Thinking About Your Race?

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Well, white males will become a minority eventually. Which means Republicans will no longer have much political power. Therefore, Democrats will have a constant hold on Washington. So, eventually we’ll see more wealth redistribution programs, and more diversity mandates. Government will be fully in charge of enforcing equality and we’ll all live in utopia. In the meantime, vote Obama, you’ll feel better about yourself.

I’m so going to get flamed over this.[/quote]

The Democratic party will fracture when people realize how racist many of its members actually are.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402716.html?nav=rss_print/asection

Biden attempted to explain why some schools perform better than others – in Iowa, for instance, compared with the District. “There’s less than 1 percent of the population of Iowa that is African American. There is probably less than 4 or 5 percent that are minorities. What is in Washington? So look, it goes back to what you start off with, what you’re dealing with,” Biden said.

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

Actually, if you follow threads like this enough, you notice the trend: White people claim there isn’t racism, so people who see it point out examples of it, and those who claim it doesn’t exist accuse them of “bitching and whining” or “needing somebody to come and fix it”.[/quote]

Who said there was no racism? I sure as hell didn’t. Also when I mention bitching and whining, I am referring to the excuse makers, and the people who refuse to do anything but bitch and whine. The ones who cannot see their own problems as their own.

Nobody ever would have said that to me because I never complained about it. Just dealt with it.

You don’t even understand what I mean when I am talking about bitching and whining do you? The person who complains day after day about being fat, yet refuses to diet or exercise is bitching and whining, while others are working out and dieting.

Ever work with people who do nothing but bitch and whine about their job? Yet not once do they take their problems to the people who can do something about it. Nor do they take the effort to find another job that fits them better. (I know, there are no jobs anywhere for anyone at any time.) This is what I am talking about when I say bitching and whining.[quote]

Its a tough defense mechanism to work around, isn’t it? On one hand you need to prove your point with real life examples, but giving real life examples is considered pissing and moaning.
[/quote]

If I am not willing to do something about my problems, I have no right to bitch and whine, and that is the philosophy I follow, so no it is not a tough defense mechanism to work around because I don’t allow myself to bitch and moan, if I am not willing to do something about my problems.

How much of your argument included an answer? It was nothing but excuses. (But…but…but) You can’t find solutions by looking at your but(t).

Not once did I say there was no racism, (again,) not once did I say people are not having problems, nor did I say life was easy for these people. The only thing I am saying is get off your ass and do something about the problems.

I know, I have to agree with you fully, or that makes me a bigot. Great argument tactic. I actually believe these people can make their lives better, and find it racist to think they can’t.

The problem I am pointing out about bitching and moaning is an easy trap to fall into, and millions of people have fallen into that trap. Too many people look outside of themselves for solutions to their problems. If only this person was different. If only life was like this. If only this person was president. Oh woe is me.

There are solutions to the problems in these areas. Unfortunately they are not politically correct, so they would never be approved by you.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:

The Democratic party will fracture when people realize how racist many of its members actually are.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402716.html?nav=rss_print/asection

Biden attempted to explain why some schools perform better than others – in Iowa, for instance, compared with the District. “There’s less than 1 percent of the population of Iowa that is African American. There is probably less than 4 or 5 percent that are minorities. What is in Washington? So look, it goes back to what you start off with, what you’re dealing with,” Biden said.
[/quote]

Yes. I once was having a discussion about affirmative action, and finally asked point blank why anyone needs it. I was told, “Because they are not as smart as you or I, so they need the help.”

Many of the people who think they know what racism is, really don’t. They don’t even realize that saying, “You can’t know what racism is because your white.” is actually a racist comment.

[quote]The Mage wrote:
CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

Actually, if you follow threads like this enough, you notice the trend: White people claim there isn’t racism, so people who see it point out examples of it, and those who claim it doesn’t exist accuse them of “bitching and whining” or “needing somebody to come and fix it”.

