So for tonight, before I do my mobility work (slowly because I am sore haha) I am going to bitch about something that keeps popping up in weightlifting articles that the average reader seems to not comprehend. You can apply this to just about anything, but I will choose the greatest offenders as of late…the average Joes who dish out advice to everyone.
I have to admit that I have stopped reading anything that talks about Pareto’s principle or whatever the hell it is called.
Pareto’s principle is that you will get 80 percent of your results from 20 percent of your work.
Average Joes interpret this incorrectly, especially when in the context of competitive lifting and training for maximal results. (Again, you can apply this to anything where you are working to be your best or be competitive.)
I have heard multiple people say shit like “you don’t have to do that much to get strong,” and things like “just do what is most effective and leave, forget all that other garbage (down sets, volume work, assistance, etc).”
Before I start talking shit, I am going to tell you this. I do believe that the SAID (specific adaptations to imposed demand) principle is important, makes sense, and should be implemented as part of any serious routine.
We however are dealing with oversimplification. Yes, getting results is simple, but getting the best result possible isn’t THAT simple. You do in fact have to think every now and then.
So, lets say that your goal is to be the strongest and most muscular and sexy version of yourself that you can be. You hear 3 or 4 articles talk about the 80/20 rule, and how it is dumb to do more work than you need to do to get results. They say to just cut down to what is giving you 80 percent of your results and do that. “Don’t worry bro, you’ll get stronger. Just bench and leave” You start to think this is a great idea, so you stop all that other silly work.
“Hell, if you get 80 percent of your benching strength from bench pressing your work sets, why on earth would you ever overhead press, do chins, rows, triceps, etc?”
Why would I settle for squatting 800 when I can squat 1000?
Why would I want to get an 80 percent on the test, when I can just get a 100?
Why? Because, all things being equal (genetics, recovery, talent, health), you will lose to the guy who does 100 percent every time.
Instead of this stupidity and extreme view on training, why not just take a look at the last 3 months of your training? Look at what is working for you, what is not working for you, and what might work for you. Keep the first group, and start to slowly try to get rid of the second group and replace it with the third. If you don’t have a good reason to keep something in your program, toss it. If you can think of something that you need in your program, that will get you to your goal in a more efficient way, you need to ask yourself to come up with a good reason why you aren’t doing that.
See, Bruce Lee WAS right. “Absorb what is useful, Discard what is not, Add what is uniquely your own.”
“Yeah, but there is this one guy who only does X, Y, and Z and he is stronger than you, so he is right.”
Yeah, but you probably shouldn’t assume that you are in the same position as him, that he isn’t doing something else behind the scenes, or that he has gotten 100 percent of what he is capable of!