Trinity - Bible Teaching or Doctrine of Man

[quote]mse2us wrote:

Isaiah 9:6 states:
“6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7 To the abundance of the princely rule and to peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom in order to establish it firmly and to sustain it by means of justice and by means of righteousness, from now on and to time indefinite. The very zeal of Jehovah of armies will do this.”

quote]

So this verse is talking about being King in Heaven? The throne of David is on Earth, so being crowned King in Heaven is not what this verse is talking about. You might want to reread what you posted.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

Anyway, sorry for babbling away about myself there! Just thought it would be interesting to say. It’s been a pleasure talking, and I must say that I’m not used to speaking to one’s who seem to “get it” :)[/quote]

I know most of you all do not care for me, but I appreciate you sharing a bit about what led you to be religious. This is a first step to the softening of your heart. There is nothing we can say, but at least your heart is soft to the teaching of the Holy Spirit. My God bless you my friend.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:
I know most of you all do not care for me…
[/quote]

On the contrary, we care because most of us firmly believe what we teach; if we didn’t believe it whole-souled (e.g. that judgement day is nearer, and people need to learn about God’s kingdom/salvation) then we wouldn’t bother knocking on doors. True, some do it out of “necessity”, but the large majority of JW’s (who do it with enthusiasm) do it mainly because of their concern for fellow man.

[quote]
…but I appreciate you sharing a bit about what led you to be religious. This is a first step to the softening of your heart. There is nothing we can say, but at least your heart is soft to the teaching of the Holy Spirit. My God bless you my friend.[/quote]

Thank you, I appreciate that :slight_smile:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:
I know most of you all do not care for me…
[/quote]

On the contrary, we care because most of us firmly believe what we teach; if we didn’t believe it whole-souled (e.g. that judgement day is nearer, and people need to learn about God’s kingdom/salvation) then we wouldn’t bother knocking on doors. True, some do it out of “necessity”, but the large majority of JW’s (who do it with enthusiasm) do it mainly because of their concern for fellow man.

[quote]
…but I appreciate you sharing a bit about what led you to be religious. This is a first step to the softening of your heart. There is nothing we can say, but at least your heart is soft to the teaching of the Holy Spirit. My God bless you my friend.[/quote]

Thank you, I appreciate that :)[/quote]

Anyone can be religious, but not everyone can have a relationship with God. The Heart is what leads to the relationship, and not the mind. This is my opinion.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:
I know most of you all do not care for me…
[/quote]

On the contrary, we care because most of us firmly believe what we teach; if we didn’t believe it whole-souled (e.g. that judgement day is nearer, and people need to learn about God’s kingdom/salvation) then we wouldn’t bother knocking on doors. True, some do it out of “necessity”, but the large majority of JW’s (who do it with enthusiasm) do it mainly because of their concern for fellow man.

[quote]
…but I appreciate you sharing a bit about what led you to be religious. This is a first step to the softening of your heart. There is nothing we can say, but at least your heart is soft to the teaching of the Holy Spirit. My God bless you my friend.[/quote]

Thank you, I appreciate that :)[/quote]

Anyone can be religious, but not everyone can have a relationship with God. The Heart is what leads to the relationship, and not the mind. This is my opinion. [/quote]

I fully agree.

I believe that balance is required - you cannot be fully left, or fully right. “Sacrifices”/head knowledge don’t mean anything if the individual is blatantly doing something un-Christian/spiritual…and a person who has “spiritual discernment” would display that spirituality in some way other than just speaking about it.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:
I know most of you all do not care for me…
[/quote]

On the contrary, we care because most of us firmly believe what we teach; if we didn’t believe it whole-souled (e.g. that judgement day is nearer, and people need to learn about God’s kingdom/salvation) then we wouldn’t bother knocking on doors. True, some do it out of “necessity”, but the large majority of JW’s (who do it with enthusiasm) do it mainly because of their concern for fellow man.

[quote]
…but I appreciate you sharing a bit about what led you to be religious. This is a first step to the softening of your heart. There is nothing we can say, but at least your heart is soft to the teaching of the Holy Spirit. My God bless you my friend.[/quote]

Thank you, I appreciate that :)[/quote]

Anyone can be religious, but not everyone can have a relationship with God. The Heart is what leads to the relationship, and not the mind. This is my opinion. [/quote]

I fully agree.