Who said there was no racism? I sure as hell didn’t. Also when I mention bitching and whining, I am referring to the excuse makers, and the people who refuse to do anything but bitch and whine. The ones who cannot see their own problems as their own.

I bet you would sound like you were bitching and whining if someone, during those years, said something to the effect of “Nobody at school is mean to you.” Naturally you’d reply (in an attept to get them to see that it was in fact happening) by giving examples of times you’d been mistreated. And they would tell you to stop bitching and whining.

Nobody ever would have said that to me because I never complained about it. Just dealt with it.

When in reality, you weren’t bitching and whining, you were giving examples to show a point (that you were, in fact, mistreated).

You don’t even understand what I mean when I am talking about bitching and whining do you? The person who complains day after day about being fat, yet refuses to diet or exercise is bitching and whining, while others are working out and dieting.

Ever work with people who do nothing but bitch and whine about their job? Yet not once do they take their problems to the people who can do something about it. Nor do they take the effort to find another job that fits them better. (I know, there are no jobs anywhere for anyone at any time.) This is what I am talking about when I say bitching and whining.

Its a tough defense mechanism to work around, isn’t it? On one hand you need to prove your point with real life examples, but giving real life examples is considered pissing and moaning.

If I am not willing to do something about my problems, I have no right to bitch and whine, and that is the philosophy I follow, so no it is not a tough defense mechanism to work around because I don’t allow myself to bitch and moan, if I am not willing to do something about my problems.

How much of your argument included an answer? It was nothing but excuses. (But…but…but) You can’t find solutions by looking at your but(t).

Not once did I say there was no racism, (again,) not once did I say people are not having problems, nor did I say life was easy for these people. The only thing I am saying is get off your ass and do something about the problems.

I know, I have to agree with you fully, or that makes me a bigot. Great argument tactic. I actually believe these people can make their lives better, and find it racist to think they can’t.

The problem I am pointing out about bitching and moaning is an easy trap to fall into, and millions of people have fallen into that trap. Too many people look outside of themselves for solutions to their problems. If only this person was different. If only life was like this. If only this person was president. Oh woe is me.

There are solutions to the problems in these areas. Unfortunately they are not politically correct, so they would never be approved by you. [/quote]

Dude, please shut the fuck up. This entire post of yours could be considered “bitching and whining” so quit acting like you can’t see his point. He made a very good one that your own pride won’t even let you see.

You are now making up people to complain and argue about…people who apparently just sit around and complain. Meanwhile, why the fuck are you even discussing all of this when none of those people ARE IN THIS THREAD?

The amount of arrogance it takes to claim that speaking about racist acts is all “bitching and whining” should be weighing many of you down.

[quote]The Mage wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:

The Democratic party will fracture when people realize how racist many of its members actually are.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402716.html?nav=rss_print/asection

Biden attempted to explain why some schools perform better than others – in Iowa, for instance, compared with the District. “There’s less than 1 percent of the population of Iowa that is African American. There is probably less than 4 or 5 percent that are minorities. What is in Washington? So look, it goes back to what you start off with, what you’re dealing with,” Biden said.

Yes. I once was having a discussion about affirmative action, and finally asked point blank why anyone needs it. I was told, “Because they are not as smart as you or I, so they need the help.”

Many of the people who think they know what racism is, really don’t. They don’t even realize that saying, “You can’t know what racism is because your white.” is actually a racist comment.[/quote]

Whoever gave you that response is an idiot. The fact that you repeated it makes me question your own intelligence.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Whoever gave you that response is an idiot. The fact that you repeated it makes me question your own intelligence.[/quote]

Rather then getting upset at what you think I am saying, try to actually read, and understand what I am saying. If you are still upset, it went over your head.

[quote]The Mage wrote:
Professor X wrote:

Whoever gave you that response is an idiot. The fact that you repeated it makes me question your own intelligence.

