[quote]steveo5801 wrote:
Well, after 9 pages, nobody seemed to answer the challenge that I originally gave when I first began this thread.[/quote]
Many people have written in various ways both the only response that makes sense for an atheist and the big problem with your little “challenge”. Your question in the context that you have asked it is totally nonsensical…and your stipulations are just silly.
[quote]So here goes to all of you scoffers and unbelievers once again:
The Challenge: What are YOU [individually] going to do about your SIN?[/quote]
I reject the very idea that you call SIN. Since there is no good reason to believe that such a thing exists, I see no reason to do anything about it. I very seldom bother dealing with nonexistant things.
[quote]The Bible says that “…the wages [just payment] for sin is death” – physical death as well as spiritual death.
So, what are your plans for dealing with your sin, since you reject God’s plan.[/quote]
And I should believe your bible because? It gets its authority from where? If I don’t believe in your god then everything you are on about in this thread is total nonsense in the context of my worldview. If you fail to grasp this then you are beyond the reach of rational discussion and are incapable of rational thought.
[quote]Please do the following in your answer:
(1) Be very specific – tell us what, specifically, you can do about your own sin debt.[/quote]
Hey, I did…NOTHING…it does not exist.
This would be fine if your question actually made sense. I feel it is within reason to address the inherent flaw of the question being asked when responding to that question.
YOU specifically make reference to the bible, then put in a stipulation that I can’t address this in my reply? Interesting…sorry, you can’t have it both ways. Beyond that, this makes no sense! If I don’t believe in something I cannot use it against itself? What?? Sorry, but demonstrating that something is not internally consistant does not require that I believe in any of it.
Ummm…what beliefs are we talking about here? Are you asking for the authority behind my non-belief in your deity and the corresponding concept of sin? I need no authority to reject claims for which there is no good evidence. This isn’t even directly related to your question in my opinion.
What exactly is your “authority” anyway?
[quote]So, let’s see if there is at least one intelligent scoffer that can answer my challenge question, while covering all of the four points above.
We will see…[/quote]
Your original question is nonsensical. Your four points are just ways for you to artificially limit the responses to suit your own goals. They are overly restrictive for no logical reason, and require that I expound on things not directly related to your original question.
In short, your “challenge” is stupid. This has been pointed out to you already. However, if you want…I will post what I considered posting before I decided to address your nonsense in more detail. It’s quite short, and meets all your bogus stipulations. Here it is…
NOTHING
I require no authority to reject unproven claims.