
I do have an honest question for you guys.

If the past of the JW’s is a history with many doctrinal errors as they sought the light of truth (I believe that is how you described it) - how do you reconcile the scriptural errors of the past with any confidence that they have it right this time? I mean, if the truth eluded the inspired founders of your faith, then how are you sure their followers/replacements are doing any better? please understand, I am not being a smart-ass, I am just really curious how you can have such confidence and boldness as you display on here with such a shaky historical record.

Also, kind of a follow on question . . . since past JW’s were disfellowshipped for not agreeing with a couple of the rendtitions of the ealier 1914 doctrine, when it was replaced with the “new light” of Jesus’ heavenly kingship, were all of the disfellowshipped JW’s automatically forgiven for not accepting the incorrect version of the doctrine and accepted back into the fellowship?

and then another follow-on question to the first two . . . if the JW leadership currently rejects most of the teachings of its founder (CT Russell - president from 1879-1916) and since they also reject his successor (JF Rutherford - president from 1916-1942) how can you be confident that in say 20-30 years, the new leadership will not be rejecting the teachings of your current president and teaching something new? I mean, they are already rejecting the first 63 years of an organization that only has existed for 130 years . . .

Speaking of your founder, since the WB&TS claims apostolic succession, who passed the apostolic “torch” to Russell?

OK - I hav emor equestions, but would like to hear your answers to these . . . thanks!

[/quote]
Excellent question! When Russell and his associates began seeking the truth they absolutely did not have the truth and they realized that. The main thing they had was being able to use the Bible to know when the trampling by the nation on Jerusalem began and ended and when Jesus would be king in heaven. This took them to the date of 1914. But this is all they had because they got this informtion from the Bible only; not from a divine source. They didn’t tie Jesus becoming king in heaven with Satan being kicked out of heaven to earth and causing trouble for the people of earth; with the signs Jesus told his disciples to look for that would identify his presence and the last days; the three bad horsemen, that are some of the signs Jesus said to look for, that would ride with the newly crowned Jesus; the fact that Jesus’ kingship and presence would be an extended period of time. So they were looking to that date before any of the major signs began to happen which was going to be a result of Satan being kicked out of heaven and causing trouble on earth. In the 1880’s the major signs that Jesus said to look for had not started to happen on a global scale.

For example, war is the first sign Jesus said to look for and is the first horseman to ride after and with the newly crowned Jesus in Revelation 6. This type of war on a global scale with the modern weapons had never happened in the history of man. Upwards of 20 million people died during that four year conflict. Then came WWII came with even more devastating weapons and even more people died. Historians say that three times as many people died in the 20th century as a result of war that all the wars combined from 1 AD to 1899 AD.

Pestilence was another sign Jesus said to look for at Luke 21:10,11 and disease/pestilence is another horseman that rode with the newly crowned Jesus at Revelation 6. In 1918 the spanish flu appeared and killed between 50-100 million people world wide in on a one and a half year period. Never had a diesease affected the human race like this. People were literally dropping dead and it affected mainly healthy young adults. Not even the Bubonic Plague which last 4 years and affected Europe and Asia killed as many people in such a short time.

Famine is another sign Jesus said to look to and famine was a horseman that rode with the newly crowned Jesus at Revelation 6. Even though food production has increased, millions around the world still go hungry and the WHO estimates that malnutrition plays a major role in the deaths of more than 5 million children each year.

Earthquakes is another sign Jesus said to look for. The U.S. Geological Survey says that since 1990 alone an average of 17 earthquakes per year have been powerful enough to damage buildings and crack the ground. Many seismologist state that reported earthquakes have increased in the 20th century most likely due to the fact that earthquake prone areas are more populated than they were in the past.

1 Timothy 3:1-5 states that “during the last days critical times hard to deal with with be here.” The verses then go on to list traits that would be dominant among people in general. In part, Paul said people would be lovers of themselves; lovers of money; disobedient to parents; disloyal; having no natural affection; without self control; fierce; lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God; not open to any agreement.

Many say that wars, diseases, food shortages, earthquakes and the bad attitudes of people have been happening for centuries. That is true, but not only did the frequency increase in the 20th century but something else happened. In the 20th century we got technology so news and information spread around the world much faster the deeper we got into the 20th century. Why would that matter? Because in the centuries prior to the 20th century if an earthquake happened in Japan and you were living in the U.S. you would not have heard about it. People could actually live on a plot of land and not know about food shortages, war in other parts of the world and the bad human traits that were dominant among people. During these times people may have been able to honestly say that the signs Jesus told his disciples to look for weren’t evident. But that is not the case in the 20th century. First, early in the 20th century as technology was taking off, two of the signs Jesus said to look for that occurred in 1914 and 1918 were so massive that technology wasn’t needed for the world to notice. When WWI happened in 1914 and then the Spanish flu in 1918 the whole world stood up to take notice. The deeper we got into the 20th century as technology increased the signs became clearer and clearer because the signs I mentioned above were being reported more and more in the news. So that if an earthquake happened in Japan or a war in Korea the whole world knew. Now look at where we’ve been the past 30 years. We are constantly bombarded with all of the signs that mark the last days on and almost daily basis. Take earthquakes for example, I personally have heard of at least 6 major earthquakes from watching the news 2 of them killed over hundreds of thousands. All of the signs Jesus mentioned and the human traits Paul mentioned are on a world wide display so that everyone can clearly see them. When the end comes no one will be able to say that they did not see the signs. Unfortunately people just don’t know what to make of them.

