Trayvon Martin Pt. 2 'The Legacy'

Off Topic
221

[quote]Smashingweights wrote:

[quote]dk44 wrote:

[quote]thehebrewhero wrote:

The clothes you wear, the music you listen to, or your choice of personal style doesnt give people the right to profile you and harass you. Taking pictures with a gun is dumb but it doesnt make you a killer. Being a dumbass teen doesnt make it ok to be hunted.

[/quote]

Sure it does, if you are walking around town in a KKK robe you are going to be profiled. Harassing isn’t ok, but we are legally allowed to profile. So, dress like a thug, I am going to assume you are one. [/quote]
Good point.
If I wear a KKK outfit - people will think I’m a KKK member
If I wear a dress and high heels down the street - people will think I’m gay/a cross dresser
If I wear pair of scrubs - people will think I’m a doctor/nurse

It’s a natural act to make your initial assessment of a stranger based on the only information you have and that is usually how they are dressed and how they act.[/quote]

Sure its natural to make an assesment thats only human. But nobody has the right to harass or violently confront someone without just reason. But Zim had no real training he all he saw was a black kid stoping and walking slow wearing typicall teanage clothse. So by your definition a hoody and sweatpants is Thug clothes so everyone wearing that stuff must be up to no good? Thats just ignorant… I wear hoodys in the winter so am I thug?
Alot of you guys think Im anti white Im not. Im anti wrongfull death…Despite what you think Travon was or could have been the fact is he was a teanage kid walking in the rain to get candy. He was chased by a overzeoulse Zimm and did not react in the best way sure I get that. But Zimm is a adult with grown up brain & with his position and his fire power should have shown more restraint. I dont think this was a murder, but it was a manslaughter, and at the very lease a wrongful death which Zimm is responsible for due to not following police instructions. The media wants to play up the black white thing, becuase it sells more TV time. If we are going to as a country love guns so much and keep creating laws that let the non trained and ignorant walk the streets with guns then we have to consider the fact that we are not progressing much. Step away from the race thing and imagine this was just two people which may be hard for some of you. Its another case of a wrongful death due to someones missuse of a firearm.

222

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
Darkninjaa Serious question. Do all the white people here live in Chicago? How do they know about the large number of murders if the people there are not complaining?[/quote]

Yeah you’re right. I wish there was a way to get information quickly from one place to another without being there. Oh wait, I’m not a retard; I just realized that I’m using a thing called the computer and internet! Wow look at that!

223

[quote]orion wrote:

All emoting aside, when they went for manslaughter, they already had burned through a lot of goodwill.

Other than that:

The unjustifiable, inexcusable, and intentional killing of a human being without deliberation, premeditation, and malice. The unlawful killing of a human being without any deliberation, which may be involuntary, in the commission of a lawful act without due caution and circumspection.

Given that noone actually saw what happened and the Stand your Ground laws, what should the verdict have been?

[/quote]

Manslaughter.

I don’t give a fuck. He killed somebody. There was no evidence Trayvon Martin attacked that fat bastard. Lol.

You should check out one of the jurors’ interview with Anderson Cooper last night. She totally gave me the impression something was fucking fishy. It’s interesting how Zimfatman’s best friend knew the verdict even before the courtroom.

Now thinking of it, I also blame the fucking Sanford PD for this travesty. Yes, the prosecution did not put on the best case in front of the jury, and that was only because they came it with a handicap. A handicap caused by the action or, shall I say, lack thereof of the Sanford, fucking pig department.

From the moment the deadly shot was fired until the travesty of justice of the verdict on Saturday night, Trayvon Martin was denied the right of due process. The Sanford pig department treated the death of that innocent kid not as a homicide the night he passed on, but as a justifiable homicide. And I’m not even fucking speculating about it. It is a fucking fact.

They never bothered to properly collect evidence, never properly handled TM’s body (hell, his dad was looking for him for three fucking days!!!). These simple steps fell short of a ‘‘proper investigation of a homicide’’. Those motherfuckers did a toxicology test on Trayvon but ‘‘omitted’’ to do the same with Zims. They looked at his injuries, believed his account and let him fucking go.

224

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

lol. “the prosecution would not have failed had the kid been white.”

So if Trayvon was white, the prosecution would have proved Zimmerman was on top of Trayvon? (even though ALL of the forensic evidence, which is impartial btw, shows otherwise.) If Trayvon was white, the prosecution would have proved that it was his voice on the 911 call? (even though one the the black residents in the neighborhood testified that it was Zimmermans.) If Trayvon was white there would not have been blood on Zimmermans nose and back of his head? (even though the pictures show otherwise.)

