[quote]swivel wrote:
k8thegr8 wrote:
swivel wrote:
k8thegr8 wrote:
swivel wrote:
No I think you are wrong. It has not been stripped of any nutrients at all. Look at the fiber, protein, and iron content.
my comment was about “gi” not “nutrients”.
glycemic index is the numerical rating of how quickly or slowly the sugars of different carbohydrates enter your blood, create insulin response, and clear your blood.
pretty much everything that had been “flaked” , which is essentially pre-digested by cooking in a heated and acidic mash then formed and dried, has a dramatically higher g.i. than in it’s raw state.
doesn’t look like anyone has done a g.i. on quinoa flakes yet so we don’t know for sure though.
Gotcha, but with 7 grams of fiber in half a cup serving (double the amount in rolled oats), I am pretty sure it is extremely low glycemic as far as carbs go…
why would you be “pretty sure” ?
it still seems like it’s up in the air to me…
is that soluble or insoluble fiber ?
[/quote]
It doesn’t specify but I would guess it is the same type found in most “grains” like oatmeal (soluble I think). But we are wasting our time arguing over such a small detail. It was just a suggestion for those looking for an alternative to oatmeal and who like the whole “hot cereal” thing but want to avoid wheat and gluten.
Whether its GI is 100 or 25 doesn’t really make a difference. It’s a healthy, high fiber carbb loaded with protein, fiber, and iron, and contains all of the essential amino acids (unlike any other grain).