[quote]thehebrewhero wrote:
[quote]Airtruth wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Airtruth wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Speaking of names, if this would have first been reported locally as “Jorge Mesa” claims self defense in shooting of Trayvon Martin, would it really have become a huge national story? Would it really have been grown into a movement?
Here’s my reasoning behind asking this hypothetical. In the earliest accounts it’s an supposedly a white guy kills black controversy. George Zimmerman. Gets the national inertia going before people are familiar with Zimmerman, his face, and heritage. His father being white, and his mother the Peruvian immigrant. Only later did “white,” when it became difficult to maintain as people began to recognize photos, become “white-Hispanic.” Instead of multi-racial Hispanic…His mother having, I don’t know, some mestizo/Afro-Peruvian heritage. Probably not exact, but these terms seem to change depending on who you are and where you are.
But, as a hypothetical, had his father been the Peruvian immigrant, and his mother white, he could’ve realistically been Jorge Mesa. In fact, that is his uncle’s name (mother’s side).
[/quote]
No it wouldn’t be a national controversy. As said all the time, and as derailed by every closet racist, the crime isn’t the issue. The response and reaction is. Plenty of hispanics would’ve either said that’s fucked up jorge should go to jail, or hell yeah he killed that ni**s. Instead we have a million white people JUSTIFYING, and RATIONALIZING Trayvon getting killed then looking around like why are you calling us racist.
[/quote]
Justifying? Justifying how our justice system works? [/quote]
Is there a need for a question mark? I clearly stated what they are justifying, then you make up your own justification. Again proving the point of racism because your trying to rationalize what I said by totally avoiding the issue. I’ll say it again.
“Instead we have a million white people JUSTIFYING, and RATIONALIZING Trayvon getting killed”
Last I remember you weren’t on the jury. The same people screaming “OJ IS GUILTY!!!” are all of a sudden screaming “I trust the court systems got it right this time.” What all of a sudden they(you) are incapable of an opinion? All of a sudden you can’t speculate? I’ve heard two of Aaron Hernandez teammates siding with him, and they were heavily ridiculed. He hasn’t even went to court yet. Maybe he should rename himself Aaron Zimmerman.
That’s all it took was the reasonable possibility that Martin did that. Obviously we can’t be sure as there is not enough evidence, so if the court system is supposed to work then it played out like it is supposed to.
Someone told me while arguing about this in a barbershop, “I wish Martin was afforded the same rights as Zimmerman.”
All I could muster was, “You mean mobs of people wanting to lynch him, his family, friends, lawyers, &c. based off the perceived color of his skin?”[/quote]
No what they meant was the right to walk home without getting killed, but that went over your head right?
I guess all the mobs wanting to lynch him is worse then one guy actually killing him.
[/quote]
Nice very short and to the point… What I think is being missed here is big picture vs small picture. GZ never identified who he was. From TMs stand point he didnt know who GZ was. TMs right to defend himeself went out the window once he became the winner of the altercation created by GZ’s actions. If someone was following me I’d likely react the same way at 17. Imagine someones stalking you its fight or flight and TM paid the price for his self defense.
Yes based on the law GM was defending himself in that 2 minute altercation but prior to that 2 minutes GM was responsible for creating that altercation by stalking TM. The jurrors have spoke and pretty much they were stuck with just judging that 2 minute part of the incident as it was the moment of impact. Why its so hard to see that TM feared GM was stalking him I dont get. A guy following we in the dark chasing me after I’ve done nothing wrong seems like a good reason to throw down or at least get the jump on my atacker. Black white purple or blue the reaction to someone chasing you would either be run or fight. Also lets not discount he viewed the world throgh a 17s yr olds eyes
[/quote]
No this is not a normal reaction. This is called a criminal action. TMs actions are not justifiable, you cannot attack someone because someone is following you. GZ was not stalking TM. At all. GZ was not breaking the law AT ALL. TM broke the law when we attacked GZ.
I have been a varsity athlete from high school to college, wrestling is one of my sports. I box when I can get to the gym. I have been in countless street fights, just for fun and because of feuds. I have confidence that if I go toe to toe with the majority of men, I will win.
If I was JUST walking home and someone was following me, I’d run. If I had some criminal intent I’d still run. Zimmerman didn’t have Martin cornered, Martin actually ran away…then he came back to confront Zimmerman because he thought he was gay.