Sorry man, race was not a factor in this case. However, the overwhelming evidence showing Zimmerman was not guilty was.[/quote]

Okay, let’s use this hypothetical scenario:

  • a lanky white teen was walking in a strange neighborhood, snacking on junk food, talking to a friend on his cell phone. He’s a good kid – according to one of his teachers, ‘‘an A and B student who majored in cheerfulness’’. But he’s not above making the foolish teenage mistake of getting caught with an empty bags of MaryJ, or fighting and being suspended. But he has no criminal record. The worst anyone can say about him is that he smokes some pot, which puts him in the company of nearly half of all American high school students, something more than half of all American adults would legalize. But he’s a good student and has no criminal record. In other words, he’s a pretty typical teenager. A good kid.

  • A large black man stepped out of an SUV, started following him, frightened him, and shot him dead.

Now Imagine the reaction.

Now, suppose we find out that the motherfucker who killed that teen had a history of race-based paranoia. Suppose we find out that the teen’s killer’s neighbours had complained of his aggressive behaviour. Suppose we find out that the teen’s killer had once been arrested for ‘‘resisting arrest with violence and battery on an officer.’’ Suppose we find out that the teen’s killer that night had ignored a police dispatcher who had told him to stop following the teen. And suppose that after all that, the much larger black man who had stepped out of an SUV, started following the white teen, had ended up shooting the white teen dead.

What would have been the response?

-Would the local state attorney and police chief have overruled even the lead homicide investigator, who recommended that the killer be charged with manslaughter? Would the police have neglected even to give the killer a routine drug and alcohol test? Would the police have neglected to contact whomever the kid was talking to on the phone just moments before he was shot, ignored the witnesses who contradicted the killer’s story, and later reported that the killer had been bloodied in a confrontation with the dead teen, even though the real time reports suggested no such thing, and even though the police surveillance video shows the killer had no discernible wounds or discomfort, and even though the funeral director who prepared the dead teen’s body for burial says there was no evidence he had been in a fight?

It defies credulity to think the killer’s behaviour would be dismissed, making despicable excuses such as blaming the kid’s clothing, or if – unthinkable in this scenario, there had been no criminal charges filed against the killer, dismissing the story altogether.

Had Trayvon Martin been white and George Zimmerman black, Zimmerman would be headed for death row. White Trayvon would have been hailed as a martyr who would have stood his ground against a dangerous predator.

This was a racist killing, with a racist cover-up.[/quote]

Most normal teens don’t assault a bigger older man just cause he’s looking at them funny/folowing them around.

So you’re disputing the eyewitness for the PROSECUTION who said that Trayvon was ground and pounding Zimmerman?

225

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]thehebrewhero wrote:
Well all you white conservative assholes with small dicks and big guns must be happier than a pig in shit. Chalk one up for good ol Christian values. Once again you can smile as minorities get shit on. But who really gives a fuck it?s not your son or relative, or even friend. I guess now white guys with guns, and ego complexes can happily look for young black men to start shit with so they can thin the heard. But this is America waddya expect? The only thing u aren’t allowed to kill in an instant is a fetus. [/quote]

Damn you are ignorant. I haven’t read many of you’re posts but I hope you are joking. If not, damn you are ignorant.[/quote]

Wow thats deep… Yeah I was sort of joking but think about it… Do you really think all these stand your ground laws that give everyday assholes a opportunity to use deadly force is a good thing? With this law you can be the aggressor and still not be liable for a death as the result of your agression as long as you can claim you had to “stand your ground”. I think what dark Ninja said about stand your ground = lynchings could be very real… It also gives people a out in killing any person they dont like as long as they can claim they were on the loosing end of a physical confrontation regardless of if you started it or not. So the only way to be safe in this kind of society is everyone wear and carry… Come on thats just bad news
As far as what I said about the fetus thing yeah… Americans give more of a shit about a fucking zygot then they do a grown human.

226

[quote]no_name_narrator wrote:

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
Darkninjaa Serious question. Do all the white people here live in Chicago? How do they know about the large number of murders if the people there are not complaining?[/quote]

Yeah you’re right. I wish there was a way to get information quickly from one place to another without being there. Oh wait, I’m not a retard; I just realized that I’m using a thing called the computer and internet! Wow look at that![/quote]

Oh fucking cool.