I believe that balance is required - you cannot be fully left, or fully right. “Sacrifices”/head knowledge don’t mean anything if the individual is blatantly doing something un-Christian/spiritual…and a person who has “spiritual discernment” would display that spirituality in some way other than just speaking about it.[/quote]

At least you and I have something in common.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
An interesting post ending with this:
<<< Anyway, sorry for babbling away about myself there! Just thought it would be interesting to say. It’s been a pleasure talking, and I must say that I’m not used to speaking to one’s who seem to “get it” :)[/quote]
Will you quit apologizing LOL! It was interesting and reminds me of a few other people I’ve known and known of. We may wind up in the end quite a bit closer than it presently appears.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
An interesting post ending with this:
<<< Anyway, sorry for babbling away about myself there! Just thought it would be interesting to say. It’s been a pleasure talking, and I must say that I’m not used to speaking to one’s who seem to “get it” :)[/quote]
Will you quit apologizing LOL! It was interesting and reminds me of a few other people I’ve known and known of. We may wind up in the end quite a bit closer than it presently appears.[/quote]

Sorry about that; I’m British (we say sorry a lot) :slight_smile:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
An interesting post ending with this:
<<< Anyway, sorry for babbling away about myself there! Just thought it would be interesting to say. It’s been a pleasure talking, and I must say that I’m not used to speaking to one’s who seem to “get it” :)[/quote]
Will you quit apologizing LOL! It was interesting and reminds me of a few other people I’ve known and known of. We may wind up in the end quite a bit closer than it presently appears.[/quote]

Sorry about that; I’m British (we say sorry a lot) :)[/quote]
A limey in Skawtlind! That explains a lot =] (you’re supposed to laugh now)

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
An interesting post ending with this:
<<< Anyway, sorry for babbling away about myself there! Just thought it would be interesting to say. It’s been a pleasure talking, and I must say that I’m not used to speaking to one’s who seem to “get it” :)[/quote]
Will you quit apologizing LOL! It was interesting and reminds me of a few other people I’ve known and known of. We may wind up in the end quite a bit closer than it presently appears.[/quote]

Sorry about that; I’m British (we say sorry a lot) :)[/quote]

Ya’ll also say TTFN, Cheers, and Cheerio a lot to. Long live the Queen.

googles “limey”

Yes, I’m half English, half Scot

Or as the Scots would say:

“half Scot, half c**t”

(excuse the language)

Dmaddox - Don’t forget “whoopsie-daisey” and “bravo!”

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
googles “limey”

Yes, I’m half English, half Scot

Or as the Scots would say:

“half Scot, half c**t”

(excuse the language)

Dmaddox - Don’t forget “whoopsie-daisey” and “bravo!”[/quote]

lol.

You play cricket? If yes, I have heard, “Great catch that was magic.” We do a lot of business with Lloyds so some of my employees spend a lot of time in London. I personally have never been to the Mother country, but would like to some day. I am Welch by descent.

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

One thing I can say for certain is the fact that the scriptural evidence in the Bible is so strong and the signs that all can see with their own eyes are so clear which all point to 1914 being the year Jesus became king in heaven, when Satan was kicked out of heaven, when Jesus presence started and when the last days began.

[/quote]

I dont know about you guys, but I beleive that Jesus has been king in heaven forever. How do I know this? In the begining God created the Heavens and the Earth. God is on the throne in Genesis, and God is on the throne in Revelation. Never was God not on the throne. He is King in Heaven and King of Earth.

Got one more thought of questions for the JWs. If the end of days started in 1914 when will Jesus be returning? I mean if you know when he started to reign in heaven when will he reign on Earth? When will your prophesy, made after the year 1914, be discredited, or are your prophesies the same as a fortune teller? So vague that when Jesus returns you will say, “See we were right.” We had 1000 years past 1914 for the prophesy to be correct, but when 2914 comes around and he has not returned would you then agree the JWs are full or crap, or will the prophecy be changed again?

