Dang I’d like to read the article, if anyone finds that story then if you could edit the proper URL into the first post or something…
Anyway the question isn’t whether or not it’s ‘human’. Clearly it is, but then so are our skin cells. Human is what we classify as the DNA pattern in the nucleus. Rather the question is whether or not it’s ‘a’ human, that singular indefinite article implying our concept of ‘individual’ or something like that.
It’s about personhood, which is primarily an issue of sentience. This is something to do with the brain, in which is housed the mind/spirit/personality/etc. what people call our thoughts, opinions and memes/memories.
Retrospectively, you’d have people saying ‘oh, I am glad I was not aborted’ but the thing is, we could say that any hypothetical person would say that, including the ones who might be born if all us men went out and raped a church full of nuns. Clearly this isn’t the basis to make choices on. It’s sort of like saying “oh well I’m glad my grandfather did not keep to his oath of celibacy” as justification that priests shouldn’t get married.
I just think in terms of the mind and I wonder how much mind we have at different stages in our development. Obviously it tends to be more as we move along, the trouble is finding a discrete point at which to draw the line. I personally think conception is too early, but I also understand the suspicion that birth might possible be too late. I’d really like it if there were some simple mathematical way to make these decisions. I hope we can some day, like monitor brain wave activity or MRI or something, because it’s a very apprehensive issue.