Rather then getting upset at what you think I am saying, try to actually read, and understand what I am saying. If you are still upset, it went over your head.[/quote]

We get it. You think you have to inform us that racism exists within the Democratic Party. This is of course while pretending that it doesn’t exist in the Republican party.

Yeah, that was deep.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
The Mage wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:

The Democratic party will fracture when people realize how racist many of its members actually are.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/24/AR2007102402716.html?nav=rss_print/asection

Biden attempted to explain why some schools perform better than others – in Iowa, for instance, compared with the District. “There’s less than 1 percent of the population of Iowa that is African American. There is probably less than 4 or 5 percent that are minorities. What is in Washington? So look, it goes back to what you start off with, what you’re dealing with,” Biden said.

Yes. I once was having a discussion about affirmative action, and finally asked point blank why anyone needs it. I was told, “Because they are not as smart as you or I, so they need the help.”

Many of the people who think they know what racism is, really don’t. They don’t even realize that saying, “You can’t know what racism is because your white.” is actually a racist comment.

Whoever gave you that response is an idiot. The fact that you repeated it makes me question your own intelligence.[/quote]

It appears that Senator Joe Biden is an idiot.

I’m a mixed race, does that mean I get to take cracks at both whites and Mexicans? Like, I could call that Mexican a beaner, and a white guy a cracker. Would that make me a racist? I get confused sometimes…

I guess that makes me a beaner-cracker…Or a cracker-bean…Or a beacker…crackner…

[quote]skaz05 wrote:
I’m a mixed race, does that mean I get to take cracks at both whites and Mexicans? Like, I could call that Mexican a beaner, and a white guy a cracker. Would that make me a racist? I get confused sometimes…

I guess that makes me a beaner-cracker…Or a cracker-bean…Or a beacker…crackner…[/quote]

If your white half was French you could be franks and beans.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

We get it. You think you have to inform us that racism exists within the Democratic Party. This is of course while pretending that it doesn’t exist in the Republican party.

Yeah, that was deep.[/quote]

Really? That is what you got out of what I posted? I have an idea. READ MY FUCKING POSTS BEFORE MAKING UP SHIT TO ARGUE AGAINST!

There is bigotry in the Democratic party, and in the Republican party. (And I belong to neither.) The question is are you capable to get beyond yours to be able to read and understand my posts?

(Is anyone capable of a rational discussion on this forum?)

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
skaz05 wrote:
I’m a mixed race, does that mean I get to take cracks at both whites and Mexicans? Like, I could call that Mexican a beaner, and a white guy a cracker. Would that make me a racist? I get confused sometimes…

I guess that makes me a beaner-cracker…Or a cracker-bean…Or a beacker…crackner…

If your white half was French you could be franks and beans.[/quote]

Careful, the PC police will get you.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:

It appears that Senator Joe Biden is an idiot.[/quote]

I would apreciate it if you would find direct quotes if you are going to attribute words or sentiments to people.

[quote]The Mage wrote:
Professor X wrote:

We get it. You think you have to inform us that racism exists within the Democratic Party. This is of course while pretending that it doesn’t exist in the Republican party.

Yeah, that was deep.

Really? That is what you got out of what I posted? I have an idea. READ MY FUCKING POSTS BEFORE MAKING UP SHIT TO ARGUE AGAINST!

There is bigotry in the Democratic party, and in the Republican party. (And I belong to neither.) The question is are you capable to get beyond yours to be able to read and understand my posts?

(Is anyone capable of a rational discussion on this forum?)[/quote]

Your posts aren’t that complicated. You don’t have much of a point. You have been “making up shit to argue about” since you started posting in this thread.

[quote]The Mage wrote:

Really? That is what you got out of what I posted? I have an idea. READ MY FUCKING POSTS BEFORE MAKING UP SHIT TO ARGUE AGAINST! [/quote]

Best of luck on this.

