I know science with real empirical evidence can be difficult to wrap your head around but, seeing as gender is a thing in your head that cannot be verified to be one or the other, and science is something that actually exists in reality and can be tested, I’d say that it is a lot easier to just stick with the science.
There is no need to make exceptions for 0.3% of people or a tiny minority who have a physical disease.
There is three genders. Male, Female and Retarded.
As we’re not playing in your sandbox, it doesn’t really matter what you told me. Your assertion was patently absurd, and I would not dream of dignifying it by discussing it seriously.
‘Bubba’ seems an unlikely name for a MTF TG woman (the population we’re discussing). And no, I do not think the rate of heterosexual male child molesters attempting to sneak into women’s bathrooms to assault little girls would rise with TG BR laws. In fact, as stated earlier, if anything were to make it easier for such perverts, I think it would be the ‘birth sex’ BR laws such as the one passed (and now rescinded) in NC.
Says the guy who posted the kindergarten-level cartoon above to stake out his position on the matter.
Is this based on fact, or just a guess that fits with your viewpoint and helps your already poor argument.
I think from the sentence structure it is clear that I am expressing an opinion. But if you’d like to see an example of the evidence that led to that opinion:
Ha ha…we are playing in the same sandbox ED it’s called PWI. I said that the next step the left will take is to include infanticide (they will call it something else as the pc usually do to cover up the gruesomeness of what they are doing. Just like calling the killing of babies “pro choice”). You laughed at the notion. I merely suggested that you show me where the left has become more conservative on a social issue. And now you say nu uh I am not playing. And you say this because we both know the left has never gotten more conservative on any issue. They just keep moving further to the left. Case in point Bubba being able to use the little girls room. What a charming and wholesome idea right? Ha.
There really is no other issue to discuss we are pretty much done. It has taken me many posts but you are in fact trapped. Unless of course you are able to come up with an example of where the left has become more conservative on social issues we are finished here.
The left marches on further to the left continually year after year decade after decade. Until today where they want Bubba peeing in a little girls room…and possibly tomorrow where under a different name they will be pro infanticide.
If you wish to conclude that you have proven that the Democratic Party will soon enough have a plank in its platform advocating infanticide, I will simply marvel, and leave you to it.
Nice diversion ED but I have been around far too long for such nonsense. All you have to do for the win is show me where the left has ever become more conservative on a social issue and you win.
Short of that my work is done here.
(I liked that last sentence for some reason)
I knew the article was going to be false as soon as I saw the Title but I read it anyway. To no surprise at all in a few major cities where Men can use the Female Bathroom there hasn’t been any incidents.
Do you not realise that if this is everywhere and there are anti-discrimination laws that mean you can’t say anything as Bubba, a 6 foot bearded man, walks into the Female bathroom with children in it.
Predators will capitalise on it.
Your argument is poor as there is 0 evidence supporting it.
Like I said–not your sandbox, so I’m not obligated to play by your rules. And besides–I’ve already declared that I’m willing to let stand unchallenged your assertion that the Democratic Party will soon endorse infanticide. If that’s the sort of belief/statement you wish to have appended to your name here on TN, by all means. So while I will draw several conclusions about you based on that assertion (as I’m sure others will as well), I pledge to keep those conclusions to myself.
I only phrased it like that to not preclude the possibility, not as an indication of likely hood.
I’m just waiting for your party to advocate turning into a different species, then the shitshow that will lead into.
Given a matter of time some Liberal moron will have sexual relationship with a dog and your party will embrace them with open arms.
Swapping sex is just the first step into a never ending pile of Human degeneracy led by your pathetic Party.
More nonsense. My assertion is that the left never moves to the conservative on social issues. And you have proven me correct my not taking up the challenge of proving me wrong. AND…that’s how it works here on T Nation.
The fact that the left now wants to allow abortion in the 9th month tells us all something very compelling and begs the question: Where do they go from here? Have they ever gotten more conservative on social issues? NOPE!! And you have admitted it by your lack of ability to come up with proof to the opposite. So, any rational person must now make the following statement: Since the left never moves to be more conservative on social issues and they are in favor of allowing abortion in the 9th month could the next step be infanticide (under a pc name of course). The answer is a resounding YES!
Unless you can prove otherwise by showing me where they’ve moved to be more conservative on social issues. They continue their mad march to the left.
The following gives further credence to my point:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290707/when-obama-voted-infanticide-andrew-c-mccarthy
“Obama’s abortion extremism is such that, as a state legislator, he opposed protection for — I’ll use his words here — “that fetus, or child — however way you want to say describe it” when, contrary to the wishes of the women involved and their abortionists, there was “movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead.” Babies were inconveniently being born alive, self-styled health-care providers carted them off to utility rooms where they would be left to die. That is infanticide, plain and simple. In Illinois, people tried to stop this barbarism by supporting “born alive” legislation. Barack Obama fought them all the way.”
Oh my ED the left is almost there. You better run away from this topic quickly!
Not only am I not obliged to do that, but the entire premise that ‘becoming more conservative on social issues’ is some sort of desideratum is flawed.
OK cool. Glad you’re walking this back.
See above.
No, that question is not ‘begged’ by the antecedent assertion.
Nah, I’m good, thanks.
Okay, most people would not be “good” with infanticide.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290707/when-obama-voted-infanticide-andrew-c-mccarthy
Glad you decided to run from my challenge of finding proof that the left has actually turned more conservative on social issues. And as you can see by the link above (you like links right?) that your side is almost there.
The left is sick.
And if you think the above is trolling you have either lost touch with reality, or you are truly looking for a way out because you have nothing to back up your assertions.
Quick question (Trying to keep up with the back and forth is getting rough). Is the challenge that if ED can’t think of a subject that libs have moved to the right, that equates to inevitable infantcide?
What in the world is happening in here???
I step away for a couple of days…
Honestly, I blame you for most of this Zeb. EyeDentist was talking about the topic and we were reading the sports science experts and at least trying to understand the complexities of the issue.
Thank you.
I’m going to try to summarize the weekend …
EyeDentist is on the left.
Zeb is on the right.
They both really like their ideological positions.
faction, faction, faction
party, party, party
no, faction
no, party
Did I miss anything? Don’t make me put up more pictures of my cankles while bowling. It’s NOT an empty threat.
1 Like
I think it’s trolling.
BTW, I’d hope the use of the word “freaks” is like fingernails on a chalkboard to many of us. Why go there? I think Hugh said it as well, and then qualified it as “unique” or “rare.” There are better words, right?
I’ll let you guys get back to it. Sorry, but some of this is just ridiculous to me.
2 Likes
It looks like a shit show of semantic quibbling to me. But hey, what do I know? Hubbard looked like a man to me and it turns out I called that one wrong. He’s actually a woman. A brave and beautiful woman, especially gifted in the sport of weightlifting.