Just had a thought. Jesus died late Friday afternoon, was burried before night fall on Friday, dead all day Saturday, and rose on Sunday Morning. As we all know he was not dead for 3, 24 hour periods, but was dead for 3 days, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Maybe that Jesus started to reign in heaven in 1914 the millenium reign may have ended at the turn of the millenium in the year 2000. Not a full 1000 years, but a millenium that started in 1000 AD. I would say your prophesy of 1914 is false based on these assumptions. Got a new prophesy?[/quote]
No Jesus has not been king in heaven forever. The Bible clearly shows that Jesus is given the kingship in heaven. Ezekiel 21:26,27 is a prophecy which states that the crown will be removed from a wicked King which turned out to be Zedekiah. The prophecy then states that the crown will be given to the one who comes and has the legal right. King Zedekiah was the last king in the line of David to sit on God’s throne. Jesus as a descendant of David is the one who has the legal right. Isaiah 9:6 states:
“6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7 To the abundance of the princely rule and to peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom in order to establish it firmly and to sustain it by means of justice and by means of righteousness, from now on and to time indefinite. The very zeal of Jehovah of armies will do this.”

That prophecy makes it clear that Jesus will sit on the throne of King David which has been vacant since King Zedekiah was removed by the Babylonians. Daniel 7:12, 13 show a scene in heaven where Jesus aproaches Jehovah and is given a kingdom. Daniel 7:13,14 states:
13 “I kept on beholding in the visions of the night, and, see there! with the clouds of the heavens someone like a son of man happened to be coming; and to the Ancient of Days he gained access, and they brought him up close even before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership and dignity and kingdom, that the peoples, national groups and languages should all serve even him. His rulership is an indefinitely lasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom one that will not be brought to ruin.”

Again, this is Jesus approaching God and God gives him the kingdom just like God gave King David his kingship.

Revelation, which is a future vision describes a battle in heaven where Satan is kicked out of heaven and thrown down to the earth. After that event God’s Kingdom is officially announced with Jesus having authority over this kingdom which means he is king.

Revelation 12:7-10 states:
“7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled 8 but it did not prevail, neither was a place found for them any longer in heaven. 9 So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him. 10 And I heard a loud voice in heaven say:
Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God!

This is when Jesus becomes king in heaven which is after Satan gets kicked out of heaven. Once Satan is kicked out of heaven this spells WOE for the people of the earth according to Revelation 12:12. Remember this is a future vision that was given to John and when he writes Revelation the above events did not yet happen.

So no Jesus has not been king in heaven forever.[/quote]

So I am assuming you think the time in heaven is the same as “Earth time”? Why would God be Pigeon holed to our calendar?[/quote]
No, the time in heaven is not the same as time on earth. There are two places in the Bible that mention how long one day is for God. 2 Peter 3:8 which states that “one day is with Jehovah as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day.” And Psalms 90:4 states “that for a thousand years are in your eyes but as yesterday when it is past.”

So in God’s time 1000 humans years is one day but the scriptures I mentioned in my previous post do not reference any specific time period but Isaiah 9:6 does state that Jesus will sit upon the throne of David. So we know that when David was king Jesus was not king over God’s Kingdom. There were 19 Kings in the line of David from the tribe of Judah that sat on the Davidic throne spanning at least four centuries. The last king in the line of David was Zedekiah and as Ezekiel 21:26,27 states the crown or kingship is removed from him and is given to he who the legal right which is Jesus. This happened in 607 B.C.E. So the Davidic throne in the line of David from the tribe of Judah would remain vacant until Jesus who is a descendant of David sits on the throne and becomes king.