[quote]The Mage wrote:
CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

Actually, if you follow threads like this enough, you notice the trend: White people claim there isn’t racism, so people who see it point out examples of it, and those who claim it doesn’t exist accuse them of “bitching and whining” or “needing somebody to come and fix it”.

Who said there was no racism? I sure as hell didn’t. Also when I mention bitching and whining, I am referring to the excuse makers, and the people who refuse to do anything but bitch and whine. The ones who cannot see their own problems as their own.
[/quote]

I’m sorry for being unclear; I meant systemic racism. That is, many believe that racism exists if you’re talking about the KKK or Black Panthers, that it exists only in isolated instances or for certain people.

I think I understand your point: People should work to overcome hardships instead of laying down in front of them.

What I’m trying to say is that black people don’t “use it as an excuse” when there is legitimate systemic discrimination against them, and, also, its wrong of those in the position to do something about it to deny it or just tell them to “toughen up”.

What about the ones who are doing something about it, but still wish to be heard? What about the black people who work full time jobs and have never been in jail but complain about being discriminated against?

Labeling them all as whiners who just dont want to take control of their lives sounds like another defense mechanism.

An answer? What was the question?

This is an attitude that causes a lot of racial friction: people in a position of power and privilege (whites) tell those not getting the same benefits (blacks) to “just deal with it”.

Plenty of black people are getting off their asses and doing something about it, but it seems easier for you to focus on the worst examples.

I never said they can’t, now you’re putting words in my mouth. You dont sound like a bigot at all, but you do sound like you’re resistant to seeing the systemic racism in America, or to accept responsibility for your part in it.

I think its unfair that its much harder for blacks to make their lives better, and, as part of the group that is benefiting from that, I see it as our (whites) responsibility to do something about it.

[quote]

The problem I am pointing out about bitching and moaning is an easy trap to fall into, and millions of people have fallen into that trap. Too many people look outside of themselves for solutions to their problems. If only this person was different. If only life was like this. If only this person was president. Oh woe is me.

There are solutions to the problems in these areas. Unfortunately they are not politically correct, so they would never be approved by you. [/quote]

What solutions?

That blacks should just “shut up and deal with it” and that, since its not impossible (but much more difficult) for them to improve their lives, nothing should be done about the racism in America?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:

It appears that Senator Joe Biden is an idiot.

I would apreciate it if you would find direct quotes if you are going to attribute words or sentiments to people. [/quote]

I posted his quote where he blames DC’s poor test scores in comparison with Iowa’s directly on race. He doesn’t analyze quality of teachers, environment, money spent etc. He blames it on race and lets the listener assume the worst.

That is the mark of an idiot.

[quote]
BostonBarrister wrote:
I guess it’s better to stereotype an entire culture and assume racism?

Professor X wrote:
Gee, if an entire culture controls and dominates pop culture, business and politics (like what sparked the Civil Rights movement), claiming THE SYSTEM is racist is how far off?

Please answer that.[/quote]

Which entire culture? Are you stereotyping all white people together as one culture? As in the white, Jewish guy in NYC and the white cowboy in Wyoming being part of some dominant white culture?

BTW, as to controlling pop culture, you’ve got to be kidding me - in music, TV, sports, etc., if you think in terms of “under” or “over” represented as compared to percentage of population, black Americans are overrepresented in pop culture. This isn’t good or bad - it just is, and it runs contra to your post above.

As for politics, you should blame the gerrymandered districts and the overwhelming Dem affiliation as to why blacks are underrepresented nationally (as opposed to any particular state or locality) with regard to elected (not appointed) political governing positions. One can actually measure those effects - as opposed to just believing they are the product of racism and assigning that as fact in the manner that people in Egypt assigned causation to Ra for the flooding of the Nile.

[quote]
BostonBarrister wrote:
I said it was easier for me to ignore because I don’t choose to focus on it - and it’s less applicable to me as a white guy.