So, since you’ve the INTERNET, you must also be aware that Chicago’s black community has been working hard to fix the issue. Or, shall I suggest, that you leave the comfort of your seat and, go to Chitown and, check out what black groups and foundations have been up to with regards to the violence.

But of course, you chose to ignore that and, just focused on the negative part just as you’ve been ignoring the fucking fact that white on white crime is as high as Black of black crime.

Black people don’t give a fuck about white on white crime, when some white kid gets killed by a black motherfucker. So, why on fucking hell, do some white posters bring the black on black crime argument up when the TM case is about a white asshole who got away with murder??

Deflecting much?

227

[quote]RampantBadger wrote:

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

lol. “the prosecution would not have failed had the kid been white.”

So if Trayvon was white, the prosecution would have proved Zimmerman was on top of Trayvon? (even though ALL of the forensic evidence, which is impartial btw, shows otherwise.) If Trayvon was white, the prosecution would have proved that it was his voice on the 911 call? (even though one the the black residents in the neighborhood testified that it was Zimmermans.) If Trayvon was white there would not have been blood on Zimmermans nose and back of his head? (even though the pictures show otherwise.)

Sorry man, race was not a factor in this case. However, the overwhelming evidence showing Zimmerman was not guilty was.[/quote]

Okay, let’s use this hypothetical scenario:

  • a lanky white teen was walking in a strange neighborhood, snacking on junk food, talking to a friend on his cell phone. He’s a good kid – according to one of his teachers, ‘‘an A and B student who majored in cheerfulness’’. But he’s not above making the foolish teenage mistake of getting caught with an empty bags of MaryJ, or fighting and being suspended. But he has no criminal record. The worst anyone can say about him is that he smokes some pot, which puts him in the company of nearly half of all American high school students, something more than half of all American adults would legalize. But he’s a good student and has no criminal record. In other words, he’s a pretty typical teenager. A good kid.

  • A large black man stepped out of an SUV, started following him, frightened him, and shot him dead.

Now Imagine the reaction.

Now, suppose we find out that the motherfucker who killed that teen had a history of race-based paranoia. Suppose we find out that the teen’s killer’s neighbours had complained of his aggressive behaviour. Suppose we find out that the teen’s killer had once been arrested for ‘‘resisting arrest with violence and battery on an officer.’’ Suppose we find out that the teen’s killer that night had ignored a police dispatcher who had told him to stop following the teen. And suppose that after all that, the much larger black man who had stepped out of an SUV, started following the white teen, had ended up shooting the white teen dead.

What would have been the response?

-Would the local state attorney and police chief have overruled even the lead homicide investigator, who recommended that the killer be charged with manslaughter? Would the police have neglected even to give the killer a routine drug and alcohol test? Would the police have neglected to contact whomever the kid was talking to on the phone just moments before he was shot, ignored the witnesses who contradicted the killer’s story, and later reported that the killer had been bloodied in a confrontation with the dead teen, even though the real time reports suggested no such thing, and even though the police surveillance video shows the killer had no discernible wounds or discomfort, and even though the funeral director who prepared the dead teen’s body for burial says there was no evidence he had been in a fight?

It defies credulity to think the killer’s behaviour would be dismissed, making despicable excuses such as blaming the kid’s clothing, or if – unthinkable in this scenario, there had been no criminal charges filed against the killer, dismissing the story altogether.

Had Trayvon Martin been white and George Zimmerman black, Zimmerman would be headed for death row. White Trayvon would have been hailed as a martyr who would have stood his ground against a dangerous predator.

This was a racist killing, with a racist cover-up.[/quote]

Most normal teens don’t assault a bigger older man just cause he’s looking at them funny/folowing them around.

So you’re disputing the eyewitness for the PROSECUTION who said that Trayvon was ground and pounding Zimmerman?[/quote]

Do you have anything to say about my hypothetical scenario? What has your question to do with what is posted above? Maiden said the case wasn’t based on race. I brought up the scenario. What have you got to say about it?

