I believe that would be ridiculous and I don’t expect that from people.
Absolutely
Then I don’t know what you mean by punitive measures in relation to “restoring the nuclear family system and healthy sexuality would involve being mean to and taking away the fun from some men and women.”?
To continue, I’ve even given thought to how I’ll educate my children about sex and women and despite being big on sexual regulation, I wouldn’t tell him or my daughter with a straight face, “You must wait until marriage to have sex” considering current social dynamics. I will tell them that sexuality isn’t just a bunch of fun and games and comes with serious responsibility and not to be used to destroy, attention monger, manipulate, and so on. If pregnancy results from their activities, it’s on them to get their acts together. If they make dumb sexual decisions, that’s on them too. And it’s on then if they don’t take my guidance in making sound decisions in all this.
The transformer using a Lead Star, Keltech, and a shitty SW Shield.
Why are these school shooters always the biggest pussy retards that look like a bad villain out of a C rank Bollywood movie?
This school has glass that can easily be shot through, no armed guards or lockdown procedures for this it seems. This piece of shit went to this school because of the lax security. It had originally planned to go to another school, but the security was heavier.
Again, wanting to change your gender (which is impossible) is a severe mental disorder. Wanting to mutilate your body is a severe mental disorder. We need to stop placating these people and get them help. Our mental health system has turned to an absolute lunacy joke by catering to the insane.
-That these people get the help they clearly need.
-That my tax dollars doesn’t go towards their elective surgeries.
-That they stop deliberately pushing this onto children in the absence of their parents (or as a whole for that matter).
-That we just live and let live. I don’t care if someone desires to turn their dick inside out. Truly, I don’t. Maybe let’s stop celebrating it though, this is clearly a deeply personal decision that doesn’t (and shouldn’t) be made public.
-That they are recognized as their biological gender. The only folks who have an option to choose between the two are those with the Klinefelter gene; for them, i will accept and respect their pronouns as they are the ONLY ones who actually have a choice.
-That they do not get to bully the public around to meet their every desire.
-That they get the fuck out of women’s sports, locker rooms, and bathrooms.
The few I have come across in person are more insufferable than vegans and crossfitters. Always looking for a reason or discrimination where it literally does not exist. They don’t want to be treated normally. They want preferential treatment.
I’ve seen this written and heard it from many men.
First off, I don’t want to go back to 100 years ago for several matters.
Secondly, men as a whole can put a stop to any social dynamic they want to. It’s just that I’ve concluded they think they can’t (and they certainly can’t as lone individuals) and they are under an indefinite mommy spell.
Denying biological reality, in essence playing God. Promoting gender fluidity to other people’s children. I read an interview with a drag queen who talked about how the so called hetero normative view is forced upon children but was completely ok with forcing an opposite view on children. Gender fluidity is not a scientific fact yet, they promote it as such.
Because Daddy never taught them the “It Ain’t Cool to Shoot Up School” motto.
Also, women have their own money now.
Physically they can, sure. However, a significant percentage of men don’t have sex on a regular basis or even at all so it’s not like them abstaining will reduce promiscuity.
If we’re talking about the realm of ideas, you’d essentially have to convince non-married men to have less sexual partners for the good of society. That doesn’t seem feasible to me.
I don’t know what this means?
@BrickHead
I got married at 21 to my HS sweetheart and I think that’s pretty close to ideal so I’m not really disagreeing with you fundamentally. I guess I’m just not following your logic?
The definition of asshole. This was posted on his Twitter, he has since deleted it. Not because it was wrong, but because he received threats.
Very surprising that there would be a mass shooting at a Christian school, given that lack of prayer is often blamed for these horrible events. Is it possible they weren’t praying enough, or correctly, despite being a Christian school?
— David Pakman
That’s understandable because I haven’t gone into detail and likely won’t here as I’ve gone into derailing territory, despite sexual “liberation” being proven to be stupid (fitting for thread title) and destructive.
Actually there are and were measures that can be taken that don’t involve such convincing, although a responsible male establishment could transmit ideas about sexuality into their sons (including shaming of man-whores and useless and abusive fathers). Again, there’s more to it than that which I haven’t gotten into.
I’ve already suggested several books, some of them tomes, about how sexual licentiousness is destructive to institutions and how societies that embrace it become increasingly tyrannical. Perhaps if men thought clearly and didn’t see women as sexual objects that give them the fuzzy-wuzzies at the mere sight of them, they could figure that out too.
If you’re interested, I’ll list them again. I don’t want to derail the thread further.
Or you could decentivise single-motherhood. Alimony ceases, child support ceases, single-mother subsidies stop. Suddenly women would be far more careful with who they let bed them.
Just saying.
Yup. Several ways. We could also get down on simping, which would simply be a new cultural measure (no policy alteration at all).
honestly IDK how you would go about this. You know as well as I that a lack of sex will drive a man to do things they would NEVER normally do, including being full beta orbiting a woman that has 0 intention of sleeping with them “just in case”.
Personally, I don’t think there is a fix to stop simping.
When I think single motherhood I don’t picture divorced women. A woman shouldn’t have to remain married to a scumbag and he should pay whatever support is necessary after divorce. Also, a divorced couple can still raise a child together provided they aren’t big babies.
It’s the women who were never married and will never be married that are the issue. In those cases, the fathers are often absent which yes, says something about them as men, but something about the women who chose them.