How do we know that it happened in 1914? First, the Bible Students in the 1800’s used the prophecy in Daniel 4:10-16 about a kingship represented by a tree being cut down and restrained for seven times to interpret when the trampling by the nations on Jerusalem would end which Jesus mentions at Luke 21:24. They realized that the trampling started in
607 B.C.E. when Jersalem was destroyed by the Babylonians and the last Davidic king was removed. This took them to 1914. Second, Revelation 12:10 states that as a result of Satan being kicked out of heaven, God’s kingdom comes into power with Jesus as it’s king. At Revelation 12:12 as a result of Satan being kicked out of heaven and thrown down to earth the verse states that he will cause “WOE” to the people of the earth. We can clearly see the results of Satans anger. Because the first WOE Satan causes is WAR which was a world war that never occurred before. If you look at the four horsemen of the apocalypse at Revelation 6, the first rider in white is given a crown or kingship, he has a bow and he goes forth to complete a conquest. This horseman is the newly crowned Jesus. The next horseman that rides after the newly crowned Jesus and continues to ride with Jesus is war. The first sign Jesus said would mark his presence and the conclusion of the system of things mentioned at Matthew 24:3 is War. This is the start of the WOE Satan brings to the earth because of him being kicked out of heaven which is marked by a clear, discernable event. The other two horsemen that ride with the newly crowned Jesus at Revelation 6 are famine and pestilence which again is more WOE that Satan brings on the earth. So when Jesus becomes king he kicks Satan out of heaven down to the earth. As a result of Satan being kicked out of heaven he is angry because he knows his time is short so he causes trouble for the people on the earth. Some of the problems Satan causes are symbolized by horsemen who appear after Jesus becomes king and ride with Jesus for a period of time. They are War, Famine and Pestilence. This is the reason Jesus is riding alongside 3 bad horsemen. These three bad horsemen that ride alongside the newly crowned Jesus is a result of Satan causing WOE to the earth and the WOE comes in the form of WAR, FAMINE and PESTILENCE. These are also three of the signs Jesus mentions at Matthew 24:3-7 and Luke 21:10,11 that would mark his parousia or presence and the conclusion of the system of things.

So again, the significance of 1914 is when Jesus became king in heaven, which was when Satan got kicked out of heaven down to the earth and when Jesus presence and the conclusion of the system of things started. Due to Satan having great anger because he knows his time is short, he causes WOE or trouble for the people of the earth. The WOE or trouble comes in the form of WAR, FAMINE and PESTILENCE which Jesus told his disciples would be some of the signs that would identify his presence in heaven as king and the conclusion of the system of things. All of this is based on the Bible and the Bible only.

[/quote]

Ugh, that was actually painful to read to be honest… This is what Irish referred to as tortured logic. You want to know when Satan came to the Earth? It was the day sin aka, evil entered the world. Who do you think tempted Eve in the garden? What planet was it, Mars?
Jesus revealed his kingship in the gospels talking to Pilate. “If my kingdom was of this world…” He is speaking present tense and if I am not mistaken the Crucifixion of Christ occurred between 29 AD and 33 AD, not 1914. Since he said this plainly at that time it stands to reason that a direct saying would trump a warping of Daniel or Revelation.
I am also very weary of anybody who claims to have detailed knowledge of the goings on in heavenâ?¦We donâ??t even have a good grasp of earthly happenings, how in the hell are we supposed to know what goes on in heaven.

Now if you are biblical literalists, like you claim, then you will know that the time of the end times, Armageddon, or what ever you call it is NOT in the Bible. When Jesus said that nobody knows the day or the hour save for the Father, that means nobody knows and nobody can know. Itâ??s not knowable. â?? MT 24:36 and MT 24:42 Further, Jesus warns of those who claim to know and calls them false prophets.
So, if nobody, but the Father knows when the end times are, why then, should I trust your interpretation? Are you not playing the role of the false prophet but saying, this has occurred and that is coming? When Jesus says you cannot know and it will come when you least expect it, should I trust his words, or your interpretation. Should I listen to you or the word of God?

You are making bold claims of knowledge so these are not unreasonable questions. You are claiming to know that which Jesus said canâ??t be known and only false prophets would claim knowledge of…

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

lol.

You play cricket? If yes, I have heard, “Great catch that was magic.” We do a lot of business with Lloyds so some of my employees spend a lot of time in London. I personally have never been to the Mother country, but would like to some day. I am Welch by descent. [/quote]

I’m not really into cricket to be honest, neither football (sad I know).

Believe me, you’re not missing anything - unless you like cloudy weather and accents you can’t understand? LOL

[quote]its_just_me wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

lol.

You play cricket? If yes, I have heard, “Great catch that was magic.” We do a lot of business with Lloyds so some of my employees spend a lot of time in London. I personally have never been to the Mother country, but would like to some day. I am Welch by descent. [/quote]

I’m not really into cricket to be honest, neither football (sad I know).