I know, I could have just said the signs instead of typing this wall of text. But it’s the signs that Jesus told his disciples to look for that are all so prevalant and I can see with my own eyes that builds my confidence and faith that we are living in the last days and Jesus is king of God’s kingdom in heaven. Also, I can use the Bible to explain all of this.

The Bible Students in the 1880’s did not have these signs because Satan had not yet been kicked out of heaven down to the earth. All they could do was look to the year 1914. When that year came, the August 30, 1914 edition of the The World a leading New york newspaper had a feature article in the paper’s Sunday magazine section commented on this as follows: “The terrific war outbreak in Europe has fulfilled an extraordinary prophecy. For a quarter of a century past, through preachers and through press, the ‘International Bible Students’ . . . have been proclaiming to the world that the Day of Wrath prophesied in the Bible would dawn in 1914.” When WWI was over and Armageddon did not come they were shaken but they realized that something did happen and it took them years using the Bible to realize what actually happened in 1914. But the fact that such a big event did happen caused them to not lose their faith; they just realized that they needed to examine the Bible closer to find out what really happened. On the other hand, if nothing happened in 1914 and as the 20th century went on, life on earth got better and better then I bet the religion known as Jehovah’s Witnesses would not be in existence and if it were it would barely be noticeable. But the exact opposite happened. So the early Bible Students and the JW’s making mistakes does not shake my faith since I can clearly see the signs Jesus said to look for and I can use the Bible as I’ve been using to explain that in 1914 Jesus became king in heaven, kicked Satan out of heaven down to the earth. Due to the fact that Satan know his time is short he is causing Woe for the people of the earth and the Woe that Satan is causing makes up the signs that Jesus told his disciples to look to to identify the time period we are in.

Also, none of the founders claimed to have apostolic succession or to be inspired of God. Like I said at the beginning they realized that they did not have the complete truth when they began seeking it. Looking back at the history they believed false things in the early 1900’s and even past 1914. For example, they used the cross in their worship even though this is a clear violation of God’s law regarding idolatry (come on Irish, praying to a cross or an image no matter what the reason doesn’t set off alarms?). They saw in the Bible at
1 Corinthians 6:9-1l that Idolaters will not inherit God’s kingdom so they removed all crosses from there worship and buildings. Russell and the other Bible Students believed that the pyramids at Giza was from God. They dropped that belief in the late 1920’s. There was an article in a 1940 Watchtower about the pyramids at Giza that stated that it was a pagan monument and that it was not from God. In the article they had a footnote that stated prior to 1925 the Bible Students believed the pyramids were from God. Seeing how they adjusted their beliefs to be inline with the Bible, being encouraged to read the Bible for ourselves to make sure what we believe is inline with the Bible and seeing that the current beliefs are inline with the Bible helps me to have faith in JW’s as a religion.

Since this is long, I’ll answer your other questions which are really good questions in another post.

thanks for the reply - I appreciate your time and energy.

Man, that just opens all sorts of questions in my mind: I’ll focus on these three:

If “Russell and his associates began seeking the truth they absolutely did not have the truth and they realized that.” - Well, why did they then knowingly teach false doctrine as truth?

If “this is all they had because they got this information from the Bible only; not from a divine source.” - are you saying that the Bible is not a divine source?

“None of the founders claimed to have apostolic succession or to be inspired of God.” - I did not say the founders claimed apostolic succession - it is the Watchtower organization that has claimed apostolic succession - so who do they say passed that apostolic torch to Russell?

“Come on Irish, praying to a cross or an image no matter what the reason doesn’t set off alarms?” - It most certainly would, but I don’t pray to crosses or images - not sure why that applies to me or the questions I asked?

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:
I do have an honest question for you guys.

If the past of the JW’s is a history with many doctrinal errors as they sought the light of truth (I believe that is how you described it) - how do you reconcile the scriptural errors of the past with any confidence that they have it right this time? I mean, if the truth eluded the inspired founders of your faith, then how are you sure their followers/replacements are doing any better? please understand, I am not being a smart-ass, I am just really curious how you can have such confidence and boldness as you display on here with such a shaky historical record.

