Again, waiting to out Ford as the accusor serves the purpose of protecting Ford, as well as delaying the vote. I have a hard time believing feinstein didn’t see this as a win-win, even if only from an optics perspective. These politicians are playing chess, not checkers.
Feinstein ain’t no Kobe but yes, I agree, she was waiting to delay. We can argue all day whether she cared about protecting Ford but that’s pointless.
The Dem examination on his yearbook is weak tea. Weak. Tea.
1 Like
Eh, it shows the guy was a fratstar bro king. And that he’s lying about passing out, blacking out, and being good old fashioned DRUNK. But none of those things mean he was a sexual predator or is unfit for SCOTUS.
Does show a pattern that most are familiar with…
I’m sitting here glass eyed. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a weaker case.
You sound drunk.
Always. I’m a Tyrone man. We come out of the womb with a pint, and leave earth with a short. Our flag is commemorative of a man who chopped off his own hand and threw it to win a competition.
Well, you definitely won’t be posting in the Catholic thread…
I heard lots of questions about his yearbook and drinking. I had to go away from it all here and there at times. Still, it seems like I watched a majority of it. Was there a single question about the alleged night by Democrats? I was hoping to catch one of the Democrat senators actually asking about the allegations directly. Did I miss those questions?
I’m not through the whole thing, but I haven’t spotted one.
Please let me know!
I’m awaiting it on baited breath.
Not really. They were trying to establish that kavanaugh was a party boy and something outside his character, and memory could have happened while really drunk.
And if you believe everything kavanaugh said about his drinking, I got a sweet piece of ocean front property in AZ to sell you haha
Feinstein is blaming Ford for media leaks, lol. Are you still sure about your statement @Californiagrown?
Ford testified she was telling friends she wrote the letter, days prior to her name being released.
Also, you should go back and listen to that part again. It doesn’t say what I think you think it says.
That part where (oh, which Democrat senator was it again) he was questioned about some apparently cryptic passage in the yearbook for which Kavanaugh had to explain it as a “flatulence” joke.
I’ll say that as people, both seem credible. I mean, they both have respectable credentials and lots of folks willing to vouch for them. They both were emotional at times. So what’s left is, the witnesses named by the accuser all deny any knowledge of said party even existing…
I don’t see how the vote is delayed any further. …
1 Like
Yes it does. . Vote will be tomorrow. Shit show ends.
The closest I have seen thus far was from Senator Blumenthal. Not much, and I am nearing the end.
According to liberal logic I can accuse all of you on this forum of rape or attempted rape, I don’t need to give evidence, place, time, or anything and you should all go to prison!! Except if your name is bill Clinton of course as he was occused of rape and none of the senators that are still in the senate or house batted an eye.
Pathetic new low of politics. And all this so they can keep ripping unborn babies out of women’s uterus. They must really enjoy killing babies