How about this?
But no, yea, a billionaire dynasty NFL team owner getting involved with hookers is way more a bigger deal.
That makes me chuckle tooā¦
1 Like
Best headline never written:
BIG HUBBUB OVER RUB 'N" TUG
1 Like
This is SUPER immature and juvinile. However someone in my age demographic posted this meme/image and I legitimately burst out laughing when I saw it, itās the sheer stupidity of the image that makes it so comical
This is so ridiculous to me, ha, how can you even get yourself in this situation, I guarantee there is some gold digger out there in their 20s or 30s that wouldāve fit the bill for him.
Also, at what point is exchanging goods for sexual services not considered prostitution?
Young, hot woman - ā¦
Kraft - Just so you know, most of my girlfriends end up with a Lamborghini ā¦and stuff.
Young, hot woman - Oh, that is very interesting! Can we get dinner?
A week? A day? A label?
3 Likes
More cynical guys would argue thatās all marriage is. You pay them to go away. Rather than fee for service, the cost is half your stuff.
My stay at home wife jokingly said sheād gladly take half of everything and alimony if we split.
Uhhhā¦ listen lady. Iāll give you half, but no fucking way Iām paying alimony.
I think she was jokingā¦ lol
Itās a weird double standard if you think about it. The stay at home spouse gets half of the stuff because in theory she contributed in other ways to the marriage.
Then, when the marriage ends, the working spouse is expected to continue supporting the non-working spouse financially. But the non-working spouse is not expected to continue to contribute in other ways. Either those non-financial contributions from the non-working spouse are valuable, or they arenāt. They canāt be either depending on whatās convenient.
Alimony rules vary so much from state to state and country to country, itās ridiculous. Texas has no alimony at all. In Kansas, I have to pay my ex basically 40% of my income, minus what her income would be if she was working (sheās a nurse, so able to make decent money), and yet somehow I still ended up paying her $3,000/month. Also, with the new tax laws that just got enacted, Iām responsible for the taxes on that income, where it used to be her who was responsible.
At least itās only for 1/3 of the duration of the marriage, which comes out to 5 years 4 months, and Iāve got 2.5 years gone on that now. If Iād gotten divorced in California I would be paying for the rest of my life.
I agree. If kids are in the picture, itās a different scenario. Itās because they are used to certain āstandard of livingā and losing that would be detrimental yada yada.
F that. Iād agree to give my wife 70% of my networth if it meant I didnāt have to give up my salary.
Or until she remarries, right? Althoughā¦ whatās the incentive to remarry, ride that check and the boyfriend until it runs out.
Exactly, it incentivizes shacking up. I mean, why get married and lose that gravy train?
So, Iāve been reading the last few posts and double checked the title of this thread - I think we have a misunderstanding of what āchuckleā means
7 Likes
Yep. This not-too-fun discussion is better served in this thread:
1 Like
Hard relate to shit comic 
Well, some things you just have to laugh at the absurdity ofā¦
āThatās interesting. We generate nearly double the GDP/hour worked of your generation. Work smarter, not harder.ā
1 Like
Okay, I posted this over in training logs where a conversation turned to Samoas girl scout cookies, but had to repost it here.
Didja see what some girl scouts in Colorado did? They relabelled them āMomoasā with a shirtless Jason Momoa picture on them, and theyāre selling them like crazy to thirsty soccer momsā¦ One of the funniest things Iāve seen.
6 Likes
Cool cool cool cool ā¦ a couple posts sure, laugh at the absurdity ā¦ it started to take a turn from the generally absurd to the acutely real and sad ā¦ the chuckles were beginning to be too few and far between and the sobs all too frequent soā¦