228

[quote]WW3General wrote:

[quote]thehebrewhero wrote:

Thats the big picture that what everyone is missing. Probably becuase they arent ethnic or have ethnic kids. But in a nutshell as the father of a black kid its troubling to me. So in my gated comunity I should fear my son being harassed by a non-police officer with a gun. Worst of all my best advice I can give him is stand still if someone approaches with a gun just freeze and be nice. [/quote]

Well, tell your son that if he attacks a person to take him or her out quickly so if they have a gun on them they have no time to kill him. Also, if someone approaches your son and they are brandishing a gun I would tell him to scream and run like a fool all at once. The thing is most people carrying guns,people won’t ever know until it is too late. Everybody I know with a concealed carry makes sure to have it hidden so no one knows.[/quote]

Your missing the big picture which shows your level of racisism or at the least your racial bias. I shouldnt have to teach him anything. He should be allowed to wear what he wants listen to what he wants and not have to go through survival training just to buy some fucking candy. So does the whole “run like a fool and scream” thing apply to all kids or just those of color?

229

Still confused as to why anyone is trying to debate with DN.

230

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
Do all the white people here live in Chicago? How do they know about the large number of murders if the people there are not complaining?[/quote]

As if skin color makes it impossible to read the news. What does someone being white have to do with it?

As a staunch defender of our Second Amendment protected rights, I read an awful lot about the gun violence in major cities, Chicago is often cited in an attempt to show how “good” gun control laws work. Ie: they don’t.

And secondly the comparisons are:

Black teen shot in Florida: national protests. Black teen shot in Chicago: no national protests, no national outrage, no mention in the media anywhere near the level of the Zimmerman case. Both show the “value of black life in America” if one does.

I think it has much more to do with classism than anything, but what do I know, I’m white.

231

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]no_name_narrator wrote:

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
Darkninjaa Serious question. Do all the white people here live in Chicago? How do they know about the large number of murders if the people there are not complaining?[/quote]

Yeah you’re right. I wish there was a way to get information quickly from one place to another without being there. Oh wait, I’m not a retard; I just realized that I’m using a thing called the computer and internet! Wow look at that![/quote]

Oh fucking cool.

So, since you’ve the INTERNET, you must also be aware that Chicago’s black community has been working hard to fix the issue. Or, shall I suggest, that you leave the comfort of your seat and, go to Chitown and, check out what black groups and foundations have been up to with regards to the violence.

But of course, you chose to ignore that and, just focused on the negative part just as you’ve been ignoring the fucking fact that white on white crime is as high as Black of black crime.

Black people don’t give a fuck about white on white crime, when some white kid gets killed by a black motherfucker. So, why on fucking hell, do some white posters bring the black on black crime argument up when the TM case is about a white asshole who got away with murder??

Deflecting much?[/quote]

Lol, of all the nutty responses you’ve given me this takes the cake. My entire comment was that WE KNOW ABOUT MURDERS IN CHICAGO BECAUSE OF THE FUCKING INTERNET. The fact that you extrapolated anything else from that simple statement is blatant evidence that you have an incredibly biased perspective. Take a step back after crying racism and look at your pattern of behavior.

232

[quote]Waittz wrote:
Still confused as to why anyone is trying to debate with DN. [/quote]

Are you also confused as to why anyone is debating with the rest who shares my views? Or is it only DarkNinjaa who irks you the most? Stop throwing a tantrum because people don’t want to ignore my views on this case.

You don’t speak for the populace. This thread has been created for debate. If there was only one point of view, what would be the point of a fucking debate? People who wants to debate DN will do so, and, I will debate them if I want to.

You have no fucking say in the matter.

233

[quote]Waittz wrote:
Still confused as to why anyone is trying to debate with DN. [/quote]

I’m like a dog chasing my tail…I can’t help myself

234

  1. I will never understand how this was turned into a white on black racial case. A multicultural, multiracial/ethnic, bilingual, self-identifying Hispanic Democrat becomes the brown face of white racism. I mean, if a university was putting together a diversity and minority outreach program, Zimmerman’s photo and family back ground would be featured in the recruitment pamphlets. This guy, Zimmerman, looks more ‘brown’ than Cain “Brown Pride” Velasquez…George “White Pride” Zimmerman? Really? He’s “diversity” personified. He’s far more black than Elizabeth Warren is Native American, and vastly more Native American.

  2. I will never understand why people continue to talk about this case and Stand Your Ground together. It wasn’t a SYG defense.

  3. I’m tired of everyone pretending that white on black homicides are what needs to end in order for black youth to make it into their 30’s.
    Inter-racial homicide is pretty damn uncommon across the board. Even so, 8% of all homicides are black on white. Only 4% are white on black…

  4. But, nationally, blacks make up half of homicide victims and offenders with only 13-14% of the population. Having the highest level of intra-racial homicides.

