Trinity - Bible Teaching or Doctrine of Man

I John 1:3

“That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ.”

“Fellowship” (Gk. koinonia) literally means “having in common” and involves sharing and participation. Christians have fellowship because they have a common faith (Titus 1:4; Jude 3), common grace of God in Christ (I Cor. 1:9; Phil. 1:7), common indwelling of the Spirit (John 20:22; Rom. 8:9-11), common gifts of the Spirit (Rom. 15:27), and a common enemy (I John 2:15-18; I Pet. 5:8). There can be no true fellowship with those who reject the teaching of N.T. faith.

II John 7-11

“For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward. Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him good speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.”

John warns that many deceivers and false teachers are perverting God’s Word and attempting to persuade Christians to accept their views. Christians should be aware of being indoctrinated by cultists. Their false teaching concerns the person of Jesus Christ. They deny that Jesus Christ was the eternal and only begotten Son of God, born of the virgin (Matt. 1:18; Luke 1:27), whose blood provides forgiveness for the sins of all who believe (I John 2:2; 4:9-10) and who is “the true God, and eternal life” (I John 5:20).

Galatians 1:9

“As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.”

The word “accursed” (Gk. anathema) means that one lies under the curse of God, is doomed to destruction, and will receive God’s wrath and damnation. (1) The apostle Paul reveals the Holy Spirit’s inspired attitude of judgment and indignation toward those who attempt to distort the original gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:7) and to change the truth of apostolic witness. This same attitude was evident in Jesus Christ (Matt. 23:13), Peter (II Pet. 2), John (II John 7-11), and Jude (Jude 3-4, 12-19), and will be found in the heart of every follower of Christ who loves the gospel of Christ as revealed in God’s Word and who believes that it is the indispensable good news of salvation for a world lost in sin (Rom. 10:14-15)

(2) Accursed are all those who preach a gospel contrary to the message that Paul preached, as revealed to him by Christ (Gal. 1:6, 11-12). Anyone adding to or taking away from the original and fundamental gospel of Christ and the apostles stands under the curse of God; “God shall take away his part out of the book of life” (Rev. 22:18-19).

(3) God commands believers to defend the faith (Jude 3), to correct in love (II Tim. 2:25-26), and to separate themselves from teachers, ministers, and others in the church who deny fundamental Bible truths taught by Jesus and the apostles (Gal. 1:8-9; Rom. 16: 17-18; II Cor. 6:17). These truths include:

(a) The deity of Christ and His virgin birth Matt. 1:23; John 20:28);
(b) The full inspiration and authority of God’s Word in all it teaches (II Tim. 3:16-17);
(c) The historicity of the fall of Adam (Rom. 5:12-19);
(d) The inherent corruption of human nature (Gen. 6:5; 8:21; Rom. 1:21-32; 3:10-18; 7:14, 21);
(e) The lostness of mankind without Christ (Acts 4:12; Rom. 1:16-32; 10:13-15);
(f) Salvation by faith in Christ as Lord and Saviour through His death and blood atonement (Rom. 3:24-25; 5:10);
(g) The bodily resurrection of Christ (Matt. 28:6; I Cor. 10:1);
(h) The historical reality of miracles in both the O.T. and N.T. (I Cor. 10:1);
(i) The reality of Satan and demons as spiritual beings (Matt. 4:1; 8:28; II Cor. 4:4; Eph. 2:2; 6:11-18; I Pet. 5:8);
(j) The Biblical teaching about hell (Mat. 10:28);
(k) The literal return of Jesus Christ to earth (John 14:3; Acts 1:11; ! Cor. 1:7).

Any teachings, doctrines, or ideas originating from persons, churches, or traditions and not expressed or implied in God’s Word, may not be included in the gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:11). To mix them with the original content of the gospel is to "pervert the gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:7).

I John 1:3

“That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ.”

“Fellowship” (Gk. koinonia) literally means “having in common” and involves sharing and participation. Christians have fellowship because they have a common faith (Titus 1:4; Jude 3), common grace of God in Christ (I Cor. 1:9; Phil. 1:7), common indwelling of the Spirit (John 20:22; Rom. 8:9-11), common gifts of the Spirit (Rom. 15:27), and a common enemy (I John 2:15-18; I Pet. 5:8). There can be no true fellowship with those who reject the teaching of N.T. faith.

II John 7-11

“For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward. Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him good speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.”

John warns that many deceivers and false teachers are perverting God’s Word and attempting to persuade Christians to accept their views. Christians should be aware of being indoctrinated by cultists. Their false teaching concerns the person of Jesus Christ. They deny that Jesus Christ was the eternal and only begotten Son of God, born of the virgin (Matt. 1:18; Luke 1:27), whose blood provides forgiveness for the sins of all who believe (I John 2:2; 4:9-10) and who is “the true God, and eternal life” (I John 5:20).

Galatians 1:9

“As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.”

The word “accursed” (Gk. anathema) means that one lies under the curse of God, is doomed to destruction, and will receive God’s wrath and damnation. (1) The apostle Paul reveals the Holy Spirit’s inspired attitude of judgment and indignation toward those who attempt to distort the original gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:7) and to change the truth of apostolic witness. This same attitude was evident in Jesus Christ (Matt. 23:13), Peter (II Pet. 2), John (II John 7-11), and Jude (Jude 3-4, 12-19), and will be found in the heart of every follower of Christ who loves the gospel of Christ as revealed in God’s Word and who believes that it is the indispensable good news of salvation for a world lost in sin (Rom. 10:14-15)

(2) Accursed are all those who preach a gospel contrary to the message that Paul preached, as revealed to him by Christ (Gal. 1:6, 11-12). Anyone adding to or taking away from the original and fundamental gospel of Christ and the apostles stands under the curse of God; “God shall take away his part out of the book of life” (Rev. 22:18-19).

(3) God commands believers to defend the faith (Jude 3), to correct in love (II Tim. 2:25-26), and to separate themselves from teachers, ministers, and others in the church who deny fundamental Bible truths taught by Jesus and the apostles (Gal. 1:8-9; Rom. 16: 17-18; II Cor. 6:17). These truths include:

(a) The deity of Christ and His virgin birth Matt. 1:23; John 20:28);
(b) The full inspiration and authority of God’s Word in all it teaches (II Tim. 3:16-17);
(c) The historicity of the fall of Adam (Rom. 5:12-19);
(d) The inherent corruption of human nature (Gen. 6:5; 8:21; Rom. 1:21-32; 3:10-18; 7:14, 21);
(e) The lostness of mankind without Christ (Acts 4:12; Rom. 1:16-32; 10:13-15);
(f) Salvation by faith in Christ as Lord and Saviour through His death and blood atonement (Rom. 3:24-25; 5:10);
(g) The bodily resurrection of Christ (Matt. 28:6; I Cor. 10:1);
(h) The historical reality of miracles in both the O.T. and N.T. (I Cor. 10:1);
(i) The reality of Satan and demons as spiritual beings (Matt. 4:1; 8:28; II Cor. 4:4; Eph. 2:2; 6:11-18; I Pet. 5:8);
(j) The Biblical teaching about hell (Mat. 10:28);
(k) The literal return of Jesus Christ to earth (John 14:3; Acts 1:11; ! Cor. 1:7).

Any teachings, doctrines, or ideas originating from persons, churches, or traditions and not expressed or implied in God’s Word, may not be included in the gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:11). To mix them with the original content of the gospel is to "pervert the gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:7).