[/quote]

I like honest questions :slight_smile:

I’ll answer the first part for just now (I think mse2us is covering some other parts);

For me personally, I can accept the errors (if done with good motives and not completely against principles). The main thing for me is the forward direction and their emphasis on making sure the members are “topped up” spiritually speaking (there are constant reminders etc). Their concern for spiritual welfare is very great. What many people “on the outside” don’t realise is that the bulk of the bible based info that we receive is designed to help us apply the bible much better in our lives (in other words, to help us to be stronger in our faith so that it move us to action). Of course, nothing replaces the bible, but talking about it using other media and meetings/church helps to strengthen faith and encourage/motivate others.

Also, I feel it’s important for Christians to have some sort of “evangelical spirit”; to feel that “The Message” is so important that you need to actually go to the people (something JWs do even physically).

There can be many errors in interpreting dates etc in the past, but to a true Christian, this should not matter much because you do not serve God in order to get a reward. There’s more to being a JW than just guessing dates and getting them wrong (LOL), it’s about the above and other things (like believing they have the truth about what the bible teaches).

If there’s another thing too, it’s acting on what they teach too (in general) - take for example World War 2, when Hitler wanted people to sign up for the army, JWs became conscientious objectors because they did not want to kill their brothers and fellow man in other countries…and as a result, many were put into Concentration Camps and lost their lives (simply because they refused to be freed by denouncing their faith).

An interesting little story:

My granddad (a JW) was put in prison because he refused to go to war (based on his beliefs)…and to make matters worse, his colleagues/fellow villagers treated him like scum because they perceived JW’s as un-patriotic/cowards. In some places, the JWs were even killed by their own countrymen who forms mobs against them.

But of course, we’re all just cultist who are brainwashed by the Watchtower (mwah hah hah hah), it’s got nothing to do with trying to follow Jesus’ teachings :wink:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

I can completely understand coming from your perspective that this seems like a twisting of the scriptures because it is unlike anything you have heard but let me try to clarify some of the points you made.
[/quote]
Not seems, are. Further you rewrite scripture to make it fit you views.

Yes, it is still tortured logic. You are claiming factual knowledge of the going ons in heaven of from something that is largely symbolic, as is the book of Revelation. In the context of the story, it can be taken many ways. The woman can be God’s people, the twelve stars being the twelve tribes of Israel. The birth would would be the birth of the Messiah. The messiah was called to heaven, the people of God scattered. War breaks out, Satan loses. He precedes then to attack God by going after his people. The date stamp of 1914 is no where in there. There is no discernible difference between 1914 and now. I could see how the folks in 1914 thought WW1 was the beginning of the end, but it clearly wasn’t. The war ended and life continued. Hell, the flu pandemic of 1918 was more deadly than WW1.

Jn 18:36
"Jesus answered, “My kingdom does not belong to this world. If my kingdom did belong to this world, my attendants (would) be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. But as it is, my kingdom is not here.”
Sounds present tense to me.
Aside from the fact that I don’t think Jesus is overwhelmingly concerned with being a “King”. It’s just a word. Being Messiah is a much bigger deal. There have been many kings in the world most were useless and all but a few figure heads are dead.

I am aware of what the signs are as stated in scripture. And whether or not we’re in those times I do not know or care. People have always read the signs of their days as the end is near. They have been wrong. However, eventually somebody will be write, but it will not be some great insight that they were provided, but rather the sheer luck of having that mentality when it does actually happen. Like if you where a coat everyday, eventually you’ll hit winter and need it.

[quote]
Pat, when you use words like “Ugh” or “tortured logic” you need to thoroughly examine the Bible before you make statements like that. Because it is obvious that you do not know. You don’t know about what happened to Satan in Revelation 12, you don’t know about God’s kingdom and you don’t know that the last days can be identified by the signs Jesus gave. I apologize if my post are too long and they appear to be “torture” to read but I do that so I can thoroughly explain a point like I did with the above points. It’s just sad that this information in the Bible is not taught and is so different to people that it is “tortured logic” to many.[/quote]

Revelation is the least important book in the bible. Thousands of people have interpreted it a thousand different ways. It offers little in the way of instruction of faith, communication with God, or hope. In the end it’s merely a statement that despite everything that happens Good will conquer evil. Everybody pretends to understand it, and everybody has been wrong.