Believe me, you’re not missing anything - unless you like cloudy weather and accents you can’t understand? LOL[/quote]

Football - soccer, or Football - American. I always have to distinguish between the two. You have to be a fan of rugby.

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:
Non-Bible Students were able to use the Bible to figure this out. The Bible Students understood where in history to apply it which was when the last king to sit on God’s throne was removed by the Babylonians in 607 B.C.E. This again is based on the Bible because at Ezekiel 21:26,27 which is a prophecy about King Zedekiah being removed from God’s throne states that the crown will be removed and will become no ones until he who has the legal right comes. That of course is Jesus Christ who as a descendant of King David has the legal right to the Davidic throne. Once the Bible Students counted up 2520 years from 607 B.C.E they were taken to 1914. They just didn’t understand what Jesus becoming king in heaven meant, but they knew that it was going to be a significant year.

[/quote]

Th only problem is that the vast majority of biblical and secular historians and archeologists have dated the destruction of Jerusalem and the removal of the Jewish throne at 586/587 BC, not 607 BC. Which would preclude the possibility of 1914 being the year of significance . . .

Now as far as Jesus becoming King on earth, the Bible clearly states that he already was given all authority over the earth in the first century.

“All authority has been given me in heaven and on the earth.”
-Matthew 28:18, New World Translation

“He has operated in the case of the Christ when he raised him up from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places, far above every government and authority and power and lordship and every name named, not only in this system of things, but also in that to come.”
-Ephesians 1:20-21, New World Translation

How can there be another ruler over the earth for the next 2 millenia when Christ already had all of the authority? How can someone else rule when he was already given rule “far above every government and authority and power and lordship and every name named, not only in this system of things, but also in that to come?”[/quote]
Not all secular history puts the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians at 586/587 but most do. This is a case of secular history verses Bible chronology and who are you going to believe. Due to the fact that secular history on many occassions tried to discredit the Bible based on their findings only to be proven wrong and the Bible proven right time and again and due to the fact that the Bible is inspired by God, I will always believe the Bible over secular history. Historians base the destruction of Jerusalem on the Canon of Ptolemy. The Canon of Ptolemy list the length of reign for several of the Babylonian kings and historians used the length of reign of the kings to determine when Jerusalem was destroyed. But the problem is Ptolemy based the reign of these king on a barely legible cuneiform tablet so it’s impossible to say if they are completely accurate. The best way to tell when Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians is to look at Bible chronology.

Babylon was destroyed by General Cyrus in 539 B.C.E. This is based on stone document known as the Nabonidus (Nabunaid) Chronicle, which was discovered in ruins near the city of Baghdad in 1879 and is now preserved in the British Museum. The stone tablet is completely ledgible and was translated and published by Sidney Smith in Babylonian Historical Texts Relating to the Capture and Downfall of Babylon, London, 1924 with precise detail of the days and months Babylon was overthrown. So all of secular history is in agreement that Babylon fell in 539 B.C.E. When Babylon fell, Darius the Mede was made king and reigned for about 1 year. Cyrus followed him in late 538 B.C.E. and in 537 B.C.E. Cyrus issued the edict permitting the Jews to return home and build the temple thus ending the devastaion of Jerusalem. This was prophesied at Isaiah 44:28 that Cyrus would be the one who would free the Jews and allow them to rebuild the temple. Danile 9:1,2 states that Jerusalem would be devastated for 70 years. So all one has to do is add 70 years to 537 B.C.E. which is when the devastation of Jerusalum ended, to get to 607. So according to Bible chronology Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 B.C.E. Who are you going to believe - secular historians or the inspired Word of God?

That’s a good question in your last paragraph. God’s sovereignty makes his authority and power higher than everything else in heaven and on earth. Before Jesus came to earth no other being shared God’s sovereignty and was at his right hand. We say that Jesus is the archangel Michael in his heavenly, position but even though he is the highest ranking angel he did not sit at God’s right hand and share his sovereignty. When Jesus went back to heaven, Acts 2:33 states that Jesus was “exalted” to the right hand of God" meaning he was given a higher position than he previously had. In this exalted position at the right had of God’s sovereignty, God has allowed Jesus to share this authority and power which is higher than everything else in heaven and on earth so that, with the exception of God, everything in heaven and on earth is subject to Jesus like it had already been with God.