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:
<<< A monstrous collection of watchtower documentation. >>>[/quote]
There’s even more than that if you can believe it. For the record, the WB&TS is evil in ways that the members certainly are not. The honchos know it’s a scam though I tend to buy that Russel and maybe even Rutherford actually believed in what they were doing. I should throw in here that when I abbreviate Jehovah’s Witnesses as JWs I mean it as no particular disrespect. It probably doesn’t show, but I’m a lazy typist (a loosely used term here) ans it’s just shorter.

[quote]blacksheep wrote:
<<<>>>
(3) God commands believers to defend the faith (Jude 3), to correct in love (II Tim. 2:25-26), and to separate themselves from teachers, ministers, and others in the church who deny fundamental Bible truths taught by Jesus and the apostles (Gal. 1:8-9; Rom. 16: 17-18; II Cor. 6:17). These truths include:

(a) The deity of Christ and His virgin birth Matt. 1:23; John 20:28);
(b) The full inspiration and authority of God’s Word in all it teaches (II Tim. 3:16-17);
(c) The historicity of the fall of Adam (Rom. 5:12-19);
(d) The inherent corruption of human nature (Gen. 6:5; 8:21; Rom. 1:21-32; 3:10-18; 7:14, 21);
(e) The lostness of mankind without Christ (Acts 4:12; Rom. 1:16-32; 10:13-15);
(f) Salvation by faith in Christ as Lord and Saviour through His death and blood atonement (Rom. 3:24-25; 5:10);
(g) The bodily resurrection of Christ (Matt. 28:6; I Cor. 10:1);
(h) The historical reality of miracles in both the O.T. and N.T. (I Cor. 10:1);
(i) The reality of Satan and demons as spiritual beings (Matt. 4:1; 8:28; II Cor. 4:4; Eph. 2:2; 6:11-18; I Pet. 5:8);
(j) The Biblical teaching about hell (Mat. 10:28);
(k) The literal return of Jesus Christ to earth (John 14:3; Acts 1:11; ! Cor. 1:7).

Any teachings, doctrines, or ideas originating from persons, churches, or traditions and not expressed or implied in God’s Word, may not be included in the gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:11). To mix them with the original content of the gospel is to "pervert the gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:7). [/quote]
This is quite so and that’s a good list. People can and do believe whatever they want. Usually it’s god created in their image and after their likeness. Actually anything that denies any part of that list logically concludes in either a denial of the Bible as the Word of God altogether or a rank perversion of it which then leaves us with some hip n groovy god I happen to like because he looks, but especially acts rather suspiciously like me.

I would maybe expand on (b) by including a historical exegetical method of interpretation. It means what it meant to the people who wrote it and it was written to in it’s various historical contexts with the resulting principle binding all peoples of all ages. It isn’t an allegorical hippified expression of spiritual men to be taken any way except literally. It is not merely the work of inspired men but is itself inspired in the autographs.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

I abbreviate Jehovah’s Witnesses as JWs I mean it as no particular disrespect. It probably doesn’t show, but I’m a lazy typist (a loosely used term here) ans it’s just shorter.[/quote]

I too mean no disrespect either. I am also a lazy typist. I am really bad a grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
IrishSteel I have one response to your massive wall of critical text:

John 8:7
“…He who is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone…”

Do you really want to go down THAT road? What you’ve listed are genuine mistakes in doctrine…how many pages would it take to list the abominations done over the centuries in the name of “Christianity”, and even your denomination (if you have one)?

Are you trying to say that Jesus’ disciples never made mistakes? Did they not think that Jesus was going to “kick butt” and become king at the same time that he came to earth? Did they not believe that Jesus was coming back in their generation?

James 5:8 You also be patient, establish your hearts, for the coming of your Lord draws near.
Hebrews 10:37 For yet a little while, He who shall come will come and will not delay.
Hebrews 1:2 “has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, by whom also He made the worlds”

You must also have a problem with these bible writers too?

Tell me, is it not better to be “on the watch”, than just casual about God’s kingdom and what it will accomplish?[/quote]
Right. I have said plenty of times that Jehovah’s Witnesses have made mistakes in the past. We don’t hide or deny this. We realize that we are not a perfect organization and we see the examples in the Bible of God’s servants making mistakes and misunderstanding different parts of the Bible. A good example of this is in the last chapter of John. At John 21:20-23 Peter misunderstands the statement Jesus made about John and thought that Jesus said John would never die. Peter then tells the other brothers and this misunderstanding spread among Jesus’ disciples so they all thought that John would not die, but as we know this was not the case because John did die. As its_just_me pointed out, Jesus’ disciples thought that Jesus’ Kingdom was going to be established on earth and would remove the oppressive yoke of Roman rule. Even after Jesus went to heaven they still didn’t have the correct view of God’s Kingdom. In both of the examples I mentioned above the Christians at that time had to readjust their thinking when they realized they were wrong and change their belief.

All of the books that Irish quotes are from websites whose goal is to discredit Jehovah’s Witnesses. Jehovah’s Witnesses know that the truth was progressively revealed over time just like the “Sacred Secret” mentioned at 1 Corinthians 2:6-16 was progressively revealed over time. What the these websites don’t quote are the books were Charles Taze Russell admits to not having the full truth and when Bible Students frequently referred to their Scriptural beliefs as “present truth” - not with any idea that truth itself changes but rather with the thought that their understanding of it was progressive. So looking back at the mistakes of the past and realizing that they did happen doesn’t discourage us. Seeing how God progressively revealed his purpose regarding Jesus so that not all of his servants had the complete truth during their lifetime helps us to understand that the Bible Students and early Jehovah’s Witnesses did not have the full understanding. When we saw that they were wrong we adjusted our beliefs just like Jesus’ disciples had to do. We look at all the mistakes of God’s faithful servants as individuals and as a group recorded in the Bible and this gives us confidence that God will still use imperfect humans who make mistakes to accomplish his will and be his people.

One thing I can say for certain is the fact that the scriptural evidence in the Bible is so strong and the signs that all can see with their own eyes are so clear which all point to 1914 being the year Jesus became king in heaven, when Satan was kicked out of heaven, when Jesus presence started and when the last days began.

well, I’m certainly glad I didn’t post my hopes on getting a Ab Lounger, and that i just went ahead and got my own cigars . . .

[quote]mse2us wrote:

One thing I can say for certain is the fact that the scriptural evidence in the Bible is so strong and the signs that all can see with their own eyes are so clear which all point to 1914 being the year Jesus became king in heaven, when Satan was kicked out of heaven, when Jesus presence started and when the last days began.

[/quote]

I dont know about you guys, but I beleive that Jesus has been king in heaven forever. How do I know this? In the begining God created the Heavens and the Earth. God is on the throne in Genesis, and God is on the throne in Revelation. Never was God not on the throne. He is King in Heaven and King of Earth.

Got one more thought of questions for the JWs. If the end of days started in 1914 when will Jesus be returning? I mean if you know when he started to reign in heaven when will he reign on Earth? When will your prophesy, made after the year 1914, be discredited, or are your prophesies the same as a fortune teller? So vague that when Jesus returns you will say, “See we were right.” We had 1000 years past 1914 for the prophesy to be correct, but when 2914 comes around and he has not returned would you then agree the JWs are full or crap, or will the prophecy be changed again?

Just had a thought. Jesus died late Friday afternoon, was burried before night fall on Friday, dead all day Saturday, and rose on Sunday Morning. As we all know he was not dead for 3, 24 hour periods, but was dead for 3 days, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Maybe that Jesus started to reign in heaven in 1914 the millenium reign may have ended at the turn of the millenium in the year 2000. Not a full 1000 years, but a millenium that started in 1000 AD. I would say your prophesy of 1914 is false based on these assumptions. Got a new prophesy?