Stevie doesn’t like Florida? Good. He and the rests of the racial agitators, race pimps and hustlers, should consider marching and protesting on NYC. Oh no, right, a black life only has value in the rare instance when a white man takes it. Or hell, if you don’t have a white man, shoe horn in a multiracial Hispanic.

http://www.nyc.gov/...ment_report.pdf
You want to save black lives? Look in a mirror.

I’m over people pretending they gave a crap that a young black kid died. They cared more about the thrill of the activist spirit. Of being part of something. And just the fact that Zimmerman wasn’t black himself gave them all the excuse to get a big touchy feely movement going. I’m over it.

235

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
Do all the white people here live in Chicago? How do they know about the large number of murders if the people there are not complaining?[/quote]

As if skin color makes it impossible to read the news. What does someone being white have to do with it?

As a staunch defender of our Second Amendment protected rights, I read an awful lot about the gun violence in major cities, Chicago is often cited in an attempt to show how “good” gun control laws work. Ie: they don’t.

And secondly the comparisons are:

Black teen shot in Florida: national protests. Black teen shot in Chicago: no national protests, no national outrage, no mention in the media anywhere near the level of the Zimmerman case. Both show the “value of black life in America” if one does.

I think it has much more to do with classism than anything, but what do I know, I’m white. [/quote]

I may have missed your point. However, it seems that you think the issue here is “the loss of life” alone.

It isn’t.

Yes, there are social implications to basically saying it is alright to judge a black man as a THREAT because he is dressed in a very common fashion item or “acting black”.

The issue was never what specific race Zimmerman was but what he was PERCEIVED as and what Martin was PERCEIVED as at the time of the incident.

That is why one death can hold more social significance over another.

You can choose to ignore this…and you likely will…or you may try to rationalize it away.

Either way, this is where the conflict lies…and perception is everything.

236

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]Waittz wrote:
Still confused as to why anyone is trying to debate with DN. [/quote]

Are you also confused as to why anyone is debating with the rest who shares my views? Or is it only DarkNinjaa who irks you the most? Stop throwing a tantrum because people don’t want to ignore my views on this case.

You don’t speak for the populace. This thread has been created for debate. If there was only one point of view, what would be the point of a fucking debate? People who wants to debate DN will do so, and, I will debate them if I want to.

You have no fucking say in the matter.[/quote]

Dont you get tired of spending hours a day keeping up with maintaining your internet persona?

237

I don’t think there is a hypothetical scenario to debate here. What youre arguing it race. Race is the only argument being given by people who don’t like the verdict. My argument is different: I believe he was wrong for shooting Martin. Getting your ass beat doesn’t exactly equal use of deadly force. You can stand your ground all you want but when you have a loaded weapon, rules change.

Also, please keep in mind, Zimmerman does not look like a “killer” nor does he look like someone who would get out of a vehicle at night and pursue a sweatshirt wearing, dark individual. Despite what most people think: humans don’t really like or want to kill other humans. They have a lot of problems with it. Talk to anyone in Military or LEO or read On Killing. They especially don’t want to kill another human at close range.

You cant cry racial injustice, what if it was your kid, when they jury was mostly women, some ethnic. This article sums a lot up about how bullshit racial injustice is concerning this case.

Read more: Defense lawyer Joe Tacopina: Don’t blame the Zimmerman jury for doing its duty – New York Daily News

  • The six women on the jury applied the law to the facts and found that Zimmerman was not guilty of second-degree murder or manslaughter.

  • Despite the outcry by political activists, race baiters and people who do not understand the legal system, particularly Florida’s unique and controversial law, the jury’s decision was that he had the right to shoot Martin under the Stand Your Ground law.

  • In order to prove Zimmerman guilty of second-degree murder, the prosecution had to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he acted intentionally out of ill will or spite when he shot Martin.

  • There was absolutely no evidence put forth by the prosecution to rebut Zimmerman’s claim of self defense. That is all that was relevant. With that, the jury was left no choice at all. The jurors were not empaneled to improve race relations or right historical wrongs.

And also please everyone stop this case history copy and paste fucking nonsense of horrible atrocities committed by blacks or whites or whatever the fucks…everyone of every color does horrible shit everyday that never makes the news. If you want to defend white crimes against black crimes, whites are going to lose. A couple black kids get shot in Chicago, wow…shocking… most serial killers in mainstream media and history are white. Whites riot too…watch tapes from Katrina or listen to Sublimes song about Bradly actually looting.