Professor X wrote:
I already wrote this earlier. That is why I am avoiding even responding to every single post. I have no time to waste trying to “teach” some white guys about how everyone isn’t white but since whites are still the majority, it just might help everyone else out if this fact was acknowledged because those in majority have the most effect on a system that still has remnants of racist acts, stereotypes and impressions.

No, I don’t have time for that at all. The only reason I am even responding to you is because I actually believe you think a little before you type.[/quote]

Why are you arguing the point then - particularly when you’re agreeing with what I said on its face (even if we disagree about the background)?

Minorities in the US don’t know what it’s like to be a white male; white males don’t know what it’s like to be a minority in the US. I don’t know what it’s like to be a woman; and my wife doesn’t know what it’s like to be me. This is belaboring the obvious.

If you want to discuss the system we have today and whether it makes sense to attribute causation to unseen and unmeasurable “racist remnants,” that’s another issue.

[quote]
BostonBarrister wrote:
I grew up in the Bay Area in California, went to high school in Salt Lake City, UT, went to college in San Diego, CA, and grad school in Nashville, TN, and in each of those places I remember race being constantly brought up and focused upon - particularly in the manner I laid out in my original post. In the majority white school in Salt Lake City there were cultural celebrations for Tongans, Mexicans, black history month, Asians, etc.

Professor X wrote:
This is a bad thing?

Please answer this.[/quote]

Pointing out and celebrating differences is divisive on its face - it’s already human nature to focus on differences and be suspicious of different groups. The govI have no problem with cultural groups maintaining their own cultures - or even sharing them in private (as in not govt. sponsored) celebrations. I do think it’s not a good idea for the government to promote: “We’re different, and it’s based on race.” Much better, IMHO, for the government to emphasize common American culture and how we can come together.

[quote]
BostonBarrister wrote:
And it’s not just in school - it’s the media and the culture generally. Newspapers, TV, internet boards on weightlifting sites - it’s not as if you can escape it.

Professor X wrote:
Excuse me…but BULLSHIT. You and me are about 2-3 years apart. I grew up not even seeing a black Barbie doll until the mid-80’s. Black cabbage patch kids were a “new thing” considering a well known doll company made all nationalities of dolls and made a killing…for the first time. I find it hard to feel sorry for your non-stop barrage of race focused media…especially since I doubt it was happening anywhere near the level you claim it was.[/quote]

Maybe, just maybe, the Bay Area, capital of liberal ex-hippies in CA, was a tad more focused on this stuff than the places in which you were growing up…

I don’t recall anything really about Barbies and Cabbage Patch Kids - not my cup of tea, and my little sister is 8 years younger than I am so she missed the Cabbage Patch phenomenon - I don’t recall she had any black Care Bears, but it seemed as if there sure were a lot of blue, pink and green ones. And some blue Smurfs. I guess small blue folks with tails were happy to have a role model…

Care to link any article or reference establishing that whichever doll company you’re referencing was the first to offer dolls other than white dolls?

And then there’s now, of course - apparently one can’t escape it on internet boards on weightlifting sites.

Of course, that’s all beside the point really - the point was more focused on various media and media-access points.

[quote]
BostonBarrister wrote:
Quite frankly, even the positive-focused portrayals of race don’t do anything other than call attention to differences.

Professor X wrote:
Are you saying this didn’t need to happen in this country? It was ok that we had far fewer role models growing up who showed intelligence and determination? These issues were already so ingrained in a mostly white culture that the pendulum had to swing the other way for there to be any balance at all…yet you can’t see this?

What world are you living in?

Oh, wait.[/quote]

The United States of America - I’ve spent time living pretty much everywhere except the midwest and the deep South. And I’ve been lower middle class to upper middle class - not poor and not rich.

See what I wrote above on my opinions on emphasizing differences rather than similarities. I don’t exactly know where you got the idea I was talking about whether there were role models for minorities. Not that I believe one needs role models of a specific race or gender anyway - I think the fact people think they need them is another byproduct of having a culture that attempts to force people to think of and define themselves by race and gender categorizations.