[quote]mse2us wrote:
<<< Also, none of the founders claimed to <<<>>> be inspired of God. [/quote]
I just scanned this from my copy of the Time is at Hand. Page 15

[quote]dmaddox wrote:
I loved the weight room. My only issue is fat loss. I have always been the fat kid. I have tried everything. My discipline sucks. I am 6’5" tall and 315lbs. I played football in high school then hurt my back. If you can avoid back issues by all means do. I have been dealing with that for 15 years.[/quote]

Growing up I would have loved to have had a heavy build! Funny how the grass is always greener on the other side. Not got major back issues, but I do need to sort out my upper back/neck posture - slightly hunched and gets worse when working up to a PR on deadlifts.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
<<< I believe that balance is required - you cannot be fully left, or fully right. “Sacrifices”/head knowledge don’t mean anything if the individual is blatantly doing something un-Christian/spiritual…and a person who has “spiritual discernment” would display that spirituality in some way other than just speaking about it.[/quote]
I don’t think “balance” is the way I’d characterize it. Questions of carnality and spirituality, mere intellectual acquiescence versus a change of heart and the like are all after the fact. What we’re dealing with, what God is dealing with, what the Bible, the whole of human history and the entirety of the Gospel are dealing with is life and death.

Have you been to a cemetery lately? The local residents there have been rendered strikingly incapable of life in this present world. They are in fact dead. I really believe what has been largely lost in modern Christianity is the biblical truth that sin IS death. It is spiritual death every bit as real as and infinitely more consequential than physical death. The spiritually dead are no more capable of interacting with the kingdom of God than the physically dead are this world. They must be resurrected from that spiritual death which is a supernatural act upon the inner man by God himself.

It is not an acknowledgment that the Bible is true or even that Jesus is God. A recent poll showed that 80% of Americans say that they believe that Jesus of Nazareth was the Son of God and that He did in fact raise from the dead!!! If that weren’t so heartrendingly tragic it would be laughable. This country could not possibly be the national whorehouse that it has degenerated into if that were actually the case. They don’t mind answering a poll to make themselves feel good as long it doesn’t make any real demands on their life. They are dead.

It is also not being the most externally moral and upright selfless “good” person you can be. There is such a thing as common grace wherein God restrains evil in the heathen for the blessing of the elect and to prevent them from destroying the Earth by dinner time. “All these things I have kept from my youth” is not resurrection and once again Paul couldn’t be clearer that by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

All of the commands of Christ and the exhortations of Peter, Paul, James, John etc. are to those who have already been made alive in Christ and who can hear them as properly glorifying to the one true God.

In short, even not being “blatantly un-Christian” is in itself positive evidence of no more than common grace for which one will be all the more accountable in the judgment. God is not impressed that Gandhi did a buncha “really good stuff” in the name of his pagan hindu god/s. He is interested in His own glory and is quite stuck on Himself that way. He can do it and we can’t.[/quote]

Are you some sort of priest/teacher, because your text comes across that way and you seem to have “contacts”? Not saying that to be funny, I’m just interested in your background?

Anyway, what I said earlier about balance was more a case of balance amongst people who profess to be Christian. For example, one person may say, “I think that holiness/justice is more important”, another may say, “I thing that mercy is more important”…so in these situations, balance is needed. Also, you have to learn more about God through study, but you also have to “practice what you preach”. Some may be more inclined to practice what they preach but with little study/understanding, and others may be more inclined to learn a lot but not do much about it…so somewhere in between these two extremes would be better.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

Anyway, what I said earlier about balance was more a case of balance amongst people who profess to be Christian. For example, one person may say, “I think that holiness/justice is more important”, another may say, “I thing that mercy is more important”…so in these situations, balance is needed. Also, you have to learn more about God through study, but you also have to “practice what you preach”. Some may be more inclined to practice what they preach but with little study/understanding, and others may be more inclined to learn a lot but not do much about it…so somewhere in between these two extremes would be better.
[/quote]

I agree with you here. Balance is needed. I love God and I love religion, but even that has to be in perspective as well. I find people who are overly religious tend to pervert their thoughts and religion itself.
You brought up an interesting point about getting to know God. God is more than the bible and there are other ways to know him. Science teaches us about God, art comes from God, nature shows his mastery and elegance in creation, family is a microcosm of God’s relationship with us, etc.

Read the bible and study and practice the disciplines of your faith yes. But also seek God in everything.

Sometimes I find I can learn a lot about God just sharing some whiskey and a cigar on the back deck both talking or just thinking.

As long as you seek truth, you are seeking God for he is truth.

Here is what I a profoundly sick of, the notion that you have to follow certain rules or be a certain way or you’re screwed and condemned. I whole heartily reject this notion. You know who your going find in God’s kingdom? A whole lot of people you’d never think of as “deserving”. It may be a case where, we may be way behind the very people we out right condemn.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
<<< I believe that balance is required - you cannot be fully left, or fully right. “Sacrifices”/head knowledge don’t mean anything if the individual is blatantly doing something un-Christian/spiritual…and a person who has “spiritual discernment” would display that spirituality in some way other than just speaking about it.[/quote]
I don’t think “balance” is the way I’d characterize it. Questions of carnality and spirituality, mere intellectual acquiescence versus a change of heart and the like are all after the fact. What we’re dealing with, what God is dealing with, what the Bible, the whole of human history and the entirety of the Gospel are dealing with is life and death.

