Trayvon Martin Pt. 2 'The Legacy'

Off Topic
961

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
Lol, best behavior professor X lasted for a whole week or two and now we’re right back where we started.

Keep the asinine posts coming.
It’s definitely entertaining to watch you grasp at straws and frantic try to defend your point, no matter how lame it is.
More quotes for the Mocha Muscle Mosaic Meme
[/quote]

I was thinking the same thing. There was just a couple massive threads regarding this very issue and now its right back where he started.

And yet everyone else is the problem.

962

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

you must suffer from ADD

you just keep going off on tangents. It’s like trying to herd ferrets on meth.

963

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

since when are you everyone? cuz you are the only one not agreeing.[/quote]

That may be because I am the only one you are discussing this with.

Once again, does everyone assume the same about a woman dressed in low cut pants and low cut blouse?

I am asking you.

I am wondering if you can respond without the personal attacks.[/quote]

I am telling you, for the nth time, it is a safe assumption that one who dresses slutty is a slut. hell, it is even referred to as “dressing slutty”. it will be right the vast majority of the time.

964

[quote]rehanb_bl wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

you must suffer from ADD

you just keep going off on tangents. It’s like trying to herd ferrets on meth.[/quote]

MUhahahahahahaha! classic.

on that note i need to do some finite element analysis.

until the next time, miss me!

965

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Once again, can someone explain to me why it is IDIOTIC to NOT call the cops if someone is from a neighborhood where REAL THUGS would actually be “loitering” on their drive way?

Is it incomprehensible that someone would see calling the cops as ESCALATION of a situation that could end with a simple comment?

Fear seems to guide the reaction.

[/quote]

Reposted.

It seems many want to focus on me and not the discussion.[/quote]

You’re confused MMM…people arent focusing on you because they have no argument…they are focusing on you because you are being hilariously ignorant and unable to understand any viewpoint that differs from yours in the slightest.

Arguing with you is like trying to be the second sperm to break into the egg. One already got in, and now it is just not naturally possible, even though there are thousands of them swirling around you. Better to just comment on how ignorant you are.

966

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

since when are you everyone? cuz you are the only one not agreeing.[/quote]

no, how someone dresses doesn’t make them a slut.
[/quote]

This will be ignored…because apparently no one thinks like this.

967

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

got it. and its bullshit. that is YOUR PERSONAL DEFINITION of a thug. it isnt everyone elses definition.[/quote]

We are now arguing over what a Thug is?

What is your definition and why is your own NOT “bullshit”?[/quote]

you mean the one i got from the dictionary? that is why it isnt bullshit.

hang on, gonna get my crayons.

now say it with me D-I-C-T-I-O-N-A-R-Y

dictionary.

i repeat, dictionary.[/quote]

from a dictionary:
thug
/THÃ???g/
Noun
A violent person, esp. a criminal.

A criminal.

Gee, that strangely sounds like someone who has been in the criminal justice system…like I wrote.

I am sorry, what are you arguing about again?

I asked you what your defnition of a thug was. I am still waiting.[/quote]

way to ignore everything but what you want to see, douchebag.

from a dictionary:
thug
/THÃ???g/
Noun
A violent person, esp. a criminal.

A violent person. not a criminal.

especially a criminal, not explicitly a criminal.

the level of doucheness you are achieving here may be unprecedented in the history of the interwebz.[/quote]

I literally laughed out loud when i saw his post completely ignoring this point. He’s really reaching hard for something to back him up here, isnt he?

968

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

way to ignore everything but what you want to see, douchebag.

from a dictionary:
thug
/THÃ???g/
Noun
A violent person, esp. a criminal.

A violent person. not a criminal.

especially a criminal, not explicitly a criminal.

the level of doucheness you are achieving here may be unprecedented in the history of the interwebz.[/quote]

First, no one insulted you.

Second, what makes these people VIOLENT because they were standing there that you would call them THUGS?

969

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

since when are you everyone? cuz you are the only one not agreeing.[/quote]

no, how someone dresses doesn’t make them a slut.
[/quote]

This will be ignored…because apparently no one thinks like this.
[/quote]

2 so far. i was actually agreeing with another poster with my remarks, so that makes at least 2 that disagree with you. so a verified 50%. how again does 50% equal 100% again?

i challenge you to go back and count all who have agreed and disagreed and cite them by name to be tallied up to see which view is the most common.

now i really do have to do finite element analysis.

miss me. i know you will.

970

[quote]rehanb_bl wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

you must suffer from ADD

you just keep going off on tangents. It’s like trying to herd ferrets on meth.[/quote]

Maiden wrote this:

[quote]No different than a chick walking around public with her ass hanging out and tits about to bust out of her shirt being perceived as a slut.
[/quote]
…which is what the rest of this nonsense stemmed from.

Please explain the “ADD” comment if I am responding directly to what was written?

971

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

since when are you everyone? cuz you are the only one not agreeing.[/quote]

no, how someone dresses doesn’t make them a slut.
[/quote]

This will be ignored…because apparently no one thinks like this.
[/quote]

Literally, everyone in this thread thinks like that.

Nobody said dressing like a slut makes you a slut.

But GEE, if shes dressed like a slut, the likelihood that she is one is pretty damn high.

There’s a reason you all know what we’re talking about when we say “dressing like a slut”

…Cause everyone knows what a slut looks like.

I cant get any more elementary here without killing brain cells.