[quote]mse2us wrote:
<<< Right. I have said plenty of times that Jehovah’s Witnesses have made mistakes in the past. We don’t hide or deny this. We realize that we are not a perfect organization and we see the examples in the Bible of God’s servants making mistakes and misunderstanding different parts of the Bible. A good example of this is in the last chapter of John. At John 21:20-23 Peter misunderstands the statement Jesus made about John and thought that Jesus said John would never die. Peter then tells the other brothers and this misunderstanding spread among Jesus’ disciples so they all thought that John would not die, but as we know this was not the case because John did die. As its_just_me pointed out, Jesus’ disciples thought that Jesus’ Kingdom was going to be established on earth and would remove the oppressive yoke of Roman rule. Even after Jesus went to heaven they still didn’t have the correct view of God’s Kingdom. In both of the examples I mentioned above the Christians at that time had to readjust their thinking when they realized they were wrong and change their belief.

All of the books that Irish quotes are from websites whose goal is to discredit Jehovah’s Witnesses. Jehovah’s Witnesses know that the truth was progressively revealed over time just like the “Sacred Secret” mentioned at 1 Corinthians 2:6-16 was progressively revealed over time. What the these websites don’t quote are the books were Charles Taze Russell admits to not having the full truth and when Bible Students frequently referred to their Scriptural beliefs as “present truth” - not with any idea that truth itself changes but rather with the thought that their understanding of it was progressive. So looking back at the mistakes of the past and realizing that they did happen doesn’t discourage us. Seeing how God progressively revealed his purpose regarding Jesus so that not all of his servants had the complete truth during their lifetime helps us to understand that the Bible Students and early Jehovah’s Witnesses did not have the full understanding. When we saw that they were wrong we adjusted our beliefs just like Jesus’ disciples had to do. We look at all the mistakes of God’s faithful servants as individuals and as a group recorded in the Bible and this gives us confidence that God will still use imperfect humans who make mistakes to accomplish his will and be his people.

One thing I can say for certain is the fact that the scriptural evidence in the Bible is so strong and the signs that all can see with their own eyes are so clear which all point to 1914 being the year Jesus became king in heaven, when Satan was kicked out of heaven, when Jesus presence started and when the last days began. [/quote]
So what we have here is an unbroken tradition of un-explicitly stated, but nonetheless trinitarian belief going right back to the first century which isn’t formally confessed until the early councils and that doesn’t qualify as “God progressively revealing”? The path of the righteous like the light of dawn, That shines brighter and brighter until the full day, but 100 plus years of date specific false prophecies and incoherent self contradictory teachings does? Who cares where Irishsteel got the quotations? They’re from YOUR books. How well I know. I owned most of them.

This has nothing to do with hatred for JW’s and everything to do with love of the truth.

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:
Second - I’m not trying to judge any man. There is one judge and one savior. So I am not casting stones.

Third - every generation of believers has anticipated the imminent return of Chirst, but we don’t go prophecying actual dates. The Bible was very specific that man does not/cannot know the actual date of His return.

Fourth - to make a single prophecy that does not come true marks one as a false prophet, not as a teacher trying to get a lesson right. To make dozens of prohecies that do not come true makes someone a false prophet with a very bad track record.

Fifth - that wall of text was your own history . . . every false/wrong statement uttered with the same authority and 100% sincerity as what you are being told today. My heritage of faith has an unbroken lineage of veracity, yours has a history filled with errors and corrections. The teaching is only as true as the source.
[/quote]
Bible Students as they were called did not say that the interpretation of Luke 21:24 was given through divine inspiration which is what a prophecy is. Had that claim been made then they would be false prophets. 1914 being a significant year was due to using the Bible to interpret a prophecy that was already in the Bible. Jesus statement at Luke 21:24 which stated that “Jerusalem will be trampled on by the nations, until the appointed times of the nations are fulfilled.” Jesus said this, not Charles Russell or any other Bible Student. When Jesus said this statement it’s clear that there was going to be a beginning as to when Jerusalem would be trampled on by the nations and an end. Charles Russell and the other Bible Students weren’t the ones who applied the prophecy in Daniel 4 about the tree stump being banded for seven times and using Revelation 12 to understand how long seven times was which was 2520 years. Non-Bible Students were able to use the Bible to figure this out. The Bible Students understood where in history to apply it which was when the last king to sit on God’s throne was removed by the Babylonians in 607 B.C.E. This again is based on the Bible because at Ezekiel 21:26,27 which is a prophecy about King Zedekiah being removed from God’s throne states that the crown will be removed and will become no ones until he who has the legal right comes. That of course is Jesus Christ who as a descendant of King David has the legal right to the Davidic throne. Once the Bible Students counted up 2520 years from 607 B.C.E they were taken to 1914. They just didn’t understand what Jesus becoming king in heaven meant, but they knew that it was going to be a significant year.

The Bible Students came to this conclusion by using the Bible, not from a prophetic dream or vision from God. The same can be said for determining that when Jesus became king in heaven was when Satan got kicked out of heaven, when Jesus presence and the last days started. We use the Bible and the Bible only to determine this. So no the Bible Students never claimed to be prophets of God.

Irish, Mr Greek linguist, you don’t know that the Greek word Parousia which most Bibles translate as “coming” is more accurately translated as presence. Parousia denotes an arrival and presence which is what happened when Jesus became king in heaven? If you look a little closer and use your Greek skills then you may understand that Jesus’ parousia or presence mentioned at Matthew 24:3 and 37-39 is not when Jesus is going to “come” or “return,” which is when Armageddon is going to come. No, it’s an extended period of time that would be invisible to human eyes and that Jesus said could be identified the signs he mentioned at Matthew 24:3-7.

And we did not give dozens of dates as to when armageddon was going to come - we gave three approximate dates. Since we were able to use the Bible to see when the last days started which was 1914. We are on a constant watch as to when Armageddon is going to come. Christians had been warned by the apostle Paul that Jehovah’s day of judgment would come unexpectedly. He wrote at 1 Thessalonians 5:2-6: “You yourselves know quite well that Jehovah’s day is coming exactly as a thief in the night. . . . So, then, let us not sleep on as the rest do, but let us stay awake and keep our senses.” So Understandably, then, awake, watchful Christians in the 20th century have been sensitive to all events and chronological implications that might indicate the proximity of “Jehovah’s day” - just as a person expecting a thief’s nighttime arrival could possibly interpret any unusual sound as evidence of the thief’s presence. So the few times we were overanxious does not mean that the 1914 date is wrong which is the date that I know based on Biblical evidence was the beginning of the end or the conclusion of the system of things.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

I abbreviate Jehovah’s Witnesses as JWs I mean it as no particular disrespect. It probably doesn’t show, but I’m a lazy typist (a loosely used term here) ans it’s just shorter.[/quote]

I too mean no disrespect either. I am also a lazy typist. I am really bad a grammar, spelling, and punctuation.[/quote]

Don’t worry, we use that initial too :slight_smile:

I only spell it out fully when I’m not sure the reader will understand it (many think it means Jew LOL).

[quote]blacksheep wrote:
I John 1:3

“That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ.”