[quote]
BostonBarrister wrote:
And here’s the kicker - if you’re thinking about race all the time, are you going to be more, or less, likely to attribute any perceived discrimination you do suffer to race (irrespective of whether it was or wasn’t actually the cause)?

Professor X wrote:
How about, if you experience more racism, wouldn’t race be on your mind more?

Are you really about to hold the position that every black male in the country who perceives any level of racism is doing so because he can’t think as clearly as you?[/quote]

In a lot of cases, whether one is “experiencing racism” is in the eye of the beholder. That was my point on the murky causation. For example, say you have a 19-year-old black guy dressed in a hoodie who gets pulled over during school hours by a cop when he wasn’t speeding or really doing anything else. The cop might be biased against young drivers, might be biased against people who wear hoodies (he might think this is a class or culture signal) or might be biased against black people - or he might have thought this was a kid playing hooky from high school. Just because the driver thinks he got pulled over because the cop was racist doesn’t mean it’s true - but the driver will experience it as true.

And my point was that thinking about race all the time and getting taught that society is fraught with racism and the man is constantly trying to keep you down will make a racial minority in the USA more (rather than less, which I’m arguing would be the case if we focused more on commonalities) likely to attribute any negative experiences he undergoes to racism.

[quote]ProfessorX wrote:

Wow…and people talk about MY ego.[/quote]

And I can’t imagine why…

I honestly believe racism is the least of problems for young minorities (specifically blacks and hispanics). If I could pick only one area to focus on, it would be the intact family. This isn’t racist by any means. No, It’s a cultural judgement, and one based on reality. Imus is less of a threat to black prosperity than most rap stars.

[i]One-third of all births in the United States are to unmarried women, up from less than 5 percent in 1940 and 7 percent in the mid-1960s (Ventura and Bachrach 2000). While most births to teenagers are out of wedlock, the bulk of nonmarital births are to young adult women over age 18. Nonmarital birth rates also vary significantly by race and ethnicity. In 1998, the number of births per 1,000 unmarried women was 90 for Hispanics, 73 for blacks, and 38 for whites.

The increasing rate of nonmarital childbearing has been accompanied by a significant rise in the rate of cohabitation, especially in the past decade (Bumpass and Lu 2000). Cohabitation increases the chances that a nonmarital birth will occur, and recent data show that nearly half of all unmarried couples are living together when their children are born (McLanahan et al. 2001). Cohabiting unions are less stable than marriage, and the children of these unions often are ultimately raised by a single mother (Smock 2000; Seltzer 2000; and Graefe and Lichter 1999).

The consequences of the decline in marriage and the increase in out-of-wedlock childbearing are not only widespread but also serious for the well-being of children, their parents, their communities, and society as a whole. Studies show children living in single-parent families generally are at greater risk for poor developmental outcomes, less stable family structure, and poverty or near-poverty than are children raised by their married parents (McLanahan and Sandefur 1994). Even when such important family characteristics as parents�?? income, race, and socioeconomic status are accounted for, children raised in single-parent families are more likely to have adverse health, behavioral, and academic outcomes (Duncan and Brooks-Gunn 1997). They are also more likely to experience multiple living arrangements and to receive less supervision, care, and contact from both parents (McLanahan 1997).

In contrast, research shows that children who grow up with married, biological parents have better outcomes than children raised in a different family structure. On average, the former are more likely to be healthy, to complete high school, and to become economically self-sufficient adults; and in turn, they are less likely to be involved in drug and alcohol abuse or juvenile delinquency, or to become teen parents (McLanahan and Sandefur 1994).[/i]
http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/opre/strengthen/strengthfam/reports/conceptual_framework/framework_chp1.html

BB, like you. I really do. But what the hell was this?

[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
Which entire culture? Are you stereotyping all white people together as one culture? As in the white, Jewish guy in NYC and the white cowboy in Wyoming being part of some dominant white culture?