Jesus being king over God’s kingdom is different than being at the right hand of God’s sovereignty. During the time of the kings of Israel God used human kings to represent his authority over his chosen people - the Israelites. Even though these kings ruled over God’s people on earth, God was still sovereign over everything in heaven and on earth. The kingdom that Jesus told us to pray for in the “Our Father” pray is going to be similar to the kingdom arrangement God used with the Israelites. This kingdom will rule specifically over God’s people on earth just like king David did with the Israelites. Isaiah 9:6,7 states that upon the throne of David Jesus will sit and Luke 1:31,32 states that God will give Jesus “the throne of David his father.” Again, King David ruled over God’s people on earth. However, unlike the kings in the line of David who ruled over a relatively few number of people on earth, God’s kingdom with Jesus as it’s king will rule over God’s people earth wide. When Jesus went to heaven, even though everything in heaven and on earth were made subject to him, he had not yet sat on the throne of David because David’s throne had nothing to do with sitting at the right hand of God in heaven; his throne or kingship ruled over God’s people on earth.

When God’s kingdom is established on earth an event will happen - Armageddon. Daniel 2:44 explains what this kingdom will do:
“And in the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be brought to ruin. And the kingdom itself will not be passed on to any other people. It will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, and it itself will stand to times indefinite.”

This kingdom is a governmental kingdom that will destroy all of the existing governments on earth. Daniel 7,13,14 explains who receives the kingship and notice that this is referring to earth:

“I kept on beholding in the visions of the night, and, see there! with the clouds of the heavens someone like a son of man happened to be coming; and to the Ancient of Days he gained access, and they brought him up close even before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership and dignity and kingdom, that the peoples, national groups and languages should all serve even him. His rulership is an indefinitely lasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom one that will not be brought to ruin.”

When the human kingdoms or governments are removed, God’s kingdom which will rule over the earth, will be firmly established and will rule over the people left after Armageddon. Jesus as the king will undo all the bad effect of human rule and there will finally be peace. Jesus said to the Pharisee’s at Luke 17:21 that the Kingdom of God was in their midst. He could rightly say that because as king-designate he was doing some of the things God’s Kingdom will do for mankind. Such as curing every kind of sickness, raising the dead, providing food and controlling the weather and vegetation to name a few. This is what JW’s put faith in as the only hope for salvation.

This kingdom will be made up of Jesus as the king and co-rulers who will rule with Jesus. This is why there are scriptures that state the people in heaven will sit with Jesus in his kingdom (Matthew 20:21-23, Mark 10:37) and rule as kings (2 Timothy 2:12, Revelation 5:10, 1 Corinthians 4:8). These ones have been bought from the earth and now have the special priviledge of ruling with Jesus as representatives from earth. To rule with Jesus in his kingdom is the ONLY reason humans go to heaven.

no no no, please don’t make me go through all of that again . . . .

oh, well,

here goes: first the general quotes from all sorts of encyclopedias, etc . . .

… The intervening years after the fall of Samaria (722-BCE), and after the destruction of Jerusalem (586-BCE), were probably marked by closer intercourse, similar to the period of union in the popular traditions relating to the pre-monarchical age.

… This brought about the final siege of the city, which was at length taken and destroyed (B.C. 586).

… Some of the most important prophets and poets lived during the Babylonian Exile, the period of captivity that followed Babylonâ??s conquest of Judah in 587 or 586 B.C.

… In 586 B.C. it fell to the Babylonians, and the Temple was destroyed.

… Nebuchadnezzar subsequently engaged in several military campaigns designed to increase Babylonian influence in Syria and Judah, capturing Jerusalem in 597 BC, bringing King JehoiAchin to Babylon. Another siege of Jerusalem occurred in 586 BC, ending in the destruction of both the city and the Temple and the deportation of many prominent citizens to Babylon.