The jury was a fair jury. The prosecution did piss poor job…even after the judge didn’t allow damning evidence against Martin into the courtroom, which now the prosecution is being sued for.

Moral of the story, humans are a dirty and dark creature sometimes, sometimes beautiful, weve done horrible things to each other for no reason at all other than it was a Tuesday. To bitch and moans and make up shit and protest against FACTS isn’t helpful. To try to say another group of people is better or worse is wrong and unfair. I still don’t see how a ground in pound = getting shot, I still stand by that.

238

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
Do all the white people here live in Chicago? How do they know about the large number of murders if the people there are not complaining?[/quote]

As if skin color makes it impossible to read the news. What does someone being white have to do with it?

As a staunch defender of our Second Amendment protected rights, I read an awful lot about the gun violence in major cities, Chicago is often cited in an attempt to show how “good” gun control laws work. Ie: they don’t.

And secondly the comparisons are:

Black teen shot in Florida: national protests. Black teen shot in Chicago: no national protests, no national outrage, no mention in the media anywhere near the level of the Zimmerman case. Both show the “value of black life in America” if one does.

I think it has much more to do with classism than anything, but what do I know, I’m white. [/quote]

Seriously, you know very well why there were protests for Trayvon Martin. Zimmfat was let go after the murder. The police closed the case. This case started in a local channel before it garnered attention and fucking blew out of proportion. And, during all this time, the fat cunt was free. It took 45 fucking days to send him to jail! And that was thanks to the protests.

And now, people are protesting, because, once again, Zimfatkiller got away with murder. What is it wrong with that??? Does it really bother you that much that an innocent teen death is garnering so much attention? His death will not be in vain. Yes, there is black on black crime, but the death of TM is fucking big because of what the consequence of letting his killer go could be for other kids in the future, in fucking Florida or other states that support the Stand your ground law. Other black kids run the risk of being killed by happy trigger white bastards because they look like thugs. Laws need to be fucking changed.

Lol. I’m laughing right here. I really don’t think you really care about youth being killed in Chitown. Why are you bringing it up? Why do you fucking care?

239

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]audiogarden1 wrote:

LOL yeah you’re right, they’re all just a bunch of vigilantes.

Remember the last time all those white people rioted when a black guy killed one of them? Oh wait…

Remember the last time the black community placed any value in a black teens death when killed by another black man? Oh wait…[/quote]

Oh hell yeah, man, I hear ya!!!

Remember when all those white people riot whenever their teams lost a fucking football game?
Or do you remember when those white people rioted when their coach was arrested and jailed for fucking lil’ boys in restrooms???

Oh shiiiiit!!! Whaaaaaat???

We can play this game all night.

The bottom line is, all races love to riot as a pass time, and grab some TV sets. Not only blacks. Any race has a reason to fucking riot. And usually, they are all mixed in that kinda shit.[/quote]

You’re missing the point.

Black people killing black people (which is statistically the majority of the time) = no riot.

White or white looking person kills black person = black people riot.

Express your outrage for ONE SMALL violent act amongst all the thousands of other violent and fatal crimes committed in and around the same time period, by using violence against others, racial profiling, looting, destroying, etc…

Hilarious that some try to defend this and say it isnt racist.

Pathetic that black people dont lend any value to their fellow black people unless that life is taken by a non-black.

And the most ridiculous thing is, even if it can be perceived as a hate-crime, none of you would give a shit if it had just had a run in the sunday morning news paper and their wasnt a ridiculously overblown media circus surrounding it.

Guarantee if it were a mexican or puerto rican kid most of you would have never even heard about this case.

240

[quote]no_name_narrator wrote:

Lol, of all the nutty responses you’ve given me this takes the cake. My entire comment was that WE KNOW ABOUT MURDERS IN CHICAGO BECAUSE OF THE FUCKING INTERNET. The fact that you extrapolated anything else from that simple statement is blatant evidence that you have an incredibly biased perspective. Take a step back after crying racism and look at your pattern of behavior.[/quote]

And you have your own biased perspective. I don’t chastise you for that. Freedom of fucking speech. Probably wish we were in 1800s, huh?

I will cry racism whenever I like, thank you very much, and, could give a fuck if that gets your fucking panties twisted.

You have the internet, buddy, now go to Chitown and see how it’s going down and, what balck people are doing about it. It all fucking good and dandy to say you can tell by reading the news online. Lol.