“Fellowship” (Gk. koinonia) literally means “having in common” and involves sharing and participation. Christians have fellowship because they have a common faith (Titus 1:4; Jude 3), common grace of God in Christ (I Cor. 1:9; Phil. 1:7), common indwelling of the Spirit (John 20:22; Rom. 8:9-11), common gifts of the Spirit (Rom. 15:27), and a common enemy (I John 2:15-18; I Pet. 5:8). There can be no true fellowship with those who reject the teaching of N.T. faith.

II John 7-11

“For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward. Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him good speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.”

John warns that many deceivers and false teachers are perverting God’s Word and attempting to persuade Christians to accept their views. Christians should be aware of being indoctrinated by cultists. Their false teaching concerns the person of Jesus Christ. They deny that Jesus Christ was the eternal and only begotten Son of God, born of the virgin (Matt. 1:18; Luke 1:27), whose blood provides forgiveness for the sins of all who believe (I John 2:2; 4:9-10) and who is “the true God, and eternal life” (I John 5:20).

Galatians 1:9

“As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.”

The word “accursed” (Gk. anathema) means that one lies under the curse of God, is doomed to destruction, and will receive God’s wrath and damnation. (1) The apostle Paul reveals the Holy Spirit’s inspired attitude of judgment and indignation toward those who attempt to distort the original gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:7) and to change the truth of apostolic witness. This same attitude was evident in Jesus Christ (Matt. 23:13), Peter (II Pet. 2), John (II John 7-11), and Jude (Jude 3-4, 12-19), and will be found in the heart of every follower of Christ who loves the gospel of Christ as revealed in God’s Word and who believes that it is the indispensable good news of salvation for a world lost in sin (Rom. 10:14-15)

(2) Accursed are all those who preach a gospel contrary to the message that Paul preached, as revealed to him by Christ (Gal. 1:6, 11-12). Anyone adding to or taking away from the original and fundamental gospel of Christ and the apostles stands under the curse of God; “God shall take away his part out of the book of life” (Rev. 22:18-19).

(3) God commands believers to defend the faith (Jude 3), to correct in love (II Tim. 2:25-26), and to separate themselves from teachers, ministers, and others in the church who deny fundamental Bible truths taught by Jesus and the apostles (Gal. 1:8-9; Rom. 16: 17-18; II Cor. 6:17). These truths include:

(a) The deity of Christ and His virgin birth Matt. 1:23; John 20:28);
(b) The full inspiration and authority of God’s Word in all it teaches (II Tim. 3:16-17);
(c) The historicity of the fall of Adam (Rom. 5:12-19);
(d) The inherent corruption of human nature (Gen. 6:5; 8:21; Rom. 1:21-32; 3:10-18; 7:14, 21);
(e) The lostness of mankind without Christ (Acts 4:12; Rom. 1:16-32; 10:13-15);
(f) Salvation by faith in Christ as Lord and Saviour through His death and blood atonement (Rom. 3:24-25; 5:10);
(g) The bodily resurrection of Christ (Matt. 28:6; I Cor. 10:1);
(h) The historical reality of miracles in both the O.T. and N.T. (I Cor. 10:1);
(i) The reality of Satan and demons as spiritual beings (Matt. 4:1; 8:28; II Cor. 4:4; Eph. 2:2; 6:11-18; I Pet. 5:8);
(j) The Biblical teaching about hell (Mat. 10:28);
(k) The literal return of Jesus Christ to earth (John 14:3; Acts 1:11; ! Cor. 1:7).

Any teachings, doctrines, or ideas originating from persons, churches, or traditions and not expressed or implied in God’s Word, may not be included in the gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:11). To mix them with the original content of the gospel is to "pervert the gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:7). [/quote]

You have to understand that those scriptures “work” for both sides. Other than differences in interpretation of a couple of the scriptures, we agree.

Take for instance your last paragraph:

Even secular sources agree that after the apostles died, Christianity started adopting pagan ideas and traditions. The teaching of “eternal hell fire” is not only against God’s principles (1John 4:16, Jeremiah 7:13), it’s clearly a teaching adopted by the church religious leaders to keep the “heathen” converts from becoming “trouble makers”. It is a gross misunderstanding of bible/Jewish symbolism and the word Gehennah (Valley of Hinnom):

Here’s a decent source talking about what hell really is (not from JW’s - just so you understand we’re not “twisting” anything):

http://www.what-the-hell-is-hell.com/

Another tradition of man is the teaching of the soul and it’s immortality. The bible clearly states that Adam became a living soul (he did not have a soul, he WAS a soul - Genesis 2:7). Soul in the bible often refers to life-force, the “spirit”/personality of a person, or the body itself (flesh)…and never refers to the soul as being a spirit being that survives death.

Praise and prayer to saints is another thing that is condemned in the bible, yet is widely practised.

Christmas and Easter were founded on pagan celebrations…enough said


You could fill books with the teachings of man that have creeped into the church; it’s a different subject that I could not do justice on here with.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
…People can and do believe whatever they want. Usually it’s god created in their image and after their likeness…

…which then leaves us with some hip n groovy god I happen to like because he looks, but especially acts rather suspiciously like me.

[/quote]

That’s funny, because of all the Born Again Christians (that is, the denomination) that I’ve spoken to, they always seem to give a very personal opinion of the bible/God. It appears that they seem more interested in saying that “God chose me, I’m special, therefore I know what I’m talking about”.

They have a very contradictory way of saying: “I am humble, I’m not boasting”

And then the whole of the rest of the conversation goes something like this:

“God chose me” (so deep down I feel a smug sense of achievement/meaning)

But of course, “I’m not saying that I’m special or anything” :wink:

I’m not saying that this is you, I’m simply relaying what I’ve experienced. The Born Again’s that I’ve met are more interested in their “position” and feeling of “specialness”, and they’re quite complacent in telling me that they’re going to heaven (without even getting off their backside to try and help others to be “saved”, despite believing without being saved, people will be eternally tortured in hell fire).

If I was to sum up most Born Again’s that I’ve met, it’s complacency and a feeling of worth because they feel that God has specially chosen them. Without that element of “selfishness”, I don’t believe most would be interested or have any passion about what they believe.


As regards making God to be something that they want Him to be, I was not “sugar coating” God by talking about His mercy - the bible talks about that.

JW’s are the ones who say that you cannot just make God out to be some “big cuddly teddy bear of love”, action is required. You cannot just claim that you are saved and that’s it. Faith is proved by actions:

James 2:17 “faith without works is dead”

JW’s are the only ones who take unrepentant and blatent sin within the church seriously, and ironically, they’re “persecuted” for this arrangement (disfellowshiping) and are told that this is “unloving”, despite following biblical guidelines (some scriptures of which have been mentioned).

JW’s by far do not sugar coat the truth, and make out that all you need to do is “say a line and you’re converted/saved”. It is the mainstream belief that says “all you need to do is be good”. If anything, JW’s are the ones who are accused of making their members “jump through many hoops” in order to attain salvation. When in reality, these so called hoops are bible standards. Although this is mistaken as an unbalanced focus on works rather than faith, which isn’t true. Faith and works go hand in hand (one does not exist without the other). If you say that you have faith, and love God, and yet are committing fornication, or cheating on your wife every week (despite knowing that the bible condemns this)…I’d say that you are a liar.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
That’s funny, because of all the Born Again Christians (that is, the denomination) that I’ve spoken to, they always seem to give a very personal opinion of the bible/God. It appears that they seem more interested in saying that “God chose me, I’m special, therefore I know what I’m talking about”.