Have you been to a cemetery lately? The local residents there have been rendered strikingly incapable of life in this present world. They are in fact dead. I really believe what has been largely lost in modern Christianity is the biblical truth that sin IS death. It is spiritual death every bit as real as and infinitely more consequential than physical death. The spiritually dead are no more capable of interacting with the kingdom of God than the physically dead are this world. They must be resurrected from that spiritual death which is a supernatural act upon the inner man by God himself.

It is not an acknowledgment that the Bible is true or even that Jesus is God. A recent poll showed that 80% of Americans say that they believe that Jesus of Nazareth was the Son of God and that He did in fact raise from the dead!!! If that weren’t so heartrendingly tragic it would be laughable. This country could not possibly be the national whorehouse that it has degenerated into if that were actually the case. They don’t mind answering a poll to make themselves feel good as long it doesn’t make any real demands on their life. They are dead.

It is also not being the most externally moral and upright selfless “good” person you can be. There is such a thing as common grace wherein God restrains evil in the heathen for the blessing of the elect and to prevent them from destroying the Earth by dinner time. “All these things I have kept from my youth” is not resurrection and once again Paul couldn’t be clearer that by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

All of the commands of Christ and the exhortations of Peter, Paul, James, John etc. are to those who have already been made alive in Christ and who can hear them as properly glorifying to the one true God.

In short, even not being “blatantly un-Christian” is in itself positive evidence of no more than common grace for which one will be all the more accountable in the judgment. God is not impressed that Gandhi did a buncha “really good stuff” in the name of his pagan hindu god/s. He is interested in His own glory and is quite stuck on Himself that way. He can do it and we can’t.[/quote]

Are you some sort of priest/teacher, because your text comes across that way and you seem to have “contacts”? Not saying that to be funny, I’m just interested in your background?

Anyway, what I said earlier about balance was more a case of balance amongst people who profess to be Christian. For example, one person may say, “I think that holiness/justice is more important”, another may say, “I thing that mercy is more important”…so in these situations, balance is needed. Also, you have to learn more about God through study, but you also have to “practice what you preach”. Some may be more inclined to practice what they preach but with little study/understanding, and others may be more inclined to learn a lot but not do much about it…so somewhere in between these two extremes would be better.[/quote]
I’m not sure what you mean by contacts. I am not affiliated or in touch with anybody other than myself and everything in these posts, except where indicated, is entirely mine.

I could be wrong, but I have a feeling your friends may be telling you I’m part of some apostate organization. Maybe not.

[quote]pat wrote:
<<< Here is what I a profoundly sick of, the notion that you have to follow certain rules or be a certain way or you’re screwed and condemned. >>>[/quote]
You’re “screwed and condemned” at birth. The only exception since Adam was Jesus. All somebody has to do to incur the eternal wrath of God is nothing. Adam took care of that. Those who are born a second time of the Spirit see the kingdom Of God. That can only happen though deliberate self concious faith in the resurrected life of Christ which brings with it a changed life. The entire Bible revolves around that nutshell description of the Gospel.

If people can simply believe and live how they’d like as long as they’re sincere and not that bad then the Bible and the Gospel are lies and Jesus was the king of charlatans.

However you are correct in that every single fact of existence, espcially mankind itself, declares that there is a God and we are accountable to him.

[quote] Romans 1
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,

19 because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them.

20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.

21 For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

22 Professing to be wise, they became fools,

23 and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them.

25 For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.[/quote]
Any view of God different than the one He Himself reveals in His Word is an idol. This has nothing to do with self righteous fundamentalist fanaticism. It is the simple and unavoidable message of the Bible. If anybody wants to believe something else, that’s up to them, but it isn’t Christianity.

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:
oh, well,

here goes: first the general quotes from all sorts of encyclopedias, etc . . .

… The intervening years after the fall of Samaria (722-BCE), and after the destruction of Jerusalem (586-BCE), were probably marked by closer intercourse, similar to the period of union in the popular traditions relating to the pre-monarchical age.

… This brought about the final siege of the city, which was at length taken and destroyed (B.C. 586).

… Some of the most important prophets and poets lived during the Babylonian Exile, the period of captivity that followed Babylonâ??s conquest of Judah in 587 or 586 B.C.

… In 586 B.C. it fell to the Babylonians, and the Temple was destroyed.

… Nebuchadnezzar subsequently engaged in several military campaigns designed to increase Babylonian influence in Syria and Judah, capturing Jerusalem in 597 BC, bringing King JehoiAchin to Babylon. Another siege of Jerusalem occurred in 586 BC, ending in the destruction of both the city and the Temple and the deportation of many prominent citizens to Babylon.

