[quote]Tonino wrote:
[quote]its_just_me wrote:
Where’s this article that you’re talking about btw? I’ve heard good things about Shelby…
[/quote]
Here’s the Shelby article… and yes, you’re right, in the beginning, I opted to follow some of the advice to an exact science, but this just makes the process more difficult. The easier the process, the easier is seems to be successful and make progress. Just my 2cents.
Good read, very similar to what I would say.
The parts where I always feel the need to point out to people is that you have to bulk within your own bulk range (which is individual). For example, I can comfortably bulk within the range of 8-12%, and the closer to 15% I get, the more my hormones become screwed up (bodyweight gains become very fat and I gain very little muscle)…whereas my brother can’t comfortably bulk when that lean - typically around 15% is his “sweet spot”.
The general rule of thumb to follow is this (which I’ve found): if it’s easy to lose fat at a certain bf %, then you’ll gain muscle within that range too. So say you go on a very mild diet at 12% bf, and it only takes 8-12 weeks to get down to 8% all while maintaining strength relatively easily - this would be a good range to stay in while bulking. Whereas, if it takes extreme measures just to get down to 12%, and to stay there, you are probably better off bulking at a higher bf%. Or at the very least, the person who really struggled to get their bodyfat down to a reasonable level, should maintain that level for some time before bulking (e.g. endomorphic builds).