They have a very contradictory way of saying: “I am humble, I’m not boasting”

And then the whole of the rest of the conversation goes something like this:

“God chose me” (so deep down I feel a smug sense of achievement/meaning)

But of course, “I’m not saying that I’m special or anything” :wink:

I’m not saying that this is you, I’m simply relaying what I’ve experienced. The Born Again’s that I’ve met are more interested in their “position” and feeling of “specialness”, and they’re quite complacent in telling me that they’re going to heaven (without even getting off their backside to try and help others to be “saved”, despite believing without being saved, people will be eternally tortured in hell fire).

If I was to sum up most Born Again’s that I’ve met, it’s complacency and a feeling of worth because they feel that God has specially chosen them. Without that element of “selfishness”, I don’t believe most would be interested or have any passion about what they believe.[/quote]

There’s no such denomination as “born again”, but that’s OK. I understand what you mean. As for the rest of the above? To our great shame you are pretty much correct and the church, by which I mean all those claiming the Christ of the Bible regardless of denomination, would do well to hear what you are saying. There is a humongous new discussion potentially involved here, but I’ll be as concise as I can.

There ARE different levels of maturity among true Christians as Paul writes about extensively. There are also legions of false Christians, especially in the United States. I can’t speak about the particular people you’ve met, but any person who addresses you (or anyone else) with a holier than thou attitude either hasn’t yet understood their own salvation or isn’t saved at all. The indwelling presence of the Spirit of God brings a deep awesome humility in the face of exactly how UN-special in themselves they are. Once somebody has the focus honed in on their on their own sin by the Holy Spirit nobody else’s looks quite so bad.

In short, the church has failed miserably, again, especially in this country, in both her witness and her outreach.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
As regards making God to be something that they want Him to be, I was not “sugar coating” God by talking about His mercy - the bible talks about that.

JW’s are the ones who say that you cannot just make God out to be some “big cuddly teddy bear of love”, action is required. You cannot just claim that you are saved and that’s it. Faith is proved by actions:

James 2:17 “faith without works is dead”

JW’s are the only ones who take unrepentant and blatent sin within the church seriously, and ironically, they’re “persecuted” for this arrangement (disfellowshiping) and are told that this is “unloving”, despite following biblical guidelines (some scriptures of which have been mentioned).

JW’s by far do not sugar coat the truth, and make out that all you need to do is “say a line and you’re converted/saved”. It is the mainstream belief that says “all you need to do is be good”. If anything, JW’s are the ones who are accused of making their members “jump through many hoops” in order to attain salvation. When in reality, these so called hoops are bible standards. Although this is mistaken as an unbalanced focus on works rather than faith, which isn’t true. Faith and works go hand in hand (one does not exist without the other). If you say that you have faith, and love God, and yet are committing fornication, or cheating on your wife every week (despite knowing that the bible condemns this)…I’d say that you are a liar.[/quote]
You are also essentially correct here as well. Saving faith of necessity brings with it a transformed life though sanctification is a lifelong process. It’s a war, Paul uses that word, (Rom. 7:23) between the congenital indwelling sin bequeathed to us by Adam and the new creature in Christ raised from the dead in the new birth. If that new creature exists he will make his presence known. No truly regenerate person can peacefully coexist with known sin. It is his sworn mortal enemy. He hates it because his Lord hates it but he will not be free from it while dwelling in this fallen flesh. 1 Cor. 15:54

Christians can and do sin and sometimes quite grievously so. David had Uriah the Hittite, a faithful ultimately loyal officer in his army killed so he could steal his wife. 2 Sam: 11-12 An abominable eye popping double whammy of sin to be sure. When Nathan confronts David about this he crumbles in self loathing repentance leaving us the quintessential model for how this is done in the 51st Psalm. David is called a man after God’s heart by God himself. He is repeatedly referred to as “the man of God” all over the old testament. Jesus is called “Son of David”. David was forgiven, not because he jumped through a bunch of ritualistic hoops, but because he fell on his face and begged mercy of the holy God he had offended. David had a better understanding of “grace through faith” than most modern day Christians.

Living the process of forsaking sin, putting off the old man and putting on the new, along with all the works of righteousness, including bringing the Gospel to a lost world, are the result of having been saved by grace though faith, not of works lest any man should boast Eph. 2:8-9. They are not the means to it.

On the other hand works in themselves prove nothing. Jesus is talking about false prophets in Matt. 7 when he says you’ll know them by their fruits. He tells the crowd there that people will prophesy, cast out demons and perform miracles in His very name and he will command them to depart telling them that he never knew them. Paul everywhere drills his readers with the truth that righteousness comes not by the works of the law. Even using Abraham, the father of Israel, as a prime example calling him “the believer” because he believed God and it was accounted to him as righteousness.

Faith is what saves and it IS the gift of God. Christ is the author and finisher/perfecter of our faith. Heb. 12:2. A transformed life and works of righteousness are the fruits of the spirit manifesting themselves in the new creature in Christ.

There cannot be one without the other and neither can be found in a false gospel or a false god. I may bring controversy even with those here I consider brothers with this next statement, but in this context I’m gonna say it anyway. I firmly believe, completely contrary to what is most commonly held in modern christendom, that it is the arminian and pelagian misunderstandings within contemporary Christianity that have rendered the church nearly powerless to externally effect individuals and societies. It was the reformation faith of Paul, Augustine, Calvin, the Westminster divines and Whitfield that took the colonies by storm and paved the way for the American revolution. A thing that pacifist JW’s will probably hold as evidence against it.

The bottom line is your points are well taken and you’ve been done a disservice by those who should know better. Nobody can change that, but the faith once for all delivered to the saints stands on the name and authority of God Himself despite the hypocrisy of some claiming it as their own.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

One thing I can say for certain is the fact that the scriptural evidence in the Bible is so strong and the signs that all can see with their own eyes are so clear which all point to 1914 being the year Jesus became king in heaven, when Satan was kicked out of heaven, when Jesus presence started and when the last days began.

[/quote]

I dont know about you guys, but I beleive that Jesus has been king in heaven forever. How do I know this? In the begining God created the Heavens and the Earth. God is on the throne in Genesis, and God is on the throne in Revelation. Never was God not on the throne. He is King in Heaven and King of Earth.

Got one more thought of questions for the JWs. If the end of days started in 1914 when will Jesus be returning? I mean if you know when he started to reign in heaven when will he reign on Earth? When will your prophesy, made after the year 1914, be discredited, or are your prophesies the same as a fortune teller? So vague that when Jesus returns you will say, “See we were right.” We had 1000 years past 1914 for the prophesy to be correct, but when 2914 comes around and he has not returned would you then agree the JWs are full or crap, or will the prophecy be changed again?

Just had a thought. Jesus died late Friday afternoon, was burried before night fall on Friday, dead all day Saturday, and rose on Sunday Morning. As we all know he was not dead for 3, 24 hour periods, but was dead for 3 days, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Maybe that Jesus started to reign in heaven in 1914 the millenium reign may have ended at the turn of the millenium in the year 2000. Not a full 1000 years, but a millenium that started in 1000 AD. I would say your prophesy of 1914 is false based on these assumptions. Got a new prophesy?[/quote]
No Jesus has not been king in heaven forever. The Bible clearly shows that Jesus is given the kingship in heaven. Ezekiel 21:26,27 is a prophecy which states that the crown will be removed from a wicked King which turned out to be Zedekiah. The prophecy then states that the crown will be given to the one who comes and has the legal right. King Zedekiah was the last king in the line of David to sit on God’s throne. Jesus as a descendant of David is the one who has the legal right. Isaiah 9:6 states:
“6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7 To the abundance of the princely rule and to peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom in order to establish it firmly and to sustain it by means of justice and by means of righteousness, from now on and to time indefinite. The very zeal of Jehovah of armies will do this.”