… Ashkelon was utterly destroyed by [Nebuchadnezzar], the Babylonian leader who later destroyed Jerusalem and Solomonâ??s Temple in 586 B.C.E.

The Babylonian Exile (586â??538) marks an epochal dividing point in Old Testament history, …

… A new revolt occurred (588-587 BC) in Judea. After a siege of about a year, Jerusalem was finally destroyed in 586 BC …

But you already stipulated that you would not contest the secular dating. . .

So in reference to the Bible dating:

The Bible contains no absolute dates, since our calendar was not invented when any part of the Old Testament was written. It is not possible, therefore, to date events directly. However, the Bible does provide many relative dates. I’ll skip all of the general stuff and go for the jugular . . .

Zechariah 1:7 “On the twenty-fourth day of the eleventh month, that is, the month Shebat, in the second year of Darius, the word of Jehovah occurred to Zechariah the son of BarachiJah the son of IdDo the prophet.”

Majority of scholars agree that this corresponds to February 519-BCE. Notice what a messenger of God said at that time as recorded in verse 12 of Zechariah: “So the angel of Jehovah answered and said: â??O Jehovah of armies, how long will you yourself not show mercy to Jerusalem and to the cities of Judah, whom you have denounced these seventy years?â??”

Yes, for 70 years God had denounced the cities of Judah. This takes us back to 589-BCE. According to the JW persepctive based on the 607 chronology, nothing of significance happened this year, moreover It would be ludicrous for this angel to say the cities had been denounced for “seventy years” if this period started eighteen years after the complete destruction of the capital! He would have had to say " these 83 years". But if the 589 date is correct, then this passage clearly denotes the year when Nebuchadnezzar started the final siege on Jerusalem (2. Kings 25:1; Ezekiel 24:1, 2; Jeremiah 52:4).

Supporters of the 607 chronology have likewise linked these seventy years with the prophecy of Jeremiah, however if this angel was talking about a seventy year period from 607 to 537 - that had ended some 18 years earlier then why would the angel ask â??how long?â?? These very words demonstrate that at this point the period of denouncing had not yet ended. And since they continued, they must have started with a major event in 589-BCE. This seventy years is not the same as that of Jeremiah, nor is it even a prophetic period. The angel is simply stating that for seventy years Judah has been denounced, and is asking how much longer it will continue to be so.

Zechariah later delivers an even more fatal blow to those who insist on the 607 chronology. Consider Zechariah 7:1-5:

“Furthermore, it came about that in the fourth year of Darius the king the word of Jehovah occurred to Zechariah, on the fourth day of the ninth month, that is, in Chislev. And Bethel proceeded to send Sharezer and Regem-melech and his men to soften the face of Jehovah, saying to the priests who belonged to the house of Jehovah of armies, and to the prophets, even saying: â??Shall I weep in the fifth month, practicing an abstinence, the way I have done these O how many years?â?? And the word of Jehovah of armies continued to occur to me, saying: â??Say to all the people of the land and to the priests, When you fasted and there was a wailing in the fifth month and in the seventh month, and this for seventy years, did you really fast to me, even me?â??”

The chronological evidence in these verses gives a wealth of information. They had been fasting in the fifth month in order to commemorate how on that day NebuZaradan, the chief of Nebuchadnezzarâ??s bodyguard, after two days of inspection, burned down the city of Jerusalem and its temple. They also fasted in the seventh month to commemorate the assassination of Governor GedaliJah, who was of the royal house of King David and whom Nebuchadnezzar made governor of the land for the Jews that were allowed to remain after the destruction of Jerusalem.

The Israelites asked if they should continue this fasting, so they were obviously doing it at the time and had been for seventy years. The date given for this vision of Zechariah (Chislev 9, 4th year of Darius) corresponds to November 518-BCE. This presents a problem if you want to date the destruction of Jerusalem at 607-BCE since this is some ninety years before. When we count seventy years however we come to the accepted chronology of 586/7-BCE.

then there is also the issue of Daniel’s age . . . but I’ll save that for a later time . . .

sheesh, why is that we have to build these walls of text . . .

[/quote]
Surprisingly, I didn’t see this Irish.

I too can provide a wall of text that can refute the year 587 B.C.E. as being the year Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians but that’s not necessary. The fact that I can use the Bible to see that 1914 was the year when the appointed time of the nations ended and Jesus became king in heaven and seeing the results of Jesus becoming king in heaven based on the Bible gives me complete confidence that 607 B.C.E. was the year Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians. If no world wide major event happened like WWI in 1914 then I would question the 607 B.C.E. date but WWI did happen and the world has never been the same since that year.

Also, thanks for pointing out that the Bible is a divine source. Of course I know that and believe that. What I meant was that none of the information I typed in my post about 1914 was given by divine inspiration meaning a prophetic dream or vision.