BTW, as to controlling pop culture, you’ve got to be kidding me - in music, TV, sports, etc., if you think in terms of “under” or “over” represented as compared to percentage of population, black Americans are overrepresented in pop culture. This isn’t good or bad - it just is, and it runs contra to your post above.[/quote]

I even put this into context by mentioning the Civil Rights movements yet you still passed that up to pretend as if blacks always dominated anything. I just love how some of you insist on acting as if time isn’t progressive.

Blacks may dominate music and even some sports, but please don’t pretend as if it wasn’t a fight to reach that point. Things are this way because of every individual who simply fought for some type of equality.

Blacks used to not be able to even play some sports…at least not on the same leagues as white players.

With that in mind, when you ask me “which entire culture”, I was referring to this one right here. The same one that took until damn near the year 2000 for you to be able to claim that blacks dominate anything at all except negative stereotypes.

[quote]

Why are you arguing the point then - particularly when you’re agreeing with what I said on its face (even if we disagree about the background)?[/quote]

Why are you? I am doing it for that same reason…whatever that is.

[quote]

Minorities in the US don’t know what it’s like to be a white male; white males don’t know what it’s like to be a minority in the US. I don’t know what it’s like to be a woman; and my wife doesn’t know what it’s like to be me. This is belaboring the obvious.

If you want to discuss the system we have today and whether it makes sense to attribute causation to unseen and unmeasurable “racist remnants,” that’s another issue.[/quote]

Gee, I thought that was what we were doing in the first place. We’re not…or is it just you?

[quote]

Pointing out and celebrating differences is divisive on its face - it’s already human nature to focus on differences and be suspicious of different groups. The govI have no problem with cultural groups maintaining their own cultures - or even sharing them in private (as in not govt. sponsored) celebrations. I do think it’s not a good idea for the government to promote: “We’re different, and it’s based on race.” Much better, IMHO, for the government to emphasize common American culture and how we can come together.[/quote]

What are you smoking and could you at least share? Celebrating differences would only be “divisive” if we were all on equal footing. Considering each of those groups has historically been UNDER-represented in this country, how does what you wrote make any sense?

[quote]Maybe, just maybe, the Bay Area, capital of liberal ex-hippies in CA, was a tad more focused on this stuff than the places in which you were growing up…

I don’t recall anything really about Barbies and Cabbage Patch Kids - not my cup of tea, and my little sister is 8 years younger than I am so she missed the Cabbage Patch phenomenon - I don’t recall she had any black Care Bears, but it seemed as if there sure were a lot of blue, pink and green ones. And some blue Smurfs. I guess small blue folks with tails were happy to have a role model…[/quote]

Well, gee, imagine that…a white guy who didn’t notice nearly every toy growing up was white. Go figure.

[quote]

The United States of America - I’ve spent time living pretty much everywhere except the midwest and the deep South. And I’ve been lower middle class to upper middle class - not poor and not rich.

See what I wrote above on my opinions on emphasizing differences rather than similarities. I don’t exactly know where you got the idea I was talking about whether there were role models for minorities. Not that I believe one needs role models of a specific race or gender anyway - I think the fact people think they need them is another byproduct of having a culture that attempts to force people to think of and define themselves by race and gender categorizations.[/quote]

The only reason you don’t think it is necessary, is because you have never lived one day of your life where whites didn’t dominate nearly every field of financial success. Even in sports, whites are usually the owners of the teams which is where the true power is.

I know you aren’t about to deny this.

[quote]

And my point was that thinking about race all the time and getting taught that society is fraught with racism and the man is constantly trying to keep you down will make a racial minority in the USA more (rather than less, which I’m arguing would be the case if we focused more on commonalities) likely to attribute any negative experiences he undergoes to racism.[/quote]

I have had negative experiences that are based around my race. You, on the other hand, will try your hardest to act as if this can all be explained away as if race was not the issue. There is no way a minority can win that battle until they become the majority.