That prophecy makes it clear that Jesus will sit on the throne of King David which has been vacant since King Zedekiah was removed by the Babylonians. Daniel 7:12, 13 show a scene in heaven where Jesus aproaches Jehovah and is given a kingdom. Daniel 7:13,14 states:
13 “I kept on beholding in the visions of the night, and, see there! with the clouds of the heavens someone like a son of man happened to be coming; and to the Ancient of Days he gained access, and they brought him up close even before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership and dignity and kingdom, that the peoples, national groups and languages should all serve even him. His rulership is an indefinitely lasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom one that will not be brought to ruin.”

Again, this is Jesus approaching God and God gives him the kingdom just like God gave King David his kingship.

Revelation, which is a future vision describes a battle in heaven where Satan is kicked out of heaven and thrown down to the earth. After that event God’s Kingdom is officially announced with Jesus having authority over this kingdom which means he is king.

Revelation 12:7-10 states:
“7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled 8 but it did not prevail, neither was a place found for them any longer in heaven. 9 So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him. 10 And I heard a loud voice in heaven say:
Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God!

This is when Jesus becomes king in heaven which is after Satan gets kicked out of heaven. Once Satan is kicked out of heaven this spells WOE for the people of the earth according to Revelation 12:12. Remember this is a future vision that was given to John and when he writes Revelation the above events did not yet happen.

So no Jesus has not been king in heaven forever.

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

One thing I can say for certain is the fact that the scriptural evidence in the Bible is so strong and the signs that all can see with their own eyes are so clear which all point to 1914 being the year Jesus became king in heaven, when Satan was kicked out of heaven, when Jesus presence started and when the last days began.

[/quote]

I dont know about you guys, but I beleive that Jesus has been king in heaven forever. How do I know this? In the begining God created the Heavens and the Earth. God is on the throne in Genesis, and God is on the throne in Revelation. Never was God not on the throne. He is King in Heaven and King of Earth.

Got one more thought of questions for the JWs. If the end of days started in 1914 when will Jesus be returning? I mean if you know when he started to reign in heaven when will he reign on Earth? When will your prophesy, made after the year 1914, be discredited, or are your prophesies the same as a fortune teller? So vague that when Jesus returns you will say, “See we were right.” We had 1000 years past 1914 for the prophesy to be correct, but when 2914 comes around and he has not returned would you then agree the JWs are full or crap, or will the prophecy be changed again?

Just had a thought. Jesus died late Friday afternoon, was burried before night fall on Friday, dead all day Saturday, and rose on Sunday Morning. As we all know he was not dead for 3, 24 hour periods, but was dead for 3 days, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Maybe that Jesus started to reign in heaven in 1914 the millenium reign may have ended at the turn of the millenium in the year 2000. Not a full 1000 years, but a millenium that started in 1000 AD. I would say your prophesy of 1914 is false based on these assumptions. Got a new prophesy?[/quote]
No Jesus has not been king in heaven forever. The Bible clearly shows that Jesus is given the kingship in heaven. Ezekiel 21:26,27 is a prophecy which states that the crown will be removed from a wicked King which turned out to be Zedekiah. The prophecy then states that the crown will be given to the one who comes and has the legal right. King Zedekiah was the last king in the line of David to sit on God’s throne. Jesus as a descendant of David is the one who has the legal right. Isaiah 9:6 states:
“6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7 To the abundance of the princely rule and to peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom in order to establish it firmly and to sustain it by means of justice and by means of righteousness, from now on and to time indefinite. The very zeal of Jehovah of armies will do this.”

That prophecy makes it clear that Jesus will sit on the throne of King David which has been vacant since King Zedekiah was removed by the Babylonians. Daniel 7:12, 13 show a scene in heaven where Jesus aproaches Jehovah and is given a kingdom. Daniel 7:13,14 states:
13 “I kept on beholding in the visions of the night, and, see there! with the clouds of the heavens someone like a son of man happened to be coming; and to the Ancient of Days he gained access, and they brought him up close even before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership and dignity and kingdom, that the peoples, national groups and languages should all serve even him. His rulership is an indefinitely lasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom one that will not be brought to ruin.”

Again, this is Jesus approaching God and God gives him the kingdom just like God gave King David his kingship.

Revelation, which is a future vision describes a battle in heaven where Satan is kicked out of heaven and thrown down to the earth. After that event God’s Kingdom is officially announced with Jesus having authority over this kingdom which means he is king.

Revelation 12:7-10 states:
“7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled 8 but it did not prevail, neither was a place found for them any longer in heaven. 9 So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him. 10 And I heard a loud voice in heaven say:
Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God!

This is when Jesus becomes king in heaven which is after Satan gets kicked out of heaven. Once Satan is kicked out of heaven this spells WOE for the people of the earth according to Revelation 12:12. Remember this is a future vision that was given to John and when he writes Revelation the above events did not yet happen.

So no Jesus has not been king in heaven forever.[/quote]

So I am assuming you think the time in heaven is the same as “Earth time”? Why would God be Pigeon holed to our calendar?

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
That’s funny, because of all the Born Again Christians (that is, the denomination) that I’ve spoken to, they always seem to give a very personal opinion of the bible/God. It appears that they seem more interested in saying that “God chose me, I’m special, therefore I know what I’m talking about”.

They have a very contradictory way of saying: “I am humble, I’m not boasting”

And then the whole of the rest of the conversation goes something like this:

“God chose me” (so deep down I feel a smug sense of achievement/meaning)

But of course, “I’m not saying that I’m special or anything” :wink:

I’m not saying that this is you, I’m simply relaying what I’ve experienced. The Born Again’s that I’ve met are more interested in their “position” and feeling of “specialness”, and they’re quite complacent in telling me that they’re going to heaven (without even getting off their backside to try and help others to be “saved”, despite believing without being saved, people will be eternally tortured in hell fire).

If I was to sum up most Born Again’s that I’ve met, it’s complacency and a feeling of worth because they feel that God has specially chosen them. Without that element of “selfishness”, I don’t believe most would be interested or have any passion about what they believe.[/quote]

There’s no such denomination as “born again”, but that’s OK. I understand what you mean. As for the rest of the above? To our great shame you are pretty much correct and the church, by which I mean the all those claiming the Christ of the Bible regardless of denomination, would do well to hear what you are saying. There is a humongous new discussion potentially involved here, but I’ll be as concise as I can.

There ARE different levels of maturity among true Christians as Paul writes about extensively. There are also legions of false Christians, especially in the United States. I can’t speak about the particular people you’ve met, but any person who addresses you (or anyone else) with a holier than thou attitude either hasn’t yet understood their own salvation or isn’t saved at all. The indwelling presence of the Spirit of God brings a deep awesome humility in the face of exactly how UN-special in themselves they are. Once somebody has the focus honed in on their on their own sin by the Holy Spirit nobody else’s looks quite so bad.

In short, the church has failed miserably, again, especially in this country, in both her witness and her outreach.

[quote]its_just_me wrote:
As regards making God to be something that they want Him to be, I was not “sugar coating” God by talking about His mercy - the bible talks about that.

JW’s are the ones who say that you cannot just make God out to be some “big cuddly teddy bear of love”, action is required. You cannot just claim that you are saved and that’s it. Faith is proved by actions:

James 2:17 “faith without works is dead”

JW’s are the only ones who take unrepentant and blatent sin within the church seriously, and ironically, they’re “persecuted” for this arrangement (disfellowshiping) and are told that this is “unloving”, despite following biblical guidelines (some scriptures of which have been mentioned).