BTW, my 5 points are still unanswered, and 2 of my 4 questions are still unanswered, and you didn’t address my 3 passage explanations from the Greek, and you have not addressed my questions about the passages proving Jesus already had all authority in heaven, and I have dozens more questions still to ask . . . :frowning:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:
oh, well,

here goes: first the general quotes from all sorts of encyclopedias, etc . . .

… The intervening years after the fall of Samaria (722-BCE), and after the destruction of Jerusalem (586-BCE), were probably marked by closer intercourse, similar to the period of union in the popular traditions relating to the pre-monarchical age.

… This brought about the final siege of the city, which was at length taken and destroyed (B.C. 586).

… Some of the most important prophets and poets lived during the Babylonian Exile, the period of captivity that followed BabylonÃ?¢??s conquest of Judah in 587 or 586 B.C.

… In 586 B.C. it fell to the Babylonians, and the Temple was destroyed.

… Nebuchadnezzar subsequently engaged in several military campaigns designed to increase Babylonian influence in Syria and Judah, capturing Jerusalem in 597 BC, bringing King JehoiAchin to Babylon. Another siege of Jerusalem occurred in 586 BC, ending in the destruction of both the city and the Temple and the deportation of many prominent citizens to Babylon.

… Ashkelon was utterly destroyed by [Nebuchadnezzar], the Babylonian leader who later destroyed Jerusalem and SolomonÃ?¢??s Temple in 586 B.C.E.

The Babylonian Exile (586Ã?¢??538) marks an epochal dividing point in Old Testament history, …

… A new revolt occurred (588-587 BC) in Judea. After a siege of about a year, Jerusalem was finally destroyed in 586 BC …

But you already stipulated that you would not contest the secular dating. . .

So in reference to the Bible dating:

The Bible contains no absolute dates, since our calendar was not invented when any part of the Old Testament was written. It is not possible, therefore, to date events directly. However, the Bible does provide many relative dates. I’ll skip all of the general stuff and go for the jugular . . .

Zechariah 1:7 “On the twenty-fourth day of the eleventh month, that is, the month Shebat, in the second year of Darius, the word of Jehovah occurred to Zechariah the son of BarachiJah the son of IdDo the prophet.”

Majority of scholars agree that this corresponds to February 519-BCE. Notice what a messenger of God said at that time as recorded in verse 12 of Zechariah: “So the angel of Jehovah answered and said: Ã?¢??O Jehovah of armies, how long will you yourself not show mercy to Jerusalem and to the cities of Judah, whom you have denounced these seventy years?Ã?¢??”

Yes, for 70 years God had denounced the cities of Judah. This takes us back to 589-BCE. According to the JW persepctive based on the 607 chronology, nothing of significance happened this year, moreover It would be ludicrous for this angel to say the cities had been denounced for “seventy years” if this period started eighteen years after the complete destruction of the capital! He would have had to say " these 83 years". But if the 589 date is correct, then this passage clearly denotes the year when Nebuchadnezzar started the final siege on Jerusalem (2. Kings 25:1; Ezekiel 24:1, 2; Jeremiah 52:4).

Supporters of the 607 chronology have likewise linked these seventy years with the prophecy of Jeremiah, however if this angel was talking about a seventy year period from 607 to 537 - that had ended some 18 years earlier then why would the angel ask �¢??how long?�¢?? These very words demonstrate that at this point the period of denouncing had not yet ended. And since they continued, they must have started with a major event in 589-BCE. This seventy years is not the same as that of Jeremiah, nor is it even a prophetic period. The angel is simply stating that for seventy years Judah has been denounced, and is asking how much longer it will continue to be so.

Zechariah later delivers an even more fatal blow to those who insist on the 607 chronology. Consider Zechariah 7:1-5:

“Furthermore, it came about that in the fourth year of Darius the king the word of Jehovah occurred to Zechariah, on the fourth day of the ninth month, that is, in Chislev. And Bethel proceeded to send Sharezer and Regem-melech and his men to soften the face of Jehovah, saying to the priests who belonged to the house of Jehovah of armies, and to the prophets, even saying: Ã?¢??Shall I weep in the fifth month, practicing an abstinence, the way I have done these O how many years?Ã?¢?? And the word of Jehovah of armies continued to occur to me, saying: Ã?¢??Say to all the people of the land and to the priests, When you fasted and there was a wailing in the fifth month and in the seventh month, and this for seventy years, did you really fast to me, even me?Ã?¢??”