… Ashkelon was utterly destroyed by [Nebuchadnezzar], the Babylonian leader who later destroyed Jerusalem and Solomonâ??s Temple in 586 B.C.E.

The Babylonian Exile (586â??538) marks an epochal dividing point in Old Testament history, …

… A new revolt occurred (588-587 BC) in Judea. After a siege of about a year, Jerusalem was finally destroyed in 586 BC …

But you already stipulated that you would not contest the secular dating. . .

So in reference to the Bible dating:

The Bible contains no absolute dates, since our calendar was not invented when any part of the Old Testament was written. It is not possible, therefore, to date events directly. However, the Bible does provide many relative dates. I’ll skip all of the general stuff and go for the jugular . . .

Zechariah 1:7 “On the twenty-fourth day of the eleventh month, that is, the month Shebat, in the second year of Darius, the word of Jehovah occurred to Zechariah the son of BarachiJah the son of IdDo the prophet.”

Majority of scholars agree that this corresponds to February 519-BCE. Notice what a messenger of God said at that time as recorded in verse 12 of Zechariah: “So the angel of Jehovah answered and said: â??O Jehovah of armies, how long will you yourself not show mercy to Jerusalem and to the cities of Judah, whom you have denounced these seventy years?â??”

Yes, for 70 years God had denounced the cities of Judah. This takes us back to 589-BCE. According to the JW persepctive based on the 607 chronology, nothing of significance happened this year, moreover It would be ludicrous for this angel to say the cities had been denounced for “seventy years” if this period started eighteen years after the complete destruction of the capital! He would have had to say " these 83 years". But if the 589 date is correct, then this passage clearly denotes the year when Nebuchadnezzar started the final siege on Jerusalem (2. Kings 25:1; Ezekiel 24:1, 2; Jeremiah 52:4).

Supporters of the 607 chronology have likewise linked these seventy years with the prophecy of Jeremiah, however if this angel was talking about a seventy year period from 607 to 537 - that had ended some 18 years earlier then why would the angel ask â??how long?â?? These very words demonstrate that at this point the period of denouncing had not yet ended. And since they continued, they must have started with a major event in 589-BCE. This seventy years is not the same as that of Jeremiah, nor is it even a prophetic period. The angel is simply stating that for seventy years Judah has been denounced, and is asking how much longer it will continue to be so.

Zechariah later delivers an even more fatal blow to those who insist on the 607 chronology. Consider Zechariah 7:1-5:

“Furthermore, it came about that in the fourth year of Darius the king the word of Jehovah occurred to Zechariah, on the fourth day of the ninth month, that is, in Chislev. And Bethel proceeded to send Sharezer and Regem-melech and his men to soften the face of Jehovah, saying to the priests who belonged to the house of Jehovah of armies, and to the prophets, even saying: â??Shall I weep in the fifth month, practicing an abstinence, the way I have done these O how many years?â?? And the word of Jehovah of armies continued to occur to me, saying: â??Say to all the people of the land and to the priests, When you fasted and there was a wailing in the fifth month and in the seventh month, and this for seventy years, did you really fast to me, even me?â??”

The chronological evidence in these verses gives a wealth of information. They had been fasting in the fifth month in order to commemorate how on that day NebuZaradan, the chief of Nebuchadnezzarâ??s bodyguard, after two days of inspection, burned down the city of Jerusalem and its temple. They also fasted in the seventh month to commemorate the assassination of Governor GedaliJah, who was of the royal house of King David and whom Nebuchadnezzar made governor of the land for the Jews that were allowed to remain after the destruction of Jerusalem.

The Israelites asked if they should continue this fasting, so they were obviously doing it at the time and had been for seventy years. The date given for this vision of Zechariah (Chislev 9, 4th year of Darius) corresponds to November 518-BCE. This presents a problem if you want to date the destruction of Jerusalem at 607-BCE since this is some ninety years before. When we count seventy years however we come to the accepted chronology of 586/7-BCE.

then there is also the issue of Daniel’s age . . . but I’ll save that for a later time . . .

sheesh, why is that we have to build these walls of text . . .

and yes, I am aware that we are now doing the classic JW topic jump without resolving issues again . . . .

or to save space . . . just read along on this site . . . http://jehovah.net.au/607.html