JW’s by far do not sugar coat the truth, and make out that all you need to do is “say a line and you’re converted/saved”. It is the mainstream belief that says “all you need to do is be good”. If anything, JW’s are the ones who are accused of making their members “jump through many hoops” in order to attain salvation. When in reality, these so called hoops are bible standards. Although this is mistaken as an unbalanced focus on works rather than faith, which isn’t true. Faith and works go hand in hand (one does not exist without the other). If you say that you have faith, and love God, and yet are committing fornication, or cheating on your wife every week (despite knowing that the bible condemns this)…I’d say that you are a liar.[/quote]
You are also essentially correct here as well. Saving faith of necessity brings with it a transformed life though sanctification is a lifelong process. It’s a war, Paul uses that word, (Rom. 7:23) between the congenital indwelling sin bequeathed to us by Adam and the new creature in Christ raised from the dead in the new birth. If that new creature exists he will make his presence known. No truly regenerate person can peacefully coexist with known sin. It is his sworn mortal enemy. He hates it because his Lord hates it but he will not be free from it while dwelling in this fallen flesh. 1 Cor. 15:54

Christians can and do sin and sometimes quite grievously so. David had Uriah the Hittite, a faithful ultimately loyal officer in his army killed so he could steal his wife. 2 Sam: 11-12 An abominable eye popping double whammy of sin to be sure. When Nathan confronts David about this he crumbles in self loathing repentance leaving us the quintessential model for how this is done in the 51st Psalm. David is called a man after God’s heart by God himself. He is repeatedly referred to as “the man of God” all over the old testament. Jesus is called “Son of David”. David was forgiven, not because he jumped through a bunch of ritualistic hoops, but because he fell on his face and begged mercy of the holy God he had offended. David had a better understanding of “grace through faith” than most modern day Christians.

Living the process of forsaking sin, putting off the old man and putting on the new, along with all the works of righteousness, including bringing the Gospel to a lost world, are the result of having been saved by grace though faith, not of works lest any man should boast Eph. 2:8-9. They are not the means to it.

On the other hand works in themselves prove nothing. Jesus is talking about false prophets in Matt. 7 when he says you’ll know them by their fruits. He tells the crowd there that people will prophesy, cast out demons and perform miracles in His very name and he will command them to depart telling them that he never knew them. Paul everywhere drills his readers with the truth that righteousness comes not by the works of the law. Even using Abraham, the father of Israel, as a prime example calling him “the believer” because he believed God and it was accounted to him as righteousness.

Faith is what saves and it IS the gift of God. Christ is the author and finisher/perfecter of our faith. Heb. 12:2. A transformed life and works of righteousness are the fruits of the spirit manifesting themselves in the new creature in Christ.

There cannot be one without the other and neither can be found in a false gospel or a false god. I may bring controversy even with those here I consider brothers with this next statement, but in this context I’m gonna say it anyway. I firmly believe, completely contrary to what is most commonly held in modern christendom, that it is the arminian and pelagian misunderstandings within contemporary Christianity that have rendered the church nearly powerless to externally effect individuals and societies. It was the reformation faith of Paul, Augustine, Calvin, the Westminster divines and Whitfield that took the colonies by storm and paved the way for the American revolution. A thing that pacifist JW’s will probably hold as evidence against it.

The bottom line is your points are well taken and you’ve been done a disservice by those who should know better. Nobody can change that, but the faith once for all delivered to the saints stands on the name and authority of God Himself despite the hypocrisy of some claiming it as their own.

[/quote]

I would be lying if I said I haven’t learned anything from this thread, many things that have been said (especially from yourself) have really made me do some self examination. It amazes me how much I can relate to what you say, and yet our beliefs are quite different?

I know this sounds funny coming from someone young (I’m 26), but I too have been through some humbling experiences. Funny enough, one was the very one that I mentioned (disfellowshiping). I lived a worldly lifestyle for some time, before I decided that enough was enough (I was pretty badly depressed). Feeling pretty low and dejected, I decided that I would start doing some bible reading (as a last resort). I absolutely loved it (whereas before it didn’t seem to mean much to me). I found myself wanting to read the bible every day, and I soaked everything up and pondered on it for ages - I started on the CEV, it was pretty easy to understand for my simple brain ;). Then, when I finally plucked up the courage (like a little boy who’d been told off) sheepishly I started praying to God. Because of reading the bible and starting to properly have respect for God, I began to feel even more guilty about the way of life I had been living. So, I poured my heart out to God (was quite emotional - and I thought of ancient King David)…I just wanted to say how much I was sorry and that I wanted to be a better person to show appreciation for the Creator of life. Once I’d done this, I felt an overwhelming sensation come over me! It was a peaceful feeling, and I felt God forgiving me (I don’t want to go into too much detail…let’s just say that there was such a feeling of feedback which I had never truly felt before).

To cut a long story short, what I’m trying to say is that this whole experience made me turn my life around (got married to the girlfriend I was living with, started controlling my mind, started to rely on God more than just myself especially in decision making, prayed regularly, stopped watching porn…“ehum”…moving on…); it made me so enthusiastic for doing what God deserves from us. Growing up, I’ve never had much confidence in myself, in fact, I’ve always had an inferiority complex (this complex has often caused me to “give up on myself” in the past…I’ve never felt good enough)…so when I felt like God was saying that I’ve been forgiven, it was so overwhelming! I was absolutely full of gratitude, and doing things like living a godly lifestyle, preaching and going to church now became a pleasure rather than a “chore”…Things don’t always go smoothly even now, but that’s just life - the main thing is it’s far better with God in your life.

Anyway, sorry for babbling away about myself there! Just thought it would be interesting to say. It’s been a pleasure talking, and I must say that I’m not used to speaking to one’s who seem to “get it” :slight_smile:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

One thing I can say for certain is the fact that the scriptural evidence in the Bible is so strong and the signs that all can see with their own eyes are so clear which all point to 1914 being the year Jesus became king in heaven, when Satan was kicked out of heaven, when Jesus presence started and when the last days began.

[/quote]

I dont know about you guys, but I beleive that Jesus has been king in heaven forever. How do I know this? In the begining God created the Heavens and the Earth. God is on the throne in Genesis, and God is on the throne in Revelation. Never was God not on the throne. He is King in Heaven and King of Earth.

Got one more thought of questions for the JWs. If the end of days started in 1914 when will Jesus be returning? I mean if you know when he started to reign in heaven when will he reign on Earth? When will your prophesy, made after the year 1914, be discredited, or are your prophesies the same as a fortune teller? So vague that when Jesus returns you will say, “See we were right.” We had 1000 years past 1914 for the prophesy to be correct, but when 2914 comes around and he has not returned would you then agree the JWs are full or crap, or will the prophecy be changed again?