The chronological evidence in these verses gives a wealth of information. They had been fasting in the fifth month in order to commemorate how on that day NebuZaradan, the chief of Nebuchadnezzar�¢??s bodyguard, after two days of inspection, burned down the city of Jerusalem and its temple. They also fasted in the seventh month to commemorate the assassination of Governor GedaliJah, who was of the royal house of King David and whom Nebuchadnezzar made governor of the land for the Jews that were allowed to remain after the destruction of Jerusalem.

The Israelites asked if they should continue this fasting, so they were obviously doing it at the time and had been for seventy years. The date given for this vision of Zechariah (Chislev 9, 4th year of Darius) corresponds to November 518-BCE. This presents a problem if you want to date the destruction of Jerusalem at 607-BCE since this is some ninety years before. When we count seventy years however we come to the accepted chronology of 586/7-BCE.

then there is also the issue of Daniel’s age . . . but I’ll save that for a later time . . .

sheesh, why is that we have to build these walls of text . . .

[/quote]
Surprisingly, I didn’t see this Irish.

I too can provide a wall of text that can refute the year 587 B.C.E. as being the year Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians but that’s not necessary. The fact that I can use the Bible to see that 1914 was the year when the appointed time of the nations ended and Jesus became king in heaven and seeing the results of Jesus becoming king in heaven based on the Bible gives me complete confidence that 607 B.C.E. was the year Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians. If no world wide major event happened like WWI in 1914 then I would question the 607 B.C.E. date but WWI did happen and the world has never been the same since that year.

Also, thanks for pointing out that the Bible is a divine source. Of course I know that and believe that. What I meant was that none of the information I typed in my post about 1914 was given by divine inspiration meaning a prophetic dream or vision.[/quote]

I have a question. Who cares whether it is 1914 or whatever date Jesus is King and that is all that matters. If you pick a date that startst the end of days, what does that mean? It is not the start of the end of days that matters. It is the final day at armageddon that matters. I might be saying this wrong. Christians beleive Jesus has been King in heaven forever. JWs beleive he has been King in Heaven since 1914. I am looking for the second coming. It is closer today than it was yesterday. A date really does not mean anything.

What are you JWs holding from us? Is there another part of 1914 that you are not telling us? What would it take for your 1914 date to be incorrect? Is this date so open ended that it can never be wrong? All prophecies from God are exact. There is always a way to say a prophet was false. There is a way to prove all the prophecies in the Bible. If there is no way to refute your date of 1914 as being false this is of man and not of God.

[quote]mse2us wrote:

Pat wrote:

Yes, it is still tortured logic. You are claiming factual knowledge of the going ons in heaven of from something that is largely symbolic, as is the book of Revelation. In the context of the story, it can be taken many ways. The woman can be God’s people, the twelve stars being the twelve tribes of Israel. The birth would would be the birth of the Messiah. The messiah was called to heaven, the people of God scattered. War breaks out, Satan loses. He precedes then to attack God by going after his people. The date stamp of 1914 is no where in there. There is no discernible difference between 1914 and now. I could see how the folks in 1914 thought WW1 was the beginning of the end, but it clearly wasn’t. The war ended and life continued. Hell, the flu pandemic of 1918 was more deadly than WW1.[/quote]

I’m claiming knowledge of what’s going on in heaven based on what the Bible says. Yes, Revelation is largely symbolic but that doesn’t mean the symbolism doesn’t have a meaning. Symbolic terms always have a meaning but often times one has to turn to other parts of the Bible to see what the symbolic term represents. I’ll give you an example. Revelation 12:12 states:
“On this account be glad, you heavens and you who reside in them! Woe for the earth and for the sea, because the Devil has come down to you, having great anger, knowing he has a short period of time.”

This is a verse from the passage I’ve been quoting to show that when Satan was kicked out of heaven, God’s kingdom was officially announced and Jesus as the king, Satan having great anger causes Woe for the people of the earth and this is the start of Jesus’ presence and the Last Days. When one reads the above verse and comes across the part that says "Woe to the earth and sea, that person may not understand what the “sea” means because it’s not explained. That person may not know to look to other parts of the Bible to understand what the term “sea” means. If that person knew to turn to Isaiah 57:20 which states:20 “But the wicked are like the sea that is being tossed, when it is unable to calm down, the waters of which keep tossing up seaweed and mire.” And if the person knew to turn to Revelation 17:15 which states: 15 And he says to me: “The waters that you saw, where the harlot is sitting, mean peoples and crowds and nations and tongues.”

When one reads the two above scriptures then he can see that the sea mentioned in Revelation 12:12 means people. The verse then becomes clear and makes sense. That person will understand that Revelation 12:12 is saying woe to the earth and the people because the devil has come down with great anger knowing he has a short period of time.

Again, just because the book of Revelation is largely symbolic doesn’t mean that it has no meaning. Unfortunately, many people feel that because of the difficulty of Revelation, that it’s the least important book which is how you feel. This is the the furthest from the truth. Revelation is one of the most important books in the Bible.