972

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

since when are you everyone? cuz you are the only one not agreeing.[/quote]

no, how someone dresses doesn’t make them a slut.
[/quote]

This will be ignored…because apparently no one thinks like this.
[/quote]

2 so far. i was actually agreeing with another poster with my remarks, so that makes at least 2 that disagree with you. so a verified 50%. how again does 50% equal 100% again?

i challenge you to go back and count all who have agreed and disagreed and cite them by name to be tallied up to see which view is the most common.

now i really do have to do finite element analysis.

miss me. i know you will.[/quote]

This isn’t about how many people agree with you.

It is about the simple fact THAT NOT EVERYONE AGREES WITH YOU…and that does not make them wrong.

973

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

since when are you everyone? cuz you are the only one not agreeing.[/quote]

no, how someone dresses doesn’t make them a slut.
[/quote]

This will be ignored…because apparently no one thinks like this.
[/quote]

2 so far. i was actually agreeing with another poster with my remarks, so that makes at least 2 that disagree with you. so a verified 50%. how again does 50% equal 100% again?

i challenge you to go back and count all who have agreed and disagreed and cite them by name to be tallied up to see which view is the most common.

now i really do have to do finite element analysis.

miss me. i know you will.[/quote]

Well you are an engineer, so the odds that you have had real life experience with women negates your vote.

974

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

since when are you everyone? cuz you are the only one not agreeing.[/quote]

no, how someone dresses doesn’t make them a slut.
[/quote]

This will be ignored…because apparently no one thinks like this.
[/quote]

2 so far. i was actually agreeing with another poster with my remarks, so that makes at least 2 that disagree with you. so a verified 50%. how again does 50% equal 100% again?

i challenge you to go back and count all who have agreed and disagreed and cite them by name to be tallied up to see which view is the most common.

now i really do have to do finite element analysis.

miss me. i know you will.[/quote]

and again, for the nth time, i never said dressing in any manor MADE anyone anything. I challenge anyone to find an exact quote where i said dressing like a slut MAKES you a slut.

I said you will be PERCEIVED as one. and that assumption will be correct the majority of the time. nowhere did i say anything about dressing like a slut being an absolute determination.

dammit, i am absolutely doing fea now.

975

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

Well you are an engineer, so the odds that you have had real life experience with women negates your vote.
[/quote]

It also makes it strange that somehow the number of people who type responses agreeing with them somehow means anything.

Simply put, apparently [quote]
No different than a chick walking around public with her ass hanging out and tits about to bust out of her shirt being perceived as a slut.[/quote]

Is how everyone thinks and no one is allowed to think differently without name calling and insults.

976

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

since when are you everyone? cuz you are the only one not agreeing.[/quote]

no, how someone dresses doesn’t make them a slut.
[/quote]

This will be ignored…because apparently no one thinks like this.
[/quote]

2 so far. i was actually agreeing with another poster with my remarks, so that makes at least 2 that disagree with you. so a verified 50%. how again does 50% equal 100% again?

i challenge you to go back and count all who have agreed and disagreed and cite them by name to be tallied up to see which view is the most common.

now i really do have to do finite element analysis.

miss me. i know you will.[/quote]

Well you are an engineer, so the odds that you have had real life experience with women negates your vote.
[/quote]

wow, how long did it take you to come up with that? super cool dude!

977

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

wow, how long did it take you to come up with that? super cool dude![/quote]

You just spent half this thread throwing insults.

Why get mad because someone did it back to you?

Stay on topic and strop insulting people and maybe it won’t happen.

978

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Da Man reloaded wrote:
she is PERCEIVED as a slut because she is dressing like a slut.[/quote]

Low cut blouse and low cut pants equals “slut”. Thanks for that.

I am sure you can’t comprehend that not everyone agrees with you.

[/quote]

since when are you everyone? cuz you are the only one not agreeing.[/quote]

no, how someone dresses doesn’t make them a slut.
[/quote]

This will be ignored…because apparently no one thinks like this.
[/quote]

2 so far. i was actually agreeing with another poster with my remarks, so that makes at least 2 that disagree with you. so a verified 50%. how again does 50% equal 100% again?

i challenge you to go back and count all who have agreed and disagreed and cite them by name to be tallied up to see which view is the most common.

now i really do have to do finite element analysis.

miss me. i know you will.[/quote]

Well you are an engineer, so the odds that you have had real life experience with women negates your vote.
[/quote]

wow, how long did it take you to come up with that? super cool dude![/quote]

LOL, this defense of the sluts sound EXACTLY like what they say “Just because I dress saknky, doesnt make me a skank”…Just cause I’m getting Double-penetrated DOWN THE THROAT doens’t make a slut…RIGHT?"

Don’t expect a non-Engineer to think rationally. It’s the reason we are never considered for jury duty.

just get back to the FEA and make sure that you don’t have more than a 10% jump in the VonMises stresses between elements.

979

[quote]carbiduis wrote:

LOL, this defense of the sluts sound EXACTLY like what they say “Just because I dress saknky, doesnt make me a skank”…Just cause I’m getting Double-penetrated DOWN THE THROAT doens’t make a slut…RIGHT?"

Don’t expect a non-Engineer to think rationally. It’s the reason we are never considered for jury duty.

just get back to the FEA and make sure that you don’t have more than a 10% jump in the VonMises stresses between elements.[/quote]

Exhibit A. Didn’t you finally get laid like last year?

980

Jesus. Counting numbers, it was good having a discussion with you. There don’t seem to be many left who can have a good discussion without this nonsense and it brings the whole site down.

Simply put, majority opinion states what a “thug” is even if minority opinion differs drastically. It is not even based on criminal activity…but “style of dress”.

That is a discussion in itself…but sadly that can’t happen here anymore.