Just had a thought. Jesus died late Friday afternoon, was burried before night fall on Friday, dead all day Saturday, and rose on Sunday Morning. As we all know he was not dead for 3, 24 hour periods, but was dead for 3 days, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Maybe that Jesus started to reign in heaven in 1914 the millenium reign may have ended at the turn of the millenium in the year 2000. Not a full 1000 years, but a millenium that started in 1000 AD. I would say your prophesy of 1914 is false based on these assumptions. Got a new prophesy?[/quote]
No Jesus has not been king in heaven forever. The Bible clearly shows that Jesus is given the kingship in heaven. Ezekiel 21:26,27 is a prophecy which states that the crown will be removed from a wicked King which turned out to be Zedekiah. The prophecy then states that the crown will be given to the one who comes and has the legal right. King Zedekiah was the last king in the line of David to sit on God’s throne. Jesus as a descendant of David is the one who has the legal right. Isaiah 9:6 states:
“6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7 To the abundance of the princely rule and to peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom in order to establish it firmly and to sustain it by means of justice and by means of righteousness, from now on and to time indefinite. The very zeal of Jehovah of armies will do this.”

That prophecy makes it clear that Jesus will sit on the throne of King David which has been vacant since King Zedekiah was removed by the Babylonians. Daniel 7:12, 13 show a scene in heaven where Jesus aproaches Jehovah and is given a kingdom. Daniel 7:13,14 states:
13 “I kept on beholding in the visions of the night, and, see there! with the clouds of the heavens someone like a son of man happened to be coming; and to the Ancient of Days he gained access, and they brought him up close even before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership and dignity and kingdom, that the peoples, national groups and languages should all serve even him. His rulership is an indefinitely lasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom one that will not be brought to ruin.”

Again, this is Jesus approaching God and God gives him the kingdom just like God gave King David his kingship.

Revelation, which is a future vision describes a battle in heaven where Satan is kicked out of heaven and thrown down to the earth. After that event God’s Kingdom is officially announced with Jesus having authority over this kingdom which means he is king.

Revelation 12:7-10 states:
“7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled 8 but it did not prevail, neither was a place found for them any longer in heaven. 9 So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him. 10 And I heard a loud voice in heaven say:
Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God!

This is when Jesus becomes king in heaven which is after Satan gets kicked out of heaven. Once Satan is kicked out of heaven this spells WOE for the people of the earth according to Revelation 12:12. Remember this is a future vision that was given to John and when he writes Revelation the above events did not yet happen.

So no Jesus has not been king in heaven forever.[/quote]

So I am assuming you think the time in heaven is the same as “Earth time”? Why would God be Pigeon holed to our calendar?[/quote]
No, the time in heaven is not the same as time on earth. There are two places in the Bible that mention how long one day is for God. 2 Peter 3:8 which states that “one day is with Jehovah as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day.” And Psalms 90:4 states “that for a thousand years are in your eyes but as yesterday when it is past.”

So in God’s time 1000 humans years is one day but the scriptures I mentioned in my previous post do not reference any specific time period but Isaiah 9:6 does state that Jesus will sit upon the throne of David. So we know that when David was king Jesus was not king over God’s Kingdom. There were 19 Kings in the line of David from the tribe of Judah that sat on the Davidic throne spanning at least four centuries. The last king in the line of David was Zedekiah and as Ezekiel 21:26,27 states the crown or kingship is removed from him and is given to he who the legal right which is Jesus. This happened in 607 B.C.E. So the Davidic throne in the line of David from the tribe of Judah would remain vacant until Jesus who is a descendant of David sits on the throne and becomes king.

How do we know that it happened in 1914? First, the Bible Students in the 1800’s used the prophecy in Daniel 4:10-16 about a kingship represented by a tree being cut down and restrained for seven times to interpret when the trampling by the nations on Jerusalem would end which Jesus mentions at Luke 21:24. They realized that the trampling started in
607 B.C.E. when Jersalem was destroyed by the Babylonians and the last Davidic king was removed. This took them to 1914. Second, Revelation 12:10 states that as a result of Satan being kicked out of heaven, God’s kingdom comes into power with Jesus as it’s king. At Revelation 12:12 as a result of Satan being kicked out of heaven and thrown down to earth the verse states that he will cause “WOE” to the people of the earth. We can clearly see the results of Satans anger. Because the first WOE Satan causes is WAR which was a world war that never occurred before. If you look at the four horsemen of the apocalypse at Revelation 6, the first rider in white is given a crown or kingship, he has a bow and he goes forth to complete a conquest. This horseman is the newly crowned Jesus. The next horseman that rides after the newly crowned Jesus and continues to ride with Jesus is war. The first sign Jesus said would mark his presence and the conclusion of the system of things mentioned at Matthew 24:3 is War. This is the start of the WOE Satan brings to the earth because of him being kicked out of heaven which is marked by a clear, discernable event. The other two horsemen that ride with the newly crowned Jesus at Revelation 6 are famine and pestilence which again is more WOE that Satan brings on the earth. So when Jesus becomes king he kicks Satan out of heaven down to the earth. As a result of Satan being kicked out of heaven he is angry because he knows his time is short so he causes trouble for the people on the earth. Some of the problems Satan causes are symbolized by horsemen who appear after Jesus becomes king and ride with Jesus for a period of time. They are War, Famine and Pestilence. This is the reason Jesus is riding alongside 3 bad horsemen. These three bad horsemen that ride alongside the newly crowned Jesus is a result of Satan causing WOE to the earth and the WOE comes in the form of WAR, FAMINE and PESTILENCE. These are also three of the signs Jesus mentions at Matthew 24:3-7 and Luke 21:10,11 that would mark his parousia or presence and the conclusion of the system of things.

So again, the significance of 1914 is when Jesus became king in heaven, which was when Satan got kicked out of heaven down to the earth and when Jesus presence and the conclusion of the system of things started. Due to Satan having great anger because he knows his time is short, he causes WOE or trouble for the people of the earth. The WOE or trouble comes in the form of WAR, FAMINE and PESTILENCE which Jesus told his disciples would be some of the signs that would identify his presence in heaven as king and the conclusion of the system of things. All of this is based on the Bible and the Bible only.

[quote]mse2us wrote:

Bible Students as they were called did not say that the interpretation of Luke 21:24 was given through divine inspiration which is what a prophecy is. Had that claim been made then they would be false prophets. [/quote]

“There is no reason for changing the figures; they are God’s dates, not ours; 1914 is not the date for the beginning, but the end!”
-The Watch Tower, July 15, 1894, p. 1677

[quote]mse2us wrote:
Non-Bible Students were able to use the Bible to figure this out. The Bible Students understood where in history to apply it which was when the last king to sit on God’s throne was removed by the Babylonians in 607 B.C.E. This again is based on the Bible because at Ezekiel 21:26,27 which is a prophecy about King Zedekiah being removed from God’s throne states that the crown will be removed and will become no ones until he who has the legal right comes. That of course is Jesus Christ who as a descendant of King David has the legal right to the Davidic throne. Once the Bible Students counted up 2520 years from 607 B.C.E they were taken to 1914. They just didn’t understand what Jesus becoming king in heaven meant, but they knew that it was going to be a significant year.

[/quote]

Th only problem is that the vast majority of biblical and secular historians and archeologists have dated the destruction of Jerusalem and the removal of the Jewish throne at 586/587 BC, not 607 BC. Which would preclude the possibility of 1914 being the year of significance . . .

Now as far as Jesus becoming King on earth, the Bible clearly states that he already was given all authority over the earth in the first century.

“All authority has been given me in heaven and on the earth.”
-Matthew 28:18, New World Translation

“He has operated in the case of the Christ when he raised him up from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places, far above every government and authority and power and lordship and every name named, not only in this system of things, but also in that to come.”
-Ephesians 1:20-21, New World Translation

How can there be another ruler over the earth for the next 2 millenia when Christ already had all of the authority? How can someone else rule when he was already given rule “far above every government and authority and power and lordship and every name named, not only in this system of things, but also in that to come?”