I completely agree ; the mixture of esters ie sustanon was originally devised as a method for improved male trt, problem is in the real world it just does not provide the steady blood levels that they had hoped. The same goes for pretty much any ester mixed product. With Trenbolone it is very important (for me anyway) to keep levels very steady, thus the ED acetate injections that most agree with. I think most of these ester mixed products coming out these days are just marketing ploys primarily, it is just something that they can say they have and no one else does. The truth is no one else wants it.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
shamus wrote:
I hear ya, Rain, but sus is one of my all time favorites! Those pre-loads from Mexico were great, once I learned to switch the fuckin’ 18g needle to a 23! But, having said that, I do like the Test E a shitload better now, I get quicker steadier gains, but the sus I seem to keep more of the gains. I’m just gonna try the Tri-, hell, 1 cycle cant hurt. But appreciate ur opinion, it definitely makes sense. But when ya look at 3 types of tren at 150 mgs, 3x’s per week, it seems better than one type, at 75mgs, EOD. You agree?
Well…
Tren is a funny duck. The most powerful steroid out there is also the one with the most severe sides.
Part of the problem with highly noticeable sides is believed to be the practice of injecting the acetate ester eod - leading to roller coaster blood levels.
Now with this tri-tren stuff, you are going to go further than eod, and shoot 50mg e3d. Do you see where I am heading with this?
The short ester, IMO, is not going to be much of a benefit, and could potentially turn an ordinarily excellent cycle into a side effect hell.
If I shoot tren ace - it’s ed.
anything longer estered such as tren enanthate, and it’s e3d.
But I am interested to see how it works for you. Maybe you will prove my loosely scientific based theories wrong.
[/quote]